June 17, 2011 To: Georgia Department of Community Affairs 60 ...

June 17, 2011 

To: Georgia Department of Community Affairs 

60 Executive Park South, NE 

Atlanta, Georgia 30329-2231 

RE: Veranda Blackshear, UC project 2011.2232.01 

Ladies/Gentlemen: 

625 HOLCOMB BRIDGE ROAD ♦ NORCROSS, GEORGIA 30071 

Tel: 770/209-0029 ♦ Fax: 770/582-2900 ♦ Client Services: 800/266-0990 

http://www.unitedconsulting.com ♦ E-mail: united@unitedconsulting.com 

Veranda Blackshear 

2011.2232.01 

I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental 

Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 C.F.R. 312. 

I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the 

nature, history and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed the all appropriate 

inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 C.F.R. Part 312. 

June 17, 2011 ________________________________________ 

Ian G. Pilling, LEED AP 

Senior Environmental Specialist 

We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and 

limitation of 40 C.F.R. Part 312 and ASTM E 1527-05 of the Veranda Blackshear site, the property. Any 

exceptions to, or deletions from this practice are described in Section 2.2.2 of this report. We certify that 

the Phase I was performed by a qualified Environmental Professional meeting the requirements set forth 

in 40 C.F.R. §312.10(b). 

June 17, 2011 _______________________________________ 

Scott D. Smelter, Principal 

Principal of Consultant Firm 

June 17, 2011 _______________________________________ 

Timothy J. Beck, P.G., Vice President 

Professional Geologist 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

UNITED CONSULTING 

625 Holcomb Bridge Road | Norcross, GA 30071 | (770) 209-0029 

www.unitedconsulting.com 

REPORT 

Phase I 

Environmental Assessment 


940 Ware Street 

Pierce County 

Blackshear, Georgia 

Project Number 


Report Date: 


Regulatory 

Review: 

April 21, 2011 

Site Visit: 

May 10 & 11, 2011


Ms. Audrey Martin 

Realtex Development Corporation 

1101 S. Capital of Texas Highway 

Bldg. F, Suite 200 

Austin, TX 78746 

RE: Phase I Environmental Assessment 



Blackshear, Pierce County, Georgia 

Project No. 2011.2232.01 

Dear Ms. Martin: 






United Consulting is pleased to submit this report of our Phase I Environmental Assessment for the 

above-referenced project. The results of the environmental assessment and our comments pertinent to this 

project are included in the enclosed report. The Phase I Environmental Assessment was performed in 

substantial conformance with the standards developed by the American Society for Testing and Materials 

(ASTM) and with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), ”All Appropriate 

Inquiry” Rules, dated November 1, 2005 (Rules), annotated per DCA’s 2011 Environmental Manual 

requirements. In addition, this assessment was performed to conform with the Housing and Urban 

Development (HUD) guidelines referenced in the DCA manual. This report has been prepared for the use 

of Realtex Development Corporation, the Georgia Housing and Finance Authority (GHFA), and the 

DCA. Any materials referenced or presented herein are, according to United Consulting, believed to be 

accurate and may be relied upon by the above parties. 

We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with this project. Please contact us if you have any questions 

or if we can be of further assistance. 

Respectfully, 


Ian G. Pilling, LEED AP David P. Huetter 

Senior Environmental Specialist Associate Environmental Specialist 

IGP/DPH/tl 

SP: 2011.2232.01.dca.doc 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

TABLE OF CONTENTS 



1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

1.1 Location and Legal Description of the Property ....................................................................4 

1.2 Environmental Concerns and Conclusions .............................................................................4 

1.2.1 On-Site ..................................................................................................................4 

1.2.2 Off-Site .................................................................................................................5 

1.3 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................5 

1.3.1 On-Site ..................................................................................................................5 

1.3.2 Off-Site .................................................................................................................5 

2.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................5 

2.1 Background .............................................................................................................................5 

2.2 Procedures ..............................................................................................................................6 

2.3 Significant Assumptions .........................................................................................................7 

2.4 Qualifications of Personnel/Documentation of qualifications as an “Environmental 

Professional” .................................................................................................................................7 

2.5 Assessment of Specialized Knowledge or Experience of User and/or “Environmental 

Professional” .................................................................................................................................8 

2.6 Limitations and Exceptions ....................................................................................................8 

2.7 Special or Additional Conditions or Contract Terms .............................................................9 

3.0 SITE SETTING .........................................................................................................................9 

3.1 General Description of the Site and Vicinity .........................................................................9 

3.1.1 Current Site Use and Description .......................................................................10 

3.1.2 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties .................................................................10 

3.1.3 Description of Structures, Roads, and Other Improvements ..............................10 

3.2 Hydrogeology .......................................................................................................................10 

3.2.1 Geologic Setting .................................................................................................10 

3.2.2 Surface Drainage .................................................................................................11 

3.2.3 Groundwater .......................................................................................................11 

3.3 Wetlands ...............................................................................................................................11 

3.4 Floodplain/Floodway ............................................................................................................12 

3.5 State Waters ..........................................................................................................................12 

3.6 Endangered Species ..............................................................................................................13 

4.0 REGULATORY INFORMATION..........................................................................................13 

4.1 Data Review .........................................................................................................................13 

4.1.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources ...........................................................13 

4.1.1.1 Sites Listed in Section 8.2.1 of ASTM E 1527-05 and in Exhibit B1 ...... 16 

4.1.1.2 Orphan/Unmappable Sites ........................................................................ 16 

4.1.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources ........................................................16 

4.1.2.1 Local Brownfield Lists ............................................................................. 16 

4.1.2.2 Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites .................................. 17 

4.1.2.3 Local Lists of Hazardous Waste/Contaminated Sites ............................... 17 

4.1.2.4 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks .................................................. 17 

4.1.2.5 Local Land Records (for activity and use limitations) ............................. 17 

4.1.2.6 Records of Emergency Release Reports ................................................... 17 

4.1.2.7 Records of Contaminated Public Wells .................................................... 17 

4.1.2.8 Planning Department Records .................................................................. 18 

4.1.2.9 Local/Regional Pollution Control Agency Records ................................. 18 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



4.1.2.10 Local/Regional Water Quality Agency Records .................................... 18 

4.1.2.11 Local Electric Utility Company .............................................................. 18 

4.1.2.12 Other ....................................................................................................... 18 

4.2 Agency Contacts/Records ....................................................................................................18 

4.2.1 Local Fire Department Official ...........................................................................19 

4.2.2 State, Local or Regional Health or Environmental Agency ...............................19 

4.2.3 Local Building Permit Agency Official ..............................................................19 

4.2.4 Local Groundwater Use Permit Agency Official................................................19 

4.3 Interviews .............................................................................................................................19 

4.3.1 Current Key Site Manager, Occupants, or Owners of the Property ...................20 

4.3.2 Current Owners or Occupants of Neighboring Properties ..................................20 

4.3.3 Past Owners, Occupants, or Operators of the Property ......................................20 

4.3.4 User(s) .................................................................................................................20 

4.3.4.1 Title Records ............................................................................................. 20 

4.3.4.2 Environmental Liens ................................................................................. 21 

4.3.4.3 Specialized Knowledge of the User .......................................................... 21 

4.3.4.4 Commonly Known/Reasonably Ascertainable Information ..................... 21 

4.3.4.5 Reason for Performing the Phase I ........................................................... 21 

4.3.4.6 Relationship of Purchase Price to Fair Market Value............................... 21 

4.3.4.6.1 Purchase Price .................................................................................. 21 

4.3.4.6.2 Differential Between Purchase Price and Market Value ................. 21 

4.3.4.6.3 Reasons For Any Differential .......................................................... 21 

5.0 SITE INFORMATION AND USE ..........................................................................................22 

5.1 Site Reconnaissance Methodology and Limiting Conditions ..............................................22 

5.2 General Site Setting ..............................................................................................................22 

5.3 Assessment of Commonly Known/Reasonably Ascertainable Information ........................22 

5.4 Current Site Use ...................................................................................................................22 

5.4.1 Storage Tanks .....................................................................................................22 

5.4.2 Hazardous and Petroleum Products Containers/Drums ......................................22 

5.4.3 Heating and Cooling ...........................................................................................23 

5.4.4 Solid Waste .........................................................................................................23 

5.4.5 Sewage Disposal / Septic Tanks .........................................................................23 

5.4.6 Hydraulic Equipment ..........................................................................................23 

5.4.7 Contracted Maintenance Services .......................................................................23 

5.4.8 Electrical Equipment / PCBs ..............................................................................23 

5.4.9 Water Supply and Wells .....................................................................................23 

5.4.10 Drains and Sumps .............................................................................................23 

5.4.11 Pits, Ponds, Lagoons and Surface Water ..........................................................23 

5.4.12 Stressed Vegetation ...........................................................................................24 

5.4.13 Stained Soil or Pavement ..................................................................................24 

5.4.14 Odors .................................................................................................................24 

5.4.15 Utilities / Roadway Easements .........................................................................24 

5.4.16 Chemical Use ....................................................................................................24 

5.4.17 Water Leaks / Mold / Fungi / Microbial Growth ..............................................24 

5.4.18 Asbestos ............................................................................................................24 

5.4.19 Lead-Based Paint ..............................................................................................24 

5.4.20 Lead in Drinking Water ....................................................................................25 

5.4.21 Radon: ...............................................................................................................26 

5.4.22 Noise .................................................................................................................26 

5.4.23 Vapor Encroachment Screening .......................................................................27 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



5.4.24 Other Site Reconnaissance Issues .....................................................................27 

5.5 Past Site Use .........................................................................................................................27 

5.5.1 Recorded Land Title Records .............................................................................27 

5.5.2 Environmental Liens ...........................................................................................27 

5.5.3 Activity and Use Limitations ..............................................................................28 

5.5.4 Aerial Photographs and Topographic Maps .......................................................28 

5.5.5 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps .............................................................................28 

5.5.6 City Directories ...................................................................................................28 

5.5.7 Previous Environmental Studies .........................................................................28 

5.5.8 Other ...................................................................................................................29 

5.6 Current Surrounding Land Use ............................................................................................29 

5.6.1 North ...................................................................................................................29 

5.6.2 East ......................................................................................................................29 

5.6.3 South ...................................................................................................................29 

5.6.4 West ....................................................................................................................29 

5.7 Past Surrounding Land Use ..................................................................................................30 

5.7.1 North ...................................................................................................................31 

5.7.2 East ......................................................................................................................31 

5.7.3 South ...................................................................................................................31 

5.7.4 West ....................................................................................................................31 

5.8 Historic Preservation ............................................................................................................31 

6.0 DATA GAPS ...........................................................................................................................31 

6.1 Identification of Data Gaps ..................................................................................................31 

6.2 Sources of Information Consulted to Address Data Gaps ....................................................32 

6.3 Significance of Data Gaps ....................................................................................................32 

7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS .........................................................................................33 

7.1 On-Site ..................................................................................................................................33 

7.2 Off-Site .................................................................................................................................33 

8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................33 

8.1 On-Site ..................................................................................................................................33 

8.2 Off-Site .................................................................................................................................34 

9.0 DATA REFERENCES ............................................................................................................34 

10.0 VALUATION REDUCTION ................................................................................................35 

10.1 Purchase Price ....................................................................................................................35 

10.2 Interview of Broker Regarding Market Value ....................................................................35 

10.3 Differential between Purchase Price and Market Value .....................................................35 

10.4 Environmental Reasons For Any Differential ....................................................................36 

TABLES 

Table 1 - Regulatory Agency Review 

Table 2 - Summary of Identified Facilities 

Table 3 - Area Reconnaissance Information 

Table 4 - Summary of Potential Data Failures/Gaps 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

APPENDICES 



Appendix A Figures and Maps 

Figure 1 National Wetlands Inventory Map 

Figure 2 FEMA Floodplain Map 

Figure 3 Site Plan (showing anticipated groundwater flow direction) 

Figure 4 USGS Topographic Map 

Appendix B Photographs 

Appendix C Historical Research Documentation 

1. Historic Aerial Maps 

2. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps (not applicable) 

3. Historic Topographic Maps 

4. City Directories 

Appendix D Documentation From Title Company/Title Professional 

1. Recorded Land Title Records 

2. Records of environmental liens and activity and use limitations 

3. Legal Description 

Appendix E Phase II Report (not applicable) 

1. Current Phase II – Scope of Work (not applicable) 

2. Current Phase II (not applicable) 

3. Other Testing Results 

a. Lead-Based Paint 

b. Lead in Soil (not applicable) 

c. Lead in Water 

d. Asbestos 

e. Radon 

f. Vapor Encroachment Screening (not applicable) 

4. Previous Phase II Reports (not applicable) 

Appendix F Regulatory Search Information 

Appendix G Record of Communications and Interviews 

1. User/applicant interview 

2. Interview of owners and occupants of neighboring properties 

3. Documentation of attempts to interview: 

a. Local fire department 

b. State or health department or environmental agency 

c. Local agency responsible for issuance of building permits 

d. Local agency responsible for issuance of groundwater permits 

Appendix H Author Credentials, Documentation of Qualification as an “Environmental 

Professional” 

Appendix I Previous Environmental Reports (not applicable) 

Appendix J Noise Assessment Documentation (not applicable) 

1. Noise Assessment Report 

2. Noise Attenuation Plan 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

Appendix K Additional HOME Requirements 

1. HOME and HUD Environmental Questionnaire 

2. HOME and HUD Questionnaire supporting documentation 

3. 8-step process for floodplains and wetlands (not applicable) 

Appendix L Owners Environmental Questionnaire 

Appendix M Property Log and Information Checklist 

Appendix N Proof of Insurance 

Appendix O Letters of Reference 

Appendix P Environmental Certification 

Appendix Q Consumer Confidence Report on Water Quality 

Appendix R Endangered Species Documentation 

Appendix S SHPO Review Documentation 

Appendix T Operation and Maintenance Manual (not applicable) 

Appendix U Other 



9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 

Page 4 of 36 



United Consulting has performed a Phase I Environmental Assessment for the Veranda 

Blackshear property (hereinafter referred to as the Project Site) in substantial conformance with 

the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-05 and the guidelines established by the 

Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA), dated 2011. 

1.1 Location and Legal Description of the Property 

A Phase I Environmental Assessment has been completed on the Project Site referenced by the 

address of 940 Ware Street in Blackshear, Pierce County, Georgia. The Project Site was 

approximately 7.2-acres of land, located in Land Lot 46, 9 th District of Pierce County, Georgia. 

The text of the report provides more detailed discussion of the items summarized below. A legal 

description is located in appendix D. 

1.2 Environmental Concerns and Conclusions 

The Phase I Environmental Assessment (Phase I) included document research, interviews and 

site reconnaissance. The results of the site reconnaissance, research, and analysis are provided 

below: 

1.2.1 On-Site 

The Project Site consisted of an approximate 7.2-acre tract of land that was developed with 

sixteen apartment buildings containing 64 units and a community center building. The Project 

Site was historically undeveloped land utilized as an orchard prior to the development of the 

apartment complex on the Project Site in the late 1970s. The Project Site was not listed on the 

federal or state databases we reviewed. No visual evidence of Recognized Environmental 

Conditions (RECs) on the Project Site such as stained soils, stressed vegetation, drums, land 

filling, or illegal disposal of hazardous substances was identified. Based on the entirety of the 

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, no on-site RECs were identified. 

• Regulated concentrations of asbestos were identified in bulk samples collected from the 

Project Site. 

• No lead based paint was identified above the current Department of Housing and Urban 

Development (HUD) action level of 0.5% lead by weight or 1.0 milligrams per kilogram 

(mg/kg). 

• No visual indications of mold were observed. No significant mold issues were observed 

within the units observed. 

1 This Executive Summary is not intended to be used or relied upon without reference to the entire report and 

cannot otherwise be properly understood and interpreted. It is provided solely for the convenience of the Client and 

not as a substitute for the report or review of the report. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



• Based on United Consulting’s investigation, there are no wetlands or state waters located 

on the Project Site. 

1.2.2 Off-Site 

The Project Site was immediately surrounded by roads, undeveloped land, residential 

developments, and recreational ball fields. Based on review of the regulatory database report no 

regulated facilities were identified within the various search distances from the Project Site. 

1.3 Recommendations 

1.3.1 On-Site 

No visual evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions at the Project Site such as stained 

soils, stressed vegetation, drums, land filling or illegal disposal of hazardous substances was 

identified during our reconnaissance. No further investigation or action is recommended to 

determine the presence of RECs originating on the Project Site. 

1.3.2 Off-Site 

Surrounding properties were a mixture of roads, residential developments, and a recreation ball 

fields. No listed, regulated facilities were identified within the prescribed search distances from 

the Project Site. United Consulting does not recommend further assessment of the Project Site 

for off-site sources. 

2.1 Background 

2.0 INTRODUCTION 

United Consulting was retained by Realtex Development Corporation to perform a Phase I 

Environmental Assessment of the Project Site. This assessment was conducted with the 

understanding that the client proposes to renovate the existing apartment complex located on the 

Project Site. The purpose of this assessment was to determine whether the property is 

environmentally suitable for multifamily housing, and whether there is evidence of Recognized 

Environmental Conditions (RECs) on or adjacent to the Project Site, which could impose an 

environmental liability on the Project Site. The purpose of this assessment was therefore to 

satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on 

CERCLA liability, innocent landowner protection, and the contiguous property owner 

protection. 

The intent was to identify conditions indicative of releases and threatened releases of hazardous 

substances on, at, in, or to the property, and to conduct all appropriate inquiry into the previous 


9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



ownership and uses of the property. A standard approach was used, which substantially 

followed the methodology developed by the American Society for Testing and Materials 

(ASTM) Practice E 1527-05 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I 

Environmental Site Assessment Process, the All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) Rules, 40 CFR 312 2 , 

annotated per the DCA 2011 Environmental Manual requirements. The ASTM approach 

constitutes a limited, but commercially prudent and reasonable, inquiry. This assessment was 

performed to identify environmental concerns that may be discerned by visual observation and 

information-gathering procedures. 

2.2 Procedures 

The general procedures, scope of services, deviations, United Consulting’s qualifications, and 

the limitations are included in the following sections of this report, and include: 

• Reconnaissance of the Project Site and surrounding area, with a focus on environmental 

issues; 

• Research of readily available Federal and State environmental agency records for 

evidence of hazardous substances or related activities on or near the Project Site; 

• Review of historic maps and aerial photographs to assess area history and past use of the 

Project Site; 

• Review of the Pierce County title records for evidence of hazardous waste liens, 

industrial use, or other environmental concerns pertaining to the Project Site as provided 

by the client; 

• Interviews with residents near the Project Site to assess past and present activities which 

may have impacted the Project Site; 

• Interviews with five government agencies (as required by the DCA), including local fire 

and health officials as possible; 

• Assessing for potential vapor intrusion risks, including a tier one screening per the 

ASTM Standard for “Assessment of Vapor Intrusion into Structures”, E2600-08; 

• Completion of the DCA Environmental Review Documentation Information checklist 

and review of the Owner Environmental Questionnaire and Disclosure Statement, and 

2 Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 312 (40 CFR 312), Standards and Practices for All Appropriate 

Inquiries, Effective November 1, 2006, as published in the Federal Register: November 1, 2005 (Volume 70, 

Number 210), pages 66069-66113. 


9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



• Preparation of this report to document the results of the site reconnaissance, historical 

and regulatory research and interviews, and to provide United Consulting's professional 

opinion of the environmental condition of the Project Site. 

The Phase I Environmental Assessment was performed to substantially meet the requirements of 

ASTM for such investigations. The technical requirements of the ASTM standard, revised in the 

year 2005, were followed. Deviations made from the ASTM standard include use of the DCAmandated 

format and review of certain non-scope, DCA-mandated issues. 

2.3 Significant Assumptions 

This Assessment was based on the following significant assumptions in the preparation of this 

report: 

• Site Use – This assessment was conducted for a DCA tax credit application with the 

understanding that the client proposed to renovate the existing apartment complex 

located on the Project Site. 

• Groundwater Flow Direction - The direction of groundwater flow in the area of the 

property has been inferred based on the site observations of topographic slope, proximity 

of nearby water bodies, and review of the current USGS topographic map. 

• Regulatory Records Information - We assume that all information provided by 

Environmental Data Resources, Inc., (EDR) regarding the regulatory status of facilities 

within the minimum search distances is complete, accurate, and current. 

• Data Gaps – Only the identified significant data gaps affect the assessment. 

• Other - This assessment is also based on all information provided through interviews of 

pertinent agencies, occupants, users, and persons familiar with the property being 

complete and unbiased. 

These limitations are referred to in the ASTM Standard as assumptions. They form part of the 

basis for the assessment performed for this Project Site. If any of these items are not accurate, 

United Consulting must be so informed so appropriate re-assessment can be performed. 

2.4 Qualifications of Personnel/Documentation of qualifications as an 

“Environmental Professional” 

United Consulting has been providing engineering and environmental service for over 20 years. 

The Principals started performing Phase I Environmental Assessments in 1986 and have adopted 

the ASTM standards as they were developed and modified. The Environmental Professionals 

(EP) performing the reconnaissance and supervising this Phase I Environmental Assessment 

have more than five and 15 years of relevant environmental experience, respectively. The 


9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



company has performed thousands of these assessments, and over 100 in the last twelve months. 

Resumes of the persons performing this assessment are included in Appendix H. A few letters 

of reference are attached in Appendix O of this report. Neither, United Consulting or the 

environmental professional (EP), is affiliated with the Owner/developer or a buyer or seller of 

the project 

2.5 Assessment of Specialized Knowledge or Experience of User and/or 

“Environmental Professional” 

The DCA User Questionnaire was provided by the client and indicated that the client did not 

have specialized knowledge of the Project Site. 

During completion of this Phase I Environmental Assessment, the EP conducted a 

reconnaissance of the Project Site, a visual review of the adjoining properties, reviewed the 

regulatory database report, and reviewed the results of the interviews from these sources; the EP 

had no specialized knowledge of the Project Site or surrounding properties. 

2.6 Limitations and Exceptions 

United Consulting has performed appropriate inquiry for this Phase I Environmental Site 

Assessment in substantial conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 

1527-05 and according to the DCA guidelines. The Phase I Environmental Assessment was also 

written for the benefit of DCA, HUD, and GHFA, which may rely on this report in deciding 

whether to make the requested loan and/or allocations of tax credits on the property involved. 

No environmental site assessment can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for 

recognized environmental conditions in connection with a site. United Consulting's assessment 

is based on a visual evaluation of the surficial conditions only. No other warranty or guarantee is 

expressed or implied. This report must be considered in its entirety. 

This report is for the exclusive use of Realtex Development Corporation, GHFA, and the 

DCA and may be used only in reference to the project or site described herein. United 

Consulting is not affiliated with the owner/developer or a buyer or seller of the Project Site. 

United Consulting’s conclusions, opinions and suggestions have been prepared using generally 

accepted standards prevailing within the relevant disciplines as practiced within the southeastern 

United States. Nothing contained within this report is intended to supersede or replace the 

judgment of the Client. All decisions relating to the aforementioned project or site are the sole 

responsibility of said user(s). 

The right to rely upon this report and the data herein may not be assigned without the express 

written permission of United Consulting. As a prerequisite for the granting of such permission, 

the third-party users (including, but not limited to, the Client’s successors and assigns) must 

agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of the original agreement between United 


9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



Consulting and the Client. Further, reliance is dependent on similar uses of the property and the 

document. 

United Consulting’s conclusions, opinions and suggestions are based upon the information 

furnished and reviewed, including governmental records, as well as United Consulting’s 

professional experience. This assessment may not detect or account for all conditions or factors 

present at a project area or Project Site. Should such unexpected conditions or factors become 

manifest during subsequent activities at a site, it will be necessary for United Consulting to 

review and re-evaluate any and all conclusions, opinions and suggestions made with respect to 

this project or Project Site. Accordingly, United Consulting should be contacted immediately in 

such a situation. 

In the event that there are any subsequent changes or additions to the project or Project Site 

information provided to United Consulting in connection with the preparation of this report, the 

contents of this report must be considered invalid unless such changes or additions are reviewed 

by United Consulting and the associated conclusions, opinions and suggestions are either 

verified or modified in writing. United Consulting should also be consulted concerning any 

future work to be performed in connection with the project or Project Site so that we can 

determine whether such work is consistent with our conclusions, opinions and suggestions. 

2.7 Special or Additional Conditions or Contract Terms 

The terms and conditions for this Phase I Environmental Assessment were set forth in United 

Consulting’s proposal, which was executed by the client. A significant condition of this 

agreement was that Realtex Development Corporation would be responsible for providing 

United Consulting with a boundary survey, property access, chain-of-title search records, search 

of environmental liens and activity and use limitations, and comment on the value of the 

property (per DCA requirements). 

3.0 SITE SETTING 

3.1 General Description of the Site and Vicinity 

The Project Site was referenced by the address of 940 Ware Street, Pierce County, Georgia. The 

Project Site consisted of approximately 7.2-acres of land located on the northwestern corner of 

the intersection of Ware Street and Yeomans Street. The general location of the Project Site is 

shown on Figure 5. 

A Survey dated August 23, 1985 and prepared by Southeastern Consulting Group was provided 

by the client. The Survey was used as a guide to locate the boundaries of the Project Site. A copy 

of the client provided survey is found in Appendix A as Figure 3. A copy of the legal 

description is located in Appendix D. 


9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

3.1.1 Current Site Use and Description 




A site reconnaissance was conducted on May 10 and 11, 2011. At that time, the Project Site was 

developed with 16 single story apartment buildings and a community center building. The 

remaining areas of the Project Site were paved, grassed or wooded. 

3.1.2 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties 

The Project Site was immediately surrounded by roads, residential structures, and recreational 

ball fields. 

3.1.3 Description of Structures, Roads, and Other Improvements 

The Project Site was developed with 16 single story apartment buildings and a community center 

building. The remainder of the Project Site consisted of paved driveways and parking areas, 

grassed areas, or wooded areas. The Project Site was accessed via paved driveways located off 

of Ware Street and Yeomans Street. Typical utility easements were observed along Ware Street 

and Yeomans Street. Local utilities including sewer and water services were reportedly 

available for use at the Project Site. Figure 3 in Appendix A shows the Project Site and utility 

locations on the Project Site. 

3.2 Hydrogeology 

3.2.1 Geologic Setting 

The topography, geology and hydrogeology commonly control the migration of chemicals 

released at a site/facility. The relative location of the properties will often define their potential 

interaction and hydraulic connection. The description of the physical setting for the Project Site 

is provided below, starting with the topography and geology. The estimated surface water and 

groundwater flow directions are then estimated and described. 

The Project Site was located in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of Georgia, which is 

characterized by gentle south-southwest dipping, mostly unconsolidated marine sediments. 

Topography in the province is variable and ranges from low to moderate hills in the north to 

nearly flat in the south. Based on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute 

topographic quadrangle map of the area, Blackshear West, Georgia, dated 1988, elevations in the 

vicinity of the Project Site range from approximately 125 feet above mean sea level (msl) to 140 

feet msl. The Project Site was located in an area with an approximate elevation of 140 feet msl. 

Topography across the Project Site generally slopes down to the northwest towards a tributary of 

the Alabaha River, located approximately 500 feet northwest of the Project Site. Figure 4 shows 

the topography of the Project Site and surrounding areas. 

The mostly unconsolidated sediments comprising the Coastal Plain consist primarily of 

Quaternary- to Cretaceous-aged marine deposits laid down during succeeding sea level 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



transgressions. These deposits dip gently to the south-southwest towards the Gulf of Mexico. 

The marine sediments are overlain along wider stream channels by Quaternary-aged alluvial and 

fluvial deposits. According to the Geologic Map of Georgia (1977), the Project Site and 

immediately surrounding areas are underlain by the Neogene Undifferentiated. 

3.2.2 Surface Drainage 

Topography in the area of the Project Site generally sloped down to the west with the highest 

elevations at the Project Site located along the eastern boundary. Surface water flow from the 

property flows northwest towards an unnamed tributary of the Alabaha River, which is located 

approximately 500 feet northwest of the Project Site. Figure 4 shows the topography of the 

Project Site and surrounding areas. 

3.2.3 Groundwater 

The uppermost occurrence of groundwater in this area is contained within pore spaces of the 

underlying sediments. Groundwater recharge occurs by seepage of water through the soil and/or 

rock or by flowing directly into openings in outcropping rock. The primary source of recharge 

water is from precipitation that falls in the area, but can also originate from river discharge 

during dry periods. Groundwater is generally unconfined with some perched zones. Regional 

groundwater flow is to the south-southwest. Local groundwater flow can generally be expected 

to flow in the direction of topography, with the groundwater table mimicking the surface 

topography and the direction of groundwater flow expected to generally conform to that of the 

surface water. Groundwater flow below the Project Site is expected to flow northwest towards 

an unnamed tributary of the Alabaha River, located approximately 500 feet northwest of the 

Project Site. Areas considered hydraulically up-gradient of the Project Site are to the west within 

approximately 500 feet south of the Project Site. The anticipated direction of groundwater flow 

is shown on the Site Plan, Figure 3. 

