NUCLEAR PHYSICS - Stony Brook University
NUCLEAR PHYSICS - Stony Brook University NUCLEAR PHYSICS - Stony Brook University
21.01.2013
Views
What is the difference between these two proposals?
- Page 1 and 2: Experimental Nuclear Physics at Sto
- Page 3: 1975 1966 Van de Graaff 1968 Superc
- Page 6 and 7: Proposal for EN tandem Van de Graaf
- Page 8: Time Line for proposal • 14 Dec 1
- Page 12 and 13: Time Line for proposal • 14 Dec 1
- Page 14 and 15: Time Line for proposal • 14 Dec 1
- Page 17 and 18: November-10-1966
- Page 19 and 20: February-1-1967
- Page 21 and 22: Completed Van de Graaff building Tr
- Page 23 and 24: Tank entering the building
- Page 25 and 26: Van deGraaff Nuclear Experiment Fac
- Page 27 and 28: Two PDP-9 computers from DEC, each
- Page 29 and 30: Dr. Dan Dietrich, Livermore. (Metca
- Page 31 and 32: Igloo 101
- Page 33 and 34: Prof. Gunter Schatz, Univ. Konstanz
- Page 35 and 36: To expedite the transfer of the sup
- Page 37 and 38: • There were competing developmen
- Page 39: Next step: Test a prototype module
- Page 43 and 44: Joseph M. Brennan, AGS Department,
- Page 45 and 46: Linac room before
- Page 47 and 48: Helium gas storage tank delivery
- Page 50 and 51: Linac room before
- Page 54 and 55: • SCIENCE Volume 291, Number 5506
- Page 57 and 58: Francium Atomic Level Scheme (work
- Page 59 and 60: Aniko Paul Dot Lee Carolyn McGrath
- Page 61 and 62: Dave Fossan, one of the creators of
- Page 69 and 70: Department Visiting Committee Comme
- Page 71 and 72: Mariachi Workshops
- Page 73 and 74: Proposed Lab Layout: MARIACHI 14 C
- Page 75: Personal remarks • Came to Stony
What is the difference between these two proposals?