19.01.2013 Views

ART 478: Representing Identity In Contemporary Art - the Center for ...

ART 478: Representing Identity In Contemporary Art - the Center for ...

ART 478: Representing Identity In Contemporary Art - the Center for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>ART</strong> <strong>478</strong>: <strong>Representing</strong> <strong>Identity</strong><br />

<strong>In</strong> <strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>Art</strong><br />

Asst. Professor Jaimey Hamilton<br />

Office: <strong>ART</strong> 222<br />

Email: jaimeyh @hawaii.edu<br />

T/Th 1:30-2:45<br />

Office Hours: T/TH 3:00-4:30<br />

Office Phone: x5253<br />

WRITING INTENSIVE CRN: 88846<br />

This is a writing intensive course<br />

designed to explore <strong>the</strong> role of<br />

autobiography, social identity, and selfexpression<br />

in current visual production.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> 1960s, many artists have<br />

abandoned <strong>the</strong> modernist notion of selfexpression<br />

<strong>for</strong> a concept of identity that<br />

involves an exploration of <strong>the</strong> dynamics<br />

between self and society. With a new<br />

critical eye developed through <strong>the</strong> lenses<br />

of feminism, civil-rights, <strong>the</strong> sexual<br />

revolution, and globalization, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

examine identity as a socially constructed<br />

representation of self. Often <strong>the</strong>ir art not<br />

only describes this condition in contemporary culture, but also tries to <strong>for</strong>mulate strategies to break out of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se confining representations of self.<br />

Many of <strong>the</strong> representational strategies<br />

artists use to do this come out of recent<br />

philosophies in cultural studies,<br />

sociology, philosophy, psychology, and<br />

semiotics. <strong>In</strong> this class we will learn how<br />

artists use <strong>the</strong>se critical tools to negotiate<br />

new representations of self and how<br />

those same tools can be used to<br />

<strong>for</strong>mulate our own visual expression. As<br />

<strong>the</strong> course moves from <strong>the</strong> 1970s<br />

<strong>for</strong>ward, and as we explore our own<br />

backgrounds and motivations, we will see<br />

that we can come to understand identity<br />

not as a confining social “label,” but as a flexible, mobile, and open-ended questioning and de-limiting of<br />

<strong>the</strong> self coming from our continual engagement with culture.<br />

Above: Cindy Sherman, Untitled #96, 1981<br />

Below: Yasumasa Morimura, To My Little Sister For Cindy Sherman,<br />

1998


2<br />

<strong>ART</strong> <strong>478</strong> Prof. Hamilton<br />

Textbooks:<br />

- Appiah, Ethics of <strong>Identity</strong><br />

- Robertson and McDaniel, Themes in <strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>Art</strong><br />

- PDFS available on Laulima<br />

- Highly recommended: Sylvan Barnett, Writing about <strong>Art</strong><br />

-<br />

Course Objectives and Outcomes:<br />

<strong>In</strong> this writing intensive course students are expected to demonstrate <strong>the</strong>ir ability to:<br />

- Recognize and understand critical and <strong>the</strong>oretical social frameworks of identity construction.<br />

- Use <strong>the</strong>se frameworks to examine and interpret contemporary art practices.<br />

- To apply <strong>the</strong>se frameworks to an understanding of <strong>the</strong> student’s own representational practices.<br />

These outcomes will be expressed and evaluated in <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>m of personal writing responses, presentation<br />

outlines, and research papers.<br />

Course Requirements:<br />

1. Personal Responses to Reading: Over <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong> semester you need to write a total of<br />

