19.01.2013 Views

pa1778data.pdf

pa1778data.pdf

pa1778data.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

#<br />

U.S. STEEL DUQUESNE WORKS<br />

HAER No. PA-115<br />

(Page 108)<br />

effected a plugging of system pipes and spray nozzles.<br />

Furthermore, there developed a tendency in the system for<br />

microbiological organisms to accumulate, which in their natural<br />

life cycle reproduced and caused foul and slimy masses to build<br />

up in the system. In an effort to allay the possibility of<br />

blockage, a variety of chemicals were introduced at the<br />

clarifier, hot well, cold well, and the gas cleaning facilities<br />

at blast furnaces number three, four, and six. These included<br />

sulfuric or hydrochloric acid and/or dispersant for mineral<br />

scale, polymers and surfactant for suspended solids, and biocides<br />

for slime. Despite the addition of these chemicals, the<br />

prevalence of mineral scale, suspended solids, and slime due in<br />

part to the evaporation of water at the cooling towers forced<br />

plant managers to blowdown up to 147 0 gpm of wastewater into<br />

either the slag pits at blast furnaces number one and six or the<br />

river. A corresponding amount of make-up water had to be drawn<br />

into the system from the river.<br />

Although the E.P.A. allowed plant operatives to blowdown as<br />

much as 1470 gpm of wastewater upon start-up of the water<br />

treatment system, progressively stricter guidelines required that<br />

blowdown values not exceed 610 gpm. Given the problems regarding<br />

the increasing concentration of system plugging substances due to<br />

the evaporation of water at the cooling tower, it became<br />

increasingly difficult to meet the more stringent blowdown<br />

guidelines. Moreover, as water passing over the cooling tower<br />

evaporated, it emitted levels of carbon monoxide into the<br />

atmosphere which exceeded E.P.A. standards. As a result of both<br />

of these factors, plant officials shut down the evaporative<br />

system after only one year of operation as part of ongoing<br />

negotiations with the E.P.A. The talks culminated in a<br />

settlement whereby the company agreed to retire blast furnaces<br />

numbers one and three and build a new non-evaporative recycle<br />

water treatment system for Dorothy Six. Built in 1980, the non-<br />

evaporative system was designed to treat 4800 gpm of process<br />

water. It was composed of a gas washer hot well, a gas cooler<br />

hot well, a spray well, two shell and tube type heat exchangers,<br />

and associated chemical feed equipment.<br />

The key components of the new system were the spray well and<br />

heat exchangers. Instead of running the process water through<br />

spray nozzles, thus exposing it to the evaporative effect of the<br />

atmosphere, gas washer and gas cooler water was passed from their<br />

respective hot wells through the heat exchanger tubes which were<br />

in turn sprayed by water from the spray well. The process water<br />

was then pumped over to the gas washer and gas cooling tower<br />

directly from the heat exchangers. In this manner, the process<br />

water was cooled from a temperature of 125° F to 90° P. while

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!