20.01.2013 Views

8. Galactic Dynamics Aim: Understand equilibrium of galaxies 1 ...

8. Galactic Dynamics Aim: Understand equilibrium of galaxies 1 ...

8. Galactic Dynamics Aim: Understand equilibrium of galaxies 1 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>8.</strong> <strong>Galactic</strong> <strong>Dynamics</strong><br />

<strong>Aim</strong>: <strong>Understand</strong> <strong>equilibrium</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>galaxies</strong><br />

1. What are the dominant forces ?<br />

2. Can we define some kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>equilibrium</strong>?<br />

3. What are the relevant timescales?<br />

4. Do <strong>galaxies</strong> evolve along a sequence <strong>of</strong><br />

equilibria ? [like stars] ?<br />

Equilibrium <strong>of</strong> stars as comparison:<br />

• gas pressure versus gravity<br />

• hydrostatic <strong>equilibrium</strong>, thermal<br />

<strong>equilibrium</strong><br />

• timescales corresponding to the above,<br />

plus nuclear burning<br />

• structure completely determined by<br />

mass plus age (and metallicity)<br />

• very little influence from “initial<br />

conditions”<br />

Galaxies:<br />

Much harder!<br />

1


Galaxy dynamics: assume ensemble <strong>of</strong> point<br />

masses, moving under influence <strong>of</strong> their own<br />

gravity<br />

Point masses can be: stars, mini BHs,<br />

planets, very light elementary particles ...<br />

Overview<br />

<strong>8.</strong>1 What are the equations <strong>of</strong> motion ?<br />

<strong>8.</strong>2 Do stars collide ? (BT p. 3+4)<br />

<strong>8.</strong>3 Virial Theorem<br />

<strong>8.</strong>4 Application: Galaxy masses (BT p.<br />

211-214)<br />

<strong>8.</strong>5 Binding Energy and Formation <strong>of</strong><br />

Galaxies (BT p. 214)<br />

<strong>8.</strong>6 Scaling Relations<br />

<strong>8.</strong>7 Relevant Time scales (BT p. 187-190)<br />

(Dynamical timescale, particle interaction<br />

timescale, Relaxation time for large<br />

systems)<br />

2


<strong>8.</strong>1 Equations <strong>of</strong> motion<br />

Assume a collection <strong>of</strong> masses mi at<br />

location xi, and assume gravitational<br />

interaction. Hence the force � Fi on particle i<br />

is given by:<br />

d 2<br />

�Fi = mi<br />

dt2�xi = �<br />

j�=i<br />

�xj − �xi<br />

|�xj − �xi| 3Gmimj<br />

• Only analytic solution for 2 point masses<br />

• “Easy” to solve numerically (brute<br />

force) - but slow for 10 11 particles. See for<br />

example:<br />

• Analytic approximations necessary for a<br />

better understanding <strong>of</strong> solution<br />

In the following we investigate properties <strong>of</strong><br />

gravitational systems without explicitly<br />

solving the equations <strong>of</strong> motion.<br />

3


<strong>8.</strong>2 Do stars collide?<br />

Is it safe to ignore non-gravitational<br />

interactions ?<br />

Example: our galaxy<br />

10 11 stars with a total mass <strong>of</strong> 5 × 10 10 M⊙<br />

A disk <strong>of</strong> 20 kpc in size, and thickness <strong>of</strong> 1<br />

kpc<br />

The sun is 8 kpc from the center<br />

Cross section <strong>of</strong> the sun σ = π ∗ (2R⊙) 2<br />

with R⊙ = 7 × 10 10 cm<br />

Typical orbital speed 200 km/s.<br />

1 km/s ∼ 1 pc in 1 Myr.<br />

One orbit: 250 Myr.<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> the galaxy: 10 1 0 yr<br />