4 - 2 page responses to <strong>the</strong> reading and discussion, as <strong>the</strong>y relate to your evolving understanding<br />

of “identity” and your own process of self-expression. You might also want to keep a “glossary,”<br />

with a reference of new terms and ideas you are learning as you do <strong>the</strong> reading. I expect you to<br />

read everything thoroughly, perhaps even twice and to have google image and wikipedia running<br />

while you read so that you can research references mentioned in <strong>the</strong> articles to help you with<br />

context. The responses will be due on <strong>the</strong> meeting after we discuss <strong>the</strong> readings in class<br />

and will be graded with a check, +,-, system. I will skim all of <strong>the</strong>m, but will also randomly select<br />

some each time to which I will respond more carefully.<br />

2. Face to Face – <strong>Identity</strong> and Identification Project<br />

- Choose an artist to research (I’ve suggested artists under each topic, but you can propose<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs). As you research <strong>the</strong> artist over <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong> semester, you will do a preliminary<br />

presentation of <strong>the</strong>ir work, develop a <strong>the</strong>sis about <strong>the</strong>ir work in relation to identity <strong>the</strong>ories and<br />

your own understanding of your identity, and <strong>the</strong>n write a final paper that explores that <strong>the</strong>sis.<br />

-<br />

- Part I -- Presentation. After you choose an artist, I will assign a time <strong>for</strong> you to present your<br />

artist in <strong>the</strong> context of a particular topic. The aim is to integrate your understanding of <strong>the</strong><br />

artist’s work with <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical insights of <strong>the</strong> readings we are doing <strong>for</strong> that class period.<br />

Present your artist as a case study in which we can explore and test <strong>the</strong> readings.<br />

- Your presentations should include a very short (10 minutes at <strong>the</strong> most!) introduction of <strong>the</strong><br />

artist’s work in general. This should be followed by some questions or larger discussion<br />

points that you would like to propose to <strong>the</strong> class. These questions should generate<br />

discussion in terms of how, why, and with what tools <strong>the</strong> artist is exploring identity. What are<br />

<strong>the</strong> questions you need to answer about identity in order to interpret <strong>the</strong> artist’s work? After<br />

you present <strong>the</strong> artist briefly, <strong>the</strong>n we will use your questions and discussion points to lead<br />

conversation about <strong>the</strong> reading <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> class period. Your job is to help me guide<br />

<strong>the</strong> conversation so that it can be as productive as possible.<br />

o Prepare a powerpoint presentation and notes: Limit yourself to 4 images <strong>for</strong> your<br />

artist overview. Then include your questions and discussion points in <strong>the</strong><br />

presentation. Usually an in depth analysis of one or two works is best. Discussion<br />

prompts are most productive when paired with an image to guide us in analysis. You<br />

can ei<strong>the</strong>r upload your presentation to laulima or bring it to class on a flash drive.<br />

o Your presentations will be graded on <strong>the</strong> content of <strong>the</strong> powerpoint itself and your<br />

notes, not on your speaking ability. So RELAX and let your work and research do<br />

<strong>the</strong> talking! …..I will help you lead discussion. <strong>In</strong> <strong>the</strong> powerpoints and notes, I am


3<br />

<strong>ART</strong> <strong>478</strong> Prof. Hamilton<br />

looking to see evidence of <strong>the</strong> depth of research you have done to understand <strong>the</strong><br />

artist’s approach to identity, <strong>the</strong> clarity and precision with which you syn<strong>the</strong>size this<br />

understanding into a very short presentation of your artist, your ability to organize this<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> people that do not know this artist, and most of all <strong>the</strong> level of critical<br />

engagement you have with <strong>the</strong> overarching <strong>the</strong>oretical material as it relates to your<br />

understanding of <strong>the</strong> artist’s approach. This will be evident to me in <strong>the</strong><br />

insightfulness of your questions and discussion points paired with <strong>the</strong> artist’s images.<br />

Part II - Paper: 15 pages. Based on your presentation, you will make an outline and write a<br />

research paper analyzing <strong>the</strong> intersubjective dimension between your identification with your<br />

artist’s exploration of identity construction. Use at least 4 of <strong>the</strong> texts we have read and your own<br />

research to help you elaborate. We will discuss specifics of <strong>the</strong> project over <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong><br />

semester.<br />

Grading: Grading will be based on your attention to <strong>the</strong> assignments, <strong>the</strong> thoughtfulness of your arguments and<br />

responses, and <strong>the</strong> clarity with which you present your ideas.<br />

