19.01.2013 Views

pa1778data.pdf

pa1778data.pdf

pa1778data.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

*<br />

U.S. STEEL DUQUESNE WORKS<br />

HAER No. PA-115<br />

(Page 98)<br />

on the fine particles of flue dust which remained entrained in<br />

the gas after it left the dust catcher. Much of this dust passed<br />

up through the stoves■ combustion chambers and became lodged in<br />

their checkerwork, thus constricting the openings provided for<br />

the passage of the gas as well as the cold blast air. Over time<br />

the checkerwork openings became completely clogged, rendering the<br />

stoves incapable of absorbing heat or giving it up. As a result,<br />

each stove had to be taken off line for a period of five or six<br />

days every two months for a complete cleaning which meant that<br />

for one-third of its time in operation the blast furnaces were<br />

deprived of one-fourth of their heating surface capacity.<br />

The decision to use four 3600 hp gas fired blowing engines,<br />

manufactured by the Snow Steam Pump Works, for the production of<br />

cold blast air at blast furnaces number five and six increased<br />

the need to provide the appropriate blast furnace plant equipment<br />

with clean gas. Because the engines required fuel gas almost<br />

completely free of entrained particulate, plant officials were<br />

faced with the prospect of furnishing them with very clean gas<br />

from the blast furnaces or buying natural gas from outside<br />

sources.<br />

In view of the difficulties experienced in the original<br />

system of producing and delivering combustion air to the blast<br />

furnaces, plant officials in 1908, led by Ambrose N. Diehl,<br />

superintendent of the blast furnace plant, devised an<br />

experimental gas cleaning plan. An industry wide pioneering<br />

effort, the four year long experiment was set up to compare the<br />

more traditional gas cleaning approach to a newly conceived wet<br />

gas cleaning system in terms of efficiency and cost<br />

effectiveness. In both systems gas flowing from the dustcatcher<br />

at each blast furnace was directed through an additional<br />

dustcatcher per furnace before it was combined into a single 8'-<br />

6" diameter rough gas main. From the rough gas main a portion of<br />

the gas was taken directly to the boilers and hot blast stoves at<br />

blast furnaces numbers one and two while the rest of it was<br />

conducted to the newly constructed wet system.<br />

The wet system, which was laid out linearly, consisted of<br />

nine 12 ! -0" diameter x 76'-0" high scrubbers arranged in<br />

parallel, four electric motor driven Sturtevant fans, each with a<br />

capacity of 84,000 cfm, and four horizontal Theisen gas washers.<br />

The scrubbers were theoretically designed to clean the gas to<br />

within one-fifth grain per cu. ft. while cooling it in order to<br />

remove most of its moisture, thus increasing its B. T. U. value.<br />

Under the experiment's original conception, gas traveling through<br />

the rough gas main leading to the wet washing system was first<br />

introduced into the bottom of one of the scrubbers. As the gas<br />

was rising up through the scrubber at a maximum rate of 30,000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!