19.01.2013 Views

pa1778data.pdf

pa1778data.pdf

pa1778data.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

U.S. STEEL DUQUESNE WORKS<br />

HAER No. PA-115<br />

(Page 43)<br />

equipment at the Duquesne Works created an atmosphere which<br />

provoked much conflict between corporate officials, county<br />

enforcement agencies, and environmental activists in the years<br />

succeeding the 1949 county-wide ordinance. The resolution of one<br />

such conflict, a controversy over the performance of air quality<br />

control equipment at the mill's electric furnace plant in the<br />

early 1970s, demonstrated the creative ways in which a<br />

public/private coalition could work together to solve common<br />

community problems.<br />

The controversy began in 1961 when the installation of an<br />

air cleaning system at the recently expanded electric furnace<br />

plant proved far too small for the task at hand. As a result,<br />

the plant emitted five to six times the amount of air pollution<br />

permitted by county law in 197 0. This violation prompted local<br />

environmental organizations like the Group Against Smog and<br />

Pollution (GASP) to call public attention to the problem. After<br />

a careful study of conditions at the Duquesne Works, the<br />

Allegheny County Air Pollution Control Bureau ordered U.S. Steel<br />

to comply with the county's air pollution control law by December<br />

31, 1970. In response, corporate officials requested an<br />

indefinite variance, claiming that there was no known practical<br />

method for controlling electric furnace smoke and particulate<br />

emission. This caused an uproar as representatives from GASP<br />

charged that the corporation had been stalling for years on<br />

serious anti-pollution measures at the Duquesne Works.<br />

Finally, after several months of negotiation, the bureau's<br />

appeal board granted a variance until July, 1971, when the<br />

company agreed to install an extensive smoke evacuation system at<br />

the electric furnace plant. In addition, the county agreed to<br />

finance the construction of the new air pollution control system<br />

with a $ 5 million loan through its Industrial Development<br />

Authority. The money was raised in the form of bonds which were<br />

sold by the county to a private securities firm. The firm, in<br />

turn, sold the bonds to individual investors under an arrangement<br />

whereby U.S. Steel paid off the principle and interest on the<br />

bonds through the payment of rental fees over a fifteen-year<br />

period. 56<br />

The successful examples, described above, of public/private<br />

efforts to enhance Allegheny County's air quality in the post-war<br />

period ultimately provided a model for labor and community<br />

activists to make a last ditch effort to reopen the Duquesne<br />

Works after U.S. Steel permanently shut it down in the fall of<br />

1984. This effort had actually begun in 1983 when USWA Local<br />

56 The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, June 2 9, 30, September 2,<br />

November 16, 1970, March 18, 1971, and January 14, 1972.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!