Participation/Personal Writing Responses: (40 pts) 20%<br />

<strong>Art</strong>ist Project: Presentation: (40 pts) 20%<br />

Outline <strong>for</strong> Final Paper: (10 pts) 5%<br />

First Draft:<br />

Part I – Autobio (15 pts)<br />

Part II - Analysis (15 pts) 15%<br />

Peer Responses: (20 pts) 10%<br />

Final Draft: (60 pts) 30%<br />

Course Policies:<br />

1. Believing that my high expectations are an indication of my respect <strong>for</strong> you and <strong>for</strong> your capacity to<br />

work at a level of excellence you may not have thought possible, I will follow <strong>the</strong> grading standards<br />

outlined in <strong>the</strong> college catalog:<br />

Grade A is reserved <strong>for</strong> work that is exceptional in quality and shows keen insight, understanding, and initiative.<br />

Grade B is given <strong>for</strong> work that is consistently superior [that is, not merely respectable or “average”] and shows<br />

interest, ef<strong>for</strong>t, or originality.<br />

Grade C is a respectable grade. It reflects consistent daily preparation and satisfactory completion of all work<br />

required.<br />

Grade D is <strong>the</strong> lowest passing grade. It is below <strong>the</strong> average necessary to meet graduation requirements and<br />

ordinarily is not accepted <strong>for</strong> transfer by o<strong>the</strong>r institutions.<br />

Grade F is failing.<br />

2. I believe my students are adults who have o<strong>the</strong>r considerations, obligations, and priorities beyond this<br />

class. I do not need to hear excuses <strong>for</strong> being late to class, not attending class, not turning in<br />

assignments, etc. But in fairness to all students in <strong>the</strong> class and with <strong>the</strong> knowledge that, in <strong>the</strong> world<br />

beyond college, people are expected to meet deadlines even in <strong>the</strong> absence of ideal circumstances, I will<br />

faithfully en<strong>for</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> following policy concerning attendance and assignments: Attendance and<br />

Participation are mandatory and will affect your final grade. Assignments are due on time, regardless of<br />

most circumstances (documentary evidence of mitigating circumstances required). Assignments lose a<br />

half-grade <strong>for</strong> every day <strong>the</strong>y are late. After 6 days <strong>the</strong>y will not be accepted.<br />

3. Plagiarism is especially seductive and easy in <strong>the</strong> era of <strong>the</strong> internet, but I believe that my students<br />

have <strong>the</strong> capability of learning to judge and use relevant, valuable sources both online and on <strong>the</strong> library


4<br />

<strong>ART</strong> <strong>478</strong> Prof. Hamilton<br />

shelves. I believe my students can learn how to use <strong>the</strong> ideas of o<strong>the</strong>rs in order to develop arguments<br />

and thoughts of <strong>the</strong>ir own and cite o<strong>the</strong>rs’ words and ideas properly. Plagiarism will result in zero credit<br />

<strong>for</strong> an assignment.<br />

4. Knowing that ultimately your education is what you make it, I will encourage you to come to class<br />

prepared; I will encourage you to initiate, ask questions, and comment on <strong>the</strong> readings and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

assignments; I will encourage you to engage your classmates in lively debate. The content of this course<br />

could be considered “controversial” by some. <strong>Contemporary</strong> artists often challenge our ethical and social<br />

mores with <strong>the</strong>ir images. This class addresses <strong>the</strong>se kinds of artists. If you are not com<strong>for</strong>table with<br />

<strong>the</strong>se challenges to your own identity (and your own process of value construction) than this class is not<br />

<strong>for</strong> you. My style of teaching is purposely open-ended so that discussion opens up questions and<br />

possibilities of complex topics that will hopefully be food <strong>for</strong> thought <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> rest of your life. I teach<br />

content, but most of all, I model critical thinking. Please come prepared <strong>for</strong> an open and thought<br />

provoking space of discussion and exploration.<br />

Citation and Bibliographic Resources:<br />

Learning to cite sources is an important component to any art history course, but something that each<br />

student should take as <strong>the</strong>ir personal responsibility to learn. It is not something I can “teach” you, but<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r a set of very explicit rules that I can give you and that you must learn to consistently follow.<br />

