19.01.2013 Views

pa1778data.pdf

pa1778data.pdf

pa1778data.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

•<br />

#<br />

#<br />

U.S. STEEL DUQUESNE WORKS<br />

HAER No. PA-115<br />

(Page 102)<br />

of the original gas scrubbers installed in 1908. A more<br />

significance industry-wide innovation was the installation of a<br />

new ferromanganese gas cleaning system in 1953. Begun in 1949 at<br />

blast furnace number two, the production of ferromanganese<br />

generated waste gases with qualities much different than those<br />

produced in furnaces on basic iron. The temperature of the gas<br />

(750° F.), for example, was nearly double the temperature at<br />

which gas from basic iron production left the furnace. Second,<br />

after leaving the dust catcher, the quantity of fine entrained<br />

particulate (about eight grains per cubic foot) was also double<br />

that contained in the flue gas emanating from furnaces on basic<br />

iron production. Consequently, it was impossible to clean all of<br />

the gas flowing from a furnace on ferromanganese by conventional<br />

methods. This meant that much of the fume had to be emitted into<br />

the atmosphere through bleeder stacks located at the top of the<br />

furnace. Third, the floury composition of the flue dust from<br />

ferromanganese furnaces made it difficult to store as it would<br />

become air-borne in the slightest breeze. Compounding the<br />

problems associated with ferromanganese production was the<br />

pyrophoric nature of the flue dust which made it susceptible to<br />

spontaneous combustion upon exposure to the atmosphere.<br />

Efforts to find solutions to these practical problems were<br />

further influenced by smoke control legislation passed by<br />

Allegheny County in 1949. Among the most stringent in the nation<br />

for its time, the ordinance limited flue dust emissions to .5 or<br />

less pounds per 1,000 pounds of gas produced, mandating that 85<br />

percent of all industrial gas produced be removed.<br />

Over the years several cleaning methods and types of<br />

equipment were tried at Duquesne without appreciable success.<br />

For example, ferromanganese gas was run through an electrical<br />

precipitator after it had passed through the plant's conventional<br />

gas cleaning equipment. This experiment lasted less than a year<br />

as the great quantity of dust generated in ferromanganese<br />

production completely clogged up the precipitator at frequent<br />

intervals. Finally, after years of research conducted by the<br />

United States Steel Corporation in conjunction with engineers<br />

from the Research Corporation at the Isabella furnace plant in<br />

Etna, Pa., a workable solution to the cleaning problem was found.<br />

It resulted in the installation of the industry's first cleaning<br />

plant devoted solely to ferromanganese gas at the Duquesne Works.<br />

The plant consisted of five parallel units, each composed of a<br />

gas conditioning tower, an electrical precipitator, a screw<br />

conveyor-fed rotary kiln, and a continuous mixer. Two additional<br />

bucket conveyor-fed intensive mixers served all five units before<br />

discharging the flue dust into a briquetting press.<br />

The process began with the transfer of the flue gas from the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!