R A I LT R AC K - The Railways Archive
R A I LT R AC K - The Railways Archive
R A I LT R AC K - The Railways Archive
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2.2<br />
2.2 Consultation with our customers,<br />
funders and passengers<br />
Last year, we strengthened our account planning through a<br />
structured exercise to agree with each of our train operating<br />
customers – and with each of the Passenger Transport<br />
Executives (PTEs) – a statement of their reasonable<br />
requirements.Customers and funders were invited to<br />
set out their requirements,which resulted in over 2,000<br />
individual proposals varying widely in both scale and type.<br />
Each was discussed with the customer or funder to agree<br />
output deliverables.<br />
We have taken forward those requirements which:<br />
• represent ways of delivering an output for which we are<br />
already funded (eg in meeting our criteria for<br />
maintenance and renewal of the network,including<br />
renewal in modern equivalent form);or<br />
• relate to enhancement of the capability or capacity of<br />
the network (or are for additional train services where<br />
no access agreement currently exists) where the<br />
requirement is consistent with the relevant Route<br />
Strategy. In these cases, we will examine how risks and<br />
benefits might be shared.<br />
Table A Analysis of customer requirements received<br />
and proposals for action<br />
Source:Railtrack analysis<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
Completed or withdrawn<br />
Account management process<br />
Access agreement negotiation<br />
Operational performance<br />
Track quality<br />
Renewal programme<br />
Enhancement feasibility study<br />
Enhancement included in NMS<br />
Still under discussion<br />
A summary of the types of requirements received from<br />
customers and funders is shown in Table A.<br />
Further information is given in Appendix 4.<br />
Requirements relating to enhancement of the network are<br />
also referred to in each Route Strategy of this document.<br />
<strong>The</strong> agreed outcome of each reasonable requirement<br />
relating to development of the network is shown in the<br />
relevant Route Strategy, including the impact on options for<br />
solving capacity constraints.Significant requirements,and the<br />
agreed way forward,are also set out in the relevant<br />
descriptions of Route Strategies in this NMS.Where the<br />
requirements relate to performance or track quality, these<br />
have been considered as part of the network-wide<br />
commitments that we have given.Requirements concerning<br />
our renewals programme, including incremental<br />
improvement options where possible, are being discussed<br />
with each customer. At the time that this NMS went to<br />
press,a small number of requirements (2%) were still being<br />
discussed with customers to agree a way forward.<br />
Action plans have been agreed either to implement<br />
each reasonable requirement,or to carry out the next stage<br />
of feasibility or development work.<strong>The</strong>se are now<br />
incorporated into the Account Plans,whether or not details<br />
of the proposal are published in this NMS,and will be used<br />
to monitor and report progress.Where new or modified<br />
requirements arise in future, these will be treated in the<br />
same way.<br />
Discussions have also been held with the Franchising<br />
Director to understand his requirements for changes to the<br />
output of the network.Those requirements related to the<br />
capacity and capability of routes,such as frequencies or<br />
journey times, have been considered within the relevant<br />
Route Strategies.<br />
Discussions have also<br />
been held with the<br />
Franchising Director<br />
to understand his<br />
requirements for<br />
changes to the output<br />
of the network<br />
23