Ei<strong>the</strong>r MLA or Chicago Style citations are acceptable. Look at how published sources write <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

footnotes and bibliography. THEY ARE ALL CONSISTENT! Learn to follow this consistency. Use <strong>the</strong><br />

Library’s online resources: log in to <strong>the</strong> library website, click “quick facts,” and <strong>the</strong>n “writing and research<br />

resources”. One of <strong>the</strong> more helpful links provided on <strong>the</strong> library’s site is this one:<br />

http://www.dianahacker.com/resdoc/p04_c10_s1.html


5<br />

<strong>ART</strong> <strong>478</strong> Prof. Hamilton<br />

Syllabus:<br />

This course is divided into a series of topics that offer different frameworks <strong>for</strong> addressing <strong>the</strong> issue of contemporary<br />

identity in art. For each topic, I have included a list of relevant artists. If you are in charge of presenting a case study<br />

<strong>for</strong> this topic, you can choose an artist from this list (if you would like to present an artist not listed, please consult with<br />

me first.) Everyone is responsible <strong>for</strong> doing <strong>the</strong> reading listed under each topic and writing a response be<strong>for</strong>e our first<br />

class meeting on that topic. <strong>In</strong> addition, I have included “<strong>Art</strong>ist Project Fur<strong>the</strong>r Readings” <strong>for</strong> those who are presenting<br />

on that topic or those who would like to pursue <strong>the</strong> topic on <strong>the</strong>ir own.<br />

Jan 10: Self-disclosures / Social contracts<br />

- intro to syllabus and parameters <strong>for</strong> discussion<br />

- guidelines <strong>for</strong> talking about and listening to difficult and personal issues and art.<br />

- pick a <strong>the</strong>me and choose an artist that you would like to learn about by next week.<br />

Jan. 12 - 17: <strong>In</strong>troducing <strong>Contemporary</strong> Theories of <strong>Identity</strong><br />

- What is <strong>Identity</strong>?<br />

- Developing Thesis Questions on <strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>Art</strong>ists<br />

Reading:<br />

- Dunn, selection from Identifying Consumption<br />

- Appiah, The Ethics of <strong>Identity</strong>, 1-61.<br />

- Fur<strong>the</strong>r Reading: Zygmunt Bauman, “From Pilgrim to Tourist – or a Short History of <strong>Identity</strong>”<br />

- Stephen Mitchell, “True Selves, False Selves, and <strong>the</strong> Ambiguity of Au<strong>the</strong>nticity”; Michel Foucault, “Discourse on<br />

Language,” Key excerpts; Bethan Benwell and Elizabeth Stokoe, “<strong>In</strong>troduction 1- 35” in Discourse and <strong>Identity</strong>;<br />

Stuart Hall, “Who Needs <strong>Identity</strong>?”<br />

Jan. 19 & 24: The Body and <strong>Identity</strong> -- Per<strong>for</strong>ming <strong>the</strong> Self<br />

Gilbert and George, Hannah Wilke, Carolee Schneemann, Eleanor Antin, Marina Abramovic and Ulay, Chris Burden,<br />

Vito Acconci, Viennese Actionists, Cindy Sherman, Jenny Saville, Yasumasu Morimura, Nikki S. Lee, Zhang Huan,<br />

Song Dong, Cang Xin, Pope L., Orlan, Laurie Anderson, Rebecca Horn, Mariko Mori, Rosemary Trockle, Gary Hill,<br />

Tim Hawkenson, Patty Chang, Rashaad Newsome, Kate Gilmore<br />

What is Identification?<br />

Reading:<br />

- Robertson and McDaniel, Themes in <strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>Art</strong>, “The Body”<br />

- Fur<strong>the</strong>r Reading: Erving Goffman, from The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life Jones, The <strong>Art</strong>ist’s Body,<br />

(Phaidon Themes Series); Christine Ross, “Fantasy and Distraction: An <strong>In</strong>terview with Pipilotti Rist,” Afterimage,<br />

(Nov. 2000); Donna Haraway, “The Cyborg Manifesto”; Stellarc, “Beyond <strong>the</strong> Body”; Judith Butler, Gender<br />