3.3 Wetlands 

United Consulting performed a preliminary wetland investigation to identify wetlands and other 

jurisdictional waters of the United States (U.S.) on the Project Site. The areas of the Project Site 

were evaluated in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 

(USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual, 1987. 

USACE has specific criteria for wetlands. For an area to be classified as a wetland, the area 

must exhibit characteristics that satisfy criteria within the following three parameters: a 

dominance of wetland vegetation; physical evidence of wetland hydrology; and indications of 

hydric soils. Hydric soil characteristics occur in soils that are saturated or flooded long enough 

during the growing season to develop anaerobic (low oxygen) conditions that support wetland 

(or hydrophytic) vegetation. Other jurisdictional waters of the U.S. include areas such as lakes, 

ponds, rivers, and streams. 


9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



Background research was conducted to determine the potential for wetlands and other 

jurisdictional waters of the U.S. on the Project Site. This research included review of the Pierce 

County Soil Survey, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland 

Inventory (NWI) map, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood 

Insurance Rate Map of Pierce County, Georgia. Additionally, an on-site investigation was 

conducted for visual evidence of wetlands and other jurisdictional waters on the Project Site. 

The Soil Survey of Pierce County indicated the soils mapped on the Project Site were listed as 

Tifton loamy sand, Irvington loamy sand, and Robertsdale loamy sand. Robertsdale loamy sand 

is listed on the local hydric soils list when it exists with a Pehlam soil inclusion which is located 

in a depression. No depressions or low areas were observed on the Project Site; therefore, no 

Pehlam soils appear to be present on the Project Site and no hydric soils exist on the Project Site. 

The additional soils mapped on the Project Site are not listed on the national or local hydric soils 

lists. 

Review of the USFWS NWI map of the area (Blackshear West, Georgia Quadrangle) did not 

indicate previously mapped wetlands on the Project Site. A copy of the NWI map of the area is 

included as Figure 1 of this report. 

During the field investigation, no streams or wetland areas were observed on the Project Site. 

3.4 Floodplain/Floodway 

The Project Site was located within the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (Community Panel 

No. 13229C0195D). The Project Site was not located within the limits of the 100-year 

floodplain. A copy of the FEMA floodplain map is included as Figure 2 of this report. 

3.5 State Waters 

United Consulting’s investigation of the Project Site was also conducted to identify areas that 

would meet the definition for state waters, as defined in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated 

(OCGA), Volume 10, 12-7-3: Definitions, (13) “State waters” and interpreted by the Georgia 

Environmental Protection Division (EPD). According to the 2005 changes in the EPD rules 

concerning state waters and buffers, a stream feature must contain ‘normal stream flow’ (which 

has been interpreted to mean ‘base flow’) in order to be subject to the buffer requirements. 

Based on United Consulting’s investigation, there are no state waters requiring a buffer located 

on the Project Site. 


9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

3.6 Endangered Species 




United Consulting reviewed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service list of endangered species for 

Pierce County (http://www.georgiawildlife.com/node/1370 ). In addition, the list of federal and 

state protected species for Pierce County was obtained from the Georgia Department of Natural 

Resources (DNR) website. Further, we reviewed the DNR Natural Heritage Inventory Program 

(NHIP) for occurrence records in the project area. Our review of the NHIP data did not identify 

federally protected species within the topographic quarter-quadrangle that includes the Project 

Site. Further, based on our on-site investigation and the current conditions of the site, no 

threatened or endangered species have been identified on the Project Site. It is not anticipated 

that the proposed development would impact species protected under the Endangered Species 

Act. 

4.1 Data Review 

4.0 REGULATORY INFORMATION 

4.1.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources 

Reasonably ascertainable Federal and State environmental agency records were reviewed for 

evidence of regulated or investigated facilities within the minimum search distances outlined by 

ASTM E 1527-05 and 40 C.F.R. Part 312. The search distances are for the Project Site, 

adjoining properties, property within 0.5 mile, or property within 1.0 mile. 

United Consulting utilized a commercial database reporting company (Environmental Data 

Resources, Inc., or EDR) to provide Federal, State, and Tribal environmental records. The 

search was conducted by selecting a center point within the interior of the Project Site and then 

expanding the search distances (in ¼-mile increments) as necessary based on the distance from 

the center point to the furthest Project Site boundary. Therefore, some facilities may appear 

within the database report that are actually beyond the required search distances. United 

Consulting field located the listed facilities and only those facilities confirmed to be within the 

respective ASTM or AAI search distances are referenced in this report. A copy of the database 

report used for the regulatory agency review is included in Appendix F. The facilities identified 

and search records reviewed are listed in Table 1. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

DATABASE 

TABLE 1: REGULATORY DATABASES 

DATE 

UPDATED 

SEARCH DISTANCE: 1-MILE 


NUMBER 

AT 

PROJECT 

SITE 



NUMBER 

WITHIN 

SEARCH RADII 

United States Environmental December 2010 0 0 

Protection Agency (US EPA) National 

Priority List (NPL) 

US EPA CORRACTS database May 2010 0 0 

Georgia Environmental Protection July 2010 0 0 

Division (EPD) Hazardous Site 

Inventory (HSI), also referred to as the 

State Priority List (SPL) or State 

Hazardous Waste Sites (SHWS) 

State equivalent CERCLIS database December 2010 

(SCL), also referred to as Non-HSI 

0 0 

SEARCH DISTANCE: ½ MILE 

U.S. Tribal 

Reservations) 

Records (Indian 

December 2005 0 0 

U.S. Tribal LUST Records (Indian 

LUST) 

N/A* 0 0 

Georgia Brownfields Public Records 

December 2010 

List (BROWNFIELDS) 

0 0 

US EPA Resource Conservation and 

Recovery Act - Treatment, Storage and 

Disposal (RCRA TSD) Facilities List 

February 2010 0 0 

US EPA Brownfields 

BROWNFIELDS) 

(US 


US EPA Comprehensive November 2010 0 0 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability 

Information 

database 

System (CERCLIS) 

US EPA CERCLIS, No Further 

Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) 

database 

October 2010 0 0 

Georgia Leaking UST List (LUST) January 2011 0 0 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

DATABASE 

DATE 

UPDATED 


NUMBER 

AT 

PROJECT 

SITE 



NUMBER 

WITHIN 

SEARCH RADII 

Georgia EPD Operating Solid Waste 

Facilities List (SWFL) 

March 2010 0 0 

Drycleaners September 

2009 

0 0 

Delisted National Priority List 

(Delisted NPL) 

US EPA Toxic Release Inventory 

database (TRIS) 

US EPA Facility Index System 

(FINDS) 


SEARCH DISTANCE ¼ MILE 


May 2010 0 0 

SEARCH DISTANCE: PROPERTY AND ADJACENT PROPERTY 

US EPA RCRA Program Generators 

database (RCRA) 

February 2010 0 0 

Georgia EPD Registered Underground September 0 0 

Storage Tanks (UST) List 

2010 

US DOT Hazardous Materials December 2010 0 0 

Information 

(HMIRS) 

Reporting System 

US EPA Emergency Response December 2010 0 0 

Network System (ERNS) 

Georgia SPILLS list December 2010 0 0 

Federally Institutional Control / January 2011 0 0 

Engineering Control Registries 

State and Tribal Institutional Control 

Registries 

December 2010 

NON-ASTM 

0 0 

DOD, Department of Defense December 2005 0 0 

EDR Proprietary Historical Database 

(Historical) 

N/A 0 0 

NOTES: The database information was obtained from Environmental Data Resources (EDR). This data was 

relied upon for this Assessment. EDR updates their system information routinely. Their databases are derived 

from databases developed by various government agencies. United Consulting cannot warrant the accuracy of 

the information included in these databases. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

4.1.1.1 Sites Listed in Section 8.2.1 of ASTM E 1527-05 and in Exhibit B1 




The Project Site was not listed as a regulated facility on the Federal and State databases 

reviewed. Based on review of the regulatory database report, no listed, regulated facilities were 

identified within the various search distances from the Project Site. As discussed above, several 

facilities listed in the regulatory review were determined to be miss-mapped or located outside of 

the applicable search radius, these facilities have not been included in this report. 

4.1.1.2 Orphan/Unmappable Sites 

The regulatory database report includes a list (Orphan List) of facilities that could not be mapped 

due to poor or incomplete address information. United Consulting reviewed this list, which 

included 15 orphan facilities, to determine if the Orphan Facilities were located within the 

respective search distances from the Project Site. Based on United Consulting’s map review and 

field reconnaissance, the listed orphan facilities do not appear to be located within the ASTM or 

AAI radii from the Project Site. 

Other notable (unmapped) facilities may include those businesses, properties or facilities that 

were not listed as regulated facilities, but were observed by United Consulting during the 

reconnaissance or by EDR as a potential historical facility and may represent potential RECs. 

United Consulting did not identify other notable (unmapped) facilities within 0.25 miles of the 

Project Site. 

EDR has compiled a proprietary collection of potential historical facilities by searching business 

directories available to EDR. The facilities identified in this compilation include those facilities 

that may have operated as gas stations/filling stations/service stations or dry cleaning 

establishments. The EDR historical compilation did not identify potential historical facilities 

within 0.25 miles of the Project Site. 

4.1.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources 

Local County and City Agencies were contacted to try and obtain the requested Additional 

Environmental Record Sources. The following information was utilized to enhance and 

supplement the standard environmental record sources. A reasonable attempt was made to 

obtain the additional environmental records. A brief description including date of contact, 

contact information, and database is found below. 

4.1.2.1 Local Brownfield Lists 

At the time that the research was conducted for this report, no local Brownfield lists existed. On 

April 28, 2011, the Georgia Environmental Protections Division Website 

(http://www.gaepd.org/) was searched, which included a list of Georgia Brownfields properties 

updated February 2011. No information regarding Brownfields review or listing associated with 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



the Project Site or the Project Site county was found. A copy of this list is included within 

Appendix G. 

4.1.2.2 Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites 

On May 27, 2011, United Consulting reviewed the document pertaining to old/current landfills 

“entitled 1968 Functional System Map of Pierce County, Georgia” reported by the EPD Land 

Protection Branch. No information regarding local lists of landfills/solid waste disposal sites on 

the Project Site or immediate adjacent properties were observed on the 1968 Functional Maps. 

In addition, United Consulting searched the EDR Regulatory Search Report for information 

regarding landfills/solid waste disposal sites. No landfills or solid waste disposal sites were 

reported on the Project Site, or immediately surrounding properties. 

4.1.2.3 Local Lists of Hazardous Waste/Contaminated Sites 

United Consulting contacted Mr. Tony Sapp, Environmentalist with the Pierce County Health 

Department, requesting information concerning listings of local Hazardous Waste and 

Contaminated Sites. Mr. Sapp indicated that Pierce County does not keep records of hazardous 

or contaminated sites. A copy of the phone interview is included within Appendix G. 

4.1.2.4 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 

United Consulting contacted Mr. Tony Sapp, representative of the Pierce County Health 

Department, requesting information concerning local lists of registered storage tanks. Mr. Sapp 

indicated that Pierce County does not maintain lists of registered storage tanks. 

4.1.2.5 Local Land Records (for activity and use limitations) 

United Consulting e-mailed Mr. Dell Brown with Pierce County Community Development. 

According to the Mr. Brown the Project Site did not have any activity and use limitations. 

4.1.2.6 Records of Emergency Release Reports 

No local records of Emergency Release Reports are maintained by Pierce County. Georgia EPD 

maintains records of Emergency Release Reports. United Consulting contacted Ms. Mary 

Whatley with the EPD’s Emergency Response Team Program (ERT) via telephone in regards to 

emergency release reports on May 27, 2011. At the time this report was issued, United 

Consulting had not received a response to the request for information. 

4.1.2.7 Records of Contaminated Public Wells 

United Consulting interviewed Mr. Richard Johnson, representative of the Blackshear Water 

Department, requesting information concerning records of contaminated public wells. Mr. 

Page 17 of 36 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



Johnson stated that The City of Blackshear does not maintain a list of contaminated public wells. 

A copy of the phone interview is included in Appendix G. 

4.1.2.8 Planning Department Records 

On March 30, 2011, United Consulting visited the Pierce County webpage at 

http://www.piercecountyga.org/ to view planning/zoning records. United Consulting also emailed 

Mr. Dell Brown with Pierce County Community Development. According to Mr. Brown, 

the Project Site was currently zoned as Multi Family. No planning or other zoning information 

was obtained from the Pierce County website for the Project Site. 

4.1.2.9 Local/Regional Pollution Control Agency Records 

United Consulting contacted Mr. Jimmy Johnston, Program Manager with the Georgia EPD Air 

Protection Branch, Planning and Support Program to obtain information regarding the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) for Georgia. He indicated no specific requirements were necessary 

for pollution control in residential areas. 

4.1.2.10 Local/Regional Water Quality Agency Records 

United Consulting contacted Mr. Richard Johnson, representative of the Blackshear Water 

Department on May 2, 2011, requesting information concerning the Consumer Confidence 

Report for the Project Site area. The 2009 City of Blackshear Water Quality report was obtained 

from Mr. Richard Johnson via fax on May 2, 2011. The Water Quality Report indicated that the 

required water parameters were within the appropriate limits. A copy of the Water Quality 

Report is included in Appendix Q. 

4.1.2.11 Local Electric Utility Company 

On May, 27, 2011, United Consulting contacted Georgia Power regarding on-site transformers. 

At the time of the issuance of this report, no response had been received from Georgia Power. 

However no transformers labeled as PCB containing were identified on the Project Site. 

4.1.2.12 Other 

No other local County or City Agencies were contacted to obtain Additional Environmental 

Record Sources. 

4.2 Agency Contacts/Records 

State and local government officials who may have been familiar with the Project Site were 

contacted. These persons were questioned as to their knowledge of any past activities at the 

Project Site that might present the potential for environmental impacts. Documentation of these 


9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



contact/interviews is included as Appendix G. The interviews provided the following 

information: 

4.2.1 Local Fire Department Official 

United Consulting contacted Ms. Deborah Harris with the Pierce County Emergency Response 

on May 27, 2011, to obtain information regarding records of hazardous spills, underground 

storage tanks, and fires associated with the Project Site. Ms. Harris stated that she was not aware 

of any records of responses to the property in relation to large fires or chemical spills at the 

property; she referred us to Mr. Lenard Roberts with the Pierce County 911 and Fire 

Department. Mr. Roberts stated that he had worked for the Fire Department for 20 years and did 

not know of any large fires or chemicals spill at or near the Project Site. 

4.2.2 State, Local or Regional Health or Environmental Agency 

United Consulting contacted Mr. Tony Sapp with the Pierce County Health Department on May 

27, 2011, requesting information concerning the Project Site. Mr. Sapp stated that he did not 

have any records associated with the Project Site. He stated that the property was serviced by 

the city sewer. 

4.2.3 Local Building Permit Agency Official 

On March 30, 2011, United Consulting visited the Pierce County webpage at 

http://www.piercecountyga.org/ to obtain information regarding building permits associated with 

the Project Site. United Consulting also e-mailed Mr. Dell Brown with Pierce County 

Community Development. According to Mr. Brown the Project Site was currently zoned as 

Multi Family and the last permit issued was an electrical permit in 2008. 

4.2.4 Local Groundwater Use Permit Agency Official 

United Consulting contacted Mr. Richard Johnson, representative of the Blackshear Water 

Department on May 2, 2011, requesting information concerning the permitting of groundwater 

for use. Mr. Johnson stated that the Blackshear Water Department did not issue permits for 

groundwater use and was unaware of restrictions for groundwater usage. 

4.3 Interviews 

During and following the site reconnaissance, interviews were conducted with persons familiar 

with the Project Site. These persons were questioned as to their knowledge of any past activities 

at the Project Site that might present the potential for environmental impacts. Documentation of 

the interviews is included as Appendix G. The interviews provided the following information: 


9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

4.3.1 Current Key Site Manager, Occupants, or Owners of the Property 




The client provided United Consulting with the DCA Owner Questionnaire completed by the 

current owner, Mr. James Kincaid representative of the current property owner Heritage Village 

Blackshear L.P. A review of the Questionnaire did not indicate any environmental concerns 

associated with the Project Site. A copy of the Questionnaire is located in Appendix L. 

United Consulting interviewed Mr. Steve Russell maintenance person for the Heritage Village 

Apartments during the site reconnaissance. Mr. Russell had been employed at the Project Site 

for approximately 7 years. Mr. Russell was also very familiar with the areas surrounding the 

Project Site, having lived in the area for his entire life. Mr. Russell was not aware of any 

environmental concerns associated with the Project Site or surrounding area. He stated that the 

Project Site did not contain any USTs, ASTs or large quantities of chemicals. 

United Consulting interviewed Ms. Tricia Thornton, property manager for the Heritage Village 

Apartments, during the site reconnaissance. Ms. Thornton had been employed at the Project Site 

for approximately 4 years. She was unaware of any environmental concerns associated with the 

Project Site or surrounding area. 

4.3.2 Current Owners or Occupants of Neighboring Properties 

United Consulting interviewed a resident of the area who did not wish to provide their name. He 

had been familiar with the vicinity of the Project Site for approximately 15 years. He was 

unaware of any environmental concerns associated with the Project Site. 

4.3.3 Past Owners, Occupants, or Operators of the Property 

Past owners and occupants of the Project Site were not interviewed because the Client did not 

provide their contact information, and they were not available during the site reconnaissance. 

4.3.4 User(s) 

The User of this report was identified as Realtex Development (Applicant). The User did not 

indicate that they were aware of any environmental concerns associated with the Project Site. 

4.3.4.1 Title Records 

United Consulting reviewed the chain-of-title information, which was provided by the client on 

May 27, 2011. The title information was compiled by Hunter Maclean and summarized in a 

letter dated May 23, 2011. The chain of title indicated that the Project Site is currently owned by 

Heritage Village Blackshear, L.P. who gained title from Heritage Village, Ltd. Previous owners 

included individuals dating back to 1907. A more detailed summary of the chain-of-title is 

found in Section 5.5.1 of this report. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

4.3.4.2 Environmental Liens 




The client indicated that they were unaware of environmental liens associated with the Project 

Site. Our review of the provided title documents did not indicate environmental liens on the 

Project Site. 

4.3.4.3 Specialized Knowledge of the User 

The client indicated that they did not have specialized knowledge of environmental significance 

with respect to the Project Site. 

4.3.4.4 Commonly Known/Reasonably Ascertainable Information 

The client indicated that they were unaware of any commonly known information of 

environmental significance with respect to the Project Site. United Consulting also conducted 

interviews with local residents during the area reconnaissance in an attempt to obtain commonly 

known information concerning the Project Site. Details of the interviews performed are included 

in Section 4.3 of this report. 

4.3.4.5 Reason for Performing the Phase I 

This Phase I Environmental Assessment was conducted with the understanding that the client 

wishes to obtain tax credits from the Department of Community Affairs (DCA), and that this 

Phase I Environmental Assessment is one of the requirements. 

4.3.4.6 Relationship of Purchase Price to Fair Market Value 

Mr. James Kincaid, representative of the current property owner Heritage Village Blackshear 

L.P., indicated the property is priced at fair market value. 

4.3.4.6.1 Purchase Price 

Based on User supplied information, the price of the Project Site represents fair market value. 

4.3.4.6.2 Differential Between Purchase Price and Market Value 

Not Applicable. 

4.3.4.6.3 Reasons For Any Differential 

Not Applicable. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

5.0 SITE INFORMATION AND USE 

5.1 Site Reconnaissance Methodology and Limiting Conditions 




A reconnaissance of the Project Site was performed on May 10, and 11, 2011, to look for 

evidence of possible hazardous substance contamination at the Project Site. The reconnaissance 

consisted of an on-site, visual review by a representative from United Consulting: Mr. Ian G. 

Pilling, Senior Environmental Specialist. The reconnaissance was performed by walking the 

property boundaries and interior portions of the Project Site. 

5.2 General Site Setting 

The Project Site was located on the northwestern corner of the intersection of Ware Street and 

Yeomans Street. The Project Site consisted of an approximate 7.2-acre tract of land that was 

developed with sixteen apartment buildings containing 64 units and a community center 

building. The remainder of the Project Site was grassed, wooded or asphalt. 

5.3 Assessment of Commonly Known/Reasonably Ascertainable Information 

The client indicated that they were not aware of any commonly known or reasonable 

ascertainable information that would lead to knowledge of RECs on the Project Site. 

5.4 Current Site Use 

The Project Site consisted of an approximate 7.2-acre tract of land that was developed with 

sixteen apartment buildings containing 64 units and a community center building. At the time of 

the reconnaissance, the apartment complex was in use. 

Additional discussions are provided below, as appropriate. Photographs of the Project Site are 

included in Appendix B. 

5.4.1 Storage Tanks 

No above ground storage tanks (ASTs) were observed on the Project Site. No features indicative 

of USTs, such as fill caps, vent pipes, pump islands, or associated piping were observed at the 

Project Site. 

5.4.2 Hazardous and Petroleum Products Containers/Drums 

No drums were observed on the Project Site. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

5.4.3 Heating and Cooling 

The apartments contained central heating and cooling units. 

5.4.4 Solid Waste 




Several trash dumpsters were observed on the Project Site. No large quantities of solid waste 

were observed on the Project Site. 

5.4.5 Sewage Disposal / Septic Tanks 

The Project Site was connected to the City of Blackshear sewage service. No septic tanks were 

reportedly located on the Project Site. 

5.4.6 Hydraulic Equipment 

No hydraulic equipment was observed on the Project Site. 

5.4.7 Contracted Maintenance Services 

Maintenance service is handled by on site personnel. 

5.4.8 Electrical Equipment / PCBs 

The pole mounted transformers located on the Project Site were not labeled as containing PCBs. 

The pole mounted transformers were reported owned and operated by Georgia Power. United 

Consulting contacted Georgia Power. At the time of the issuance of this report, a response from 

Georgia Power had not been received. 

5.4.9 Water Supply and Wells 

The Project Site was connected to the City of Blackshear water service. The City of 

Blackshear’s water quality report is included in Appendix R. No wells were observed on the 

Project Site. 

5.4.10 Drains and Sumps 

No drains or sumps were observed on the Project Site. 

5.4.11 Pits, Ponds, Lagoons and Surface Water 

No pits, ponds, or lagoons were observed on the Project Site during the site visit. No surface 

water bodies were located on the Project Site. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

5.4.12 Stressed Vegetation 

No stressed vegetation was observed. 

5.4.13 Stained Soil or Pavement 




A de minimis amount of staining was observed on the driveways and parking areas on the Project 

Site. 

5.4.14 Odors 

No unusual odors were observed on the Project Site. 

5.4.15 Utilities / Roadway Easements 

Utilities were present along Ware Street and Yeomans Street. Utility markers were observed 

along the roadways; however, easements, if any, associated with the utilities were not readily 

identifiable. 

5.4.16 Chemical Use 

No chemical use was observed on the Project Site during the site reconnaissance. 

5.4.17 Water Leaks / Mold / Fungi / Microbial Growth 

In accordance with DCA guidance documents, a mold survey was conducted in the units that 

were surveyed for asbestos and radon. This included 34 units and included at least one unit in 

the seventeen buildings located at the Project Site. No significant water leaks or mold issues 

were observed within the units observed. Areas within the ventilation system, above ceilings, 

under floors, or behind walls were not “readily accessible” during our assessment. Additionally, 

based on conversations with on site personnel, visual signs of mold and mildew had not been 

observed by on site personnel. 

5.4.18 Asbestos 

An asbestos survey was conducted at the Project Site by United Consulting personnel. Regulated 

concentrations of asbestos were identified in materials at the Project Site. These materials included: 

linoleum flooring, vinyl floor tile, and sink soundproofing. A copy of this report is attached in Appendix 

U. 

5.4.19 Lead-Based Paint 

A Lead Based Paint Inspection and Risk Assessment for lead was previously conducted on the 

Heritage Village Apartments with the report dated April 20, 2005 and performed by Progressive 

Environmental. The lead based paint survey was conducted using an XRF and included 23 units. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



Approximately 1,200 XRF tests were taken at the Project Site with a total of 87 tests conducted 

on the exterior doors and door casings. Of these 87 tests performed on the exterior doors and 

door casings, four tests showed an inconsistent result for lead, e.g. the XRF produced a negative 

reading for lead but the actual number produced by the XRF was shown to be above the Housing 

and Urban Development (HUD) level of 1.0 mg/cm 2 . None of the remaining 1,200 XRF tests 

showed lead above the HUD level. These four readings were collected within 10 minutes of 

each other, which indicated that these readings were actually due to a malfunction in the 

instrument and not indicative of the actual presence of lead based paint. The standard procedure 

when an XRF produces inconclusive results is to collect paint chip samples to verify the XRF 

results, however, no paint chip samples were collected at that time. Therefore, United 

Consulting conducted paint chip sampling of the exterior doors and door casings that produced 

the inconclusive results, along with 27 additional doors and casings, the paint chip sampling 

discussed below. A copy of the previously performed Lead Based Paint Survey and Risk 

Assessment in included in Appendix I. 

Based on the results of the aforementioned Lead Based Paint Survey and Risk Assessment, 

United Consulting conducted a Limited Lead Based Paint Survey at the Project Site which 

included collecting thirty one paint chip samples from the exterior doors and door casings at the 

Project Site, including the four buildings where inconclusive results were produced (building 4, 

building 5, and building 12). The samples collected were not found to contain lead at 

concentrations above the current HUD action level of 0.5% lead by weight. Based on these 

results, it is United Consulting’s opinion that the exterior doors and door casings do not contain 

lead based paint, and the four inconclusive readings that were previously interpreted as lead 

based paint being present on the exterior doors and door casing were incorrect. Therefore, no 

lead in soil testing was required. A copy of the Limited Lead Based Paint Survey in included in 

Appendix U. 

5.4.20 Lead in Drinking Water 

United Consulting reviewed the City of Blackshear Drinking Water Quality Reports (2009) for 

information regarding lead in the drinking water system. The report indicated that no lead was 

detected in the drinking water systems. The report states that the typical source of lead is 

corroding plumbing systems and naturally occurring deposits. A copy of the drinking water 

quality reports is found in Appendix R. 

United Consulting collected a total of 17 (one from each building) drinking water samples via 

the “first draw” protocol on May 11, 2011. This protocol requires that the water be tested after it 

has been in the plumbing overnight, before morning use (in the plumbing between 8 and 18 

hours). The water samples were analyzed for total lead using EPA Method 200.8. One of the 17 

samples collected was found to have lead at a concentration of 17.6 micrograms per liter (ug/L), 

which is above the primary drinking water standard of 15 ug/L. Micrograms per liter is 

approximately parts per billion (ppb). 


9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



The one unit (31), which had lead concentrations above the primary drinking water standard of 

15 ug/L was retested on June 2011, along with two other units from the same building. The 

retesting resulted in lead concentrations below 15 ug/L. A summary of the lead in drinking 

water reports are found in Appendix Q. 

5.4.21 Radon 3 : 

United Consulting performed a review of literature pertaining to the potential for elevated 

accumulations of radon gas to exist at the Project Site. Based on a review of the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Map of Radon Zones for Georgia (dated September 

1993), Pierce County has a low potential for the presence of radon. In 1989, 1,534 homes were 

sampled in the State/EPA Residential Radon Survey. 

Based on the data from the aforementioned study, 13 homes located in Pierce County were tested 

for indoor radon gas accumulations. Based on the reported testing results, the average radon gas 

level detected in the Pierce County homes was 1.5 picocuries per liter (pCi/L) of air and the 

maximum reading was 7.1 pCi/L of air. 

In accordance with DCA requirements, one radon test must be conducted per every 2,000 square 

feet of ground-contact units and one radon test must be conducted on each floor above the 

ground floor. Therefore, based on measurements supplied by the client, 34 radon canisters were 

placed in 34 separate apartment units within the Project Site structures. None of the 34 tests 

conducted at the Project Site were above the EPA limit of 4.0 picocuries per liter of air (pCi/L). 

A report including the results of the radon testing is included in Appendix E. 

5.4.22 Noise 

United Consulting conducted a search for the noise sources as outlined by the 2011 DCA 

Environmental Manual. There were no major roads within 1,000 feet of the Project Site. The 

closest major roadway was U.S. Highway 84, which was 2,300 feet southeast of the Project Site. 

