pa1778data.pdf
pa1778data.pdf
pa1778data.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
U.S. STEEL DUQUESNE WORKS<br />
HAER No. PA-115<br />
(Page 43)<br />
equipment at the Duquesne Works created an atmosphere which<br />
provoked much conflict between corporate officials, county<br />
enforcement agencies, and environmental activists in the years<br />
succeeding the 1949 county-wide ordinance. The resolution of one<br />
such conflict, a controversy over the performance of air quality<br />
control equipment at the mill's electric furnace plant in the<br />
early 1970s, demonstrated the creative ways in which a<br />
public/private coalition could work together to solve common<br />
community problems.<br />
The controversy began in 1961 when the installation of an<br />
air cleaning system at the recently expanded electric furnace<br />
plant proved far too small for the task at hand. As a result,<br />
the plant emitted five to six times the amount of air pollution<br />
permitted by county law in 197 0. This violation prompted local<br />
environmental organizations like the Group Against Smog and<br />
Pollution (GASP) to call public attention to the problem. After<br />
a careful study of conditions at the Duquesne Works, the<br />
Allegheny County Air Pollution Control Bureau ordered U.S. Steel<br />
to comply with the county's air pollution control law by December<br />
31, 1970. In response, corporate officials requested an<br />
indefinite variance, claiming that there was no known practical<br />
method for controlling electric furnace smoke and particulate<br />
emission. This caused an uproar as representatives from GASP<br />
charged that the corporation had been stalling for years on<br />
serious anti-pollution measures at the Duquesne Works.<br />
Finally, after several months of negotiation, the bureau's<br />
appeal board granted a variance until July, 1971, when the<br />
company agreed to install an extensive smoke evacuation system at<br />
the electric furnace plant. In addition, the county agreed to<br />
finance the construction of the new air pollution control system<br />
with a $ 5 million loan through its Industrial Development<br />
Authority. The money was raised in the form of bonds which were<br />
sold by the county to a private securities firm. The firm, in<br />
turn, sold the bonds to individual investors under an arrangement<br />
whereby U.S. Steel paid off the principle and interest on the<br />
bonds through the payment of rental fees over a fifteen-year<br />
period. 56<br />
The successful examples, described above, of public/private<br />
efforts to enhance Allegheny County's air quality in the post-war<br />
period ultimately provided a model for labor and community<br />
activists to make a last ditch effort to reopen the Duquesne<br />
Works after U.S. Steel permanently shut it down in the fall of<br />
1984. This effort had actually begun in 1983 when USWA Local<br />
56 The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, June 2 9, 30, September 2,<br />
November 16, 1970, March 18, 1971, and January 14, 1972.