Trouble; Henry Sayre, The Object of Per<strong>for</strong>mance; Moser, Immersed in Technology; Dunn, Identifying<br />

Consumption<br />

Jan 31: Writing Class: Autobiography and <strong>Art</strong><br />

- Autobiography and <strong>In</strong>tersubjectivity<br />

Reading:<br />

- Bar<strong>the</strong>s, from Camera Lucida<br />

- Sylvan Barnet, “What is an <strong>In</strong>terpretation?” & “Critical Studies,” especially <strong>the</strong> sections on Biographical Studies<br />

and Psychoanalytic Studies, from Short Guide to Writing about <strong>Art</strong><br />

Assignment: (Due March 8 th )<br />

o Based on <strong>the</strong>se writings, develop a visual autobiography that responds to a work by <strong>the</strong> artist that<br />

you have chosen <strong>for</strong> your artist project. With an emphasis on singular image describe how it


6<br />

<strong>ART</strong> <strong>478</strong> Prof. Hamilton<br />

affects you, encapsulates or challenges certain things about your identity, identifications,<br />

personality, emotional attributes etc. Use <strong>the</strong> externalized image to describe your interior life. At<br />

least 2-3 pages. This can be used to develop your final <strong>the</strong>sis. A rough draft is due on March 8 th .<br />

Feb. 2 - 14: <strong>Identity</strong> Politics -- The 80s and 90s<br />

Anna Mendieta, Valie Export, Judy Chicago, Martha Rosler, Guerrilla Girls, Mary Kelly, Barbara Kruger, Janine<br />

Antoni, Alison Saar, Dorothy Cross, Pipilotti Rist, Romare Bearden, Faith Ringgold, Adrian Piper, Andres Serrano,<br />

Lorna Simpson, Coco Fusco, Kerry James Marshall, David Hammons, Michael Ray Charles, James Luna, Laura<br />

Aguilara, Cathy Opie, Guillermo Gomez-Pena, Warhol, Nicole Eisenmann, Iké Udé, Pepon Osorio, Paul McCarthy,<br />

Pepon Ossorio, Nan Goldin, Robert Mapplethorpe, Felix Gonzalez-Torres<br />

Reading:<br />

- Robertson and McDaniel, Themes in <strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>Art</strong>, “<strong>Identity</strong>”<br />

- Appiah, The Ethics of <strong>Identity</strong>, Chapter 3<br />

- Griselda Pollock, Rethinking <strong>the</strong> artist in <strong>the</strong> woman, <strong>the</strong> woman in <strong>the</strong> artist, and that old chestnut, <strong>the</strong> gaze,” in<br />

Women <strong>Art</strong>ist at <strong>the</strong> Millennium<br />

- Piper, “Triple Negation of Black Women <strong>Art</strong>ists”<br />

-<br />

- Fur<strong>the</strong>r Reading: Selection from <strong>the</strong> <strong>In</strong>troduction to <strong>Art</strong> and Feminism; “Post-feminism” from Understanding<br />

<strong>Contemporary</strong> Society: Theories of <strong>the</strong> Present; Heywood, L., A fifteen-year history of third-wave feminism;<br />

Cornel West, Race Matters; Coco Fusco, “Passionate Irreverence: The Cultural Politics of <strong>Identity</strong>”; Martin<br />

Berger, Sight Unseen: Whiteness and American Visual Culture in Reader Coco Fusco and Russell Ferguson,<br />

Only Skin Deep: Changing Visions of <strong>the</strong> American Self ; Griselda Pollock, “Trouble in <strong>the</strong> Archives” (from<br />

Looking Back Toward <strong>the</strong> Future); Cary Levine, "Manly Crafts: Mike Kelley's (Oxy)Moronic Gender Bending," <strong>Art</strong><br />

Journal, vol. 69, no. 1, Spring 2010 ; Martin Berger, <strong>In</strong>troduction, Sight Unseen: Whiteness and American Visual<br />

Culture<br />

- <strong>In</strong>tersections -- Fred Tomaselli, Wed. Feb. 15 th 6pm <strong>ART</strong> Auditorium – Extra Credit<br />