There were no railroads within 3,000 feet of the Project Site. The closest Rail Road appeared to 

be just over 3,000 feet southeast of the Project Site. There were no civil airports located within 

five miles and no military airports located within 15 miles of Project Site. The closest civil 

airport was the Waycross-Ware County Airport, near the City of Waycross, which was 

approximately 8.7 miles southwest of the Project Site. The closest military airport is Fort 

Stewart, which is located approximately 55 miles northeast of the Project Site. Based on the 

distances to the prescribed noise sources, United Consulting’s opinion is that a noise assessment 

is not required for the Project Site. 

3 Radon is a colorless, odorless and tasteless naturally occurring gas that originates from the decay of naturally 

occurring uranium and radium in soils, rock and in water. Radon gas typically moves from the ground into 

structures (through cracks, joints, pores, and other openings in the foundations) where it can accumulate. The 

Surgeon General has warned that radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the United States today. Radon 

gas is estimated to cause about 14,000 lung cancer deaths per year, second only to smoking. 


9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

5.4.23 Vapor Encroachment Screening 




The purpose of this screening was to assess for potential vapor intrusion risks, which could 

impact the existing or future building on the Project Site. This includes a tier one screening per 

the ASTM Standard for “Assessment of Vapor Intrusion into Structures,” E2600-10. At this 

time, no facilities were identified within the prescribed distances which would constitute a vapor 

encroachment condition. Therefore, no further assessment or mitigation for vapor intrusion is 

warranted at this time. 

5.4.24 Other Site Reconnaissance Issues 

No other site reconnaissance issues were observed during the site visit. No visual evidence 

of RECs at the Project Site such as stained soils, or stressed vegetation were identified during 

our site reconnaissance. 

5.5 Past Site Use 

Historical research into the Project Site was conducted to assess the history of the Project Site 

and surrounding areas from an environmental perspective. This research included reviewing 

United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps, Sanborn fire insurance maps, city 

directories and aerial photographs, conducting interviews with people familiar with the history of 

the Project Site and surrounding areas, and researching chain of title information to determine 

the past ownership of the Project Site. The title review focused on determining whether past 

ownership included industrial firms, and whether environmental liens encumber title to the 

Project Site. The following sections summarize the results of the historical research of the 

Project Site: 

5.5.1 Recorded Land Title Records 

United Consulting reviewed the chain-of-title information, which was provided by the client on 

May 24, 2011. The title information was compiled by Hunter Maclean and dated May 23, 2001. 

The title information indicated that the Project Site is currently owned by Heritage Village 

Blackshear, L.P., who acquired title to the Project Site in December 20, 1990 from Heritage 

Village, Ltd. Previous owners of the Project Site were William Stephen Bowen, Jr., Duke A. 

Raulerson and Sam B. Owens, Robert Patterson Belvin, Mrs. Ella Belvin, R. W. Belvin, and The 

A. P. Brantley Company. The title search was terminated at 1907. A copy of the provided chainof-title 

information can be found in Appendix D. 

5.5.2 Environmental Liens 

United Consulting was provided with a letter from Hunter Maclean, who conducted the title 

research, stating that their title examination had not discovered any environmental liens or 

special environmental use restrictions affecting the property. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

5.5.3 Activity and Use Limitations 




United Consulting was provided with a letter from Hunter Maclean, who conducted the title 

research, stating that their title examination had not discovered any environmental liens or 

special environmental use restrictions affecting the property. 

5.5.4 Aerial Photographs and Topographic Maps 

Aerial photographs obtained from EDR and taken in 1938, 1947, 1956, 1968, 1970, 1988, 1993, 

2005, and 2006 were reviewed. Copies of the historic aerial photographs are found in Appendix 

C. 

The USGS 7.5-minute series quadrangle topographic map of the area entitled Blackshear West, 

Georgia, dated 1971 was reviewed. The 1971 topographic map was revised in 1988. The USGS 

7.5-minute series quadrangle topographic map of the area entitled Blackshear East, Georgia, 

dated 1971 was reviewed. The 1971 topographic map was revised in 1988. Copies of the 

historic topographic maps reviewed are found in Appendix C. 

Aerial Photographs: 

The 1938, 1947, 1956, 1968, and 1970 aerial photographs showed the Project Site was 

undeveloped, land. The property appeared to contain a tree orchard. The 1988, 1993, 2005, and 

2006 aerial photographs showed the Project Site was developed with the current structures. 

USGS Topographic Maps: 

The 1971 and the photo-revised 1981 USGS topographic maps showed the Project Site was 

undeveloped land. The property appeared to contain a tree orchard. 

5.5.5 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps 

According to a search of the most comprehensive collection of Sanborn Maps by EDR, Sanborn 

fire insurance map coverage was not available for the area of the Project Site. A copy of the No 

Coverage Letter for the Sanborn maps is found in Appendix C. 

5.5.6 City Directories 

According to a search of the most comprehensive collection of City Directories by EDR, City 

Directories were not available for the area of the Project Site. A copy of the No Coverage Letter 

for the City Directories is found in Appendix C. 

5.5.7 Previous Environmental Studies 

A Lead Based Paint and Risk Assessment was formerly conducted at the Project Site as 

discussed in the Lead Based Paint section of this report. No other previous environmental 

assessments have been provided at this time. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

5.5.8 Other 




No other previous environmental assessments have been provided at this time. If pertinent 

information is received an addendum will be issued. 

Summary: No on-site RECs were identified through our review of the available historical 

information, including topographic maps, Sanborn maps, aerial photographs, city directories, and 

deed records. 

5.6 Current Surrounding Land Use 

A foot and automobile tour of the surrounding area was conducted to assess area land use and to 

look for evidence of potential sources of hazardous substances on adjacent or nearby properties. 

The reconnaissance was performed by walking along the surrounding properties and driving 

along the nearby roads. The results of the reconnaissance are summarized in Table 3. 

Additional discussion is provided following Table 3, as appropriate. 

5.6.1 North 

Undeveloped wooded and cleared land 

5.6.2 East 

Recreation ball fields 

5.6.3 South 

Residential and undeveloped wooded land 

5.6.4 West 

Undeveloped wooded land 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

TABLE 3: AREA RECONNAISSANCE INFORMATION 

ITEMS Observed 

Yes/No 




Area Structures/Property Use: 

The property south of the Project Site was developed with residential structures. The property to 

the east was developed with recreational ball fields. The remainder of the properties surrounding 

the Project Site were either undeveloped wooded or cleared land. 

Tanks: 

No ASTs were observed on properties surrounding the Project Site. No features indicative of 

USTs, such as fill caps, vent pipes, pump islands, or other associated piping were observed 

adjacent to the Project Site. 

5.7 Past Surrounding Land Use 

DISCUSSION 

(Blanks indicate items not observed on 

nearby properties) 

REC 

Yes/No 

Area Structures Yes Discussed below. No 

Area Property Use Yes Discussed below. No 

Wells No No wells were observed on the adjacent 

properties. 

No 

Tanks No Discussed below. No 

Drums No No drums were observed on the adjacent 

properties. 

No 

Other Containers No No 

Storage Areas No No 

Ponds and/or Pools of 

Liquid or Sludge 

No No 

Stained Soil or Pavement No A de minimis amount of staining was No 

observed 

driveways. 

on the nearby roads and 

Stressed 

Vegetation/Ground Cover 

No No 

Solid Waste No No 

Odors No No unusual odors were observed on the 

properties surrounding the Project Site. 

No 

Drains and Sumps No Typical storm drains were observed along 

the roads. 

No 

Historical research of the areas surrounding the Project Site from an environmental perspective 

was conducted. This research included reviewing United States Geological Survey (USGS) 

topographic maps and aerial photographs, conducting interviews with people familiar with the 

history of the areas surrounding Project Site, researching Sanborn Maps, and researching City 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



Directories. The following sections summarize the results of the historical research of the areas 

surrounding the Project Site: 

5.7.1 North 

The property to the north of the Project Site was historically developed with a small residential 

structure; the remaining property was undeveloped wooded and cleared land. 

5.7.2 East 

Properties east of the Project Site were historically undeveloped wooded land. 

5.7.3 South 

The property to the south of the Project Site was historically developed with a small residential 

structure; the remaining property was undeveloped wooded and cleared land. 

5.7.4 West 

Properties west of the Project Site were historically undeveloped land. 

Summary: In United Consulting’s professional opinion, no off-site current or historic facilities 

represent RECs in relation to the Project Site. Further, no current or historic on-site issues were 

identified that represent RECs to the Project Site. Based on the entirety of the historical review, 

no indications of RECs to the Project Site were identified. 

5.8 Historic Preservation 

A visual reconnaissance was conducted to look for potential historic properties in the vicinity of 

the Project Site. In addition, a search was conducted on the NAHRGIS website. The NAHRGIS 

research did not indicate historic structures within 1-mile of the Project Site. The GAHPD 

indicated in a letter dated June 10, 2011that no historic or archaeological resources would be 

impacted by the proposed development of the Project Site. 

6.1 Identification of Data Gaps 

6.0 DATA GAPS 

United Consulting conducted a thorough review on the use of the Project Site during completion 

of this Phase I Environmental Assessment. The historical research included sources from 1907 

to present. Table 4 below summarizes many of the common data failures/gaps encountered 

during the completion of a Phase I Environmental Assessment. 


9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

6.2 Sources of Information Consulted to Address Data Gaps 




Per ASTM and AAI standards, United Consulting has relied on ‘User Provided Information’ to 

complete this property assessment. If the user fails to provide this information to United 

Consulting, it could result in a determination that “all appropriate inquiry” for this site is 

incomplete. Further, United Consulting is not responsible for any errors or omissions associated 

with the User Provided Information. 

6.3 Significance of Data Gaps 

If a significant data gap is identified in the table, a discussion of the data gap and conclusions 

associated with the gap will follow. 

Report 

Section 

TABLE 4: SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL DATA FAILURES/GAPS 

Information/Data Data 

See Descriptions 

Below 

Significant 

Data Gap 

(Y/N/NA) 

Additional 

Action(s) 

Required 

(Y/N/NA) 

4.3.4.1 Title History 

User Provided Information 

Client Provided N N 

4.3.4.2 Environmental Lien Review Client Provided N N 

4.3.4.3 Specialized Knowledge Client Provided N N 

4.3.4.4 Commonly 

Information 

Known Client Provided N N 

4.3.4.6 Valuation Reduction for Client Provided N N 

Environmental Issues 

5.5.4 Topographic Maps 

Historical Use Information 

Obtained N N 

5.5.4 Aerial Photographs Obtained N N 

5.5.5 City Directories Not Available N N 

5.5.6 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps Not Available N N 

5.1 Exterior Accessibility 

Site Reconnaissance 

Accessible N N 

5.1 Interior Accessibility Accessible 

Area Reconnaissance 

N N 

5.6 Accessibility Accessible 

Interviews 

N N 

4.3.1 Property Owner Obtained N N 

4.3.2 Site Manager/Occupants/Local 

Residents 

Obtained N N 

4.2 Local Government Officials Obtained N N 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

Report 

Section 

Information/Data Data 

See Descriptions 

Below 


Significant 

Data Gap 

(Y/N/NA) 



Additional 

Action(s) 

Required 

(Y/N/NA) 

Notes: Common Data Descriptions: Not Provided, Provided, Not Contacted, Contacted, Accessible, Not 

Accessible, Obtained, Not Obtained, Gap, Failure, NA = Not Available 

Per ASTM E 1527-05, failure to provide the ‘user provided information’ to the environmental professional 

could result in a determination that “all appropriate inquiry” for this site is incomplete. 

United Consulting conducted a historical review on the past use of the Project Site during 

completion of this Phase I Environmental Assessment. The historical research included sources 

from 1907 to present. Based on the historical information obtained, interviews, and information 

provided by the client, United Consulting did not identify significant data gaps that affected the 

ability of the environmental professional to render an opinion of the Project Site. 

7.1 On-Site 

7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS 

The Project Site consisted of an approximate 7.2-acre tract of land that was developed with 16 

apartment buildings containing 64 units and a community center building. The Project Site was 

historically undeveloped land prior to the development of the apartment complex on the Project 

Site in the late 1970s. The Project Site was not listed on the federal or state databases we 

reviewed. No visual evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) on the Project 

Site such as stained soils, stressed vegetation, drums, land filling, or illegal disposal of hazardous 

substances was identified. Based on the entirety of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 

no on-site RECs were identified. 

7.2 Off-Site 

The Project Site was immediately surrounded by roads, undeveloped land, residential 

developments, and recreational ball fields. Based on review of the regulatory database report no 

regulated facilities were identified within the various search distances from the Project Site. 

8.1 On-Site 

8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

United Consulting has performed a Phase I Environmental Assessment for the Project Site. The 

assessment is in substantial conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 

1527-05 and with the environmental guidelines established by the DCA, dated 2011. Based on 

this assessment, research, site reconnaissance and investigation, evidence of "on-site” RECs was 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



not identified on the Project Site. No further investigation or action is recommended to 

determine the presence of "on-site” RECs on the Project Site. 

8.2 Off-Site 

United Consulting has performed a Phase I Environmental Assessment of the Project Site in 

substantial conformance with the applicable scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-05 

and the guidelines established by the DCA, dated 2011. 

Based on this assessment, research, site reconnaissance, and investigation, no listed, regulated 

facilities were identified within the DCA prescribed search distances from the Project Site. No 

off-site facilities were identified that represent RECs to the Project Site. 

ASTM Practice E 1527-05 

9.0 DATA REFERENCES 

EPA AAI, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 312 (40 CFR 312) 

Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines 

DCA guidelines, dated 2011 

Site Survey dated August 23, 1985 and prepared by Southeastern Consulting Group 

Geologic Map of Atlanta, Georgia 30-minute x 60-minute Quadrangle, 2006, Georgia 

Geological Survey 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Wetland Delineation Manual, 1987 

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (NWI) map and 

endangered species 

United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Pierce 

County, http://soils.usda.gov/ 

Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance 

Rate Map, Fulton County, Georgia, Community Panel No. 130130110. December 18, 2009 

Official Code of Georgia Annotated (OCGA), Volume 10, 12-7-3 

Department of Natural Resources (DNR), National Heritage Inventory Program (NHIP) – 



9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



www.edrnet.com: Regulatory Review, City Directories, and aerial photographs dated 1938, 

1947, 1956, 1968, 1970, 1988, 1993, 2005 and 2006 

http://www.gaepd.org - Brownfield List dated January 11, 2010 

1968 Functional System Map of Pierce County, Georgia – Landfills 

Ms. Mary Whatley, GA EPD, Emergency Response Team (ERT) - 404-656-6905 

Mr. Jimmy Johnston, - Program Manager, GA EPD, Air Protection Branch, Planning and 

Support – 404 363-7014 

EPA’s Map of Radon Zones, Georgia, Radon Division Office of Radiation and Indoor Air US 

EPA, 1993 

Rules of DNR…391-3-6 Water Quality Control 

United States Geologic Survey, 7.5-minute series quadrangle Topographic Map, Blackshear 

West, dated 1971, photorevised 1988 

United States Geologic Survey, 7.5-minute series quadrangle Topographic Map, Blackshear 

East, dated 1971, photorevised 1988 

National Register of Historic Places (NAHRGIS) – historical preservation 

10.1 Purchase Price 

10.0 VALUATION REDUCTION 

The User indicated that the Purchase Price of the Project Site was representative of the fair 

market value for the vicinity of the Project Site. 

10.2 Interview of Broker Regarding Market Value 

United Consulting did not interview a broker regarding the market value of the Project Site. 

Based on the data provided to us and the results of our assessment, United Consulting’s opinion 

is that there is no differential in the purchase price due to environmental concerns. 

10.3 Differential between Purchase Price and Market Value 

In United Consulting’s opinion is that there is no differential in the purchase price due to 

environmental concerns. 


9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

10.4 Environmental Reasons For Any Differential 




United Consulting’s did not identify environmental concerns that would affect the purchase 

price. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

APPENDIX A – FIGURES AND MAPS

APPENDIX A 

__________________________________________________________ 

1. USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Map

APPENDIX A 

__________________________________________________________ 

2. FEMA Map

APPENDIX A 

__________________________________________________________ 

3. Site Map

APPENDIX A 

__________________________________________________________ 

4. USGS Topographic Map

APPENDIX B – PHOTOGRAPHS

Photograph 1: View of the Project Site buildings looking north. 

Photograph 2: Looking east from the Project Site.

Photograph 3: Looking west along the northern portion of the Project Site. 

Photograph 4: View of the central portion of the Project Site.

Photograph 5: Looking south from the Project Site. 

Photograph 6: Looking east along Ware Street.

Photograph 7: Looking west along Ware Street. 

Photograph 8: Looking south along Yeomans Street.

APPENDIX C – HISTORICAL RESEARCH DOCUMENTATION

APPENDIX C 

__________________________________________________________ 

1. Historic Aerial Maps



Blackshear, GA 31516 

Inquiry Number: 3049008.5 


The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package

EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 

Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist 

environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s 

professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo 

per decade. 

When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE 

ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more 

information contact your EDR Account Executive. 

Thank you for your business. 

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 

with any questions or comments. 

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice 

This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. 

It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO 

WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 

RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, 

MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL 

ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, 

ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, 

CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY 

LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, 

environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they 

be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site 

Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the 

information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. 

Copyright 2011 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map 

of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks 

used herein are the property of their respective owners.

Date EDR Searched Historical Sources: 

Aerial PhotographyApril 22, 2011 

Target Property: 



Year Scale Details Source 

1938 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=476' Flight Year: 1938 AAA 

1947 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=476' Flight Year: 1947 PMA 

1956 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=476' Flight Year: 1956 CSS 

1968 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=476' Flight Year: 1968 ASCS 

1970 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=950' Flight Year: 1970 USGS 

1988 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=950' Flight Year: 1988 USGS 

1993 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=950' Flight Year: 1993 NAPP 

2005 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=604' Flight Year: 2005 EDR 

2006 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=604' Flight Year: 2006 EDR 

3049008.5 

2

INQUIRY #: 

YEAR: 

1938 

3049008.5 

= 476'

INQUIRY #: 

YEAR: 

1947 

3049008.5 

= 476'

INQUIRY #: 

YEAR: 

1956 

3049008.5 

= 476'

INQUIRY #: 

YEAR: 

1968 

3049008.5 

= 476'

INQUIRY #: 

YEAR: 

1970 

3049008.5 

= 950'

INQUIRY #: 

YEAR: 

1988 

3049008.5 

= 950'

INQUIRY #: 

YEAR: 

1993 

3049008.5 

= 950'

INQUIRY #: 

YEAR: 

2005 

3049008.5 

= 604'

INQUIRY #: 

YEAR: 

2006 

3049008.5 

= 604'

APPENDIX C 

__________________________________________________________ 

2. Fire Insurance Maps

NOT APPLICABLE

APPENDIX C 

__________________________________________________________ 

3. Historical Topographical Maps




Inquiry Number: 3049008.4 


EDR Historical Topographic Map Report

EDR Historical Topographic Map Report 

Environmental Data Resources, Inc.s (EDR) Historical Topographic Map Report is designed to assist professionals in 

evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topographic Map Report 

includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the early 1900s. 





This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. 

It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO 

WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 

RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, 





LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, 

environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they 

be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site 

Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the 

information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. 

Copyright 2011 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map 

of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks 

used herein are the property of their respective owners.

N 

→ 

TARGET QUAD 

NAME: BLACKSHEAR WEST 

MAP YEAR: 1971 

SERIES: 7.5 

SCALE: 1:24000 

Historical Topographic Map 

SITE NAME: 940 Ware Street 

ADDRESS: 940 Ware Street 


LAT/LONG: 31.3024 / -82.2564 

CLIENT: United Consulting Group Ltd. 

CONTACT: Ian Pilling 

INQUIRY#: 3049008.4 

RESEARCH DATE: 04/22/2011

N 

→ 

TARGET QUAD 

NAME: BLACKSHEAR WEST 


PHOTOREVISED:1971 

SERIES: 7.5 

SCALE: 1:24000 





LAT/LONG: 31.3024 / -82.2564 



INQUIRY#: 3049008.4 


N 

→ 

ADJOINING QUAD 

NAME: BLACKSHEAR EAST 


SERIES: 7.5 

SCALE: 1:24000 





LAT/LONG: 31.3024 / -82.2564 



INQUIRY#: 3049008.4 


N 

→ 

ADJOINING QUAD 

NAME: BLACKSHEAR EAST 


PHOTOREVISED:1971 

SERIES: 7.5 

SCALE: 1:24000 





LAT/LONG: 31.3024 / -82.2564 



INQUIRY#: 3049008.4 


APPENDIX D – DOCUMENTATION FROM TITLE COMPANY/TITLE 

PROFESSIONAL

APPENDIX D 

__________________________________________________________ 

1. Recorded Land Title Records

HERITAGE VILLAGE BLACKSHEAR 

DEEDS IN CHAIN OF TITLE 

Land Lot 46, Ninth Land District 

PIERCE COUNTY, GA 

through May 17, 2011 

at 8:00 a.m. 

1. Warranty Deed of Correction from Heritage Village, Ltd. to Heritage Village Blackshear, 

L.P. dated December 20, 1990 and recorded in Deed Book 234, Page 41, Pierce County 

records. 

2. Warranty Deed of Correction from William Stephen Bowen, Jr. to Heritage Village, Ltd. 

dated May 2, 1980 and recorded in Deed Book 234, Page 39, Pierce County records. 

3. Warranty Deed from Heritage Village, Ltd. to Heritage Village Blackshear, Ltd. dated 

December 26, 1990 and recorded in Deed Book 226, Page 163, Pierce County records. 

4. Warranty Deed from William Stephen Bowen, Jr. to Heritage Village, Ltd. dated May 2, 

1980 and recorded in Deed Book 173, Page 286, Pierce County records. 

5. Warranty Deed from William Stephen Bowen, Jr. to Heritage Village, Ltd. dated March 

21, 1979 and recorded in Deed Book 168, Page 359, Pierce County records. 

6. Warranty Deed from Duke A. Raulerson and Sam B. Owens to William Stephen Bowen, 

Jr. dated September 1, 1977 and recorded in Deed Book 159, Page 361, Pierce County 

records. 

7. Warranty Deed from Robert Patterson Belvin to Duke A. Raulerson and Sam B. Owens 

dated March 31, 1971 and recorded in Deed Book 130, Page 580, Pierce County records. 

8. Deed from Mrs. Ella Belvin to Robert Patterson Belvin dated Ausust 29, 1947 and 

recorded in Deed Book 3-V, Page 314, Pierce County records. 

9. Executor’s Deed from J. P. Belvin, as Executor of the Estate of R. w. Belvin to Mrs. Ella 

Belvin dated April 20, 1946 and recorded in Deed Book 3-X, Page 107, Pierce County 

records. 

10. Warranty Deed from The A. P. Brantley Company to R. W. Belvin dated November 11, 

1907 and recorded in Deed Book P, Page 523, Pierce County records.

APPENDIX D 

__________________________________________________________ 

2. Records of Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitation

HERITAGE VILLAGE BLACKSHEAR 

DEEDS IN CHAIN OF TITLE 

Land Lot 46, Ninth Land District 

PIERCE COUNTY, GA 

through May 17, 2011 

at 8:00 a.m. 

1. Warranty Deed of Correction from Heritage Village, Ltd. to Heritage Village Blackshear, 

L.P. dated December 20, 1990 and recorded in Deed Book 234, Page 41, Pierce County 

records. 

2. Warranty Deed of Correction from William Stephen Bowen, Jr. to Heritage Village, Ltd. 

dated May 2, 1980 and recorded in Deed Book 234, Page 39, Pierce County records. 

3. Warranty Deed from Heritage Village, Ltd. to Heritage Village Blackshear, Ltd. dated 

December 26, 1990 and recorded in Deed Book 226, Page 163, Pierce County records. 

4. Warranty Deed from William Stephen Bowen, Jr. to Heritage Village, Ltd. dated May 2, 

1980 and recorded in Deed Book 173, Page 286, Pierce County records. 

5. Warranty Deed from William Stephen Bowen, Jr. to Heritage Village, Ltd. dated March 

21, 1979 and recorded in Deed Book 168, Page 359, Pierce County records. 

6. Warranty Deed from Duke A. Raulerson and Sam B. Owens to William Stephen Bowen, 

Jr. dated September 1, 1977 and recorded in Deed Book 159, Page 361, Pierce County 

records. 

7. Warranty Deed from Robert Patterson Belvin to Duke A. Raulerson and Sam B. Owens 

dated March 31, 1971 and recorded in Deed Book 130, Page 580, Pierce County records. 

8. Deed from Mrs. Ella Belvin to Robert Patterson Belvin dated Ausust 29, 1947 and 

recorded in Deed Book 3-V, Page 314, Pierce County records. 

9. Executor’s Deed from J. P. Belvin, as Executor of the Estate of R. w. Belvin to Mrs. Ella 

Belvin dated April 20, 1946 and recorded in Deed Book 3-X, Page 107, Pierce County 

records. 

10. Warranty Deed from The A. P. Brantley Company to R. W. Belvin dated November 11, 

1907 and recorded in Deed Book P, Page 523, Pierce County records.

APPENDIX D 

__________________________________________________________ 

3. Legal Description

APPENDIX E – PHASE II REPORT(S)

APPENDIX E 

__________________________________________________________ 

1. Current Phase II Scope of Work

NOT APPLICABLE

APPENDIX E 

__________________________________________________________ 

2. Current Phase II Report

NOT APPLICABLE

APPENDIX E 

__________________________________________________________ 


a. Lead Based Paint


625 Holcomb Bridge Road | Norcross, GA 30071 | (770) 209-0029 

www.unitedconsulting.com 

REPORT 

Asbestos and 

Lead Based Paint Survey 



Pierce County 

Blackshear, Georgia 

Project Number 


Report Date: 

June 2, 2011

June 2, 2011 

Veranda Blackshear, LP 

c/o Realtex Development Corporation 

1101 S. Capital of Texas Highway 

Bldg. F, Suite 200 

Austin, TX 78746 

Attn: Mr. Ricky Deyoe 

RE: Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey 



Blackshear, Pierce County, Georgia 

Project No. 2011.2232.01 

Dear Mr. Deyoe: 






United Consulting has completed the Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey on the above 

referenced Project Site. These activities were performed by an accredited asbestos inspector in 

substantial conformance with industry standards. It was our pleasure to assist you with this 

project and look forward to assisting you with future projects. Please contact us if you have any 

questions or if we can be of further assistance. 

Sincerely, 


Ian G. Pilling, LEED AP Seth H. Hobson. 

Senior Environmental Specialist Senior Environmental Specialist 

IGP/SHH/tl 

http://ucblade10/sites/Geotechenv/4912/2010.0734.01/Environmental Documents/2010.0734.01.asb.lbp.doc 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d


Heritage Village 


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................2 

DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY ......................................................................................................2 

SCOPE .............................................................................................................................................5 

BULK SAMPLE COLLECTION ....................................................................................................6 

Overview ......................................................................................................................................6 

Sample Location Selection ...........................................................................................................6 

Procedure ......................................................................................................................................6 

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS .........................................................................................................7 

Procedure ......................................................................................................................................7 

BULK SAMPLE RESULTS ............................................................................................................7 

Overview ......................................................................................................................................7 

Asbestos Containing Materials .....................................................................................................7 

Inaccessible Areas ......................................................................................................................10 

DATA EVALUATION/ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................10 

LIMITATIONS ..............................................................................................................................11 

FIGURES 

Figure 1 Sample Location Plan – Unit 49 




Figure 5 Sample Location Plan – Community Center 

APPENDICES 

Appendix A Photographic Documentation 

Appendix B Certifications 

Appendix C Laboratory Results 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 



United Consulting has completed the Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey on the Heritage 

Village Apartments complex located at 940 Ware Street in Blackshear, Pierce County, Georgia 

(hereinafter referred to in this report as the Project Site). The results are briefly summarized 

below. The text of the report should be reviewed for a discussion of the following items: 

I. Limited Lead Based Paint Survey 

1. United Consulting performed a lead-based paint survey of the Project Site building to 

visually identify suspect lead-based paint films on the door and door casings located on 

the exterior of the buildings which were previously determined to possibly contain lead 

based paint. Thirty one representative paint chip samples were collected from the Project 

Site and submitted for laboratory testing to determine the lead concentrations in the paint 

films. 

2. The painted surfaces identified at the Project Site were in poor to fair condition at the 

time of United Consulting’s survey activities. The thirty one samples collected were not 

found to contain lead above the current HUD action level of 0.5% lead by weight. 

3. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations require that workers 

be protected from exposure to lead via proper engineering controls and appropriate levels 

of personal protective equipment. 

II. Asbestos Survey 

1. Bulk samples of typical suspect asbestos-containing materials such as drywall system 

materials, resilient flooring materials, and ceiling materials, were collected and submitted 

to a laboratory for testing using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). 