Sun has made 30 revolutions and disk is in<br />

quasi steady state<br />

4


Calculate number <strong>of</strong> collisions between t1<br />

and t1 + dt <strong>of</strong> stars coming in from the left,<br />

in a galaxy with homogeneous number<br />

density n.<br />

• incoming star has velocity v<br />

• suppose all stars have radius r∗<br />

• incoming star will collide with stars in<br />

cylinder with volume V1:<br />

−> V1 = π(2r∗) 2 × v × dt<br />

• number <strong>of</strong> stars in V1 : N1 = nV1<br />

• number <strong>of</strong> collisions per unit time:<br />

N1<br />

dt<br />

= nV1<br />

dt = 4πr2 ∗ nv<br />

5


This gives a collision rate <strong>of</strong> 1.6×10 −26<br />

sec −1 = 5×10 −19 yr −1 .<br />

Note that the age <strong>of</strong> the Universe is<br />

13.75 ± 0.11 Gyr ∗<br />

So collisions are very rare indeed. Hence we<br />

can ignore these collisions without too<br />

much trouble.<br />

∗ Komatsu, E., et.al.,<br />

http://arXiv.org/abs/1001.4538<br />

6


<strong>8.</strong>3 Virial Theorem:<br />

Relation for global properties:<br />

Kinetic energy and Potential energy.<br />

Again consider our system <strong>of</strong> point masses<br />

mi with positions �xi.<br />

Construct �<br />

i �pi�xi and differentiate w.r.t.<br />

time:<br />

d<br />

dt<br />

�<br />

i<br />

�pi�xi = d<br />

dt<br />

where I = �<br />

inertia.<br />

�<br />

i<br />

i mix 2 i<br />

d�xi<br />

mi<br />

dt �xi = d<br />

dt<br />

= 1d<br />

2<br />

2I dt2 �<br />

i<br />

1<br />

2<br />

d<br />

dt (mix 2 i )<br />

, which is the moment <strong>of</strong><br />

However, using the chain rule, we can also<br />

write:<br />

d<br />

dt<br />

�<br />

i<br />

�pi�xi = �<br />

i<br />

d�pi<br />

dt �xi + �<br />

i<br />

d�xi<br />

�pi<br />

dt<br />

7


Then<br />

�<br />

i<br />

d�xi<br />

�pi<br />

dt<br />

= �<br />

i<br />

mi�v 2 i<br />

with K the kinetic energy.<br />

Since d�pi<br />

dt = � Fi we have<br />

1d2I<br />

2 dt<br />

2 = �<br />

i<br />

= 2K<br />

�Fi�xi + 2K.<br />

Now assume the galaxy is ’quasi-static’, i.e.<br />

its properties change only slowly so that<br />

d2I dt2 = 0. Then the equation above implies<br />

.<br />

K = − 1<br />

2<br />

�<br />

i<br />

�Fi�xi<br />

8


Then assume that the force � Fi can be<br />

written as a summation over ’pairwise<br />

forces’ � Fij<br />

Now realize that<br />

�<br />

i<br />

�Fi = �<br />

j,j�=i<br />

�Fi�xi = �<br />

i<br />

�Fij<br />

�<br />

j�=i<br />

�Fij�xi<br />

This summation can be rewritten. We sum<br />

the terms over the full area 0 < i ≤ N,<br />

0 < j ≤ N, i �= j. However, we can also limit<br />

the summation over just half this area:<br />

0 < i ≤ N, i < j ≤ N, and add the (j, i) term<br />

explicitly to the (i, j) term within the<br />

summation.<br />

9


Hence instead <strong>of</strong> summing over � Fij�xi, we<br />

sum over � Fij�xi + � Fji�xj<br />

Hence<br />

�<br />

i<br />

�<br />

j�=i<br />

�Fij�xi = �<br />

i<br />

�<br />

j>i<br />

( � Fij�xi + � Fji�xj)<br />

This is simply a change in how the<br />

summation is done, it does not use any<br />

special property <strong>of</strong> the force field.<br />

Because � Fij = − � Fji (forces are equal and<br />

opposite for pairwise forces) the last term<br />