Feb. 16 - 23: Beyond <strong>Identity</strong> Politics<br />

Felix Gonzalez Torres, Jiri Kovanda, Jimmie Durham, Mat<strong>the</strong>w Barney, Paul Pfeiffer, Blake Simpson, Isaac Julien,<br />

Glenn Ligon, Laylah Ali, Ghada Amer, Jason Rhoades, Cai Guo-Qiang, Ann Hamilton, Gabriel Orozco, Mike Kelley,<br />

Kiki Smith, Michael Arcega, Vanessa Beecroft, Rineki Dijkstra, Mark Brad<strong>for</strong>d, Beatrice Searle, Peggy Chan, Phil<br />

Collins, Elizabeth Peyton, Mika Rottenburg, Erwin Wurm, Tino Seghal, Mark Brad<strong>for</strong>d, Juan Munoz, Steve McQueen,<br />

Feb. 21 st – “Who’s Afraid of Lady Gaga?” Brownbag. Kuy 106 12-1:30pm<br />

Presentations 21 st<br />

Judy Chicago<br />

Adrian Piper<br />

Ana Mendieta<br />

Marian Abramovic<br />

Presentations 23 rd<br />

Do Ho Suh<br />

Glenn Ligon<br />

Duane Michaels<br />

Reading:<br />

- Appiah, Ethics of <strong>Identity</strong>, Chapter 4<br />

- Susette Min, “The Last Asian American Exhibition in <strong>the</strong> Whole Entire World” from One Way or Ano<strong>the</strong>r: Asian<br />

American <strong>Art</strong> Now<br />

- Suzi Gablik, “Connective Aes<strong>the</strong>tics, <strong>Art</strong> after <strong>In</strong>dividualism”<br />

- Fur<strong>the</strong>r Reading: Armstrong and deZegher, Women <strong>Art</strong>ist at <strong>the</strong> Millenium; Russell Furgeson, “<strong>In</strong>visible<br />

<strong>Center</strong>” from Out There: Marginalization and <strong>Contemporary</strong> Culture Carolyn D’Cruz, “What Matter Who’s<br />

Speaking?: Au<strong>the</strong>nticity and <strong>Identity</strong> in Discourses of Aboriginal Australia”; Homi Bhabha, Location of Culture;<br />

Olu Oguibe, The Culture Game; Freestyle exhibition catalog; Toon Van Meijl and Jelle Miedema, <strong>In</strong>troduction to<br />

Shifting Images of <strong>Identity</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Pacific.


7<br />

<strong>ART</strong> <strong>478</strong> Prof. Hamilton<br />

Feb. 28 - March 6: Narrative, Memory, and <strong>Identity</strong><br />

Eric Fischl, Anselm Keifer, Carrie Mae Weems, Kara Walker, Walton Ford, William Kentridge, Jane Alexander, Doris<br />

Salcedo, Tracy Moffatt, Trenton Doyle Hancock, On Kawara, Ilya Kabokov, Amelia Mesa-Bains, Raymond Pettibon,<br />

Roger Shimomura, Dinh Q Lê, Zoe Leonard, Omer Fast, Peter Doig, Neo Rauch, Louise Bourgeois, Amy Cutler,<br />

Doris Salcedo, Lorrain O’Grady,<br />

Presentations March 6 th<br />

Zoe Leonard<br />

G. Richter<br />

T. Hawkinson<br />

Reading:<br />

- Robertson and McDaniel, Themes of <strong>Contemporary</strong> art, “Time and <strong>Art</strong>”<br />

- James Hannahan, “Kara Walker” (from New Histories)<br />

- Alcoff, L., “The Problem of Speaking <strong>for</strong> O<strong>the</strong>rs”<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r Reading: Jill Bennett, Emphatic Vision: Trauma, Affect, and <strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>Art</strong>, re/righting history:<br />

counter narratives; Stephen Heath, Questions of Cinema; Image and Narrative (Journal)<br />

March 8: First Draft Part I - Autobiographies Due – Citing<br />

Reading:<br />

- Bloom, from The Anxiety of <strong>In</strong>fluence<br />

- Sylvan Barnet, “How to Write an Effective Essay,” “Style in Writing,” “Quotations and Quotation<br />

