20.01.2013 Views

Network Logic - Index of

Network Logic - Index of

Network Logic - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Network</strong> logic<br />

more likely to be large, composed <strong>of</strong> many internal businesses, and<br />

hierarchical. It will make sense to integrate essential supplies and<br />

services in one single organisation. And it will make sense to channel<br />

relevant information up a pyramid and have a set <strong>of</strong> rules for which<br />

decisions need to be taken at each level <strong>of</strong> the business. Conversely, if<br />

information flows more easily, outsourcing, breaking up conglomerates<br />

and flattening hierarchies will look more attractive.<br />

And so it is been since the early 1990s, when the steep recession<br />

triggered a substantial corporate reorganisation with exactly these<br />

features. Although they might have looked like straightforward costcutting<br />

or management fads, each had a fundamental technological<br />

rationale.<br />

The pattern throughout the past decade has been a hollowing-out<br />

<strong>of</strong> medium-sized companies. A huge merger wave created more very<br />

big companies, increasingly with an internal network rather than a<br />

hierarchical structure, taking advantage <strong>of</strong> economies <strong>of</strong> scale and<br />

global market opportunities. The possibilities <strong>of</strong> ICT have allowed<br />

more small companies to thrive by exploiting better and faster<br />

information on specialist consumer demands or specialised sources<br />

<strong>of</strong> supply, and operating in an external network <strong>of</strong> other companies.<br />

The relative advantages <strong>of</strong> being in between have diminished. Indeed,<br />

being medium-sized can combine all the disadvantages <strong>of</strong> lacking<br />

scale with all the disadvantages <strong>of</strong> lacking flexibility.<br />

There are no consistent data across countries, but the OECD has<br />

estimated from different national sources that the average size <strong>of</strong><br />

companies has been shrinking. The number employing more than<br />

500 people has declined since 1990 – although the remaining big<br />

companies are almost certainly much bigger than before. And in most<br />

industrial countries (Japan being a significant exception) the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> businesses employing up to 50 people has rocketed. 1<br />

It is hard to be sure how far this size redistribution will go, for<br />

there will certainly always be some big firms around. But it is a safe<br />

bet that the organisational and social ramifications are still in their<br />

infancy.<br />

170 Demos

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!