20.01.2013 Views

R A I LT R AC K - The Railways Archive

R A I LT R AC K - The Railways Archive

R A I LT R AC K - The Railways Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• the impact of these flows on several key locations on<br />

the network including Leeds,Manchester, Leicester, the<br />

West Midlands,Reading,the North London Line and the<br />

West London Line.<br />

• the effect on our existing routes of the construction of<br />

the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (CTRL) and the<br />

opportunities to use it for freight.<br />

From this work, we expect to be able to carry our<br />

customers’ forecast freight volumes on these seven routes<br />

for the next five years,together with all declared passenger<br />

requirements.We are now producing indicative timetables<br />

for our customers to confirm this conclusion,although,<br />

inevitably, forecasting five-year timetables cannot be done<br />

with certainty.<br />

To accommodate the highest growth forecasts on these<br />

routes for all ten years, we propose the following:<br />

WCML corridor<br />

Under the PUG 2 agreement, we committed to providing an<br />

additional 42 paths for passenger and freight.In the past two<br />

years,the number of freight paths used on the WCML has<br />

stayed static at around 40,while our freight customers are<br />

forecasting a demand for more than 150 on some sections<br />

by 2009.<strong>The</strong> West Coast Route modernisation works<br />

include, at the south end,the provision for an increase in<br />

train length by around 40% which will help accommodate<br />

some of this extra demand.To provide a robust solution, we<br />

have to finalise one of three options.<br />

• Further investment in the WCML to accommodate all<br />

customer requirements which would involve substantial<br />

extra track work at a cost of at least £400M.We do not<br />

expect the traffic to be able to support this investment;<br />

it would have to come from grant funding.<br />

• Displacing some of freight’s requirements to other<br />

routes such as the MML or an orbital route that avoids<br />

London.Some further investment would then be<br />

required on those routes.<br />

• Further restructuring of the timetable for all the lines<br />

and all operators at the south end of the WCML which<br />

could release further capacity for freight.<br />

We will have finalised our proposals with customers and<br />

other stake h o l d e rs by July 1999, not just for the WCML bu t<br />

also for parallel routes such as those in Route 38.<br />

Additional capacity along the ECML Corridor<br />

Freight operator requirements – in terms of capacity,<br />

capability and funding – are being incorporated into the<br />

upgrade of the main route .This will include the provision of<br />

a mainly four-track corridor from London to Newcastle .To<br />

achieve this, we will use some parallel routes and reopen the<br />

Leamside Line in Durham.At a number of locations, we will<br />

create grade-separated junctions to minimise conflicts<br />

between train movements.Full details are set out in Route<br />

Strategy 2.<br />

Felixstowe Port traffic<br />

We propose to transfer port traffic to a cross-country route<br />

via Peterborough and Leicester to the WCML at Nuneaton<br />

by 2004 to reduce volume on the Great Eastern (Route 16)<br />

and North London Line (Route 26). We also intend to<br />

enhance the gauge of this new route.We expect to have<br />

proposals by July 1999.<strong>The</strong>y will require grant funding.<br />

London-area capacity<br />

We shall create additional capacity between the eastern end<br />

of the GWML (Route 3) and between Acton and<br />

Cricklewood along the west end of the North London Line.<br />

This would accommodate freight requirements,together<br />

with a possible increase in passenger traffic. We will evaluate<br />

options with all our customers during this year.<br />

Southampton Dibden Bay Container Port<br />

If the Dibden Bay development proceeds in 2004, we may<br />

not be able to accommodate all train-movement forecasts in<br />

the Southampton area (Route 21) and at Reading (Routes 3<br />

and 4). We will carry out feasibility work later this year to<br />

assess whether the projected train movements can be<br />

accommodated and,if not,what would be required to<br />

accommodate them.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ECML upgrade<br />

will include the<br />

provision of a mainly<br />

four-track corridor<br />

from London to<br />

Newcastle<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!