Marks,” “Acknowledging Sources,” and “Citation” from A Short Guide to Writing About <strong>Art</strong> in Reader<br />

- http://www.indiana.edu/~wts/pamphlets/plagiarism.shtml<br />

March 8 - 20: Place, Space, and <strong>Identity</strong><br />

Helio Oiticica, Cildo Merieles, Joseph Beuys, Wodiczko, Tehching Hsieh, Rachel Whiteread, Fred Wilson, Mona<br />

Hatoum, Christian Boltanski, Maria Campos-Pons, Anselm Keifer, Do Ho-Suh, Shahzia Sikander, Tseng Kwong Chi,<br />

M<strong>the</strong>thwa Zwelethu, Georges Adegbo, Gillian Wearing, Mark Brad<strong>for</strong>d, Lorraine O Grady, Wodiczko, Rikrit Tiravanija,<br />

Renate Lucas,<br />

<strong>In</strong>tersections: Joao Ribas Monday, 19 @ 6pm, <strong>Art</strong> Auditorium – Extra Credit<br />

Presentations 20 th<br />

Kapoor<br />

Cai Guo-Qiang<br />

Tim Hawkinson<br />

Reading:<br />

- Robertson and McDaniel, Themes in <strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>Art</strong>, “Place”<br />

- Foucault, “Of O<strong>the</strong>r Spaces”<br />

- Frazer Ward, “Alien Duration: Tehching Hsieh, 1978-99”<br />

- Fur<strong>the</strong>r Reading: Irene Winter, “Fred Wilson” (from New Histories) ; Vilsoni Hereniko and Rob Wilson,<br />

<strong>In</strong>troduction to <strong>In</strong>side Out: Literature, Cultural Politics and <strong>Identity</strong> in <strong>the</strong> New Pacific; <strong>In</strong>troduction to Flow<br />

exhibition; BW E. Balibar and I. Wallerstein, 1991. Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities, London: Verso.<br />

Margo Machida, “Out of Asia: Negotiating Asian Idenitities in America,” in Asia/America: Identities in<br />

<strong>Contemporary</strong> Asian American <strong>Art</strong>; Bhabha, “Beyond <strong>the</strong> Pale: <strong>Art</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Age of Multicultural Translation”; Sarup,<br />

“Imperialism and Culture”; Nicholas Thomas, “The Dream of Joseph: Practices of <strong>Identity</strong> in Pacific <strong>Art</strong>”<br />

SPRING BREAK March 26-30


8<br />

<strong>ART</strong> <strong>478</strong> Prof. Hamilton<br />

March 22 and April 5: Soul Searching<br />

Shirit Neshat, Mona Hatoum, Bill Viola, Wolfgang Liab, Anish Kapoor, Mel Chin, John Feodorov, Shahzia Sikander,<br />

James Turrell, Willy Tjungurrayi (Pintupi), Pierre Huyghe, Douglas Gordon, Sigmar Polke, Joseph Beuys, Bruce<br />

Conner, Paul Chan, Doug Aitkins, <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> Tactical Magic<br />

- 1 page Outlines <strong>for</strong> Final Papers Due on April 5 th (see Barnett <strong>for</strong> guidelines)<br />

Presentations April 5 th<br />

Mariko Mori<br />

James Turrell<br />

Reading:<br />

- Appiah, Ethics of <strong>Identity</strong>, chapter 5<br />

- Robertson and McDaniel, Themes of <strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>Art</strong>, “Spirituality and <strong>Art</strong>”<br />

- Fur<strong>the</strong>r Reading: Weintraub, “Andreas Serrano”; Paul Chan, 7 Lights,<br />

http://www.newmuseum.org/exhibitions/20 ; Richard Francis, “Negotiating Rapture: an <strong>In</strong>troduction,” from<br />

Negotiating Rapture: The Power of <strong>Art</strong>; Centre Pompidou, Traces of <strong>the</strong> Sacred, 2008, Ecstasy: <strong>In</strong> and About<br />