2. Regulated concentrations of asbestos were identified in materials at the Project Site. 

These materials included: linoleum flooring, vinyl floor tile, and sink soundproofing. 

3. The National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requires the 

removal of asbestos-containing materials prior to activities, which would disturb them. 

United Consulting recommends that the asbestos-containing materials be removed, prior 

to renovation activities which may disturb them by a qualified asbestos abatement 

contractor, using State of Georgia accredited personnel, in accordance with applicable 

federal, state and local regulations governing the removal of asbestos-containing 

material. 

1 This Executive Summary is not intended to be used or relied upon without reference to the entire report and 

cannot otherwise be properly understood and interpreted. It is provided solely for the convenience of the Client and 

not as a substitute for the report or review of the report. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



4. A Ten-Day Notification must be forwarded to the Georgia Department of Natural 

Resources - Environmental Protection Division, by the building owner or 

demolition/renovation contractor, prior to the start of any building demolition/renovation 

activities. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

INTRODUCTION 




United Consulting was retained by the National Development Foundation, Inc. to perform a 

Limited Lead Based Paint and Asbestos Survey on the Project Site. The terms and conditions for 

these surveys were set forth in United Consulting’s proposals 2011.2232.01R and 

2011.2232.01R2, which were authorized by the client. The purpose of the asbestos survey was 

to collect and test representative samples of common building materials for the presence of 

asbestos fibers that may be present in the Project Site structures, which United Consulting 

understands, are to be renovated. The purpose of the limited lead based paint survey was to 

determine if lead paint was present on the exterior doors and door casings. Photographs of the 

Project Site structure are included in Appendix A. 

The lead-based paint survey and asbestos bulk sample collection activities were performed by 

United Consulting representatives, Mr. Ian G. Pilling. Mr. Pilling is an accredited Asbestos 

Inspectors in accordance with the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), 

Inspector Certificate Numbers 12472. Mr. Pilling is a licensed lead based paint inspector with 

the State of Georgia, certification number 1400. His certification and that of the laboratory used 

for this investigation are reproduced in Appendix B. 

DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY 

The Project Site was developed with sixteen single-story apartment buildings and a single story 

community center building. The apartment complex contained 64 units which were 

approximately 500 square feet in size. The apartment complex was constructed in the late 1970s 

and reportedly renovated in the 1990s. 

The buildings were wood framed structures with the exteriors finished with brick. The interior 

walls and ceilings were wood framed finished with drywall; the ceilings contained a textured 

finish. The floors were poured concrete covered with carpet, linoleum or vinyl floor tile. The 

windows were metal framed. The buildings contained a pitched roof finished with shingles. Of 

the units surveyed, only one unit was observed to contain a sink with a soundproofing material. 

Additionally, based on the type of exterior doors at the Project Site, it does not appear the doors 

are original to the apartment complex and therefore, were likely produced after 1978 and do not 

contain lead based paint as was verified through sampling. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

I. LEAD BASED PAINT SURVEY 

PREVIOUS LEAD BASED PAINT SURVEY 




A Lead Based Paint Inspection and Risk Assessment for lead was previously conducted on the 

Heritage Village Apartments with the report dated April 20, 2005 and performed by Progressive 

Environmental. The lead based paint survey was conducted using an XRF and included 23 units. 

Approximately 1,200 XRF tests were taken at the Project Site with a total of 87 tests conducted 

on the exterior doors and door casings. Of these 87 tests performed on the exterior doors and 

door casings, four testes showed an inconsistent result for lead, e.g. the XRF produced a negative 

reading for lead but the actual number produced by XRF was shown to be above the Housing 

and Urban Development (HUD) level of 1.0 mg/cm 2 . None of the remaining 1,200 XRF tests 

showed lead above the HUD level. These four readings were collected within 10 minutes of 

each other, which indicated that these readings were actually due to a malfunction in the 

instrument and not indicative to the actual presence of lead based paint. The previously 

conducted report is included in appendix E, Section 3.a of the Phase I environmental report. 

PURPOSE 

The buildings that were previously identified to possibly contain exterior LBP were building 4, 

building 5, and building 12. In order to determine if the previous positive readings were true or 

false, United Consulting collect a limited number of paint chip samples from the exterior doors 

and door casings from the previously identified buildings as well as the five additional buildings 

that were not previously tested. 

The purpose of the Lead-Based Paint Survey was to visually identify suspect lead-based paint 

films on the exterior doors and door frames which during a previously performed lead based 

paint survey, were determined to possibly contain lead based paint. United Consulting 

performed the survey in substantial conformance to industry standards. 

SCOPE 

The lead-based paint survey involved the following protocol: 

1. Visually examined exterior doors and door frames to identify suspect lead-based paint 

films; 

2. Described each suspect lead-based paint film and noted the components or surfaces to 

which the paint films were applied; 

3. Assessed the condition of the suspect lead-based paint films and noted the condition of 

the painted surface; 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



4. Collected thirty one paint chip samples of suspect lead-based paint films from 

representative samples of the interior and exterior building components and submitted 

these samples for analysis utilizing Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS). 

Procedure 

SAMPLE ANALYSIS 

Thirty one (31) paint chip samples were obtained by either chipping or coring the film and 

substrate materials. Each sample was removed using a clean knife or core, and placed in a new 

dedicated container. Each container was separately labeled and taken to the laboratory for 

analytical testing. Each sample was assigned a unique sample number and delivered to an 

independent laboratory (Analytical Environmental Services, Inc.) for analysis. Chain of Custody 

was documented and retained on-file. The laboratory results are attached in Appendix C. The 

locations of the samples collected during this survey are found on Figure 1. 

Overview 

SURVEY RESULTS 

The paint chip samples were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis. The samples 

collected were found to contain lead at a concentration below 0.5 % or below reportable limits. 

Table 1 lists the sample descriptions and laboratory results. Photocopies of the laboratory results 

are included in Appendix C. 

SAMPLE 

NUMBER 

TABLE 1: LEAD BASED PAINT SAMPLE RESULTS 

CONDITION 

LOCATION 


COLOR 

PERCENT LEAD 

BY WEIGHT 

L-1 Good Unit 49, bldg 13, back casing Brown BRL 

L-2 Good Unit 49, bldg 13, back door Brown BRL 

L-3 Good Unit 49, bldg 13, front casing Brown BRL 

L-4 Good Unit 49, bldg 13, front door Brown BRL 





L-9 Good Unit 17, bldg 17, back casing Brown 0.0184 

L-10 Good Unit 17, bldg 17, back door Brown BRL 

L-11 Good Unit 17, bldg 17, back casing Brown BRL 

L-12 Good Unit 17, bldg 17, back casing Brown BRL 




9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

L-17 Good Unit 45, bldg 12, back door Brown BRL 












L-30 Good Unit 62, bldg 17, front casing Brown BRL 

L-31 Good Unit 62, bldg 17, front door Brown BRL 

L-32 Good Unit 62, bldg 17, back casing Brown BRL 

L-33 Good Unit 62, bldg 17, back door Brown BRL 

Notes: BRL: Not Detected at the Reporting Limit 

Bldg; Building 

ASSESSMENT/RECOMMENDATIONS 




A total of thirty one paint chip samples were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis. 

The samples collected were not found to contain lead at concentrations above the current 

HUD action level of 0.5% lead by weight. Further, the thirty of the thirty one samples were 

below laboratory detection limits. Based on these results it is United Consulting’s opinion that 

the exterior doors and door casings do not contain lead based paint. 

II. ASBESTOS SURVEY 

SCOPE 

In performing the assessment, United Consulting's representative: 

1. Visually examined the accessible areas of the building to identify suspect asbestoscontaining 

materials which could be impacted by the planned demolition activities; 

2. Physically examined suspect materials to evaluate whether the materials were friable or 

non-friable (a friable material is any material that, when dry, may be crumbled, 

pulverized or reduced to a powder using hand pressure); 

3. Described the suspect material and noted the area where the material was located; 

4. Assessed the condition of the suspect materials to be sampled as well as their potential 

for impact during the planned renovation/demolition; 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

5. Collected 98 bulk samples of suspect materials for testing; 




6. Tested bulk samples obtained for detectable concentrations of asbestos using PLM and 

dispersion oil staining; 

7. Prepared this report to document the sampling activities and results of the tests 

performed. 

Overview 

BULK SAMPLE COLLECTION 

Bulk sampling was performed in substantial conformance with the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency’s (EPA's), "Guidance for Controlling Asbestos-Containing Materials in 

Buildings" (EPA 560/5-85-024, 1985). 

Sample Location Selection 

Sample locations were randomly chosen in the field, based on the identification of suspect 

asbestos-containing material. A distributed sampling plan based on a randomized sampling 

scheme was not used for this sampling program. This survey was being conducted to evaluate 

the property for the presence of asbestos prior to possible renovation of the buildings. 

Bulk samples were collected from typical suspect materials such as drywall, linoleum flooring, 

textured ceiling, and other suspect materials. Bulk samples were not collected of non-suspect 

materials such as carpets, drapes, wood, fiberglass insulation or ceramic tiles. 

Procedure 

Samples were collected by wetting the material to be sampled, by extracting a representative 

section of the suspect material and by placing the material in a sample container. Each sample 

was assigned a unique sample number and delivered to an independent laboratory (Analytical 

Environmental Services, Inc.) for analysis. Chain of Custody was documented and retained onfile. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

Procedure 

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS 




The bulk samples were tested for detectable concentrations of asbestos (greater than one percent 

asbestos) utilizing Polarized PLM and dispersion staining techniques. The testing method used 

was the “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA 

600/M4-82020, as amended). Bulk sample testing was performed by Analytical Environmental 

Services, Inc., a successful participant in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation 

Program (NVLAP), certificate number 102082-0. 

Asbestos identification was achieved by examining the morphology and optical properties of the 

sampled material. Optical properties include the color under dispersion staining, birefringence, 

extinction characteristics, and Sign of Elongation. Quantification was obtained by visual 

estimation. The PLM method may be used for the analysis of samples containing from 0 to 100 

percent asbestos. The lower limit of detection is less than 1 percent and the upper detection limit 

is 100 percent. Results are reported as percent of asbestos by type (e.g. Amosite, Chrysotile, 

Crocidolite, etc.). Additional information such as other fibrous and non-fibrous components is 

also reported if noted in the sample. 

Overview 

BULK SAMPLE RESULTS 

United Consulting collected 98 bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials from the 

Project Site buildings. The assessment of results discussed below has been compiled by 

homogenous area and material type (e.g., linoleum, drywall, etc.). Photocopies of the laboratory 

results are included in Appendix C, and a complete list of all the bulk samples collected is 

provided in Table 2. The materials identified as containing asbestos are described below. 

Sample locations are shown on Figure 1. 

Asbestos Containing Materials 

Materials identified at the Project Site as containing regulated concentrations of asbestos fibers 

include: 

• Linoleum flooring kitchens and bathrooms (linoleum located underneath floor tile 

in all units tested) 

• Sink soundproofing (only identified in one of the four units surveyed) 

• 12” x 12” vinyl floor tile in the Community Center 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

SAMPLE 

NUMBER 

CONDITION 

FRIABILITY 

TABLE 2: ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLES 




LOCATION MATERIAL RESULTS 

A-1 Good Non-friable 

Unit 49, kitchen 

and bathroom 

12” x 12” VFT white ND 



and bathroom 




and bathroom 




and bathroom 

Linoleum yellow, under 12” x 

12” VFT 

30 % ch 



and bathroom 


12” VFT 

30 % ch 



and bathroom 


12” VFT 

30 % ch 

A-7 Good friable Unit 49 Textured Ceiling ND 



A-10 Good friable Unit 49 Drywall Materials ND 







A-17 Good Non friable Unit 49 Caulking Kitchen ND 

A-18 Good Non friable Unit 49 Caulking Kitchen ND 



and bathroom 




and bathroom 




and bathroom 




and bathroom 


12” VFT 

30 % ch 



and bathroom 


12” VFT 

30 % ch 



and bathroom 


12” VFT 

30 % ch 












9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d




SAMPLE 

NUMBER 

CONDITION 

FRIABILITY 


A-36 Good Non friable Unit 15 Caulking Window ND 




and bathroom 




and bathroom 




and bathroom 




and bathroom 

Linoleum red, under 12” x 12” 

VFT 

30 % ch 



and bathroom 


VFT 

30 % ch 



and bathroom 


VFT 

30 % ch 

















A-60 Good friable Unit 32 Drywall Materials ND 





and bathroom 


12” VFT 

30 % ch 



and bathroom 


12” VFT 

30 % ch 



and bathroom 


12” VFT 

30 % ch 



and bathroom 




and bathroom 




and bathroom 








9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d




SAMPLE 

NUMBER 

CONDITION 

FRIABILITY 



A-76 Good friable Unit 32 Sink Soundproofing 5 % ch 

A-77 Good friable Unit 32 Sink Soundproofing 5 % ch 

A-78 Good friable 

Community 

Center 

Textured Ceiling ND 



Center 




Center 




Center 




Center 




Center 

12” x 12” VFT brown 2 % ch 



Center 




Center 




Center 

Drywall Materials ND 



Center 




Center 




Center 




Center 




Center 

Roofing ND 



Center 

Roofing ND 

A-93 Good friable Bldg 6 Roofing ND 




A-97 Good friable Bldg12 Roofing ND 


Bold = regulated asbestos containing materials 

ND= Non-detect; CH=chrysotile 

Inaccessible Areas 

Areas within walls, behind mirrors, and above ceilings were not accessed during this assessment. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

DATA EVALUATION/ASSESSMENT 




Regulated concentrations of asbestos were identified in three of the bulk samples collected from 

the linoleum flooring, sink soundproofing, and vinyl floor tile located in the community center. 

Based on the units surveyed, asbestos containing linoleum flooring is assumed to be located in 

every unit under the vinyl floor tile. The sink soundproofing was only identified in one of the 

units surveyed; however, it is possibly present in other units within the apartment complex. Any 

sinks identified to contain a coating underneath the sink should be treated as asbestos containing. 

In the event that inaccessible, suspect ACM are encountered within previously inaccessible 

building areas (wall cavities, columns, etc.) at the time of demolition, United Consulting should 

be contacted and proper samples of the suspect materials should be collected and submitted for 

testing, prior to continuing demolition activities which could disturb these materials and 

potentially result in an asbestos fiber release. 

The National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requires the removal 

of asbestos-containing materials prior to activities, which would disturb them. United Consulting 

recommends that the asbestos-containing materials be removed, prior to demolition by a 

qualified asbestos abatement contractor, using State of Georgia accredited personnel, in 

accordance with applicable federal, state and local regulations governing the removal of 

asbestos-containing material. 

A properly prepared Ten Day Notification must be forwarded to the Georgia Department of 

Natural Resources - Environmental Protection Division, by the building owner or renovation 

contractor, prior to the start of any building demolition/renovation activities. A blank copy of 

the notification form is included in Appendix D for your use. 

LIMITATIONS 

The conclusions presented in this Lead Based Paint and Asbestos Survey are based on the 

laboratory results and condition of the materials identified. Concentrations will vary between 

sample locations, and in un-sampled locations. No other warranty or guarantee is expressed or 

implied. 

Representative areas of the Project Site were sampled. Preparation of abatement design bid 

documents or scopes of work for abatement, may require additional sampling and definition of 

the extent of the asbestos materials. United Consulting shall not be held responsible for errors, 

miscalculations, assumptions, misinterpretations or other problems or liabilities arising from, or 

associated with, firms or individuals bidding on asbestos abatement work that rely solely, or in 

part, on this document. 

9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d



This report has been prepared on behalf of Realtex Development Corporation, GHFA, and 

DCA. Should any other person, partnership, or corporation desire to rely upon this report, it will 

be necessary for United Consulting to update the report for the new user. 

The conclusions presented in this Lead-Based Paint Survey report are based on the results and 

condition of the materials identified. Lead concentrations will vary between sample locations. 

Our assessment of the Project Site is a professional opinion arrived at through the method and 

procedures accepted by, and standard to, the industry. No other warranty or guarantee is 

expressed or implied. 



9 0 0 1 : 2 0 0 8 C e r t i f i e d

APPENDIX A – PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION

United Consulting Project No. # 2011.2232.01 

Photo # 1.: View of the Project Site buildings. 

Photo # 2.: View of the Project Site buildings.


Photo # 3.: View of the identified asbestos containing linoleum flooring and non asbestos containing 

vinyl floor tile. 

Photo # 4: View of the asbestos containing sink soundproofing material.


Photo # 5: View of exterior door and door casings at the Project Site. 

Photo #6: View of exterior door and door casings at the Project Site.

APPENDIX B – CERTIFICATIONS

APPENDIX C – LABORATORY RESULTS

ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

- 

3785 Pres~dent~al Pkwy , Atlanta. GA 30340-3704 

(770) 457-8 177 /Toll Free (800) 972-4889 1 Fax (770) 457 81 88 

CHAIN OF CUSTODY 

7 

BULK ASBESTOS ANALYSIS (/omqc 

- , 

Phone. (7)C;62-NI& 

Address 60 Fax: ( ) 

Clty, State, Zip: Project Name !&L l v, [lqS &d- 

Contact. -------sf--. Project Number. Zc 11 . 2232,ol 

Sampler's Name. Sampl~ng Date. 

11 - Il 

12 -12 

13 - 13 

14 - /#, 

15 6, 

16 - /L 

17 -- /7 

18 /y 

19 - /1 

Rellnqulshed by 

J 

/ 

I 

? 1 

I i 

I I 

1 u 

r\I\ /air( 

Recelved by c?=- 

I 

Rellnqu~shedby DatelT~me 

Rece~vedby DatelT~me 

Lab Rec~p~ent Method of Sh~pment 

Page 1 of 34

Client Name: 

Address: 


3785 Presidential Pkwy., Atlanta, GA 30340-3704 

(770)457-81 77 1 Toll Free (800) 972-4889 I Fax (770) 457-81 88 


BULK ASBESTOS ANALYSIS 

/\ 

(I 

Phone: 

Fax: 

City, State, Zip: Project Name: 

Contact : 

Sampler's Name: 


Project Number: 

Sampling Date: 

( 

( 

) 

) 

- 

Client Name: ofl.~ 



(770)457-81 77 1Toll Free (800)972-48891Fax (770)457-8188 



& 3 (& fl w\-\; fi 

Phone: 

Address: Fax: 


Contact : 


fl 

0

Client Name: 

Address: 



(770)457-81 77 / Toll Free (800)972-4889/ Fax (770) 457-81 88 

hi,u /L1y 



(.J 

Phone: 

Fax: 


?& 45- 

/ 

( 1 

llor? clc 

Contact : Project Number: Dl/(,2232,df 

Relinquished by: DatelTirne: 

Rece~vedby, 

/ /'M 1 DatelT~me: 

y/ 

Lab Rec~p~enl DateIT~nieFOTcJ>Y 

Methad of Sh~prnenl 


Client Name: 

Address: 



(770) 457-81 77 /Toll Free (800) 972-4889 / Fax (770) 457-81 88 



U 

Phone: 

Fax: 


Contact : Project Number: 

Sampler's Name: Sampling Date: 

Relinquished by: DatelTime: 

Recetved by: P*P DateiTirne: 

/

Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-1 

Layer: 1 

A-2 

Layer: 1 

A-2 

Layer: 2 

A-3 

Layer: 1 

A-3 

Layer: 2 

A-4 

Layer: 1 

A-4 

Layer: 2 


Bulk Sample Summary Report 

United Consulting Group Inc. 

AES Job Number: 

1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 

HERITAGE VILLAGE Project Number: 2011.2232.01 

Client ID AES ID Location 

Asbestos Mineral Percentage Comments 

CH AM CR AN TR AC 

1105995- 

001A 

1105995- 

002A 

1105995- 

002A 

1105995- 

003A 

1105995- 

003A 

1105995- 

004A 

1105995- 

004A 

12x12 VFT White, Kit / Bath 

Unit 49 


Unit 49 


Unit 49 


Unit 49 


Unit 49 

Linoleum Yellow Kit / Bath 

Unit 49 


Unit 49 

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite 

For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets. 

ND = None Detected 

PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials. Quantitative TEM 

is currently the only method that can be used to determine the conclusive asbestos content. 

It is certified by the signatures below that the laboratory identified is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology for 

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis under the EPA Interim Asbestos Bulk Sample Quality Assurance Program, Laboratory ID 102082-0. All 

percentages given are by visually estimated volume. All analyses are performed in accordance with the EPA "Method for the Determination of Asbestos 

in Bulk Building Materials, EPA/600/R-93/116, July 1993." This report must not be reproduced except in full without the approval of Analytical 

Environmental Service, Inc. These test results apply only to the samples actually tested. 

Microanalyst: QC Analyst: 

Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

Yelena Khanina 

Floor Tile with glue 



Dark Yellow Mastic 

Vinyl

Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-4 

Layer: 3 

A-4 

Layer: 4 

A-5 

Layer: 1 

A-5 

Layer: 2 

A-5 

Layer: 3 

A-5 

Layer: 4 

A-6 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

004A 

1105995- 

004A 

1105995- 

005A 

1105995- 

005A 

1105995- 

005A 

1105995- 

005A 

1105995- 

006A 


Unit 49 


Unit 49 


Unit 49 


Unit 49 


Unit 49 


Unit 49 


Unit 49 












Vira Ruiz 


30 

ND 

ND 

ND 

30 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 


Backing 

Beige Mastic 


Vinyl 

Backing 

Beige Mastic 

Dark Yellow Mastic

Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-6 

Layer: 2 

A-6 

Layer: 3 

A-7 

Layer: 1 

A-8 

Layer: 1 

A-9 

Layer: 1 

A-10 

Layer: 1 

A-10 

Layer: 2 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

006A 

1105995- 

006A 

1105995- 

007A 

1105995- 

008A 

1105995- 

009A 

1105995- 

010A 

1105995- 

010A 


Unit 49 


Unit 49 

Text Ceiling, Unit 49 



Drywall, Unit 49 













Vira Ruiz 


ND 

30 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 


Vinyl 

Backing 

Paint included as binder 



Paint included as binder

Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-10 

Layer: 3 

A-10 

Layer: 4 

A-11 

Layer: 1 

A-11 

Layer: 2 

A-11 

Layer: 3 

A-11 

Layer: 4 

A-12 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

010A 

1105995- 

010A 

1105995- 

011A 

1105995- 

011A 

1105995- 

011A 

1105995- 

011A 

1105995- 

012A 



















Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 




Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-12 

Layer: 2 

A-12 

Layer: 3 

A-12 

Layer: 4 

A-13 

Layer: 1 

A-13 

Layer: 2 

A-13 

Layer: 3 

A-13 

Layer: 4 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

012A 

1105995- 

012A 

1105995- 

012A 

1105995- 

013A 

1105995- 

013A 

1105995- 

013A 

1105995- 

013A 



















Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 



Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-14 

Layer: 1 

A-14 

Layer: 2 

A-14 

Layer: 3 

A-14 

Layer: 4 

A-15 

Layer: 1 

A-15 

Layer: 2 

A-16 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

014A 

1105995- 

014A 

1105995- 

014A 

1105995- 

014A 

1105995- 

015A 

1105995- 

015A 

1105995- 

016A 



















Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 





Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-16 

Layer: 2 

A-17 

Layer: 1 

A-18 

Layer: 1 

A-19 

Layer: 1 

A-20 

Layer: 1 

A-21 

Layer: 1 

A-22 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

016A 

1105995- 

017A 

1105995- 

018A 

1105995- 

019A 

1105995- 

020A 

1105995- 

021A 

1105995- 

022A 


Caulking Kitchen 


12x12, White VFT, Kit / Bath 

Unit 15 


Unit 15 


Unit 15 

Linoleum, Yellow Kit / Bath 

Unit 15 












Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 




Floor Tile 



Pad with glue

Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-22 

Layer: 2 

A-22 

Layer: 3 

A-23 

Layer: 1 

A-23 

Layer: 2 

A-23 

Layer: 3 

A-24 

Layer: 1 

A-24 

Layer: 2 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

022A 

1105995- 

022A 

1105995- 

023A 

1105995- 

023A 

1105995- 

023A 

1105995- 

024A 

1105995- 

024A 


Unit 15 


Unit 15 


Unit 15 


Unit 15 


Unit 15 


Unit 15 


Unit 15 












Vira Ruiz 


ND 

30 

ND 

ND 

30 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 


Vinyl 

Backing 

Pad with glue 

Vinyl 

Backing with glue 

Pad with glue 

Vinyl

Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-24 

Layer: 3 

A-25 

Layer: 1 

A-25 

Layer: 2 

A-26 

Layer: 1 

A-26 

Layer: 2 

A-27 

Layer: 1 

A-27 

Layer: 2 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

024A 

1105995- 

025A 

1105995- 

025A 

1105995- 

026A 

1105995- 

026A 

1105995- 

027A 

1105995- 

027A 


Unit 15 


















Vira Ruiz 


30 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 


Backing 




Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-27 

Layer: 3 

A-28 

Layer: 1 

A-28 

Layer: 2 

A-28 

Layer: 3 

A-28 

Layer: 4 

A-29 

Layer: 1 

A-29 

Layer: 2 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

027A 

1105995- 

028A 

1105995- 

028A 

1105995- 

028A 

1105995- 

028A 

1105995- 

029A 

1105995- 

029A 



















Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 




Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-29 

Layer: 3 

A-29 

Layer: 4 

A-30 

Layer: 1 

A-30 

Layer: 2 

A-30 

Layer: 3 

A-30 

Layer: 4 

A-31 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

029A 

1105995- 

029A 

1105995- 

030A 

1105995- 

030A 

1105995- 

030A 

1105995- 

030A 

1105995- 

031A 







Text Ceiling 












Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 




Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-32 

Layer: 1 

A-33 

Layer: 1 

A-34 

Layer: 1 

A-35 

Layer: 1 

A-36 

Layer: 1 

A-37 

Layer: 1 

A-38 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

032A 

1105995- 

033A 

1105995- 

034A 

1105995- 

035A 

1105995- 

036A 

1105995- 

037A 

1105995- 

038A 

Text Ceiling 

Text Ceiling 



Caulking Window 

Caulking Window 

12x12, White, Kit / Bath Unit 

18 












Vira Ruiz 

Page 17 of 34 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 








Floor Tile with glue

Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-39 

Layer: 1 

A-40 

Layer: 1 

A-41 

Layer: 1 

A-41 

Layer: 2 

A-41 

Layer: 3 

A-42 

Layer: 1 

A-42 

Layer: 2 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

039A 

1105995- 

040A 

1105995- 

041A 

1105995- 

041A 

1105995- 

041A 

1105995- 

042A 

1105995- 

042A 


18 


18 

Linoleum, Red, Kit / Bath 

Unit 18 


Unit 18 


Unit 18 


Unit 18 


Unit 18 












Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

30 

ND 

ND 

30 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 




Vinyl 

Backing 

Yellow Mastic 

Vinyl 

Backing

Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-42 

Layer: 3 

A-43 

Layer: 1 

A-43 

Layer: 2 

A-43 

Layer: 3 

A-44 

Layer: 1 

A-45 

Layer: 1 

A-46 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

042A 

1105995- 

043A 

1105995- 

043A 

1105995- 

043A 

1105995- 

044A 

1105995- 

045A 

1105995- 

046A 


Unit 18 


Unit 18 


Unit 18 


Unit 18 















Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

30 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 


Yellow Mastic 

Vinyl 

Backing 

Yellow Mastic 




Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-47 

Layer: 1 

A-47 

Layer: 2 

A-47 

Layer: 3 

A-48 

Layer: 1 

A-48 

Layer: 2 

A-48 

Layer: 3 

A-48 

Layer: 4 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

047A 

1105995- 

047A 

1105995- 

047A 

1105995- 

048A 

1105995- 

048A 

1105995- 

048A 

1105995- 

048A 



















Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 




Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-49 

Layer: 1 

A-49 

Layer: 2 

A-50 

Layer: 1 

A-50 

Layer: 2 

A-50 

Layer: 3 

A-51 

Layer: 1 

A-51 

Layer: 2 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

049A 

1105995- 

049A 

1105995- 

050A 

1105995- 

050A 

1105995- 

050A 

1105995- 

051A 

1105995- 

051A 



















Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 




Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-52 

Layer: 1 

A-52 

Layer: 2 

A-52 

Layer: 3 

A-52 

Layer: 4 

A-53 

Layer: 1 

A-53 

Layer: 2 

A-54 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

052A 

1105995- 

052A 

1105995- 

052A 

1105995- 

052A 

1105995- 

053A 

1105995- 

053A 

1105995- 

054A 





Caulking Kitchen, Unit 18 














Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 




Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-54 

Layer: 2 

A-55 

Layer: 1 

A-56 

Layer: 1 

A-57 

Layer: 1 

A-57 

Layer: 2 

A-57 

Layer: 3 

A-58 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

054A 

1105995- 

055A 

1105995- 

056A 

1105995- 

057A 

1105995- 

057A 

1105995- 

057A 

1105995- 

058A 


Caulking, Window, Unit 18 

Caulking, Window, Unit 18 
















Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 





Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-58 

Layer: 2 

A-58 

Layer: 3 

A-59 

Layer: 1 

A-59 

Layer: 2 

A-59 

Layer: 3 


Layer: 1 


Layer: 2 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

058A 

1105995- 

058A 

1105995- 

059A 

1105995- 

059A 

1105995- 

059A 

1105995- 


1105995- 




















Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 




Client Name: 

