20.01.2013 Views

Network Logic - Index of

Network Logic - Index of

Network Logic - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Network</strong> logic<br />

more trust, which in turn strengthens the network itself. It is arguable<br />

that NWP succeeded because it tapped and refreshed pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

trust among the participating teachers.<br />

To say this is not simply to play with words for, if this hypothesis is<br />

correct, there may well be many different ways <strong>of</strong> generating high<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> social capital in addition to those specified in the analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

NWP. The explanation may not lie in particular practices, such as<br />

teachers engaging in writing, but in the fact that here is one activity<br />

that in this particular context helped to generate high social capital.<br />

In a different context – another curriculum subject or another aspect<br />

<strong>of</strong> schooling – very different practices may be successful in generating<br />

the high social capital that allows teachers to learn with and from<br />

their colleagues in a way that benefits their classroom practices.<br />

Indeed, one <strong>of</strong> the things we really do need to untangle is whether<br />

peer-to-peer approaches are always better than expert-to-novice ones<br />

in education, or whether the latter have <strong>of</strong>ten been less successful<br />

because they have lacked a basis <strong>of</strong> social capital. Indeed, expert-tonovice<br />

systems do seem to work in apprenticeship-type relationships<br />

where trust is well established, as documented by Jean Lave and<br />

Etienne Wenger among others. 3 The problem may be not that expertto-novice<br />

approaches are ineluctably destined to failure in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

teachers’ pr<strong>of</strong>essional learning, but that we have missed out <strong>of</strong> our<br />

analysis the key underlying feature, social capital, and mistakenly<br />

assumed that the surface features, the participants’ identities as<br />

experts and novices, are the critical variables that explain the low<br />

success rate.<br />

<strong>Network</strong>s, knowledge management and innovation<br />

This brings us to another aspect <strong>of</strong> the wider conceptual framework<br />

for networks since 1990, namely the dramatic growth <strong>of</strong> interest in<br />

knowledge management and innovation.<br />

From a knowledge management perspective, what we have<br />

traditionally called pr<strong>of</strong>essional learning is very <strong>of</strong>ten a form <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge creation and knowledge transfer, alternatively conceived as<br />

innovation and the dissemination <strong>of</strong> such innovation. We now<br />

84 Demos

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!