R A I LT R AC K - The Railways Archive
R A I LT R AC K - The Railways Archive
R A I LT R AC K - The Railways Archive
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• the impact of these flows on several key locations on<br />
the network including Leeds,Manchester, Leicester, the<br />
West Midlands,Reading,the North London Line and the<br />
West London Line.<br />
• the effect on our existing routes of the construction of<br />
the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (CTRL) and the<br />
opportunities to use it for freight.<br />
From this work, we expect to be able to carry our<br />
customers’ forecast freight volumes on these seven routes<br />
for the next five years,together with all declared passenger<br />
requirements.We are now producing indicative timetables<br />
for our customers to confirm this conclusion,although,<br />
inevitably, forecasting five-year timetables cannot be done<br />
with certainty.<br />
To accommodate the highest growth forecasts on these<br />
routes for all ten years, we propose the following:<br />
WCML corridor<br />
Under the PUG 2 agreement, we committed to providing an<br />
additional 42 paths for passenger and freight.In the past two<br />
years,the number of freight paths used on the WCML has<br />
stayed static at around 40,while our freight customers are<br />
forecasting a demand for more than 150 on some sections<br />
by 2009.<strong>The</strong> West Coast Route modernisation works<br />
include, at the south end,the provision for an increase in<br />
train length by around 40% which will help accommodate<br />
some of this extra demand.To provide a robust solution, we<br />
have to finalise one of three options.<br />
• Further investment in the WCML to accommodate all<br />
customer requirements which would involve substantial<br />
extra track work at a cost of at least £400M.We do not<br />
expect the traffic to be able to support this investment;<br />
it would have to come from grant funding.<br />
• Displacing some of freight’s requirements to other<br />
routes such as the MML or an orbital route that avoids<br />
London.Some further investment would then be<br />
required on those routes.<br />
• Further restructuring of the timetable for all the lines<br />
and all operators at the south end of the WCML which<br />
could release further capacity for freight.<br />
We will have finalised our proposals with customers and<br />
other stake h o l d e rs by July 1999, not just for the WCML bu t<br />
also for parallel routes such as those in Route 38.<br />
Additional capacity along the ECML Corridor<br />
Freight operator requirements – in terms of capacity,<br />
capability and funding – are being incorporated into the<br />
upgrade of the main route .This will include the provision of<br />
a mainly four-track corridor from London to Newcastle .To<br />
achieve this, we will use some parallel routes and reopen the<br />
Leamside Line in Durham.At a number of locations, we will<br />
create grade-separated junctions to minimise conflicts<br />
between train movements.Full details are set out in Route<br />
Strategy 2.<br />
Felixstowe Port traffic<br />
We propose to transfer port traffic to a cross-country route<br />
via Peterborough and Leicester to the WCML at Nuneaton<br />
by 2004 to reduce volume on the Great Eastern (Route 16)<br />
and North London Line (Route 26). We also intend to<br />
enhance the gauge of this new route.We expect to have<br />
proposals by July 1999.<strong>The</strong>y will require grant funding.<br />
London-area capacity<br />
We shall create additional capacity between the eastern end<br />
of the GWML (Route 3) and between Acton and<br />
Cricklewood along the west end of the North London Line.<br />
This would accommodate freight requirements,together<br />
with a possible increase in passenger traffic. We will evaluate<br />
options with all our customers during this year.<br />
Southampton Dibden Bay Container Port<br />
If the Dibden Bay development proceeds in 2004, we may<br />
not be able to accommodate all train-movement forecasts in<br />
the Southampton area (Route 21) and at Reading (Routes 3<br />
and 4). We will carry out feasibility work later this year to<br />
assess whether the projected train movements can be<br />
accommodated and,if not,what would be required to<br />
accommodate them.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ECML upgrade<br />
will include the<br />
provision of a mainly<br />
four-track corridor<br />
from London to<br />
Newcastle<br />
87