Altered States (La MOMA), Kay Larson, “Keeping <strong>the</strong> Faith,” <strong>ART</strong>news, v. 105, v.2 (Feb. 2006): 98-101; Ackland<br />

<strong>Art</strong> Museum, Five <strong>Art</strong>ists, Five Faiths: Spirituality in <strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>Art</strong> ; Nevill Drury and Anna Voigt, Fire &<br />

Shadow: Spirituality in <strong>Contemporary</strong> Australian <strong>Art</strong>; Evans, Tim, “Nature as Teacher: The art of Manabu Ikeda,”<br />

<strong>ART</strong> AsiaPacific, n.44.<br />

April 10 - 17: Rooted Cosmopolitanism – <strong>the</strong> Millennial <strong>Identity</strong><br />

Shilpa Gupta, Corey Archangel, Kahinda Wiley, Jenny Saville, Abdel Adbessemad, Natlaie Durjberg, Shaun<br />

Gladwell, Daniel Guzman, Takashi Murakami, Sylvia Fleury, Andrea Zittel, Andreas Gursky, Christian Marclay, Xu<br />

Bing (Wenda Gu,) Yinka Shonibare, Walid Raad, Emily Jacir, Nikki S. Lee, Julie Mehretu, Marcel van Eeden, Aneta<br />

Greszykowska, Surasi Kusolwang, Creative Time<br />

Presentations April 17 th<br />

Takashi Murakami<br />

Elizabeth Peyton<br />

Keith Tyson<br />

Reading:<br />

- Appiah, Ethics of <strong>Identity</strong>, chapter 6<br />

- Paul Bains, “Subjectless Subjectivities”<br />

- Younger Tan Jesus Catalog – Cornell, “New Age Thinking” and Massimiliano Gioni, “We are Too Many”<br />

- Fur<strong>the</strong>r Reading: Homi Bhabha, Culture’s <strong>In</strong>-Between” Questions of Cultural <strong>Identity</strong><br />

- Nikos Papastergiadis, “Limits of Cultural Translation”; “Now in Moving Pictures: The Multitudes of Nikki S. Lee”;<br />

Masao Miyoshi, “A Borderless World?”; John Storey, from Cultural Consumption and Everyday Life From The<br />

Cultures of Globalization (Post-<strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>In</strong>terventions) by Fredric Jameson (Editor), Masao Miyoshi<br />

(Editor)] Noi Sawaragi, “On <strong>the</strong> Battlefield of ‘Superflat’: Subculture and <strong>Art</strong> in Postwar Japan” Gao Minglu,<br />

“Extensionality and <strong>In</strong>tentionality in a Transnational Cultural System”<br />

April 19-26: Collectivity<br />

Jorge and Lucy Orta, Critical <strong>Art</strong> Ensemble, Political <strong>Art</strong> Documentation/Distribution, REPOhistory; The Land, The<br />

<strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> Land Use <strong>In</strong>terpretation, Temporary Services, Las Agencias, <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> Tactical Magic, Radical Software<br />

Group, <strong>In</strong>stitute <strong>for</strong> Applied Autonomy, Yes Men, ®Rtmark, Knitta Collective<br />

Presentations 26 th<br />

Patty Chang<br />

Xue Song<br />

Olafur Eliasson<br />

Reading:<br />

Maria Lind, from The Collaborative Turn<br />

Claire Bishop, “The Social turn: Collaboration and its Discontents,” in Right About Now


9<br />

<strong>ART</strong> <strong>478</strong> Prof. Hamilton<br />

- [<strong>Art</strong>ist Project Fur<strong>the</strong>r Reading: Gregory Sholette, “Activist <strong>Art</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Counter-Public Sphere,” Gregory<br />

Sholette, The <strong>In</strong>terventionists: Users’ Manual <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Creative Disruption of Everyday Life; Stimson and Sholette,<br />

Collectivism after Modernism: The <strong>Art</strong> of Social Imagination after 1945, n]<br />

April 26: First Drafts II- Analysis Due<br />

May 1: Peer Reading Groups<br />

Final Papers Due May 9 th to my office, Rm. 222.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!