Project Name: 


Layer: 3 

A-61 

Layer: 1 

A-61 

Layer: 2 

A-61 

Layer: 3 

A-62 

Layer: 1 

A-62 

Layer: 2 

A-62 

Layer: 3 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 


1105995- 

061A 

1105995- 

061A 

1105995- 

061A 

1105995- 

062A 

1105995- 

062A 

1105995- 

062A 



















Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 




Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-63 

Layer: 1 

A-63 

Layer: 2 

A-63 

Layer: 3 

A-64 

Layer: 1 

A-64 

Layer: 2 

A-64 

Layer: 3 

A-65 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

063A 

1105995- 

063A 

1105995- 

063A 

1105995- 

064A 

1105995- 

064A 

1105995- 

064A 

1105995- 

065A 


Unit 32 


Unit 32 


Unit 32 


Unit 32 


Unit 32 


Unit 32 


Unit 32 












Vira Ruiz 


ND 

30 

ND 

ND 

30 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 


Vinyl 

Backing 


Vinyl 

Backing 


Vinyl

Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-65 

Layer: 2 

A-65 

Layer: 3 

A-65 

Layer: 4 

A-66 

Layer: 1 

A-67 

Layer: 1 

A-68 

Layer: 1 

A-69 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

065A 

1105995- 

065A 

1105995- 

065A 

1105995- 

066A 

1105995- 

067A 

1105995- 

068A 

1105995- 

069A 


Unit 32 


Unit 32 


Unit 32 

12x12 VFT White, Kit, Unit 

32 


32 


32 













Vira Ruiz 


30 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 


Backing 


Leveling Compound 

Brown / Dark Gray Vinyl with 

glue 


glue 


glue

Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-69 

Layer: 2 

A-69 

Layer: 3 

A-69 

Layer: 4 

A-70 

Layer: 1 

A-70 

Layer: 2 

A-70 

Layer: 3 

A-70 

Layer: 4 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

069A 

1105995- 

069A 

1105995- 

069A 

1105995- 

070A 

1105995- 

070A 

1105995- 

070A 

1105995- 

070A 



















Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 




Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-71 

Layer: 1 

A-71 

Layer: 2 

A-72 

Layer: 1 

A-72 

Layer: 2 

A-73 

Layer: 1 

A-74 

Layer: 1 

A-75 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

071A 

1105995- 

071A 

1105995- 

072A 

1105995- 

072A 

1105995- 

073A 

1105995- 

074A 

1105995- 

075A 

Caulking Window, Unit 32 


















Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 









Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-76 

Layer: 1 

A-77 

Layer: 1 

A-78 

Layer: 1 

A-79 

Layer: 1 

A-80 

Layer: 1 

A-81 

Layer: 1 

A-82 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

076A 

1105995- 

077A 

1105995- 

078A 

1105995- 

079A 

1105995- 

080A 

1105995- 

081A 

1105995- 

082A 

Sink Sound Proofing, Unit 32 

Sink Sound Proofing, Unit 32 

Text Ceiling, CC 
















Vira Ruiz 


5 

5 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 







Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-83 

Layer: 1 

A-83 

Layer: 2 

A-84 

Layer: 1 

A-84 

Layer: 2 

A-85 

Layer: 1 

A-85 

Layer: 2 

A-86 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

083A 

1105995- 

083A 

1105995- 

084A 

1105995- 

084A 

1105995- 

085A 

1105995- 

085A 

1105995- 

086A 

12x12, Brown, CC 






Drywall, CC 












Vira Ruiz 


2 

ND 

2 

ND 

2 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 


Floor Tile 

Gray Mastic 

Floor Tile 

Gray Mastic 

Floor Tile 

Gray Mastic 


Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-86 

Layer: 2 

A-87 

Layer: 1 

A-88 

Layer: 1 

A-88 

Layer: 2 

A-89 

Layer: 1 

A-90 

Layer: 1 

A-90 

Layer: 2 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

086A 

1105995- 

087A 

1105995- 

088A 

1105995- 

088A 

1105995- 

089A 

1105995- 

090A 

1105995- 

090A 

Drywall, CC 

Drywall, CC 

Drywall, CC 

Drywall, CC 

Drywall, CC 

Drywall, CC 

Drywall, CC 












Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 




Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-90 

Layer: 3 

A-91 

Layer: 1 

A-92 

Layer: 1 

A-93 

Layer: 1 

A-94 

Layer: 1 

A-95 

Layer: 1 

A-96 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

090A 

1105995- 

091A 

1105995- 

092A 

1105995- 

093A 

1105995- 

094A 

1105995- 

095A 

1105995- 

096A 

Drywall, CC 

Roofing, CC 

Roofing, CC 

Roofing, Bldg 6 















Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

Yelena Khanina

Client Name: 

Project Name: 

A-97 

Layer: 1 

A-98 

Layer: 1 





1105995 

Lab ID# 102082-0 

18-May-11 





1105995- 

097A 

1105995- 

098A 














Vira Ruiz 


ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

Yelena Khanina

May 19, 2011 

Ian Pilling 


625 Holcomb Bridge Rd 

Norcross GA 30071 

TEL: 

FAX: 

RE: 

(770) 582-2816 

(770) 582-2816 

Heritage Village Apartments 

Dear Ian Pilling: 

Order No: 

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received 31 samples on 

for the analyses presented in following report. 

No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associated 

Quality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies 

associated with the analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of a 

project Case Narrative. 

AES’ certifications are as follows: 

-NELAC/Florida Certification number E87582 for analysis of Environmental Water, 

soil/hazardous waste, and Drinking Water Microbiology, effective 07/01/10-06/30/11. 

-AIHA Certification ID #100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Inorganics), 

Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental Microbiology (Fungal) 

effective until 09/01/11. 

These results relate only to the items tested. This report may only be reproduced in full. 

If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call. 

Kathleen Betsill 

Project Manager 

1105A30 

5/12/2011 10:45:00 AM 


3 

_4_ 

_5_ 

_6_ 

1__ 

_8_ 

_9_ 

1°_ 

11 

12_ 

11 

14_ 

15_ 

1^ 

V7 

I8. 

!i 

20 

Client Name: \ 

Address: 

City, State, Zip: 

Contact : 

Sampler's Name: 

L-l 

L^_ 

-7 

Relinquished by: < 

Received by: 

Relinquished by: 

Received by: 

Lab Recipient 

,J- A V 

^ 

Sample ID Sample Location/Description 

-76 

Date/Time: 

Date/Time: 

Date/Time: 

Date/Time: 

Phone: 

Fax: 

FORLABUS^-ONLY 

Project Name: 

Project Number: 

Sampling Date: 

Analysis 

Requested 

Date/Tinie.,^//^^/^/ Method of Shipment 

If 

/ 

4- 

Turnaround 

Time Comments 

iiW^L u c» 


For AES 

Use Only

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

Client Name: \Jf\\ 

Address: 

City, State, Zip: 

Contact : Icw/^ 

Sampler's Name: t ^ 

V. 

Sample ID 

L'?Td-Z2> 

L-& 

-£f 

-7c 

^?7 

-?% 

1 - f f 

~?o 

-?! 

-32 

' -33 

Relinquished by: /^ ^ \ / 

Received by: /\d by: 

Received by: f ' ^ 

/! / // 

Lab Recipient fl/rfrlt(. / /fa^ 

lt / f 



(770) 457-8177 / Toll Free (800) 972-4889 / Fax (770) 457-8188 


-LJULJ\1 U3 AIVALTOIU — "-"*• ^" / 

v^GO^L^ \ \y Phone: ( 

0 Fax: ( 

Project Name: f-r^ 

V .\X Project Number: ^ I 

^ ^ ^ Sampling Date: j 

Sample Location/Description 

Analysis 

Requested 

) 

|ewJ0A»>vV •S^ivW' 

/ 

•v y 

/ Date/Time: ^ \\'2. \ 

Date/Time: 

Date/Time: 

Date/Time: 

FOR LAB USJ?ONLY 

| 

Turnaround 

Time 

S/ 

/ 

Z 

) 

) 

I 1 L/ ^•r] ~3U 

,/,-Uts^u;lU(x^ 

n \x 

S^ o 

Comments 

Date/Time: _y///C-U/ Method of Shipment fC^^

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc 

Client: 

Project: 

Lab ID: 



1105A30 

Sample "L-28 " was listed on the COC, but not received by the lab. Ian Pilling was notified 5/12/11. 

Lead in Paint Analysis by Method N7082: 

Date: 

Case Narrative 

For all samples submitted with less than 0.100g of material for analysis, values are reported with elevated reporting limits. 

19-May-11 


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 19-May-11 

Lab Order: 1105A30 

Client: United Consulting Group Inc. 

Project: Heritage Village Apartments 

Matrix: Paint 

Date Received: 5/12/2011 10:45:00 AM 

Laboratory ID 

Client Sample ID 

Result 

Units 

Reporting 

TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082) 

DF 

PAINT 

Date 

Collected 

Date 

Analyzed 

1105A30-001A L-1 BRL wt% 0.0129 1 05/11/2011 05/16/2011 TA 


1105A30-003A L-3 BRL wt% 0.00917 1 05/11/2011 05/16/2011 TA 







1105A30-010A L-10 0.0184 wt% 0.00984 1 05/11/2011 05/16/2011 TA 






1105A30-016A L-17 BRL wt% 0.00951 1 05/11/2011 05/16/2011 TA 

1105A30-017A L-18 BRL wt% 0.00962 1 05/11/2011 05/16/2011 TA 




1105A30-021A L-22 BRL wt% 0.00975 1 05/11/2011 05/17/2011 TA 








1105A30-030A L-31 BRL wt% 0.00917 1 05/11/2011 05/17/2011 TA 



Limit 

Qualifiers: BRL - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit DF - Dilution Factor 

B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank 

Results are blank corrected where applicable 

Qual 

Analyst 


Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. 

Sample/Cooler Receipt Checklist 

Client UWvl Work Order Number 

Checklist completed by Kj ,£) 

Signature ignature " 

"^ Dafe 

//g/(( 

Carrier name: FedEx UPS Courier Client*-^ US Mail Other 

Custody seals intact on sample bottles? ottles? Yes 

X/dU ,. 

Container/Temp Blank tempera ure in compliance? ($


Client: 

Project Name: 

Workorder: 



1105A30 

BatchID: 

Date: 

19-May-11 

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT 

Sample ID: MB-146351 Client ID: Units: wt% Prep Date: 05/13/2011 Run No: 197156 

SampleType: MBLK TestCode: TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082) 

BatchID: 146351 Analysis Date: 05/16/2011 Seq No: 4114940 

Analyte Result RPT Limit SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPD Limit Qual 

Lead BRL 0.0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Sample ID: LCS-146351 Client ID: Units: wt% Prep Date: 05/13/2011 Run No: 197156 

SampleType: LCS TestCode: TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082) 



Lead 0.7548 0.0274 0.6839 0.002750 110 80 120 0 0 0 

Sample ID: 1105A30-002AMS Client ID: L-2 Units: wt% Prep Date: 05/13/2011 Run No: 197156 

SampleType: MS TestCode: TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082) 



Lead 0.5102 0.0202 0.4975 0.006008 101 75 125 0 0 

Sample ID: 1105A30-002AMSD Client ID: L-2 Units: wt% Prep Date: 05/13/2011 Run No: 197156 

SampleType: MSD TestCode: TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082) 



Lead 0.5092 0.0200 0.496 0.006008 101 75 125 0.5102 0.202 25 

Qualifiers: 

> Greater than Result value 

BRL Below reporting limit E Estimated (value above quantitation range) 

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded 

J Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit 

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit 

< Less than Result value 

N Analyte not NELAC certified 

S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix 

146351 

B Analyte detected in the associated method blank 

R RPD outside limits due to matrix 



Client: 

Project Name: 

Workorder: 



1105A30 

BatchID: 

Date: 

19-May-11 

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT 

Sample ID: MB-146352 Client ID: Units: wt% Prep Date: 05/13/2011 Run No: 197264 

SampleType: MBLK TestCode: TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082) 

BatchID: 146352 Analysis Date: 05/17/2011 Seq No: 4117225 


Lead BRL 0.0100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Sample ID: LCS-146352 Client ID: Units: wt% Prep Date: 05/13/2011 Run No: 197264 

SampleType: LCS TestCode: TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082) 



Lead 0.7215 0.0277 0.7246 0 99.6 80 120 0 0 0 

Sample ID: 1105A42-001AMS Client ID: Units: wt% Prep Date: 05/13/2011 Run No: 197264 

SampleType: MS TestCode: TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082) 



Lead 1.217 0.0385 0.496 0.7850 87.1 75 125 0 0 

Sample ID: 1105A42-001AMSD Client ID: Units: wt% Prep Date: 05/13/2011 Run No: 197264 

SampleType: MSD TestCode: TOTAL LEAD IN PAINT (N7082) 



Lead 1.411 0.0415 0.4965 0.7850 126 75 125 1.217 14.8 25 S 

Qualifiers: 

> Greater than Result value 

BRL Below reporting limit E Estimated (value above quantitation range) 

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded 

J Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit 

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit 

< Less than Result value 

N Analyte not NELAC certified 

S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix 

146352 

B Analyte detected in the associated method blank 

R RPD outside limits due to matrix 


APPENDIX E 

__________________________________________________________ 


b. Lead in Soil

NOT APPLICABLE

APPENDIX E 

__________________________________________________________ 


c. Lead in Water

ASI 

ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 

Environmental Monitoring & Laboratory Analysis 

110 Technology Parkway, Norcross, GA 30092 

(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 

Laboratory Report 

United Consulting Group 

625 Holcomb Bridge Road 

Norcross, GA 30071 

Attention: 

Prepared For: 

Mr. Ian Pilling 

Report Number: AUE0362 


Project: Heritage Village 

Project #:2011.2232.01 

We appreciate the opportunity to provide the analytical support for your project. The analytical results in this report are 

based upon information supplied by you, the client, and are for your exclusive use. If you have any questions regarding this 

data package, please do not hesitate to call. 

Approved: 

This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from Analytical Services, Inc. 

Analytical Services, Inc. certifies that the following analytical results meet all requirements of the National 

Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference(NELAC). 

All test results relate only to the samples analyzed. 



ASI Environmental Monitoring & Laboratory Analysis 


(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 



Norcross GA, 30071 

Attention: Mr. Ian Pilling 

ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES 

Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled 


Date Received 

Unit 4 AUE0362-01 Drinking Water 

05/11/11 08:35 05/11/11 16:00 


05/11/11 08:40 05/11/11 16:00 


05/11/11 08:45 05/11/11 16:00 


05/11/11 08:50 05/11/11 16:00 


05/11/11 08:55 05/11/11 16:00 


05/11/11 09:00 05/11/11 16:00 


05/11/11 09:05 05/11/11 16:00 


05/11/11 09:10 05/11/11 16:00 


05/11/11 09:15 05/11/11 16:00 


05/11/11 09:20 05/11/11 16:00 

Com. Unit AUE0362-11 Drinking Water 

05/11/11 09:25 05/11/11 16:00 


05/11/11 09:30 05/11/11 16:00 


05/11/11 09:35 05/11/11 16:00 


05/11/11 09:40 05/11/11 16:00 


05/11/11 09:45 05/11/11 16:00 


05/11/11 09:50 05/11/11 16:00 

Unit 31 AUE0362-17 Drinking Water 

05/11/11 09:55 05/11/11 16:00 





(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 





Report No.: AUE0362 

Client ID: Unit 4 

Date/Time Sampled: 5/11/2011 8:35:00AM 

Matrix: Drinking Water 

Analyte Result RL 

Metals, Total 


Lab Number ID: AUE0362-01 

Date/Time Received: 5/11/2011 4:00:00PM 


Preparation Analytical 

Units Method Qual. DF Date 

Date Batch Init. 

Lead ND 0.0030 mg/L EPA 200.8 

1 5/17/11 15:30 5/17/11 17:30 1050486 CSW 





(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 
























(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 
























(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 
























(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 
























(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 
























(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 



















1 5/17/11 15:30 5/17/11 18:10 1050486 CSW 





(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 
























(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 
























(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 
























(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 






Client ID: Com. Unit 












Lead 0.0102 0.0030 mg/L EPA 200.8 






(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 


















Lead 0.0044 0.0030 mg/L EPA 200.8 






(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 
























(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 


















Lead 0.0079 0.0030 mg/L EPA 200.8 






(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 


















Lead 0.0067 0.0030 mg/L EPA 200.8 


Page 17 of 24




(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 


















Lead 0.0067 0.0030 mg/L EPA 200.8 






(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 












Lab Number ID: AUE0362-17 






Lead 0.0176 0.0030 mg/L EPA 200.8 






(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 






Analyte 

Batch 1050486 - EPA 200.8 

Metals, Total - Quality Control 

Reporting 

Result Limit 

Spike 

Units Level 

Source 

Result 

%REC 

%REC 

Limits RPD 

Blank (1050486-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 05/17/11 

Lead ND 0.0030 mg/L 

LCS (1050486-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 05/17/11 

Lead 0.103 0.0060 mg/L 0.10000 103 85-115 

Matrix Spike (1050486-MS1) Source: AUE0362-01 

Prepared & Analyzed: 05/17/11 

Lead 0.102 0.0060 mg/L 0.10000 0.0013 101 70-130 

Matrix Spike (1050486-MS2) Source: AUE0362-02 

Prepared & Analyzed: 05/17/11 

Lead 0.100 0.0060 mg/L 0.10000 0.0002 100 70-130 


RPD 

Limit Qual 





(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 





Laboratory Certifications 

Code Description Number 

Expires 

GA Georgia 812 

06/30/2011 

NELDW NELAC (Drinking Water) E87315 







(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 





Definition of Laboratory Terms 

ND 

TIC 

CFU 

SOP 

- None Detected at the Reporting Limit 

- Tentatively Identified Compound 

- Colony Forming Units 

Legend 

- Method run per ASI Standard Operating Procedure 

RL - Reporting Limit 

DF - Dilution Factor 

* - Analyte not included in the NELAC list of certified analytes. 

Sample Information 

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine breaks down to diphenylamine in the GCMS; both analytes are reported as 

N-Nitrososdiphenylamine. ASI is not NELAC certified for diphenylamine. 

Phthalic acid and phthalic anhydride are reported as dimethyl phthalate 

Maleic acid and maleic anhydride are reported as dimethyl malate 

1,2-Diphenylhydrazine breaks down to azobenzene in the GCMS; both analytes are reported as azobenzene 

Definition of Qualifiers 

Note: Unless otherwise noted, all results are reported on an as received basis. 






(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 





COC Goes Here 






(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 





COC Goes Here 



ASI 

Attn: Mr. Ian Pilling 




(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 

LOG-IN CHECKLIST 

Client: United Consulting Group 


Work Order: AUE0362 

Date Received: 05/11/11 16:00 Logged In By: Mohammad M. Rahman 

OBSERVATIONS 

#Samples: 17 #Containers: 17 

Minimum Temp(C): 22.0 Maximum Temp(C): 22.0 

CHECKLIST ITEMS 

Comments: 

COC included with Samples 

Sample Container(s) Intact 

Chain of Custody Complete 

Sample Container(s) Match COC 

Custody seal Intact 

Temperature in Compliance 

Sufficient Sample Volume for Analysis 

Zero Headspace Maintained for VOA Analyses 

Samples labeled preserved (If Applicable) 

Samples received within Allowable Hold Times 

Samples Received on Ice 

Preservation Confirmed 

YES 

YES 

YES 

YES 

NO 

YES 

YES 

YES 

YES 

YES 

NO 

YES 

Custody Seal(s) Used: No 

Printed: 5/19/2011 6:48:46PM 


ASI 




(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 

Laboratory Report 



Norcross, GA 30071 

Attention: 

Prepared For: 

Mr. Ian Pilling 

Report Number: AUF0406 



Project #:2011.2232.01 

We appreciate the opportunity to provide the analytical support for your project. The analytical results in this report are 

based upon information supplied by you, the client, and are for your exclusive use. If you have any questions regarding this 

data package, please do not hesitate to call. 

Approved: 

This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from Analytical Services, Inc. 

Analytical Services, Inc. certifies that the following analytical results meet all requirements of the National 

Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference(NELAC). 

All test results relate only to the samples analyzed. 





(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 





ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES 

Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled 


Date Received 

Apt. #30 AUF0406-01 Drinking Water 

06/08/11 15:30 06/11/11 09:00 


06/08/11 15:30 06/11/11 09:00 


06/08/11 15:30 06/11/11 09:00 





(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 





Report No.: AUF0406 

Client ID: Apt. #30 

Date/Time Sampled: 6/8/2011 3:30:00PM 





Lab Number ID: AUF0406-01 

Date/Time Received: 6/11/2011 9:00:00AM 






1 6/16/11 11:30 6/17/11 20:53 1060422 KLH 





(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 
























(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 
























(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 






Analyte 

Batch 1060422 - EPA 200.8 

Metals, Total - Quality Control 

Reporting 

Result Limit 

Spike 

Units Level 

Source 

Result 

%REC 

%REC 

Limits RPD 

Blank (1060422-BLK1) Prepared: 06/16/11 Analyzed: 06/17/11 

Lead ND 0.0030 mg/L 

LCS (1060422-BS1) Prepared: 06/16/11 Analyzed: 06/17/11 

Lead 0.100 0.0060 mg/L 0.10000 100 85-115 

Matrix Spike (1060422-MS1) Source: AUF0298-01 

Prepared: 06/16/11 Analyzed: 06/17/11 

Lead 0.0985 0.0060 mg/L 0.10000 ND 98 70-130 


RPD 

Limit Qual 





(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 





Laboratory Certifications 

Code Description Number 

Expires 

GA Georgia 812 


NELDW NELAC (Drinking Water) E87315 







(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 





Definition of Laboratory Terms 

ND 

TIC 

CFU 

SOP 

- None Detected at the Reporting Limit 

- Tentatively Identified Compound 

- Colony Forming Units 

Legend 

- Method run per ASI Standard Operating Procedure 

RL - Reporting Limit 

DF - Dilution Factor 

* - Analyte not included in the NELAC list of certified analytes. 

Sample Information 

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine breaks down to diphenylamine in the GCMS; both analytes are reported as 

N-Nitrososdiphenylamine. ASI is not NELAC certified for diphenylamine. 

Phthalic acid and phthalic anhydride are reported as dimethyl phthalate 

Maleic acid and maleic anhydride are reported as dimethyl malate 

1,2-Diphenylhydrazine breaks down to azobenzene in the GCMS; both analytes are reported as azobenzene 

Definition of Qualifiers 

Note: Unless otherwise noted, all results are reported on an as received basis. 






(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 





COC Goes Here 



ASI 

Attn: Mr. Ian Pilling 




(770) 734-4200 FAX (770) 734-4201 

LOG-IN CHECKLIST 

Client: United Consulting Group 


Work Order: AUF0406 

Date Received: 06/11/11 09:15 Logged In By: Mohammad M. Rahman 

OBSERVATIONS 

#Samples: 3 #Containers: 3 

Minimum Temp(C): 21.0 Maximum Temp(C): 21.0 

CHECKLIST ITEMS 

Comments: 

COC included with Samples 

Sample Container(s) Intact 

Chain of Custody Complete 

Sample Container(s) Match COC 

Custody seal Intact 

Temperature in Compliance 

Sufficient Sample Volume for Analysis 

Zero Headspace Maintained for VOA Analyses 

Samples labeled preserved (If Applicable) 

Samples received within Allowable Hold Times 

Samples Received on Ice 

Preservation Confirmed 

YES 

YES 

NO 

YES 

YES 

YES 

YES 

YES 

YES 

YES 

NO 

YES 

Custody Seal(s) Used: Yes 

The matrix code, sample type and analysis required were not listed on the COC. The matrix code was taken from the 

container labels and the analysis required was received prior to sample laboratory receipt. MMR/NC 

Printed: 6/20/2011 4:05:48PM 


APPENDIX E 

__________________________________________________________ 


d. Asbestos

SEE APPENDIX E, SECTION 3a

APPENDIX E 

__________________________________________________________ 


e. Radon

APPENDIX E 

__________________________________________________________ 


f. Vapor Encroachment Screening

NOT APPLICABLE

APPENDIX E 

__________________________________________________________ 

4. Previous Phase II Reports

NOT APPLICABLE

APPENDIX F – REGULATORY SEARCH INFORMATION




Inquiry Number: 3049008.2s 


The 

EDR 

Radius 

Map 

Report 

with 

GeoCheck® 

440 Wheelers Farms Road 

Milford, CT 06461 

Toll Free: 800.352.0050 

www.edrnet.com 

FORM-STD-SXA

SECTION PAGE 

Executive Summary ES1 

Overview Map 2 

Detail Map 3 

Map Findings Summary 4 

Map Findings 7 

Orphan Summary 30 

Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 

GEOCHECK ADDENDUM 


Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 

Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 

Physical Setting Source Map A-7 

Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-8 

Physical Setting Source Records Searched A-24 





This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data 

Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from 

other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL 

DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, 





LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, 

environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor 

should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I 

Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any 

property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. 

Copyright 2011 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole 

or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other 

trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 

TC3049008.2s Page 1


A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). 

The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards 

and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for 

Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of 

environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. 

TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION 

ADDRESS 

COORDINATES 

940 WARE STREET 

BLACKSHEAR, GA 31516 

Latitude (North): 

31.302400 - 31˚ 18’ 8.6’’ 

Longitude (West): 

82.256400 - 82˚ 15’ 23.0’’ 

Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17 

UTM X (Meters): 

380429.7 

UTM Y (Meters): 

3463612.2 

Elevation: 

138 ft. above sea level 

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 

Target Property Map: 

Most Recent Revision: 

East Map: 


AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 

Portions of Photo from: 

Source: 

TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS 

31082-C3 BLACKSHEAR WEST, GA 

1988 

31082-C2 BLACKSHEAR EAST, GA 

1988 

2005, 2006, 2007 

USDA 

The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. 

DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES 

No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government 

records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the 

following databases: 

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS 

Federal NPL site list 

NPL National Priority List 

TC3049008.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1


Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites 

NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens 

Federal Delisted NPL site list 

Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions 

Federal CERCLIS list 

CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System 

FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing 

Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List 

CERC-NFRAP CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned 

Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 

CORRACTS Corrective Action Report 

Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 

RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal 

Federal RCRA generators list 

RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators 

RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators 

RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator 

Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 

US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List 

US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls 

Federal ERNS list 

ERNS Emergency Response Notification System 

State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 

SHWS Hazardous Site Inventory 

GA NON-HSI Non-Hazardous Site Inventory 

State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 

SWF/LF Solid Waste Disposal Facilities 

State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 

INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land 

State and tribal registered storage tank lists 

UST Underground Storage Tank Database 



AST Above Ground Storage Tanks 

INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land 

FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing 

State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries 

INST CONTROL Public Record List 

State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 

INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing 

VIC Voluntary Cleanup Program site 

State and tribal Brownfields sites 

BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Public Record List 

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS 

Local Brownfield lists 

US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites 

Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 

DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations 

ODI Open Dump Inventory 

HIST LF Historical Landfills 

INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands 

Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 

US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs 

DEL SHWS Delisted Hazardous Site Inventory Listing 

US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register 

Local Land Records 

LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information 

LUCIS Land Use Control Information System 

Records of Emergency Release Reports 

HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System 

SPILLS Spills Information 

Other Ascertainable Records 

RCRA-NonGen RCRA - Non Generators 

DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data 

DOD Department of Defense Sites 

FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites 

CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees 

ROD Records Of Decision 



UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites 

MINES Mines Master Index File 

TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System 

TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act 

FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide 

Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) 

HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing 

SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems 

ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System 

PADS PCB Activity Database System 

MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System 

RADINFO Radiation Information Database 

RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System 

NPDES NPDES Wastewater Permit List 

DRYCLEANERS Drycleaner Database 

AIRS Permitted Facility and Emissions Listing 

TIER 2 Tier 2 Data Listing 

INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations 

SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing 

COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Site Listing 

COAL ASH DOE Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data 

PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database 

COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List 

FINANCIAL ASSURANCE Financial Assurance Information Listing 

EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS 

EDR Proprietary Records 

Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants 

SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS 

Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. 

Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on 

a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity 

should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been 

differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. 

Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed 

data on individual sites can be reviewed. 

Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. 

Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. 



LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported 



leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Natural Resources’ Confirmed 

Release List. 

A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/04/2011 has revealed that there are 4 

LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. 

____________________ Equal/Higher Elevation 

________ Address 

Direction ___________________ / Distance Map _____ID Page _____ 

ACE POLE CO INC HWY 84 E 6352 TIMBER LN WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.457 mi.) A2 8 

BUS BARN HAYWOOD RD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.457 mi.) A3 10 

GRIFFIS GROC SR 121 SOUTH WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.457 mi.) A4 11 

T & R FOOD MART #2 504 HWY 84W WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.457 mi.) A5 12 



FINDS: The Facility Index System contains both facility information and "pointers" to other 

sources of information that contain more detail. These include: RCRIS; Permit Compliance System (PCS); 

Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS); FATES (FIFRA [Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act] 

and TSCA Enforcement System, FTTS [FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System]; CERCLIS; DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to 

manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes); Federal 

Underground Injection Control (FURS); Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS); Surface Impoundments (SIA); TSCA 

Chemicals in Commerce Information System (CICS); PADS; RCRA-J (medical waste transporters/disposers); TRIS; 

and TSCA. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA/NTIS. 

A review of the FINDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/14/2010 has revealed that there are 11 

FINDS sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. 

____________________ Equal/Higher Elevation 


Direction ___________________ / Distance Map _____ID Page _____ 

HUNTLEY JIFFY FOOD STORE #339 HWY 82 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.457 mi.) A1 7 

____________________ Lower Elevation 


Direction ___________________ / Distance _____ Map ID _____ Page 

FLASH FOODS #79 HWY 82 & KELLER ST ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.561 mi.) 6 15 

T & R FOOD MART #2 504 HWY 84W E 1/2 - 1 (0.608 mi.) 7 18 

WATERS FORD COMPANY INC 304 WARE ST E 1/2 - 1 (0.634 mi.) 8 19 

QUICK CHANGE #96 2034 HWY 84 E 1/2 - 1 (0.698 mi.) 9 22 

BLACKSHEAR (LAS) 318 TAYLOR STREET ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.821 mi.) 10 23 

FLASH FOODS #163 114 GORDON ST ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.883 mi.) B11 24 

FLASH FOODS #163 CORNER US HWY 82 & HWY ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.885 mi.) B12 27 

MOBLEY’S AUTO CENTER 418 GORDON ST ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.938 mi.) 13 28 

MRCX 200 PARK ST E 1/2 - 1 (0.967 mi.) 14 29 

DIXON SERVICE CENTER 527 GORDON ST ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.979 mi.) 15 29 



Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 15 records. 

Site Name Database(s) 

____________ ____________ 

PIERCE COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL UST, FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 

NO FACILITY NAME UST, FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 

MATTOX FOOD MART FINDS, LUST, UST, FINANCIAL 

ASSURANCE 

FORMER KENNETH JACKSON CHANCEY PRO UST, FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 

PIERCE COUNTY - SR 121 MSWLF SHWS 

PINEY GROVE INERT LANDFILL SWF/LF 

PIERCE CO.-HIGHWAY 38 INERT LF SWF/LF 

S & P FOOD MART SK MART #3 LUST 

FORMER KENNETH JACKSON CHANCEY PRO LUST 

BRANTLEY GAS COMPANY AST 

FERRELLGAS, LP AST 

TRUE VALUE AST 

UNITED MARKET #2 AST 

TRUETT HARDWARE (CLOSED) AST 

FLASH FOODS #79 AST 


EDR Inc. 

120 

120 

120 

120 

120

EDR Inc.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY 

Search 

Target Distance Total 

Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 



NPL 

Proposed NPL 

NPL LIENS 


Delisted NPL 


CERCLIS 

FEDERAL FACILITY 


1.000 

1.000 

TP 

1.000 

0.500 

1.000 

CERC-NFRAP 

0.500 


CORRACTS 

1.000 


RCRA-TSDF 


RCRA-LQG 

RCRA-SQG 

RCRA-CESQG 

Federal institutional controls / 

engineering controls registries 

US ENG CONTROLS 

US INST CONTROL 


ERNS 


SHWS 

GA NON-HSI 

State and tribal landfill and/or 

solid waste disposal site lists 

0.500 

0.250 

0.250 

0.250 

0.500 

0.500 

TP 

1.000 

1.000 

SWF/LF 

0.500 


LUST 

0.500 

INDIAN LUST 

0.500 


UST 

0.250 

0 

0 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

NR 

NR 

NR 

0 

0 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

4 

0 

NR 

0 

0 

NR 

0 

NR 

0 

NR 

0 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

0 

0 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

4 

0 

0 

TC3049008.2s Page 4


Search 



AST 

0.250 

INDIAN UST 

0.250 

FEMA UST 

0.250 

State and tribal institutional 

control / engineering control registries 

INST CONTROL 


INDIAN VCP 

VIC 


BROWNFIELDS 



US BROWNFIELDS 

Local Lists of Landfill / Solid 

Waste Disposal Sites 

DEBRIS REGION 9 

ODI 

HIST LF 

INDIAN ODI 

Local Lists of Hazardous waste / 

Contaminated Sites 

US CDL 

DEL SHWS 

US HIST CDL 


0.500 

0.500 

0.500 

0.500 

0.500 

0.500 

0.500 

0.500 

0.500 

TP 

1.000 

TP 

LIENS 2 

TP 

LUCIS 

0.500 


HMIRS 

SPILLS 


RCRA-NonGen 

DOT OPS 

DOD 

FUDS 

CONSENT 

ROD 

UMTRA 

MINES 

TP 

TP 

0.250 

TP 

1.000 

1.000 

1.000 

1.000 

0.500 

0.250 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

NR 

0 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

NR 

0 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

NR 

NR 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

NR 

0 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

0 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

TC3049008.2s Page 5


Search 



TRIS 

TSCA 

FTTS 

HIST FTTS 

SSTS 

ICIS 

PADS 

MLTS 

RADINFO 

FINDS 

RAATS 

NPDES 

DRYCLEANERS 

AIRS 

TIER 2 

INDIAN RESERV 

SCRD DRYCLEANERS 

COAL ASH 

COAL ASH DOE 

PCB TRANSFORMER 

COAL ASH EPA 

FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 



Manufactured Gas Plants 

1.000 

TP 

TP 

TP 

TP 

TP 

TP 

TP 

TP 

1.000 

TP 

TP 

0.250 

TP 

TP 

1.000 

0.500 

0.500 

TP 

TP 

0.500 

TP 

1.000 

NOTES: 

TP = Target Property 

NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance 

Sites may be listed in more than one database 

0 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

0 

0 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

0 

0 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

1 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

0 

0 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

10 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

0 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

NR 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

11 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

TC3049008.2s Page 6

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

Owner/Operator Summary: 

Owner/operator name: 

Owner/operator address: 

Owner/operator country: 

Owner/operator telephone: 

Legal status: 

Owner/Operator Type: 

Owner/Op start date: 

Owner/Op end date: 

MAP FINDINGS 

HUNTLEY JIFFY FOOD STORES INC 

PO BOX 23180 

JACKSONVILLE, FL 32241 

Not reported 

(904) 464-7219 

Private 

Owner 

01/01/0001 

Not reported 

Handler Activities Summary: 

U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No 

Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown 

Recycler of hazardous waste: No 

Transporter of hazardous waste: No 

Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No 

Underground injection activity: No 

On-site burner exemption: No 

Furnace exemption: 

No 

Used oil fuel burner: 

No 

Used oil processor: 

No 

User oil refiner: 

No 

Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No 

Used oil Specification marketer: No 

Used oil transfer facility: 

No 

Used oil transporter: 

No 

Off-site waste receiver: 

Verified to be non-commercial 

Historical Generators: 

Date form received by agency: 05/31/1991 

Facility name: 

HUNTLEY JIFFY FOOD STORE #339 

Classification: 

Small Quantity Generator 

Database(s) 

RCRA-NonGen: 



HUNTLEY JIFFY FOOD STORE #339 

Facility address: 

HWY 82 


EPA ID: 

GAD984293951 

Mailing address: 

PHILLIPS HWY STE 200 


Contact: 

MARCIA GLICK 

Contact address: 

9143 PHILLIPS HWY STE 200 


Contact country: 

US 

Contact telephone: 

(904) 464-7200 

Contact email: 

Not reported 

EPA Region: 

04 


Non-Generator 

Description: 

Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 

A1 HUNTLEY JIFFY FOOD STORE #339 RCRA-NonGen 1001076351 

WNW HWY 82 FINDS GAD984293951 

1/4-1/2 

0.457 mi. 


2412 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster A 

Relative: 

Higher 

Actual: 

139 ft. 

TC3049008.2s Page 7

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

Hazardous Waste Summary: 

Waste code: 

Waste name: 

Waste code: 

Waste name: 

Waste code: 

Waste name: 

Violation Status: 

FINDS: 

Registry ID: 

D000 

Not Defined 

D018 

BENZENE 

No violations found 

110007493961 

MAP FINDINGS 

Environmental Interest/Information System 

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource 

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of 

events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, 

and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA 

program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and 

corrective action activities required under RCRA. 

Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 

HUNTLEY JIFFY FOOD STORE #339 (Continued) 1001076351 

LUST: 

Facility ID: 

Leak ID: 

Description: 

Cleanup Status: 

Date Received: 

Project Officer: 

UST: 

Facility: 

Facility Id: 

Facility Status: 

Facility Type: 

Contact Id: 

Owner Name: 

Owner Address: 

Owner City: 

Owner State: 

Owner Zip: 

Owner City,St,Zip: 

D001 

IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF 

LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS 

CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE 

FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, 

WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE 

MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT 

WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. 

A2 ACE POLE CO INC LUST U001920287 

WNW HWY 84 E 6352 TIMBER LN UST N/A 

1/4-1/2 

0.457 mi. 




Relative: 

Higher 

Actual: 

139 ft. 

09113003 

1 

Confirmed Release Received 

NFA - No Further Action 

9/26/1996 

Li,Yonghong June 

9113003 

Active 

Industrial 

5943 

ACE POLE COMPANY INC 

6352 TIMBER LN 

BLACKSHEAR 

GA 

31516 


TC3049008.2s Page 8

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

Owner Telephone: 

District: 

Tank ID: 

Status Date: 

Status: 

Product1: 

Material: 

Capacity: 

Pipe Material: 

Pipe Type: 

Overfill Protection: 

Overfill Installed: 

Tank Exempt From Spill: 

912-449-4011 

Coastal Brunswick 

MAP FINDINGS 

Tank ID: 

1 

Status Date: 

1/1/1987 

Status: 

Currently In Use 

Product1: 

Gas 

Material: 

Steel-Impressed Current 

Capacity: 

3000 


Cathodically Protected 

Pipe Type: 

Suction: Valve At The Tank 

Overfill Protection: Not reported 

Overfill Installed: 5/1/1996 

Tank Exempt From Spill: Not reported 

Date Spill Device Installed: 5/1/1996 

Tank ID: 

2 

Status Date: 

1/1/1987 

Status: 


Product1: 

Diesel 

Material: 


Capacity: 

3000 



Pipe Type: 






Tank ID: 

3 

Status Date: 

8/15/2000 

Status: 

Removed From Ground 

Product1: 

Diesel 

Material: 


Capacity: 

10000 


Galvanized Steel 

Pipe Type: 

Pressure 





4 

8/16/2000 


Diesel 

Fiberglass 

10000 

Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic 

Pressure 

Not reported 

5/1/1996 

Not reported 

Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 

ACE POLE CO INC (Continued) U001920287 

TC3049008.2s Page 9

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 


FINANCIAL ASSURANCE: 

Region: 

Facility ID: 

Financial Responsiblity: 

1 

9113003 

G.U.S.T. Trust Fund 

MAP FINDINGS 

Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 

ACE POLE CO INC (Continued) U001920287 

A3 BUS BARN LUST U001482759 

WNW HAYWOOD RD UST N/A 

1/4-1/2 

0.457 mi. 




Relative: 

Higher 

Actual: 

139 ft. 

LUST: 

Facility ID: 

Leak ID: 

Description: 




UST: 

Facility: 

Facility Id: 



Contact Id: 

Owner Name: 


Owner City: 

Owner State: 

Owner Zip: 



District: 

Tank ID: 

19 

Status Date: 

4/1/1999 

Status: 


Product1: 

Gas 

Material: 

Bare Steel 

Capacity: 

4000 


Bare Steel 

Pipe Type: 

Not Marked 


Overfill Installed: Not reported 


Date Spill Device Installed: Not reported 

Tank ID: 

Status Date: 

Status: 

Product1: 

Material: 

01130014 

1 



4/15/1999 

Simpkins,Terrence 

1130014 

Closed 

County 

5173 

PIERCE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION 

PO BOX 349 

BLACKSHEAR 

GA 

31516 


912-449-2044 


20 

4/1/1999 


Diesel 

Bare Steel 

TC3049008.2s Page 10

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

Capacity: 

3000 


Bare Steel 

Pipe Type: 

Not Marked 





Tank ID: 

21 

Status Date: 

Not reported 

Status: 


Product1: 

Propane 

Material: 

Bare Steel 

Capacity: 

500 


Bare Steel 

Pipe Type: 

Not Marked 






Region: 

Facility ID: 


1 

1130014 


MAP FINDINGS 

Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 

BUS BARN (Continued) U001482759 

A4 GRIFFIS GROC LUST U001482776 

WNW SR 121 SOUTH UST N/A 

1/4-1/2 

0.457 mi. 




Relative: 

Higher 

Actual: 

139 ft. 

LUST: 

Facility ID: 

Leak ID: 

Description: 




UST: 

Facility: 

Facility Id: 



Contact Id: 

Owner Name: 


Owner City: 

Owner State: 

Owner Zip: 



District: 

01130032 

1 



9/22/1997 

Wallace,Ronald J 

1130032 

Closed 

Gas Station 

1434 

T & R OIL COMPANY 

PO BOX 31 

WAYCROSS 

GA 

31502 

WAYCROSS, GA 31502 

912-283-3142 


TC3049008.2s Page 11

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 


Region: 

Facility ID: 


1 

1130032 


MAP FINDINGS 

Tank ID: 

1 

Status Date: 

8/4/1997 

Status: 


Product1: 

Gas 

Material: 

Bare Steel 

Capacity: 

1000 



Pipe Type: 






Tank ID: 

2 

Status Date: 

8/4/1997 

Status: 


Product1: 

Gas 

Material: 

Bare Steel 

Capacity: 

1000 



Pipe Type: 






Tank ID: 

3 

Status Date: 

8/4/1997 

Status: 


Product1: 

Gas 

Material: 

Bare Steel 

Capacity: 

3000 



Pipe Type: 






Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 

GRIFFIS GROC (Continued) U001482776 

A5 T & R FOOD MART #2 LUST U003007680 

WNW 504 HWY 84W UST N/A 

1/4-1/2 

0.457 mi. 




Relative: 

Higher 

Actual: 

139 ft. 

LUST: 

Facility ID: 

Leak ID: 

Description: 


09148032 

1 



TC3049008.2s Page 12

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 



UST: 

Facility: 

Facility Id: 



Contact Id: 

Owner Name: 


Owner City: 

Owner State: 

Owner Zip: 



District: 

Tank ID: 

Status Date: 

Status: 

Product1: 

Material: 

Capacity: 


Pipe Type: 


6/21/2004 

Burris,Stephen B 

9148032 

Active 

Gas Station 

1434 

T & R OIL COMPANY 

PO BOX 31 

WAYCROSS 

GA 

31502 


912-283-3142 


MAP FINDINGS 

Tank ID: 

1 

Status Date: 

12/1/1998 

Status: 


Product1: 

Gas 

Material: 

Bare Steel 

Capacity: 

3000 



Pipe Type: 






Tank ID: 

2 

Status Date: 

12/1/1998 

Status: 


Product1: 

Gas 

Material: 

Bare Steel 

Capacity: 

3000 



Pipe Type: 






3 

12/1/1998 


Gas 

Bare Steel 

4000 



Not reported 

Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 

T & R FOOD MART #2 (Continued) U003007680 

TC3049008.2s Page 13

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 




Tank ID: 

6 

Status Date: 

3/16/1998 

Status: 


Product1: 

Gas 

Material: 

Epoxy 

Capacity: 

10000 


Double Walled Flex 

Pipe Type: 

Pressure 





Tank ID: 

Status Date: 

Status: 

Product1: 

Material: 

Capacity: 


Pipe Type: 


Overfill Installed: 

7 

3/16/1998 


Gas 

Epoxy 

6000 

Double Walled Flex 

Pressure 

Not reported 

3/16/1998 

MAP FINDINGS 

Tank ID: 

4 

Status Date: 

12/1/1998 

Status: 


Product1: 

Gas 

Material: 

Bare Steel 

Capacity: 

4000 



Pipe Type: 






Tank ID: 

5 

Status Date: 

1/1/1989 

Status: 


Product1: 

Diesel 

Material: 

STIP-3 

Capacity: 

3000 


Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic 

Pipe Type: 

Suction: No Valve At The Tank 





Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 


TC3049008.2s Page 14

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 




Region: 

Facility ID: 


1 

9148032 


MAP FINDINGS 

Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 


6 FLASH FOODS #79 RCRA-NonGen 1000449511 

ESE HWY 82 & KELLER ST FINDS GAD981276835 

1/2-1 BLACKSHEAR, GA 31516 

LUST 

0.561 mi. UST 

2964 ft. FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 

Relative: 

Lower 

Actual: 

137 ft. 

RCRA-NonGen: 



FLASH FOODS #79 


HWY 82 & KELLER ST 


EPA ID: 

GAD981276835 


P O BOX 2149 


Contact: 

HANK SIRMANS 


P O BOX 2149 



US 


(912) 285-4011 


Not reported 

EPA Region: 

04 


Non-Generator 

Description: 







Legal status: 




FLASH FOODS INC 

UNKNOWN 

UNKNOWN, UNKNO 

Not reported 

UNKNOWN 

Private 

Owner 

Not reported 

Not reported 










No 


No 


No 


No 


TC3049008.2s Page 15

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

Used oil Specification marketer: 





Waste code: 

Waste name: 

LUST: 

Facility ID: 

Leak ID: 

Description: 




UST: 


FINDS: 

Registry ID: 

Facility: 

Facility Id: 



Contact Id: 

Owner Name: 


Owner City: 

Owner State: 

Owner Zip: 



District: 

Tank ID: 

Status Date: 

Status: 

D018 

BENZENE 


110007492098 

01130004 

1 


NFA -Monitoring Only (MNA) 

10/4/1999 

Mayila,Ferdinand 

1130004 

Active 

Gas Station 

372 


PO BOX 2149 

WAYCROSS 

GA 

31502 


912-285-4011 


MAP FINDINGS 

No 

No 

No 



GEIMS (Geographic Environmental Information Management System) 

provides the EPA and Public a single point of access to core data for 

all facilities and sites regulated or monitored by the EPA and a 

single system for the reporting of all environmental data. 







1 

9/8/1999 


Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 

FLASH FOODS #79 (Continued) 1000449511 

TC3049008.2s Page 16

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

Tank ID: 

Status Date: 

Status: 

Product1: 

5 

10/8/1999 


Gas 

MAP FINDINGS 

Product1: 

Gas 

Material: 


Capacity: 

10000 



Pipe Type: 

Pressure 





Tank ID: 

2 

Status Date: 

9/8/1999 

Status: 


Product1: 

Gas 

Material: 


Capacity: 

10000 



Pipe Type: 

Pressure 





Tank ID: 

3 

Status Date: 

9/8/1999 

Status: 


Product1: 

Gas 

Material: 


Capacity: 

8000 



Pipe Type: 

Pressure 





Tank ID: 

4 

Status Date: 

9/8/1999 

Status: 


Product1: 

Diesel 

Material: 


Capacity: 

8000 



Pipe Type: 

Pressure 





Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 


TC3049008.2s Page 17

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

Material: 

Double Walled 

Capacity: 

10000 



Pipe Type: 

Pressure 





Tank ID: 

6 

Status Date: 

10/8/1999 

Status: 


Product1: 

Gas 

Material: 

Double Walled 

Capacity: 

10000 



Pipe Type: 

Pressure 





Tank ID: 

7 

Status Date: 

10/8/1999 

Status: 


Product1: 

Diesel 

Material: 

Double Walled 

Capacity: 

8000 



Pipe Type: 

Pressure 






Region: 

Facility ID: 


1 

1130004 

Insurance 

MAP FINDINGS 

Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 


7 T & R FOOD MART #2 FINDS 1006772009 

East 504 HWY 84W N/A 

1/2-1 

0.608 mi. 

3211 ft. 


Relative: 

Lower 

Actual: 

129 ft. 

FINDS: 

Registry ID: 

110013412878 






TC3049008.2s Page 18

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 






Legal status: 








Legal status: 








Legal status: 




MAP FINDINGS 

WATERS S M JR 

OWNERSTREET 

OWNERCITY, WY 99999 

Not reported 

(404) 555-1212 

Private 

Owner 

01/01/0001 

Not reported 

WATERS AND WATERS 

PO BOX 311 


US 

Not reported 

Private 

Owner 

03/01/1973 

Not reported 

WATERS FORD COMPANY INC 

Not reported 

GA 

US 

Not reported 

Private 

Operator 

03/01/1973 

Not reported 

Database(s) 

RCRA-SQG: 





304 WARE ST 


EPA ID: 

GAD981241003 


P O BOX 311 


Contact: 

JAMES WATERS JR 


P O BOX 311 



US 


(912) 449-4446 


Not reported 

EPA Region: 

04 

Land type: 

Private 


Small Small Quantity Generator 

Description: 

Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous 

waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of 

hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous 

waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of 

hazardous waste at any time 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 

8 WATERS FORD COMPANY INC RCRA-SQG 1000217598 

East 304 WARE ST FINDS GAD981241003 

1/2-1 

0.634 mi. 

3347 ft. 


Relative: 

Lower 

Actual: 

127 ft. 

TC3049008.2s Page 19

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 


Waste code: 

Waste name: 

Waste code: 

Waste name: 

Waste code: 

Waste name: 

Waste code: 

Waste name: 

Waste code: 

Waste name: 

Waste code: 

Waste name: 

D006 

CADMIUM 

D018 

BENZENE 

MAP FINDINGS 



Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No 







No 


No 


No 


No 




No 


No 


Commercial status unknown 

Historical Generators: 











D027 

1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 

D039 

TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 

D040 

TRICHLOROETHYLENE 

Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: 

Regulation violated: Not reported 

Area of violation: 

Used Oil - Generators 

Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 

WATERS FORD COMPANY INC (Continued) 1000217598 

D001 

IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF 

LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS 

CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE 

FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, 

WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE 

MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT 

WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. 

TC3049008.2s Page 20

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

Date violation determined: 

Date achieved compliance: 

Violation lead agency: 

Enforcement action: 

Enforcement action date: 

Enf. disposition status: 

Enf. disp. status date: 

Enforcement lead agency: 

Proposed penalty amount: 

Final penalty amount: 

Paid penalty amount: 

Regulation violated: 


Date violation determined: 


Violation lead agency: 

Enforcement action: 

Enforcement action date: 

Enf. disposition status: 

Enf. disp. status date: 

Enforcement lead agency: 

Proposed penalty amount: 

Final penalty amount: 

Paid penalty amount: 

Evaluation Action Summary: 

Evaluation date: 

Evaluation: 



Evaluation lead agency: 

Evaluation date: 

Evaluation: 



Evaluation lead agency: 

FINDS: 

Registry ID: 

110005680888 

MAP FINDINGS 

12/09/2009 

01/29/2010 

State 

WRITTEN INFORMAL 

12/30/2009 

Not reported 

Not reported 

State 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Generators - General 

11/28/2007 

01/03/2008 

State 

WRITTEN INFORMAL 

12/10/2007 

Not reported 

Not reported 

State 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

12/09/2009 

COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE 

Used Oil - Generators 

01/29/2010 

State 

11/28/2007 

COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE 

Generators - General 

01/03/2008 

State 


AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility 

Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the 

National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of 

Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for 

information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is 

used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. 

AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans 

to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the 

estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major 

redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V 

of the Clean Air Act. 


Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 


TC3049008.2s Page 21

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

MAP FINDINGS 






ICIS (Integrated Compliance Information System) is the Integrated 

Compliance Information System and provides a database that, when 

complete, will contain integrated Enforcement and Compliance 

information across most of EPA’s programs. The vision for ICIS is to 

replace EPA’s independent databases that contain Enforcement data with 

a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all 

Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions. This 

information is maintained in ICIS by EPA in the Regional offices and 

it Headquarters. A future release of ICIS will replace the Permit 

Compliance System (PCS) which supports the NPDES and will integrate 

that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also 

has the capability to track other activities occurring in the Region 

that support Compliance and Enforcement programs. These include; 

Incident Tracking, Compliance Assistance, and Compliance Monitoring. 

Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 


9 QUICK CHANGE #96 FINDS 1006795821 

East 2034 HWY 84 SPILLS N/A 

1/2-1 

0.698 mi. 

3687 ft. 


Relative: 

Lower 

Actual: 

115 ft. 

FINDS: 

Registry ID: 






SPILLS: 

CTS Number: 

Spill Number: 

UN Number: 

UN Number2: 

Report Number: 

Report Date: 

Report Time: 

Spill Date: 

Spill Time: 

Incident Type: 

Material Involved: 

Quantity: 

Phase: 

Radioactive: 

Waterway Impctd: 

Evacuation: 

Caller: 

110013652911 

49817 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

TC3049008.2s Page 22

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

Organization: 

Org Phone: 

Primary Concern: 

Associate Name: 

Investigation Date: 

Resolved: 

Closure Date: 

Ten Days Follow Up: 

Transferred Record: 

Emergency Units: 

Responsible Prty: 

RP Contact: 

RP Address: 

RP Phone: 

RP City: 

Action Code: 

Action: 

Investigator: 

EOC Operator: 

Time EOC Notifd: 

Time Dispatched: 

Complaint Code: 

Complaint ID: 

Cmplaint Referred: 

Report Sum: 

At: 

DDO: 

Date Recieved: 

Referred: 

Substance: 

Location: 

Source: 

Details: 

Additional Info: 

Incident Type: 

Incident: 

MAP FINDINGS 

Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 

QUICK CHANGE #96 (Continued) 1006795821 

FINDS: 

Registry ID: 


Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

5-Dec-07 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

CALLER ADVISED A SEMI AND SCHOOL BUS WERE INVOLVED IN ACCIDENT AND 

ABOUT 35 GALLONS OF DIESEL FUEL WAS SPILLED ON CONCRETE. NO WATERWAY 

AFFECTED.CALLED MARY SMILEY VIA CELL AND BRIEFED AT 17:10 

10 BLACKSHEAR (LAS) FINDS 1012264019 

ENE 318 TAYLOR STREET N/A 

1/2-1 

0.821 mi. 

4333 ft. 


Relative: 

Lower 

Actual: 

121 ft. 

110039856698 

TC3049008.2s Page 23

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

FINDS: 

Registry ID: 

Facility: 

Year: 

Facility ID Type: 

ID: 

Facility ID Description: 

Facility ID Last Modified: 

Year: 


ID: 



Inventory: 

Chemical Inventory ID: 

Year: 

Acute Health Risks: 

Average Daily Amount: 

Average Daily Amount Code: 

CB Record ID: 

Chemical Same as Last Year: 

110013598375 

MAP FINDINGS 






GA TIER 2: 

Facility ID: 

FATR2009HQL6SE3659SZ 

Facility Country: 

USA 

Chemicals Same as Last Year: Not reported 

Data Tier 2 Signed: 

02-25-2010 

Dikes/Saveguard Measures: Not reported 

Facility Department: 

Not reported 

Facility Date Modified: 

Not reported 

State Fees Total: 

Not reported 

Mailing Address: 

P. O. Box 2149 

Mailing City,St,Zip: 

Waycross, GA 31502 

Mailing Country: 

USA 

Latitude: 

31.306121 

Longitude: 

-82.242107 

Lat/Long Location Desc: Not reported 

Lat/Long Method: 

Not reported 

Number Employees on Site: 2 

Reporting Year: 

2009 

Site Coordinate Abbrvtns Sbmttd: Not reported 

Fire District: 

Not reported 

Notes: 

Not reported 

Validity: 

Not reported 

2009 

NAICS 

44711 

Gasoline Stations with Convenience Stores 

Not reported 

2009 

SIC 

5541 

GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS 

Not reported 

CVTR2009HQL6SE001VA 

2009 

True 

61900.0 

04 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 

B11 FLASH FOODS #163 FINDS 1006790411 

ENE 114 GORDON ST TIER 2 N/A 

1/2-1 

0.883 mi. 


4664 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster B 

Relative: 

Lower 

Actual: 

116 ft. 

