20.01.2013 Views

Economics of Kautiliya Shukra and Brihaspati.pmd

Economics of Kautiliya Shukra and Brihaspati.pmd

Economics of Kautiliya Shukra and Brihaspati.pmd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Details Sravana Asadha Total<br />

1 2 ... 15 1 ... 30 1 ... 30 354<br />

Place<br />

Time <strong>of</strong><br />

accounting<br />

Date <strong>and</strong> time<br />

<strong>of</strong> receipt<br />

Accounting<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer<br />

Details <strong>of</strong><br />

current year<br />

Amount<br />

received<br />

Paid by<br />

Ordered by<br />

Received by<br />

Accountant<br />

Table 6.4.Possible Income Account<br />

Note- 1= First day <strong>of</strong> bright fortnight, 1 = First day <strong>of</strong> dark<br />

fortnight, 15= Full moon day, 30= Blue moon day<br />

Source: Rangrajan, 1992 : 277<br />

86<br />

Taxation Principles<br />

The theory that the taxes were wages for protection was so in<br />

gained in the constitution that even partial failure <strong>of</strong> protection was<br />

deemed to entitle the subject claim refund <strong>of</strong> wages in proportion to<br />

the loss <strong>and</strong> those claims as we have actual payment. The subject<br />

through that the servant king was not fulfilling his obligation. He thought<br />

that the compact was not fully kept <strong>and</strong> he threatened as the Arthashastra<br />

says to migrate to the enemy country, in other words, the subject<br />

threatened to transfer allegiance. The Mahabharata says the same thing<br />

when it sanctions the ab<strong>and</strong>onment <strong>of</strong> the king who fails to protect.<br />

According to Mahbharata, 'He is like a ship which leaks that is<br />

dangerous to remain with <strong>and</strong> he is like the barber who wishes to go to<br />

the forest evidently to become an ascetic. The barber has left his clientele<br />

<strong>and</strong> master <strong>and</strong> broken his contract <strong>of</strong> service. He is fit to be given up<br />

<strong>and</strong> another barber is to be appointed to the household'. (Jayasawal,<br />

1978:319-21) Similarly the king who failed in his duty was worthless<br />

fit to be given up. The relation between the king <strong>and</strong> the subject is<br />

proved to have ended by the very fact <strong>of</strong> the formers incapacity. The<br />

ties <strong>of</strong> allegiance is deemed dissolved the moment the king failed to<br />

fulfill this duty <strong>of</strong> protect action <strong>and</strong> the subject was free to employ<br />

another servant master instead. This was a natural corollary to the<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> taxation <strong>and</strong> the king’s legal position.(ibid)<br />

The mainstay <strong>of</strong> revenue was the kings’ fixed bhaga or the<br />

share <strong>of</strong> produce <strong>of</strong> agriculture. His share in merch<strong>and</strong>ise sold in<br />

the market was one tenth or so according to circumstances.(Manusmriti,<br />

7.130-132, Gautam-smriti 10, 24-27. Vasistha-smriti, 21.26-<br />

27, Apastamba 2.20,26-29, Vishnu-smriti 3, 20-25, Boudhayana,<br />

1.1018.1 cited in Jayasawal, 1978)<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!