pa1778data.pdf
pa1778data.pdf
pa1778data.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
#<br />
the plant might be closed for good. 36<br />
U.S. STEEL DUQUESNE WORKS<br />
HAER No. PA-115<br />
(Page 29)<br />
Adding to the uncertainty of the mill's future was the<br />
enactment of smoke control legislation by Allegheny County in<br />
1949 which threatened its ability to produce ferromanganese. A<br />
common alloy in steelmaking, ferromanganese was produced for<br />
consumption by U. S. Steel's Monongahela Valley mills at the<br />
blast furnaces of the corporation's Isabella Furnace Plant,<br />
Clairton Works, and Duquesne Works. A necessary by-product of<br />
ferromanganese production was a dense, pyrophoric fume which<br />
could not be entirely cleaned by conventional gas cleaning<br />
methods. Consequently, much of the fume or flue dust had to be<br />
emitted into the atmosphere through blast furnace bleeder stacks.<br />
Under the terms of the smoke control ordinance, however, this<br />
practice was precluded by stringent requirements that limited the<br />
amount of flue dust admitted legally into the atmosphere to .5 or<br />
less pounds per 1,000 pounds of gas produced. As a result, U .S.<br />
Steel was faced with the choice of developing a comprehensive<br />
system of cleaning ferromanganese gas or abandoning production of<br />
the product in Allegheny County. The corporation experimented<br />
with several methods of cleaning the gas with only limited<br />
success. Finally, a successful pilot plant was built at the<br />
Isabella Furnaces that both cleaned the gas and sintered the flue<br />
dust into briquettes. A full-scale system was built at the<br />
Duquesne Works in 1953. The great expense of building and<br />
maintaining the system combined with the negligible reuse value<br />
of the flue dust (i.e. the briquettes could not be recharged back<br />
into the furnace because of their high alkali content), induced<br />
the corporation to centralize its Monongahela Valley<br />
ferromanganese production facilities at the Duquesne Works. With<br />
this decision, U. S. Steel insured the immediate future of the<br />
mill as a productive facility. 37<br />
In the years following the installation of the<br />
ferromanganese gas cleaning facility, the works underwent a<br />
36 Kenneth Warren, The American Steel Industry, 1850-1970: A<br />
Geographical Interpretation, (Pittsburgh: 1989), 287; Duquesne<br />
Works, Steelmaking Division. "Steel Production Conference," 1;<br />
Reference to the Kennywood Park announcement about the possible<br />
closure of the Duquesne Works can be found in U. S. Steel Chairman<br />
Edgar Speer's "U. S. is Being Legislated into a No Growth Society,"<br />
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, June 8, 1976.<br />
37 "Ferromanganese Cleaning Plant Starts Up on Duquesne<br />
Furnace," Iron and Steel Engineer 30(August 1953): 136, 139; C. H.<br />
Good Jr. , "Ferromanganese Furnace Fumes Cleaned Successfully, " Xr_o_n<br />
Age 170(July 8, 1954): 95-7; "Duquesne Streamlines Ferro<br />
Operations," U. S. Steel News 21(July 1956): 29-31.