TC3049008.2s Page 24

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

Contact: 

Year: 

Contact ID: 

Contact Title: 

Contact First Name: 

Contact Last Name: 

Contact Email: 

Contact Mail Address: 

Contact Mail City,St,Zip: 

Contact Mail Country: 

Contact Type: 

Contact Modification Date: 

Facility ID: 

Facility Country: 

Chemicals Same as Last Year: 

Data Tier 2 Signed: 

Dikes/Saveguard Measures: 

MAP FINDINGS 

Chronic Health Risk: 

True 

CAS Number: 

8006619 

EHS Substance: 

Not reported 

Last Modified: 

9/7/2010 

Days on Site: 

365 

Chemical Name: 

FUELS, GASOLINE 

Fire Hazard: 

True 

Gas: 

Not reported 

Liquid: 

True 

Max Daily Amount: 

123800.0 

Max Daily Amount Code: 

05 

Max Amount in Largest Container: 61900.0 

Mixture Form: 

True 

Sudden Release of Pressure Hazard: Not reported 

Pure Form: 

Not reported 

Reactive Hazard: 

Not reported 

Solid: 

Not reported 

Year: 

Not reported 

Mixture Chemical: 

Not reported 

Mixture Percent: 

Not reported 

Mixture CAS: 

Not reported 

Mixture EHS: 

Not reported 

Mixuter Last Modified: 

Not reported 

Year: 

2009 

Substance Amount: 

123800.0 

Units: 

pounds 

Storage Type: 

B 

Storage Pressure Code: 1 

Storage Temprature Code: 4 

Substance Location: 

Under Park 

Substance Last Modified: 9/7/2010 

Year: 

2009 


70100.0 

Units: 

pounds 

Storage Type: 

B 

Storage Pressure Code: 1 

Storage Temprature Code: 4 


Under Park 

Substance Last Modified: 9/7/2010 

2009 

CTTR2009HQL6SE10643U9 

Risk Manager 

Hank Sirmans 

Flash Foods, Inc 

hsirmans@flashfoods.com 

102 Lee Ave 


USA 

Owner / Operator 

Not reported 

FATR200824AMXF03LUWV 

USA 

T 

2/20/2009 

Not reported 

Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 


TC3049008.2s Page 25

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

Facility: 

Year: 


ID: 



Year: 


ID: 



MAP FINDINGS 

Facility Department: 

Not reported 

Facility Date Modified: 

5/13/2009 

State Fees Total: 

Not reported 

Mailing Address: 

P. O. Box 2149 

Mailing City,St,Zip: 


Mailing Country: 

USA 

Latitude: 

Not reported 

Longitude: 

Not reported 

Lat/Long Location Desc: Not reported 

Lat/Long Method: 

Not reported 

Number Employees on Site: 02 

Reporting Year: 

2008 

Site Coordinate Abbrvtns Sbmttd: Not reported 

Fire District: 

Not reported 

Notes: 

Not reported 

Validity: 

This facility passed all validation checks. 

Not reported 

5541 

SIC 

GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS 

1/23/2003 

Not reported 

44711 

NAICS 

Gasoline Stations with Convenience Stores 

1/23/2003 

Inventory: 

Chemical Inventory ID: 

CVTR200824AN0U03RSHG 

Year: 

Not reported 

Acute Health Risks: 

True 

Average Daily Amount: 

61900 

Average Daily Amount Code: 04 

CB Record ID: 

Not reported 

Chemical Same as Last Year: Not reported 

Chronic Health Risk: 

True 

CAS Number: 

8006-61-9 

EHS Substance: 

Not reported 

Last Modified: 

02/27/2009 

Days on Site: 

365 

Chemical Name: 

FUELS, GASOLINE 

Fire Hazard: 

True 

Gas: 

Not reported 

Liquid: 

True 

Max Daily Amount: 

123800 

Max Daily Amount Code: 

05 

Max Amount in Largest Container: 61900 

Mixture Form: 

True 

Sudden Release of Pressure Hazard: Not reported 

Pure Form: 

Not reported 

Reactive Hazard: 

Not reported 

Solid: 

Not reported 

Year: 

Not reported 

Mixture Chemical: 

Not reported 

Mixture Percent: 

Not reported 

Mixture CAS: 

Not reported 

Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 


TC3049008.2s Page 26

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

Mixture EHS: 

Mixuter Last Modified: 

Year: 


Units: 

Storage Type: 

Storage Pressure Code: 

Storage Temprature Code: 


Substance Last Modified: 

Contact: 

Year: 

Contact ID: 

Contact Title: 

Contact First Name: 

Contact Last Name: 

Contact Email: 

Contact Mail Address: 

Contact Mail City,St,Zip: 

Contact Mail Country: 

Contact Type: 

Contact Type: 

Contact Modification Date: 

Not reported 

Not reported 

Not reported 

123800 

pounds 

B 

1 

4 

Under Park 

02/27/2009 

MAP FINDINGS 

Not reported 

CTTR20081ZDWMW0032CG 

Risk Manager 

Hank Sirmans 

Flash Foods, Inc 

hsirmans@flashfoods.com 

102 Lee Ave 


USA 

Owner / Operator 

Emergency Contact 

02/27/2009 

Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 


B12 FLASH FOODS #163 RCRA-NonGen 1000449510 

ENE CORNER US HWY 82 & HWY 121 FINDS GAD981276793 

1/2-1 

0.885 mi. 


4673 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster B 

Relative: 

Lower 

Actual: 

115 ft. 

RCRA-NonGen: 



FLASH FOODS #163 


CORNER US HWY 82 & HWY 121 


EPA ID: 

GAD981276793 


P O BOX 2149 


Contact: 

HANK SIRMANS 


P O BOX 2149 



US 


(912) 285-4011 


Not reported 

EPA Region: 

04 


Non-Generator 

Description: 







Legal status: 




UNKNOWN 

UNKNOWN, UNKNO 

Not reported 

UNKNOWN 

Private 

Owner 

Not reported 

TC3049008.2s Page 27

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 



Waste code: 

Waste name: 


FINDS: 

Registry ID: 

Not reported 

D018 

BENZENE 


110007492061 

MAP FINDINGS 










No 


No 


No 


No 




No 


No 










Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 


13 MOBLEY’S AUTO CENTER FINDS 1006787361 

ENE 418 GORDON ST N/A 

1/2-1 

0.938 mi. 

4951 ft. 


Relative: 

Lower 

Actual: 

110 ft. 

FINDS: 

Registry ID: 

110013567666 






TC3049008.2s Page 28

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation 

Site 

FINDS: 

Registry ID: 

110016739225 

MAP FINDINGS 








Database(s) 

EDR ID Number 

EPA ID Number 

14 MRCX FINDS 1007218357 

East 200 PARK ST N/A 

1/2-1 

0.967 mi. 

5106 ft. 


Relative: 

Lower 

Actual: 

118 ft. 

15 DIXON SERVICE CENTER FINDS 1006787331 

ENE 527 GORDON ST LUST N/A 

1/2-1 

0.979 mi. 

5167 ft. 


Relative: 

Lower 

Actual: 

116 ft. 

FINDS: 

Registry ID: 






LUST: 

Facility ID: 

Leak ID: 

Description: 




110013567354 

ICIS (Integrated Compliance Information System) is the Integrated 

Compliance Information System and provides a database that, when 

complete, will contain integrated Enforcement and Compliance 

information across most of EPA’s programs. The vision for ICIS is to 

replace EPA’s independent databases that contain Enforcement data with 

a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all 

Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions. This 

information is maintained in ICIS by EPA in the Regional offices and 

it Headquarters. A future release of ICIS will replace the Permit 

Compliance System (PCS) which supports the NPDES and will integrate 

that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also 

has the capability to track other activities occurring in the Region 

that support Compliance and Enforcement programs. These include; 

Incident Tracking, Compliance Assistance, and Compliance Monitoring. 

01130007 

1 


In Remediation 

7/15/2005 

Humphris,David D 

TC3049008.2s Page 29

Count: 15 records. 

ORPHAN SUMMARY 

City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s) 

BLACKSHEAR 1006787292 PIERCE COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL RT 1 31516 UST, FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 

BLACKSHEAR A100336525 BRANTLEY GAS COMPANY 4951 HWY 121 N 31516 AST 

BLACKSHEAR U003550940 NO FACILITY NAME HWY 121 N 31516 UST, FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 

BLACKSHEAR S105565398 PIERCE COUNTY - SR 121 MSWLF HC 121 & COUNTY FARM RD 31516 SHWS 

BLACKSHEAR A100333745 FERRELLGAS, LP 633 HWY 84 GORDON STREET 31516 AST 

BLACKSHEAR A100333763 TRUE VALUE 3425 HWY 84 W 31516 AST 

BLACKSHEAR A100333780 UNITED MARKET #2 3503 HWY 84 W 31516 AST 

BLACKSHEAR A100333752 TRUETT HARDWARE (CLOSED) 203 HWY AVENUE CLOSED 31516 AST 

BLACKSHEAR S108310817 PINEY GROVE INERT LANDFILL 5358 BROWNS LN SWF/LF 

BLACKSHEAR A100333772 FLASH FOODS #79 3359 W HWY 84 31516 AST 

BLACKSHEAR 1006773700 MATTOX FOOD MART 3706 E HWY 84 31516 FINDS, LUST, UST, FINANCIAL 

ASSURANCE 

BLACKSHEAR S107667548 PIERCE CO.-HIGHWAY 38 INERT LF LOCATED ON THE OUTER BOUNDARY SWF/LF 

OFFERMAN S109504893 S & P FOOD MART SK MART #3 HWY 84 31516 LUST 

OFFERMAN U003984462 FORMER KENNETH JACKSON CHANCEY PRO 7294 HWY 84 31516 UST, FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 

OFFERMAN S105791865 FORMER KENNETH JACKSON CHANCEY PRO 7294 HIGHWAY 84 31516 LUST 

TC3049008.2s Page 30

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 

To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency 

on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. 

Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days 

from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. 



NPL: National Priority List 

National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority 

cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon 

coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center 

(EPIC) and regional EPA offices. 

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2010 

Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/13/2011 

Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2011 

Number of Days to Update: 15 

Source: EPA 

Telephone: N/A 

Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2011 

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2011 

Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 

NPL Site Boundaries 

Sources: 

EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) 

Telephone: 202-564-7333 

EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 

Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 


Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 





EPA Region 10 

Telephone 206-553-8665 

Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites 

A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule 

in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on 

the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. 





Source: EPA 





NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens 

Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority 

to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner 

received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. 


Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 

Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 


Source: EPA 

Telephone: 202-564-4267 



Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned 

TC3049008.2s Page GR-1



DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions 

The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the 

EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the 

NPL where no further response is appropriate. 






Source: EPA 





CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System 

CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, 

private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, 

and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities 

List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. 





Source: EPA 

Telephone: 703-412-9810 




FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing 

A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPAa??s Federal 

Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. 






Source: Environmental Protection Agency 

Telephone: 703-603-8704 



Data Release Frequency: Varies 

CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned 

Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status 

indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined 

no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates 

this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. 

This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, 

based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. 






Source: EPA 

Telephone: 703-412-9810 




CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report 

CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. 








Source: EPA 

Telephone: 800-424-9346 




RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal 

RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation 

and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database 

includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste 

as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that 

move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the 

waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. 

Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010 


Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 




Telephone: (404) 562-8651 




RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators 




as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate 

over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. 






Telephone: (404) 562-8651 




RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators 




as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate 

between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. 






Telephone: (404) 562-8651 




RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators 




as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators 

(CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. 






Telephone: (404) 562-8651 






Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 

US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List 

A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building 

foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental 

media or effect human health. 

Date of Government Version: 01/05/2011 









US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls 

A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, 

such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation 

care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally 

required as part of the institutional controls. 











ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System 

Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous 

substances. 






Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard 

Telephone: 202-267-2180 



Data Release Frequency: Annually 

SHWS: Hazardous Site Inventory 

State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites 

may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds 

(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially 

responsible parties. Available information varies by state. 





Source: Department of Environmental Protection 

Telephone: 404-657-8600 




NON HSI: Non-Hazardous Site Inventory 

This list was obtained by EDR in 1998 and contains property listings that have reported contamination of soil 

or groundwater under the Georgia Hazardous Site Response Act (HSRA). These sites were not placed on the Georgia 

Priority list (Hazardous Site Inventory or HSI) because their hazard evaluation scores did not exceed the threshold 

levels established for sites posing an imminent threat to health or the environment. Disclaimer provided by Rindt-McDuff 

Associates - the database information has been obtained from publicly available sources produced by other entities. 

While reasonable steps have been taken to insure the accuracy of the data, RMA does not guarantee the accuracy 

of the data. No claim is made for the actual existence of pollution at any site. This data does not constitute 

a legal opinion. 





Date Made Active in Reports: 01/17/2011 


State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 

Source: Rindt-McDuff Associates, Inc. 





SWF/LF: Solid Waste Disposal Facilities 

Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal 

facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities 

or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal 

sites. 






Source: Department of Natural Resources 

Telephone: 404-362-2696 

Source: Center for GIS, Georgia Institute of Technology 

Telephone: 404-385-0900 



Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually 

LUST: List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks 

Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground 

storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. 





Source: Environmental Protection Division 

Telephone: 404-362-2687 




INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land 

LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. 






LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska 






LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. 





Source: EPA Region 8 

Telephone: 303-312-6271 





Telephone: 913-551-7003 

Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2010 




Telephone: 214-665-6597 







A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. 






LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. 






Telephone: 617-918-1313 





Telephone: 206-553-2857 





LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada 






LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. 







Telephone: 415-972-3372 





Telephone: 404-562-8677 




UST: Underground Storage Tank Database 

Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available 

information varies by state program. 





AST: Above Ground Storage Tanks 

A listing of LP gas tank site locations. 





Source: Environmental Protection Division 

Telephone: 404-362-2687 




Source: Office of Insurance & Safety Fire Commissioner 

Telephone: 404-656-5875 




INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land 

The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian 

land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). 






Number of Days to Update: 60 


Telephone: 312-886-6136 






land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal 

Nations). 





Source: EPA, Region 1 







land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). 






Telephone: 206-553-2857 






land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). 






Telephone: 913-551-7003 






land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). 






Telephone: 303-312-6137 






land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). 






Telephone: 415-972-3368 






land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). 








Telephone: 214-665-7591 






land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee 

and Tribal Nations) 





FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing 

A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. 





State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries 


Telephone: 404-562-9424 




Source: FEMA 

Telephone: 202-646-5797 




INST CONTROL: Public Record List 

Sites on the Public Record Listing that have institutional controls or limitations on use are sites with Risk 

Reduction Standards of 3, 4, and 5. 


Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2011 









INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing 

A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. 










INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng 

A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. 






Telephone: 913-551-7365 


Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 


VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program site 

Georgia?s Voluntary Remediation Program Act was created to encourage voluntary investigation and remediation of 

contaminated properties. 








Source: DNR 





BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Public Record List 

The Brownfields Public Record lists properties where response actions under the Georgia Hazardous Site Reuse and 

Redevelopment Act are planned, ongoing or completed. 


Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2011 










US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites 

Included in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields 

properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments-EPA’s Targeted Brownfields 

Assessments (TBA) program is designed to help states, tribes, and municipalities--especially those without EPA 

Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots--minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with 

brownfields. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments 

at brownfields sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts 

under EPA’s Brownfields Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreement 

Recipients-States, political subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes become Brownfields Cleanup Revolving 

Loan Fund (BCRLF) cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the 

U.S. EPA. EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process. BCRLF 

cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified 

brownfields-related cleanup activities. 





Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 


Telephone: 202-566-2777 




ODI: Open Dump Inventory 

An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 

Subtitle D Criteria. 






Telephone: 800-424-9346 


Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A 


DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations 

A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside 

County and northern Imperial County, California. 






Telephone: 415-947-4219 






HIST LF: Historical Landfills 

Landfills that were closed many years ago. 




Number of Days to Update: 17 

INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands 

Location of open dumps on Indian land. 





Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 


Telephone: 404-362-2696 





Telephone: 703-308-8245 




US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs 

A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this 

web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported 

they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. 

In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry 

and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, 

contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. 





DEL SHWS: Delisted Hazardous Site Inventory Listing 

A listing of sites delisted from the Hazardous Site Inventory. 





Source: Drug Enforcement Administration 

Telephone: 202-307-1000 





Telephone: 404-657-8636 




US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register 

A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this 

web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported 

they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. 

In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry 

and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, 

contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. 






Source: Drug Enforcement Administration 

Telephone: 202-307-1000 




TC3049008.2s Page GR-10


LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information 

A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent 

Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. 

CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. 






Telephone: 202-564-6023 




LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System 

LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure 

properties. 






Source: Department of the Navy 

Telephone: 843-820-7326 




HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System 

Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. 





SPILLS: Spills Information 

Oil or Hazardous Material Spills or Releases. 






Source: U.S. Department of Transportation 

Telephone: 202-366-4555 





Telephone: 404-656-6905 




RCRA-NonGen: RCRA - Non Generators 




as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous 

waste. 






Telephone: (404) 562-8651 




DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data 

Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. 

TC3049008.2s Page GR-11






Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety 

Telephone: 202-366-4595 




DOD: Department of Defense Sites 

This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that 

have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. 





Source: USGS 

Telephone: 703-692-8801 




FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites 

The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers 

is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. 





Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 

Telephone: 202-528-4285 




CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees 

Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released 

periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. 





Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library 

Telephone: Varies 




ROD: Records Of Decision 

Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical 

and health information to aid in the cleanup. 





Source: EPA 

Telephone: 703-416-0223 




UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites 

Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills 

shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from 

the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings 

were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. 





Source: Department of Energy 

Telephone: 505-845-0011 




MINES: Mines Master Index File 

Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes 

violation information. 

TC3049008.2s Page GR-12






Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration 

Telephone: 303-231-5959 




TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System 

Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and 

land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. 


Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2010 



Source: EPA 

Telephone: 202-566-0250 




TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act 

Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the 

TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant 

site. 





Source: EPA 

Telephone: 202-260-5521 



Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years 

FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) 

FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, 

TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the 

Agency on a quarterly basis. 





Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 

Telephone: 202-566-1667 




FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) 

A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. 





Source: EPA 

Telephone: 202-566-1667 




HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing 

A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The 

information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA 

(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions 

are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters 

with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included 

in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. 






Telephone: 202-564-2501 

Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 


TC3049008.2s Page GR-13


HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing 

A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA 

regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation 

of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some 

EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing 

EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that 

may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. 






Telephone: 202-564-2501 

Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 

Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 


SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems 

Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all 

registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 

1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices 

being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. 





Source: EPA 

Telephone: 202-564-4203 




ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System 

The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement 

and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) 

program. 






Telephone: 202-564-5088 




PADS: PCB Activity Database System 

PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers 

of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. 





Source: EPA 

Telephone: 202-566-0500 




MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System 

MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which 

possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, 

EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. 





Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

Telephone: 301-415-7169 




RADINFO: Radiation Information Database 

The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. 

TC3049008.2s Page GR-14







Telephone: 202-343-9775 




FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System 

Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more 

detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric 

Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial 

enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal 

Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities 

Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). 





Source: EPA 

Telephone: (404) 562-9900 




RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System 

RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA 

pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration 

actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of 

the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources 

made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. 





Source: EPA 

Telephone: 202-564-4104 




BRS: Biennial Reporting System 

The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation 

and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) 

and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. 





Source: EPA/NTIS 

Telephone: 800-424-9346 



Data Release Frequency: Biennially 

NPDES: NPDES Wastewater Permit List 

A listing of NPDES wastewater permits issued by the Watershed Protection Branch. 





Source: Department of Natural Resoruces 

Telephone: 404-362-2680 




DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaner Database 

A list of drycleaners in the state. The listing includes drycleaner facilities, that use perchloroethylene, that 

responded to the Notification of Compliance Status forms. It also includes those businesses that are pick-up stores 

only and do not conduct dry cleaning on site. 






Telephone: 404-363-7000 




TC3049008.2s Page GR-15


AIRS: Permitted Facility & Emissions Lising 

A listing of permitted Air facilities and emissions data. 






Telephone: 404-363-7000 




TIER 2: Tier 2 Data Listing 

A listing of facilities which store or manufacture hazardous materials and submit a chemical inventory report. 






Telephone: 404-656-4852 




INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations 

This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater 

than 640 acres. 





Source: USGS 

Telephone: 202-208-3710 




SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing 

The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office 

of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established 

drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, 

Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. 






Telephone: 615-532-8599 




FINANCIAL ASSURANCE: Financial Assurance Information Listing 

A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. 






Telephone: 404-362-4892 




FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands 

Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps 

of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, 

Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, 

Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. 





Source: U.S. Geological Survey 

Telephone: 888-275-8747 



Data Release Frequency: N/A 

TC3049008.2s Page GR-16


PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database 

The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. 






Telephone: 202-566-0517 




COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List 

A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. 





COAL ASH DOE: Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data 

A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. 





COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Site Listing 

A listing of coal ash landfills. 












Source: Department of Energy 

Telephone: 202-586-8719 





Telephone: 404-362-2537 




Manufactured Gas Plants: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants 

The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) 

compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s 

to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture 

of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, 

such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds 

are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently 

disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil 

and groundwater contamination. 

Date of Government Version: N/A 

Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A 

Date Made Active in Reports: N/A 

Number of Days to Update: N/A 

Source: EDR, Inc. 


Last EDR Contact: N/A 



TC3049008.2s Page GR-17


OTHER DATABASE(S) 

Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be 

complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the 

area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily 

mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. 

CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data 

Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through 

transporters to a tsd facility. 





NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information 

Hazardous waste manifest information. 















NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data 

Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD 

facility. 





PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information 






RI MANIFEST: Manifest information 

Hazardous waste manifest information 





WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information 






Source: Department of Environmental Conservation 

Telephone: 518-402-8651 









Source: Department of Environmental Management 

Telephone: 401-222-2797 









TC3049008.2s Page GR-18


Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs 

from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily 

gas pipelines. 

Electric Power Transmission Line Data 

Source: Rextag Strategies Corp. 

Telephone: (281) 769-2247 

U.S. Electric Transmission and Power Plants Systems Digital GIS Data 

Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity 

to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all 

sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, 

and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. 

AHA Hospitals: 

Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. 

Telephone: 312-280-5991 

The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. 

Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing 

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 

Telephone: 410-786-3000 

A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, 

a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 

Nursing Homes 

Source: National Institutes of Health 

Telephone: 301-594-6248 

Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. 

Public Schools 

Source: National Center for Education Statistics 

Telephone: 202-502-7300 

The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary 

and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical 

database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are 

comparable across all states. 

Private Schools 

Source: National Center for Education Statistics 

Telephone: 202-502-7300 

The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. 

Daycare Centers: Child Care Centers 

Source: Department of Human Resources 

Telephone: 404-651-5562 

Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2009 from the Federal 

Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. 

NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR 

in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) 

Source: United States Geologic Survey 

A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images 

are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image 

is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. 

TC3049008.2s Page GR-19


STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION 

© 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection 

and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject 

to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. 

TC3049008.2s Page GR-20

TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS 

TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES 

Latitude (North): 

Longitude (West): 

Universal Tranverse Mercator: 

UTM X (Meters): 

UTM Y (Meters): 

Elevation: 

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 

GEOCHECK ® 

- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM 




Target Property Map: 


East Map: 


EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 

forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. 

Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: 

1. Groundwater flow direction, and 

2. Groundwater flow velocity. 

31.30240 - 31˚ 18’ 8.6’’ 

82.2564 - 82˚ 15’ 23.0’’ 

Zone 17 

380429.7 

3463612.2 

138 ft. above sea level 

31082-C3 BLACKSHEAR WEST, GA 

1988 

31082-C2 BLACKSHEAR EAST, GA 

1988 

Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 

of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the 

geologic strata. 

TC3049008.2s Page A-1

TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY 

General Topographic Gradient: 

SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES 

Elevation (ft) 

Elevation (ft) 

111 136 

121 

North South 

TP 

139 

118 

140 

GEOCHECK ® 

- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY 

GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION 

Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional 

using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other 

sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data 

collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). 

TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 

Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to 

assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, 

should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. 

102 

138 

116 

141 

128 

142 

134 

139 

140 

132 

West East 

✩Target Property Elevation: 138 ft. 

General SW 

140 

135 

138 

138 

138 

139 

TP 

0 1/2 1 Miles 

Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated 

on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity 

should be field verified. 

137 

139 

132 

137 

129 

136 

134 

133 

124 

127 

108 

124 

126 

120 

127 

120 

TC3049008.2s Page A-2

HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION 

FEMA FLOOD ZONE 

Target Property County 

PIERCE, GA 

Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: 

Additional Panels in search area: 

NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY 

NWI Quad at Target Property 

BLACKSHEAR WEST 

HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION 

Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator 

of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the 

environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should 

contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. 

AQUIFLOW ® 

Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. 

EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater 

flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory 

authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined 

hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. 

MAP ID 

Not Reported 

GEOCHECK ® 


Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist 

the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should 

contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. 

Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways 

and bodies of water). 

LOCATION 

FROM TP 

FEMA Flood 

Electronic Data 

Not Available 

Not Reported 

Not Reported 

NWI Electronic 

Data Coverage 

YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map 

GENERAL DIRECTION 

GROUNDWATER FLOW 

TC3049008.2s Page A-3

ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION 

Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology 

of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman 

Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). 

DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil 

Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information 

for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns 

in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. 

The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data. 

Soil Component Name: 

Soil Surface Texture: 

Hydrologic Group: 

Soil Drainage Class: 

Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil. 

Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: 

Depth to Bedrock Min: 

Depth to Bedrock Max: 

GEOCHECK ® 


GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION 

Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional 

using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary 

to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil 

characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes 

move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. 

GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY 

Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed 

at which contaminant migration may be occurring. 

Era: 

Cenozoic 

Category: 

System: 

Tertiary 

Series: 

Miocene 

Code: Tm (decoded above as Era, System & Series) 

LEEFIELD 

loamy sand 

Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward 

movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. 

Somewhat poorly. Soils commonly have a layer with low hydraulic 

conductivity, wet state high in profile, etc. Depth to water table is 

1 to 3 feet. 

MODERATE 

> 60 inches 

> 60 inches 

Stratified Sequence 

TC3049008.2s Page A-4

1 

2 

3 

0 inches 

23 inches 

33 inches 

OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA 

Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may 

appear within the general area of target property. 

Soil Surface Textures: 

Surficial Soil Types: 

Shallow Soil Types: 

Deeper Soil Types: 

GEOCHECK ® 


23 inches 

33 inches 

75 inches 

sandy loam 

sand 

sandy loam 

sand 

sandy clay loam 

loam 

sandy clay 

sandy clay loam 

sand 

stratified 

sandy clay 

loamy sand 

sandy loam 

sandy loam 

LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS 

Soil Layer Information 

Boundary Classification 

Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction 

Rate (in/hr) (pH) 

Granular 

materials (35 

pct. or less 

passing No. 

200), Silty, or 

Clayey Gravel 

and Sand. 

Granular 

materials (35 

pct. or less 

passing No. 


Clayey Gravel 

and Sand. 

Granular 

materials (35 

pct. or less 

passing No. 


Clayey Gravel 

and Sand. 

COARSE-GRAINED 

SOILS, Sands, 

Sands with fines, 

Silty Sand. 


SOILS, Sands, 


Clayey sand. 


SOILS, Sands, 


Clayey sand. 

EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental 

professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an 

opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. 

Max: 20.00 

Min: 6.00 

Max: 2.00 

Min: 0.60 

Max: 0.60 

Min: 0.20 

TC3049008.2s Page A-5 

Max: 6.00 

Min: 4.50 

Max: 5.50 

Min: 4.50 

Max: 5.50 

Min: 4.50

WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION 

DATABASE 

Federal USGS 

Federal FRDS PWS 

State Database 

FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION 

MAP ID 

A3 

FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION 

MAP ID 

5 

Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. 

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION 

MAP ID 

1 

2 

A4 

GEOCHECK ® 


SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) 

1.000 

Nearest PWS within 1 mile 

1.000 

WELL ID 

USGS2297504 

WELL ID 

GA2290000 

WELL ID 

927 

928 

0000008809 

LOCATION 

FROM TP 

1/2 - 1 Mile NE 

LOCATION 

FROM TP 

1/2 - 1 Mile NNE 

LOCATION 

FROM TP 

1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENE 

1/2 - 1 Mile ENE 

1/2 - 1 Mile NNE 

TC3049008.2s Page A-6

EDR Inc. 

