Network Logic - Index of
Network Logic - Index of
Network Logic - Index of
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Developing the well-connected community<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals or self-appointed community leaders acting as representatives<br />
for the sector, and a failure to allow enough time for<br />
relationships <strong>of</strong> trust, respect and understanding to develop between<br />
partners and communities. Partnership boards have been under<br />
pressure to spend budgets and find solutions to hitherto intractable<br />
social problems. Unrealistic timescales set by electoral cycles and a<br />
tradition <strong>of</strong> short-termism have created additional pressures. It is not<br />
surprising that many are experiencing major difficulties in achieving<br />
the ambitious targets set by government.<br />
Developing ‘community’ networks<br />
Despite this focus on service delivery there has been a growing<br />
realisation that community engagement is not the same as voluntary<br />
sector liaison. Community leaders have <strong>of</strong>ten been unpaid and undervalued<br />
activists who are constantly asked to convey the (sometimes<br />
unknown) views <strong>of</strong> their communities and to defend decisions over<br />
which they feel no sense <strong>of</strong> ownership. Effective community<br />
involvement in cross-sectoral partnerships can only be sustained,<br />
therefore, on the basis <strong>of</strong> sufficient organisational capacity and strong<br />
interpersonal connections. Communities are themselves complex and<br />
dynamic, comprising overlapping but shifting networks and alliances,<br />
used by communities to promote or defend their interests in an everchanging<br />
environment. Communities exist where there is interaction<br />
and mutual influence. Social networks express and reinforce a sense<br />
<strong>of</strong> belonging, <strong>of</strong> mutuality, based on somewhat transient notions <strong>of</strong><br />
‘us’ and ‘them’. To varying extents, community networks comprise<br />
neighbours, work colleagues, fellow activists, those who might share a<br />
faith or hobby, or people who have faced similar experiences, for<br />
example, through migration or discrimination. If this is the case, then<br />
how can networks be shaped to contribute to stronger, more inclusive<br />
communities?<br />
The well-connected community<br />
In the first instance, it is important to acknowledge that communities<br />
have always contained differences and divisions, even where these<br />
Demos 149