20.01.2013 Views

R A I LT R AC K - The Railways Archive

R A I LT R AC K - The Railways Archive

R A I LT R AC K - The Railways Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.8 6.9<br />

6.8 Timetabling<br />

With an increasing demand for use of the network, we must<br />

ensure that the existing,and future, capacity is efficiently<br />

allocated through an effective timetabling process.<strong>The</strong> Rail<br />

Regulator has recently approved our proposals for change to<br />

Access Condition D which governs this.<br />

With the development of the May 2000 timetable<br />

planned for this year, we move away from the potentially<br />

combative bid and offer process where train operators’bids<br />

are kept secret until the last minute . In the past this gave us a<br />

limited window to assess the implications for identifying<br />

optimal solutions and the true performance impact of<br />

options available.<br />

Instead, we will move towards a more collaborative<br />

approach starting with a National Train Planning Conference<br />

which will operate along the lines of the International Air<br />

Transport Association airline-slot allocation meeting.Over a<br />

period of three-days,train operators will discuss with us their<br />

aspirations for the following year.We have also developed a<br />

code of practice detailing the mechanism for the handling of<br />

requests for access rights prior to the commencement of the<br />

timetabling process.<br />

At the Conference, all of our Zones will be<br />

represented.We plan to convene multi-Zone line of route<br />

discussions with train operators in order that we can identify,<br />

at a very ear ly stage, likely ‘hot spots’.<strong>The</strong> teams will then<br />

jointly develop a plan to produce a fully operable ‘draft’<br />

timetable over the following 14 weeks.At agreed milestone<br />

dates, we will present standard-hour models to demonstrate<br />

how the development work is progressing.In the case of<br />

new services,this will be accompanied by appropriate results<br />

from network congestion models.<br />

This new collaborative approach will enable operational<br />

planning teams to develop a range of timetabling options<br />

rather than the present one solution,offering more optimal<br />

paths and potentially reduced journey times including the<br />

impact of scheduled engineering work on the availability of<br />

the network for train services and assesses the true<br />

performance impact of the whole timetable package. Our<br />

aim will be to minimise both the impact of engineering work<br />

on our customers services and minimise the performance<br />

risk of the timetable. During the 14-week drafting stage, our<br />

Area Delivery Groups will be involved in reviewing the<br />

timetable options,and account teams in agreeing with<br />

customers commercial terms for any new access rights.<br />

6.9 Investment packages<br />

How this Plan is structured to meet industry<br />

vision and needs<br />

<strong>The</strong> ten-year plan set out in this Statement is structured to<br />

meet our vision,and that of our customers,funders and<br />

other partners.It provides a bold agenda to deliver step<br />

changes in the capacity and capability of the network.It sets<br />

out our funding assumptions,and provides a summary of the<br />

main schemes which we propose. More details of the<br />

schemes,and how they have been set within the context of<br />

customer-reasonable requirements and the Route Strategies,<br />

are then set out in the route sections of this document.<br />

Risk and return<br />

As part of his current periodic review, the Regulator has<br />

provided a challenge to Railtrack to indicate not only<br />

what we believe the right strategic plans are for developing<br />

the industry, but also how we could share more of the<br />

demand risk involved.We welcome this opportunity.This<br />

Network Development Plan sets out our proposals in the<br />

investment area.<br />

All investments involve various types of risk.<br />

• Construction risk – the risk that the costs of the project<br />

will exceed the budget and/or forecast completion date.<br />

• Counter-party risk – the risk that the party funding the<br />

project will not be able to meet its obligations for<br />

reasons not related to the project.<br />

• Functionality risk – the risk that,even though completed,<br />

the investment is incapable of delivering its intended<br />

outputs.<br />

• Demand risk – risk that the demand generated by the<br />

project will not meet forecast levels.<br />

• Regulatory risk – risk as to how the investment will be<br />

treated by the Rail Regulator at future reviews of access<br />

charges.<br />

We will move<br />

towards a more<br />

collaborative<br />

approach starting<br />

with a National Train<br />

Planning Conference<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!