19.01.2013 Views

pa1778data.pdf

pa1778data.pdf

pa1778data.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

#<br />

the plant might be closed for good. 36<br />

U.S. STEEL DUQUESNE WORKS<br />

HAER No. PA-115<br />

(Page 29)<br />

Adding to the uncertainty of the mill's future was the<br />

enactment of smoke control legislation by Allegheny County in<br />

1949 which threatened its ability to produce ferromanganese. A<br />

common alloy in steelmaking, ferromanganese was produced for<br />

consumption by U. S. Steel's Monongahela Valley mills at the<br />

blast furnaces of the corporation's Isabella Furnace Plant,<br />

Clairton Works, and Duquesne Works. A necessary by-product of<br />

ferromanganese production was a dense, pyrophoric fume which<br />

could not be entirely cleaned by conventional gas cleaning<br />

methods. Consequently, much of the fume or flue dust had to be<br />

emitted into the atmosphere through blast furnace bleeder stacks.<br />

Under the terms of the smoke control ordinance, however, this<br />

practice was precluded by stringent requirements that limited the<br />

amount of flue dust admitted legally into the atmosphere to .5 or<br />

less pounds per 1,000 pounds of gas produced. As a result, U .S.<br />

Steel was faced with the choice of developing a comprehensive<br />

system of cleaning ferromanganese gas or abandoning production of<br />

the product in Allegheny County. The corporation experimented<br />

with several methods of cleaning the gas with only limited<br />

success. Finally, a successful pilot plant was built at the<br />

Isabella Furnaces that both cleaned the gas and sintered the flue<br />

dust into briquettes. A full-scale system was built at the<br />

Duquesne Works in 1953. The great expense of building and<br />

maintaining the system combined with the negligible reuse value<br />

of the flue dust (i.e. the briquettes could not be recharged back<br />

into the furnace because of their high alkali content), induced<br />

the corporation to centralize its Monongahela Valley<br />

ferromanganese production facilities at the Duquesne Works. With<br />

this decision, U. S. Steel insured the immediate future of the<br />

mill as a productive facility. 37<br />

In the years following the installation of the<br />

ferromanganese gas cleaning facility, the works underwent a<br />

36 Kenneth Warren, The American Steel Industry, 1850-1970: A<br />

Geographical Interpretation, (Pittsburgh: 1989), 287; Duquesne<br />

Works, Steelmaking Division. "Steel Production Conference," 1;<br />

Reference to the Kennywood Park announcement about the possible<br />

closure of the Duquesne Works can be found in U. S. Steel Chairman<br />

Edgar Speer's "U. S. is Being Legislated into a No Growth Society,"<br />

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, June 8, 1976.<br />

37 "Ferromanganese Cleaning Plant Starts Up on Duquesne<br />

Furnace," Iron and Steel Engineer 30(August 1953): 136, 139; C. H.<br />

Good Jr. , "Ferromanganese Furnace Fumes Cleaned Successfully, " Xr_o_n<br />

Age 170(July 8, 1954): 95-7; "Duquesne Streamlines Ferro<br />

Operations," U. S. Steel News 21(July 1956): 29-31.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!