can be rewritten<br />

�<br />

i<br />

�Fi�xi = �<br />

i<br />

�<br />

j>i<br />

�Fij(�xi − �xj)<br />

For gravitational force � Fij = − Gmimj<br />

|�xi−�xj| 2<br />

�xi−�xj<br />

|�xi−�xj|<br />

10


�<br />

i<br />

�Fi�xi = − �<br />

which equals<br />

= − �<br />

i<br />

�<br />

j>i<br />

i<br />

�<br />

j>i<br />

Gmimj<br />

|�xi − �xj|<br />

Gmimj<br />

|�xi − �xj| 3(�xi − �xj)(�xi − �xj)<br />

= −1<br />

2<br />

�<br />

i<br />

�<br />

j�=i<br />

Gmimj<br />

|�xi − �xj|<br />

with W the total potential energy.<br />

Therefore for a galaxy in quasi-static<br />

<strong>equilibrium</strong>:<br />

K = − 1<br />

2 W,<br />

= W<br />

eq.(1)<br />

which is the virial theorem for quasi-static<br />

systems. The more general expression for<br />

non-static systems is:<br />

1d<br />

2<br />

2I = W + 2K.<br />

dt2 11


<strong>8.</strong>4 Application: Galaxy masses<br />

Consider a system with total mass M<br />

Kinetic energy K = 1 2 M〈v2 〉 with<br />

〈v 2 〉 = mean square speed <strong>of</strong> stars<br />

(assumption: speed <strong>of</strong> star not correlated<br />

with mass <strong>of</strong> star)<br />

Define gravitational radius rg<br />

GM 2<br />

W = −<br />

rg<br />

Spitzer found for many systems that<br />

rg = 2.5r h, where r h is the radius which<br />

contains half the mass<br />

Virial theorem implies:<br />

M〈v 2 〉 =<br />

GM 2<br />

rg<br />

12


or<br />

M = 〈v 2 〉rgG −1<br />

Hence, we can estimate the mass <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>galaxies</strong> if we know the typical velocities in<br />

the galaxy, and its size!<br />

13


<strong>8.</strong>5 Binding Energy and Formation <strong>of</strong><br />

Galaxies<br />

The total energy E <strong>of</strong> a galaxy is<br />

E = K + W = −K = 1/2W<br />

• Bound <strong>galaxies</strong> have negative energy -<br />

cannot fall apart and dissolve into a very<br />

large homogeneous distribution<br />

• A galaxy cannot just form from an<br />

unbound, extended smooth distribution −><br />

E total = Estart ≈ 0, E gal = −K, so energy<br />

must be lost or the structure keeps<br />

oscillating:<br />

Possible energy losses through<br />

• Ejection <strong>of</strong> stars<br />

• Radiation (before stars would form)<br />

14


<strong>8.</strong>6. Scaling Relations<br />

Consider a steady state galaxy with<br />

particles mi at location xi(t).<br />

Can the galaxy be rescaled to other physical<br />

<strong>galaxies</strong>?<br />

• scaled particle mass ˆmi = ammi<br />

• scaled particle location ˆxi = axxi(att)<br />

• am, ax, at are scaling parameters<br />

In the ’rescaled’ galaxy we have<br />

ˆ�Fi = ammi d2<br />

dt 2ax�x(att) = amaxa 2 t � F i,orig<br />

The gravitational force is equal to<br />

ˆ�F G = �<br />

j�=i<br />

a 2 m<br />

a 2 x<br />

�F G,orig<br />

ax�xj−ax�xi<br />

|ax�xj−ax�xi| 3Gammiammj =<br />

15


Equilibrium is satisfied if the two terms<br />

above are equal<br />

ˆ�Fi = ˆ� FG<br />

Since we have <strong>equilibrium</strong> when all scaling<br />

parameters are equal to 1, we obtain<br />

or<br />

amaxa 2 t = a2m a2 ,<br />

x<br />

am = a 3 xa 2 t .<br />

Now how do velocities scale ?<br />

ˆv = d d<br />

ˆx =<br />

dt dt axx(att) = axatvorig Hence, the scaling <strong>of</strong> the velocities satisfies:<br />

av = ax at. We can write the new scaling<br />

relation as<br />

am = axa 2 v<br />

Hence ANY galaxy can be scaled up like<br />

this!<br />

16


Notice that it is trivial to derive this from<br />

the virial theorem - the expression for the<br />

mass has exactly the same form.<br />

As a consequence, if we have a model for a<br />

galaxy with a certain mass and size, we can<br />

make many more models, with arbitrary<br />

mass, and arbitrary size.<br />

17


<strong>8.</strong>7 Time scales<br />

Dynamical timescale,<br />

particle interaction timescale<br />

Is gravitational force dominated by short or<br />

long range encounters? (N.B. in a gas, only<br />

short range forces are relevant).<br />

In a galaxy, the situation is different.<br />

Consider force with which stars in cone<br />

attract star in apex <strong>of</strong> cone.<br />

18


Force ∼ 1/r 2 , with r the distance from<br />

apex. If ρ is almost constant, then the mass<br />

in a shell with width dr increases as r 2 dr.<br />

Hence differential force is constant at each<br />

r, and we have to integrate all the way out<br />

to obtain the total force.<br />

Realistic densities decrease after some<br />

radius, so that the force will be determined<br />

by the density distribution on a galactic<br />

scale (characterized by the half mass<br />

radius).<br />

19


Relaxation time<br />

Short range encounters do not dominate →<br />

Approximate force field with a smooth<br />

density ρ(x) instead <strong>of</strong> point masses.<br />

• Contrary <strong>of</strong> situation in gas: only<br />

consider long range encounters (long range<br />

∼ scale <strong>of</strong> the galaxy)<br />

Assume all stars have mass m. Analyze<br />

perturbations due to the fact that density is<br />

not smooth, but consists <strong>of</strong> individual stars.<br />

Simplify, and look first at single star-star<br />

encounter.<br />

What is the amount δv induced by one star<br />

crossing another?<br />

Estimate: straight line trajectory past<br />

stationary perturber<br />

20


The perpendicular force � F ⊥ gives<br />

perturbation δ�v ⊥:<br />

�F ⊥ = Gm2 cos θ<br />

r 2<br />

=<br />

Newton: d<br />

dt δ�v ⊥ = � F⊥ m<br />

Gm<br />

bv<br />

δ�v ⊥ =<br />

∞�<br />

−∞<br />

�<br />

dt � F ⊥<br />

m =<br />

= Gm2cos θ<br />

(b2 +x2 ) =<br />

Gm2b (b2 +x2 ) 3/2<br />

Gm 2<br />

b 2 [1+(vt/b) 2 ] 3/2<br />

�<br />

ds<br />

(1 + s2 Gm<br />

=<br />

) 3/2 bv<br />

⇒<br />

Gm<br />

b 2 [1 + (vt/b) 2 ]<br />

s<br />

�<br />

1 + s 2|∞ −∞<br />

3/2dt =<br />

= 2Gm<br />

bv<br />

In words: δv is roughly equal to acceleration<br />

at closest approach, Gm/b 2 , times the<br />

duration 2b/v.<br />

21


Note: approximation fails when<br />

δ�v ⊥ > v ⇒ b < Gm/v 2 ≡ b min<br />

Galaxy has characteristic radius R.<br />

Define crossing time tc as the time it takes<br />

a star to move through the galaxy tc = R/v<br />

Calculate number <strong>of</strong> perturbing encounters<br />

per crossing time tc<br />

In a crossing time, the star has 1<br />

“encounter” with each other star in the<br />

galaxy<br />

The impact parameter <strong>of</strong> each encounter<br />

can be derived by projecting each star onto<br />

a plane perpendicular to the unperturbed<br />

motion <strong>of</strong> the star<br />

Hence “flatten” the galaxy in the plane<br />

perpendicular to the motion <strong>of</strong> the star, and<br />

22


assume that the stars are homogeneously<br />

distributed in that plane, out to a radius R,<br />

and no stars outside R. This is obviously a<br />

simplifying assumption, but it is reasonably<br />

accurate.<br />

This can be used to derive the distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> impact parameters:<br />

N stars in total in Galaxy, distributed over<br />

total surface πR 2<br />

stellar surface density / # per unit area:<br />

N<br />

πR 2<br />

In a crossing time, the star has δn<br />

encounters with impact parameter between<br />

b and b + db. δn is given by the area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

annulus 2πbdb times the density <strong>of</strong> stars on<br />

the surface, which is N/(πR 2 ):<br />

δn = N<br />

πR22πbdb =<br />

2N<br />

R2 b db<br />

23


Result: � δv ⊥ = 0 as the perturbations are<br />

randomly distributed, and will not change<br />

the average velocity<br />

� δv 2 ⊥ = δv 2 δn =<br />

= 8N<br />

� �2 2Gm 2Nb<br />

db<br />

bv R2 � �2 Gm db<br />

Rv<br />

as each perturbation adds to � δv ⊥ by an<br />

equal amount (2Gm/bv) 2 .<br />

The encounters do not produce an average<br />

perpendicular velocity, but they do produce<br />

an average (perpendicular velocity) 2 .<br />

Hence, on average, the stars still follow<br />

their average path, but they tend to<br />

“diffuse” around it.<br />

b<br />

24


The total increase in rms perpendicular<br />

velocity can be calculated by integrating<br />

over all impact parameters from bmin to<br />

infinity:<br />

Total rms increase:<br />

∆v 2 =<br />

R<br />

�<br />

b min<br />

=8N( Gm<br />

Rv )2 ln Λ<br />

� δv 2 ⊥ db =<br />

R<br />

�<br />

b min<br />

8N<br />

� Gm<br />

Rv<br />

�2<br />

with ln Λ = Coulomb logarithm = ln R<br />

b min<br />

We can rewrite this equation. Recall:<br />

b min ≡ Gm/v 2<br />

From virial theorem:<br />

v 2 = GM/R = GNm/R<br />

db/b =<br />

25


Hence: bmin = Gm/(GNm/R) = R/N<br />

ln Λ = ln R/bmin = ln R<br />

R/N<br />

Furthermore from virial theorem:<br />

GM 2<br />

= ln N<br />

R = Mv2 → GM<br />

R = v2 → GNm<br />

R<br />

so that: 〈∆v2 ⊥ 〉<br />

v 2<br />

→ N = v2 R<br />

Gm<br />

=<br />

8 ln N<br />

N<br />

= v2<br />

This last number is the fractional change in<br />

energy per crossing time. Hence we need<br />

the inverse number <strong>of</strong> crossings N/(8 ln N)<br />

to get 〈∆v2 ⊥ 〉 ∼ v2<br />

26


The timescale t relax is defined as the time it<br />

takes to deflect each star significantly by<br />

two body encounters, and it is therefore<br />

equal to<br />

t relax = N<br />

8 ln N tc ≈ 0.1N<br />

ln N tc<br />

with crossing time: tc ≡ R/v<br />

27


Conclusions<br />

• effect <strong>of</strong> point mass perturbations<br />

decreases as N increases<br />

• even for low N=50, 〈∆v 2 ⊥ 〉/v2 = 0.6,<br />

hence deflections play a moderate role.<br />

• for larger systems the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

encounters become even less important<br />

Notice: one derives the same equation when<br />

the exact formulas for the encounters are<br />

used. Put in another way, the encounters<br />

with b < bmin do not dominate.<br />

28


Relaxation time for large systems<br />

System N tc (yr) t relax (yr)<br />

globular cluster 10 5 10 5 2 × 10 8<br />

galaxy 10 11 10 8 10 17<br />

galaxy cluster 10 3 10 9 3 × 10 10<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> Universe 13.7 Gyr.<br />

⇒ Galaxies are collisionless systems<br />

• motion <strong>of</strong> a star accurately described by<br />

single particle orbit in smooth gravitational<br />

field <strong>of</strong> galaxy<br />

• no need to solve N-body problem with<br />

N = 10 11 (!)<br />

29


Some more typical questions that can be<br />

asked at exam: (not homework<br />

assignments)<br />

• What is the virial theorem ?<br />

• How can we use it to scale <strong>galaxies</strong> ?<br />

• Do <strong>galaxies</strong> have a main sequence like<br />

stars ?<br />

• How is relaxation time defined ? What<br />

is the approximate expression ? What is the<br />

typical relaxation time for a galaxy ? How<br />

does the long relaxation time make it easier<br />

to produce models for <strong>galaxies</strong> ?<br />

30


<strong>8.</strong> Homework Assignments:<br />

1) How empty are <strong>galaxies</strong> ? Calculate the<br />

mean distance between stars. Take the<br />

radius <strong>of</strong> the sun as typical radius for a star.<br />

Take the ratio <strong>of</strong> the two. Compare this to<br />

the same ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>galaxies</strong>: take the average<br />

distance between <strong>galaxies</strong>, and the radius <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>galaxies</strong>.<br />

2) calculate the mass <strong>of</strong> our galaxy for two<br />

assumed radii:<br />

a.) 10 kpc (roughly the distance to the sun)<br />

b.) 350 kpc (halfway out to Andromeda)<br />

Take as a typical velocity the solar value <strong>of</strong><br />

200 km/s.<br />

3) Show explicitly that the virial theorem<br />

produces the same result for the scaling<br />

relations.<br />

4) Take typical sizes, velocities, number <strong>of</strong><br />

stars for globular clusters, <strong>galaxies</strong>, and<br />

31


galaxy clusters. Calculate for each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

systems, the average time between stellar<br />

collisions, crossing times and relaxation<br />

times.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!