120 

120 

120 

120 

120 

120 

80 

GA

1 

ENE 

1/4 - 1/2 Mile 

Lower 

Source ID: 

Population Served: 

Latitude: 

Source: 

GWSI ID: 

County: 

Grnd Water (Mil Gal/Day): 

2 

ENE 

1/2 - 1 Mile 

Lower 

Source ID: 


Latitude: 

Source: 

GWSI ID: 

County: 

Grnd Water (Mil Gal/Day): 

A3 

NE 

1/2 - 1 Mile 

Lower 

GEOCHECK ® 

- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 

Map ID 

Direction 

Distance 

Elevation Database EDR ID Number 

113M0101 

0 

31.3056 

Ground 

28J003 

PIERCE 

0.00 

113M0102 

0 

31.3056 

Ground 

Not Reported 

PIERCE 

0.00 

Name: 

Longitude: 

Status: 

GA Geological Survey: 

County FIPS: 

Surface Water (Mil Gal/Day): 

Name: 

Longitude: 

Status: 

GA Geological Survey: 

County FIPS: 

Surface Water (Mil Gal/Day): 

Agency cd: 

USGS 

Site no: 

Site name: 

28J003 

Latitude: 

311842 

EDR Site id: 

Longitude: 

0821457 

Dec lat: 

Dec lon: 

-82.24901086 

Coor meth: 

Coor accr: 

F 

Latlong datum: 

Dec latlong datum: NAD83 

District: 

State: 

13 

County: 

Country: 

US 

Land net: 

Location map: 

BLACKSHEAR EAST 

Map scale: 

Altitude: 

135.00 

Altitude method: 

Interpolated from topographic map 

Altitude accuracy: Not Reported 

Altitude datum: 

National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 

Hydrologic: 

Not Reported 

Topographic: 

Not Reported 

Site type: 

Ground-water other than Spring Date construction: 

Date inventoried: Not Reported 

Mean greenwich time offset: 

Local standard time flag: N 

Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type 

Aquifer Type: 

Confined multiple aquifers 

Aquifer: 

UPPER FLORIDAN AQUIFER SYSTEM 

Well depth: 

850 

Hole depth: 

Source of depth data: driller 

Project number: 

Not Reported 

Real time data flag: 0 

Daily flow data begin date: 

Daily flow data end date: 0000-00-00 

Daily flow data count: 

Peak flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 

Peak flow data end date: 

82.2492 

Confined 

Confined 

229 

0.00 

CITY OF BLACKSHEAR 

82.2467 

Confined 

Confined 

229 

0.00 

GA WELLS 


GA WELLS 

FED USGS 

311820082145701 

USGS2297504 

31.31188443 

M 

NAD27 

13 

229 

Not Reported 

24000 

Not Reported 

EST 

Not Reported 

0000-00-00 

0 

0000-00-00 

927 

928 

TC3049008.2s Page A-8 

USGS2297504

Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 8 

Feet below Feet to 

Feet below 

Date Surface Sealevel 

Date Surface 

------------------------------------------------- 

1998-05-13 82.32 

Note: The site had been pumped recently. 

1990-05-14 88.13 1986-10-21 87.10 

1984-11-01 84.35 1984-05-23 80.94 

1983-11-10 84.60 1982-10-20 85.30 

1980-05-15 82.25 

A4 

NNE 

1/2 - 1 Mile 

Lower 

Well #: 

28J003 

County FIPS: 

Remarks: 

BLACKSHEAR, GA 

Latitude: 

311842 

Longitude: 

Altitude: 

135.00 

Depth: 

Depth to bottom of Casing: 550 

Diameter of Casing: 

Casing Material: 

Steel 

Discharge: 

Type of Openings: Open hole 

Date Built: 

Depth to top of this open interval: 

550 

Depth to bottom of this open interval: 

850 

Primary Use: 

Public supply 

Aquifer: 

TERTIARY - UPPER PLORIDAN AQUIFER SYSTEM 

5 

NNE 

1/2 - 1 Mile 

Lower 

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 


Facility type: 

Treatment objective: 

Contact name: 

Original name: 

Contact phone: 

Contact address2: 

Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

GEOCHECK ® 


Peak flow data count: 0 

Water quality data end date: 0000-00-00 

Ground water data begin date: 1980-05-15 

Ground water data count: 8 

GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

8658 

NICHOLS ST WELL #1 

Well 

disinfection 

JOHNSON, RICHARD 


912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

Water quality data begin date: 0000-00-00 

Water quality data count: 0 

Ground water data end date: 1998-05-13 

Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 

Treatment process: 


229 

0821457 

850 

12 

1585 

197202 

04 

Pierce 


Feet to 

Sealevel 

------------------------------------------------- 

GA WELLS 

FRDS PWS 

Local_Govt 

hypochlorination, post 

211 NICHOLS ST. 

GA2290000 

TC3049008.2s Page A-9 

0000008809

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

GEOCHECK ® 


GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

8659 

WELL #2 

Well 

disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 


OFF CARTER AVE WELL #3 

Well 

disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

13797 

DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 

Distribution_system_zone 

disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



TC3049008.2s Page A-10

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

GEOCHECK ® 


GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

1931 

WELL #1 PLANT 

Treatment_plant 

disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

3106 

WELL #2 PLANT 


disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

3512 

WELL #3 PLANT 


disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



TC3049008.2s Page A-11

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

GEOCHECK ® 


GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

8658 


Well 

disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

8659 

WELL #2 

Well 

disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

13797 



disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



TC3049008.2s Page A-12

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

GEOCHECK ® 


GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

1931 

WELL #1 PLANT 


disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

3106 

WELL #2 PLANT 


disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

3512 

WELL #3 PLANT 


disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



TC3049008.2s Page A-13

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

GEOCHECK ® 


GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 



Well 

disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

13797 



disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

1931 

WELL #1 PLANT 


disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



TC3049008.2s Page A-14

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

GEOCHECK ® 


GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

3106 

WELL #2 PLANT 


disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

3512 

WELL #3 PLANT 


disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

8658 


Well 

disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



04 

Pierce 


Local_Govt 



TC3049008.2s Page A-15

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

Pwsid: 

State: 

Pws name: 


PWS Source: 

Pws type: 

Status: 

Facility id: 




Contact name: 




Contact city: 

Contact zip: 

PWS ID: 

Date Initiated: 

PWS Name: 

Addressee / Facility: 

Facility Latitude: 



City Served: 

Treatment Class: 

PWS currently has or had major violation(s) or enforcement: 

VIOLATIONS INFORMATION: 

Violation ID: 

Vio. beginning Date: 

Num required Samples: 

Analysis Result: 

Analysis Method: 

Violation Type: 

Contaminant: 

Vio. Awareness Date: 

GEOCHECK ® 


GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 

8659 

WELL #2 

Well 

disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

GA2290000 

GA 

BLACKSHEAR 

3350 

Groundwater 

CWS 

Active 



Well 

disinfection 



912-449-7008 

Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 

31516 

GA2290000 

Not Reported Date Deactivated: 

BLACKSHEAR 


POB 268 

BLACKSHEAR, GA 315160268 

Not Reported 

31 18 15.0000 

31 18 17.0000 

31 18 46.0000 

Not Reported 

Treated 

Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



Epa region: 

County: 

Pwssvcconn: 

Owner type: 



Not Reported 

Facility Longitude: 



Population: 

YES 

9200001 

Source ID: Not Reported 

06/01/92 

Vio. end Date: 06/30/92 

Not Reported Number of Samples Taken: 

Not Reported 

Not Reported 

Maximum Contaminant Level: 

Monitoring, Routine Minor (TCR) 

COLIFORM (TCR) 

Not Reported 

04 

Pierce 

04 

Pierce 

82 14 10.0000 

82 14 8.0000 

82 14 54.0000 

3350 


Local_Govt 




Local_Govt 



PWS Phone: 

Vio. Period: 

Not Reported 

Not Reported 

Not Reported 

001 Months 

TC3049008.2s Page A-16

ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: 

Truedate: 

Pwsname: 

Retpopsrvd: 

Vioid: 

Viol. Type: 

Complperbe: 

Complperen: 

Enf action: 

Violmeasur: 

Truedate: 

Pwsname: 

Retpopsrvd: 

Vioid: 

Viol. Type: 

Complperbe: 

Complperen: 

Enf action: 

Violmeasur: 

Truedate: 

Pwsname: 

Retpopsrvd: 

Vioid: 

Viol. Type: 

Complperbe: 

Complperen: 

Enf action: 

Violmeasur: 

Truedate: 

Pwsname: 

Retpopsrvd: 

Vioid: 

Viol. Type: 

Complperbe: 

Complperen: 

Enf action: 

Violmeasur: 

Truedate: 

Pwsname: 

Retpopsrvd: 

Vioid: 

Viol. Type: 

Complperbe: 

Complperen: 

Enf action: 

Violmeasur: 

Truedate: 

Pwsname: 

Retpopsrvd: 

Vioid: 

Viol. Type: 

Complperbe: 

Complperen: 

Enf action: 

Violmeasur: 

GEOCHECK ® 


03/31/2009 

Pwsid: 

BLACKSHEAR 


Pwstypecod: 

10101 

Contaminant: 

CCR Complete Failure to Report 

7/1/2001 0:00:00 

7/9/2001 0:00:00 

Enfdate: 

State Intentional no-action 

Not Reported 

03/31/2009 

Pwsid: 

BLACKSHEAR 


Pwstypecod: 

10101 

Contaminant: 


7/1/2001 0:00:00 

7/9/2001 0:00:00 

Enfdate: 

State Compliance Achieved 

Not Reported 

03/31/2009 

Pwsid: 

BLACKSHEAR 


Pwstypecod: 

10202 

Contaminant: 


7/1/2002 0:00:00 

7/25/2002 0:00:00 

Enfdate: 

State Violation/Reminder Notice 

Not Reported 

03/31/2009 

Pwsid: 

BLACKSHEAR 


Pwstypecod: 

10202 

Contaminant: 


7/1/2002 0:00:00 

7/25/2002 0:00:00 

Enfdate: 


Not Reported 

03/31/2009 

Pwsid: 

BLACKSHEAR 


Pwstypecod: 

10503 

Contaminant: 


7/1/2003 0:00:00 

8/19/2003 0:00:00 

Enfdate: 

State CCR Follow-up Notice 

Not Reported 

03/31/2009 

Pwsid: 

BLACKSHEAR 


Pwstypecod: 

10503 

Contaminant: 


7/1/2003 0:00:00 

8/19/2003 0:00:00 

Enfdate: 


Not Reported 

GA2290000 

C 

7000 

7/2/2001 0:00:00 

GA2290000 

C 

7000 

7/9/2001 0:00:00 

GA2290000 

C 

7000 

7/23/2002 0:00:00 

GA2290000 

C 

7000 

7/25/2002 0:00:00 

GA2290000 

C 

7000 

8/11/2003 0:00:00 

GA2290000 

C 

7000 

8/19/2003 0:00:00 

TC3049008.2s Page A-17

Truedate: 

Pwsname: 

Retpopsrvd: 

Vioid: 

Viol. Type: 

Complperbe: 

Complperen: 

Enf action: 

Violmeasur: 

Truedate: 

Pwsname: 

Retpopsrvd: 

Vioid: 

Viol. Type: 

Complperbe: 

Complperen: 

Enf action: 

Violmeasur: 

Truedate: 

Pwsname: 

Retpopsrvd: 

Vioid: 

Viol. Type: 

Complperbe: 

Complperen: 

Enf action: 

Violmeasur: 

Truedate: 

Pwsname: 

Retpopsrvd: 

Vioid: 

Viol. Type: 

Complperbe: 

Complperen: 

Enf action: 

Violmeasur: 

Truedate: 

Pwsname: 

Retpopsrvd: 

Vioid: 

Viol. Type: 

Complperbe: 

Complperen: 

Enf action: 

Violmeasur: 

Truedate: 

Pwsname: 

Retpopsrvd: 

Vioid: 

Viol. Type: 

Complperbe: 

Complperen: 

Enf action: 

Violmeasur: 

GEOCHECK ® 


03/31/2009 

Pwsid: 

BLACKSHEAR 


Pwstypecod: 

10704 

Contaminant: 


7/1/2004 0:00:00 

7/8/2004 0:00:00 

Enfdate: 


Not Reported 

03/31/2009 

Pwsid: 

BLACKSHEAR 


Pwstypecod: 

10704 

Contaminant: 


7/1/2004 0:00:00 

7/8/2004 0:00:00 

Enfdate: 


Not Reported 

03/31/2009 

Pwsid: 

BLACKSHEAR 


Pwstypecod: 

10905 

Contaminant: 


7/1/2005 0:00:00 

10/17/2005 0:00:00 

Enfdate: 


Not Reported 

03/31/2009 

Pwsid: 

BLACKSHEAR 


Pwstypecod: 

10905 

Contaminant: 


7/1/2005 0:00:00 

10/17/2005 0:00:00 

Enfdate: 


Not Reported 

03/31/2009 

Pwsid: 

BLACKSHEAR 


Pwstypecod: 

10905 

Contaminant: 


7/1/2005 0:00:00 

10/17/2005 0:00:00 

Enfdate: 


Not Reported 

03/31/2009 

Pwsid: 

BLACKSHEAR 


Pwstypecod: 

11106 

Contaminant: 


7/1/2006 0:00:00 

7/5/2006 0:00:00 

Enfdate: 


Not Reported 

GA2290000 

C 

7000 

7/1/2004 0:00:00 

GA2290000 

C 

7000 

7/8/2004 0:00:00 

GA2290000 

C 

7000 

10/17/2005 0:00:00 

GA2290000 

C 

7000 

10/3/2005 0:00:00 

GA2290000 

C 

7000 

8/1/2005 0:00:00 

GA2290000 

C 

7000 

7/5/2006 0:00:00 

TC3049008.2s Page A-18

Truedate: 

Pwsname: 

Retpopsrvd: 

Vioid: 

Viol. Type: 

Complperbe: 

Complperen: 

Enf action: 

Violmeasur: 

Truedate: 

Pwsname: 

Retpopsrvd: 

Vioid: 

Viol. Type: 

Complperbe: 

Complperen: 

Enf action: 

Violmeasur: 

System Name: 


Contaminant: 

Compliance Period: 

Violation ID: 

Enforcement Date: 

System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


GEOCHECK ® 


03/31/2009 

Pwsid: 

BLACKSHEAR 


Pwstypecod: 

11106 

Contaminant: 


7/1/2006 0:00:00 

7/5/2006 0:00:00 

Enfdate: 


Not Reported 

03/31/2009 

Pwsid: 

BLACKSHEAR 


Pwstypecod: 

12108 

Contaminant: 


7/1/2008 0:00:00 

7/3/2008 0:00:00 

Enfdate: 


Not Reported 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2001 0:00:00 - 7/9/2001 0:00:00 

10101 

7/9/2001 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2001 0:00:00 - 7/9/2001 0:00:00 

10101 

7/2/2001 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2001 0:00:00 - 7/9/2001 0:00:00 

10101 

7/9/2001 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2001 0:00:00 - 7/9/2001 0:00:00 

10101 

7/2/2001 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2002 0:00:00 - 7/25/2002 0:00:00 

10202 

7/23/2002 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2002 0:00:00 - 7/25/2002 0:00:00 

10202 

7/25/2002 0:00:00 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

GA2290000 

C 

7000 

7/5/2006 0:00:00 

GA2290000 

C 

7000 

7/3/2008 0:00:00 







TC3049008.2s Page A-19


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


GEOCHECK ® 


BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2002 0:00:00 - 7/25/2002 0:00:00 

10202 

7/23/2002 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2002 0:00:00 - 7/25/2002 0:00:00 

10202 

7/25/2002 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2003 0:00:00 - 8/19/2003 0:00:00 

10503 

8/19/2003 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2003 0:00:00 - 8/19/2003 0:00:00 

10503 

8/11/2003 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2003 0:00:00 - 8/19/2003 0:00:00 

10503 

8/19/2003 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2003 0:00:00 - 8/19/2003 0:00:00 

10503 

8/11/2003 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2004 0:00:00 - 7/8/2004 0:00:00 

10704 

7/1/2004 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2004 0:00:00 - 7/8/2004 0:00:00 

10704 

7/8/2004 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2004 0:00:00 - 7/8/2004 0:00:00 

10704 

7/1/2004 0:00:00 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 










TC3049008.2s Page A-20


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


System Name: 


Contaminant: 


Violation ID: 


GEOCHECK ® 


BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2004 0:00:00 - 7/8/2004 0:00:00 

10704 

7/8/2004 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2005 0:00:00 - 10/17/2005 0:00:00 

10905 

8/1/2005 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2005 0:00:00 - 10/17/2005 0:00:00 

10905 

10/3/2005 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2005 0:00:00 - 10/17/2005 0:00:00 

10905 

10/17/2005 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2005 0:00:00 - 10/17/2005 0:00:00 

10905 

10/3/2005 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2005 0:00:00 - 10/17/2005 0:00:00 

10905 

8/1/2005 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2005 0:00:00 - 10/17/2005 0:00:00 

10905 

10/17/2005 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2006 0:00:00 - 7/5/2006 0:00:00 

11106 

7/5/2006 0:00:00 

BLACKSHEAR 


7000 

7/1/2006 0:00:00 - 7/5/2006 0:00:00 

11106 

7/5/2006 0:00:00 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 

Enf. Action: 










TC3049008.2s Page A-21

CONTACT INFORMATION: 

Name: 

Contact: 

Address: 

Address 2: 

GEOCHECK ® 


BLACKSHEAR 

DAVIS, THOMAS W. 

POB 268 

BLACKSHEAR 

GA, 31 912-4 

Population: 

Phone: 


Not Reported 

TC3049008.2s Page A-22

AREA RADON INFORMATION 

Number of sites tested: 9 

Area 

Living Area - 1st Floor 

Living Area - 2nd Floor 

Basement 

GEOCHECK ® 


RADON 

Federal EPA Radon Zone for PIERCE County: 3 

Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. 

: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 

TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 

USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) 


EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds 

to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data 

with consistent elevation units and projection. 

Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) 


A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images 

are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image 

is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. 

HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION 

Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2009 from the Federal 

Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. 

NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR 

in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION 

AQUIFLOW R Information System 

Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information 

EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater 

flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has 

extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table 

information. 

GEOLOGIC INFORMATION 

Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit 

Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital 

representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). 

STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database 

Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national 

Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil 

survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation 

of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) 

soil survey maps. 

SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database 

Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) 

Telephone: 800-672-5559 

SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping 

scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to 

construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the 

original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county 

natural resource planning and management. 

TC3049008.2s Page A-24

LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS 

FEDERAL WATER WELLS 

PWS: Public Water Systems 

Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water 

Telephone: 202-564-3750 

Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at 

least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. 

PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data 

Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water 

Telephone: 202-564-3750 

Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after 

August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). 

USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) 

This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface 

water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. 

STATE RECORDS 

Georgia Public Supply Wells 

Source: Georgia Department of Community Affairs 

Telephone: 404-894-0127 

USGS Georgia Water Wells 

Source: USGS, Georgia District Office 

Telephone: 770-903-9100 

DNR Managed Lands 


Telephone: 706-557-3032 

This dataset provides 1:24,000-scale data depicting boundaries of land parcels making up the public lands managed 

by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (GDNR). It includes polygon representations of State Parks, State 

Historic Parks, State Conservation Parks, State Historic Sites, Wildlife Management Areas, Public Fishing Areas, 

Fish Hatcheries, Natural Areas and other specially-designated areas. The data were collected and located by the 

Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Boundaries were digitized from survey plats or other information. 

OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION 

RADON 

Area Radon Information 

Source: USGS 

Telephone: 703-356-4020 

The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. 

The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at 

private sources such as universities and research institutions. 

EPA Radon Zones 

Source: EPA 

Telephone: 703-356-4020 

Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor 

radon levels. 

OTHER 


Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities 

Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 

Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater 

Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 

TC3049008.2s Page A-25


STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION 

© 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection 

and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject 

to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. 

TC3049008.2s Page A-26

APPENDIX G – RECORDS OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INTERVIEWS

APPENDIX G 

__________________________________________________________ 

1. User/Applicant Interview

APPENDIX G 

__________________________________________________________ 

2. (Abandoned Properties) Interview of Owners and Occupants 

of Neighboring Properties


RECORD OF COMMUNICATION 

Project Name: Heritage Village Project Number: 2011.2232.01 

Communications with: Mr. Steve Russell 

Of: Heritage Village Apartments 

Location: Phone: 

Communication via:() Telephone Conversation (x) Discussions During Site Inspection 

( ) Office Visit/Meeting at () Other 

Recorded by: Ian Pilling of United Consulting 

At: (time) on (date) May 10 and 11, 2011 

Re: History of the Project Site 

Subject: 

Summary of Communication: United Consulting interviewed Mr. Steve Russell maintenance 

person for the Heritage Village Apartments during the site reconnaissance. Mr. Russell had been 

employed at the Project Site for approximately 7 years. Mr. Russell was also very familiar with 

the areas surrounding the Project Site, having lived in the area for his entire life. Mr. Russell 

was not aware of any environmental concerns associated with the Project Site or surrounding 

area. He stated that the Project Site did not contain any USTs, ASTs or large quantities of 

chemicals. 

Conclusions, Actions Taken, Required, or Recommended: 

Follow up Required: When, With and By Whom: 

Document Control No. 6000-1015 Rev. 0




Communications with: Ms. Tricia Thornton 

Of: Heritage Village Apartments 







Subject: 

Summary of Communication: United Consulting interviewed Ms. Tricia Thornton, property 

manager for the Heritage Village Apartments, during the site reconnaissance. Ms. Thornton had 

been employed at the Project Site for approximately 4 years. She was unaware of any 

environmental concerns associated with the Project Site or surrounding area. 







Communications with: Resident of the area 

Of: 







Subject: 

Summary of Communication: United Consulting interviewed a resident of the area who did 

not wish to provide their name. He had been familiar with the vicinity of the Project Site for 

approximately 15 years. He was unaware of any environmental concerns associated with the 

Project Site. 




APPENDIX G 

__________________________________________________________ 

3. Documentation of Attempts to Interview: 

a. Local Fire Department




Communications with: Ms. Deborah Harris and Mr. Lenard Roberts 

Of: Pierce County 911 and Fire Department 


Communication via:(x) Telephone Conversation ( ) Discussions During Site Inspection 

( ) Office Visit/Meeting at ( ) Other 


At: (time) on (date) May 27, 2011 


Subject: 

Summary of Communication: United Consulting contacted Ms. Deborah Harris with the 

Pierce County Emergency Response on May 27, 2011, to obtain information regarding records 

of hazardous spills, underground storage tanks, and fires associated with the Project Site. Ms. 

Harris stated that she was not aware of any records of responses to the property in relation to 

large fires or chemical spills at the property; she referred us to Mr. Lenard Roberts with the 

Pierce County 911 and Fire Department. Mr. Roberts stated that he had worked for the Fire 

Department for 20 years and did not know of any large fires or chemicals spill at or near the 

Project Site. 




APPENDIX G 

__________________________________________________________ 


b. State or Local Health Department or Environmental Agency




Communications with: Mr. Tony Sapp 

Of: Pierce County Health Department 







Subject: 

Summary of Communication: United Consulting contacted Mr. Tony Sapp with the Pierce 

County Health Department on May 27, 2011, requesting information concerning the Project Site. 

Mr. Sapp stated that he did not have any records associated with the Project Site. He stated that 

the property was serviced by the city sewer. Mr. Sapp indicated that Pierce County does not 

keep records of hazardous or contaminated sites. Mr. Sapp indicated that Pierce County does not 

maintain lists of registered storage tanks. 




APPENDIX G 

__________________________________________________________ 


c. Local Agency Responsible for Issuance of Building Permits




Communications with: Mr. Dell Brown 

Of: Pierce County Community Development 



( ) Office Visit/Meeting at (x) Other e-mail 


At: (time) on (date) March 30, 2011 


Subject: 

Summary of Communication: On March 30, 2011, United Consulting visited the Pierce 

County webpage at http://www.piercecountyga.org/ to obtain information regarding building 

permits associated with the Project Site. United Consulting also e-mailed Mr. Dell Brown with 

Pierce County Community Development. According to Mr. Brown the Project Site was 

currently zoned as Multi Family and the last permit issued was an electrical permit in 2008. 




APPENDIX G 

__________________________________________________________ 


d. Local Agency Responsible for Issuance of Groundwater




Communications with: Mr. Richard Johnson 

Of: 







Subject: 

Summary of Communication: United Consulting contacted Mr. Richard Johnson, 

representative of the Blackshear Water Department on May 2, 2011, requesting information 

concerning the Consumer Confidence Report for the Project Site area. The 2009 City of 

Blackshear Water Quality report was obtained from Mr. Richard Johnson via fax on May 2, 

2011. The Water Quality Report indicated that the required water parameters were within the 

appropriate limits. Mr. Johnson stated that the Blackshear Water Department did not issue 

permits for groundwater use and was unaware of restrictions for groundwater usage. 




APPENDIX H – AUTHOR CREDENTIALS, DOCUMENTATION OF 

QUALIFICATION AS AN “ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL”

UNITED CONSULTING SENIOR EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT / DIRECTOR 

Location 

Norcross, Georgia 

Primary Focus 

Environmental Services 

Years of Experience 

Firm -30 Total-30 

Education 

BS | Civil Engineering | Minor 

Engineering Geology- 1982 

Licenses 

PE – GA 16314 (1987-1996) 

Expertise 

• Phase I/II Environmental 

Assessments 

• Remediation Design and 

Implementation 

• Geotechnical Investigations 

• Asbestos/Lead Based 

Paint Services 

• Wetlands 

• Dams 

• Water/Wastewater 

Treatment Plants 

• Landfills 

• Transportation Projects 

• Telecommunications 

Projects 

SCOTT D. SMELTER 

Summary 

As Co-Founder and Senior Executive Vice President, Mr. Smelter 

directs and coordinates all company projects relating to Environmental 

Services, and many which also include Geotechnical Services. He has 

over 26 years of experience and oversees a wide range of technical, 

administrative, management and business development activities. He is 

responsible for the daily work of over 34 engineers and environmental 

specialists. 

Mr. Smelter’s experience includes the completion of thousands of 

Environmental Assessments and Geotechnical Investigations for 

Government and private clients. His experience includes quality control 

review, budgeting, determining scope of environmental and geotechnical 

investigations, staffing requirements, and extensive client 

communication. He has advised numerous clients, including their 

lenders and attorneys, regarding environmental risk levels. 

Mr. Smelter has consulted with numerous private clients and 

Government Agencies regarding environmental issues, including various 

State Environmental Protection Division Underground Storage Tank 

Programs, State Hazardous Site Response Programs, the Georgia 

Department of Education and the Federal Environmental Protection 

Agency. Technical expertise includes evaluation of contamination levels 

of groundwater and soil versus various State Program threshold levels, 

conducting and reviewing hydrogeologic investigations for proposed 

landfills, dam evaluations and design, failure investigations, design of 

dewatering systems, geotechnical instrumentation and monitoring 

installations of drilled piers, piles and shallow foundation systems and 

review and analysis of plans and specifications. 

Related Project Experience 

REPRESENTATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS 

United States Postal Service Facilities-Georgia 

Mr. Smelter served as Project Director for our contract for Environmental 

A/E Services. Services included Phase I Environmental Assessments, 

Wetland and Endangered Species Evaluations, Asbestos & Lead Based Paint Surveys, Indoor Air Quality 

Assessments, Underground Storage Tank Investigations, Abatement Design and Abatement monitoring 

and mitigation. Activities including proposal preparation, budgeting, staffing, coordination of work within 

United Consulting’s multiple offices, with Sub-consultants and client coordination.


SCOTT D. SMELTER 

Crown Central Petroleum Assessments - Georgia 

Mr. Smelter supervised UST Closure, Site Assessments and Corrective Action Plans at twenty four (24) 

separate Crown service facilities located throughout Georgia. Included analysis of soil and groundwater 

laboratory test results and recommended actions. Coordinated work with Georgia Environmental Protection 

Division (EPD). Obtained “No further Action Required and/or Monitor Only” status from the EPD on all 

closure projects, saving Crown considerable money. 

Communication Towers-United States 

Mr. Smelter served as Principal-in-charge for Phase I and II Environmental Assessments, NEPA Screens, 

Section 106 Documentations and Geotechnical Investigations conducted on over 2,200 communication 

towers for Cingular Wireless, Nextel, AT&T Wireless, Sprint PCS, Verizon Wireless, GTE, American Tower, 

BellSouth, SBA, Crown Castle and others. Sites were located from Arizona to Vermont. Included 

occasional Phase II Environmental Assessments and EA’s pursuant to NEPA Screens. Included evaluation 

of multiple foundation options, such as drilled pier, mat foundations and rock anchor foundations. Activities 

including negotiations with Government agencies pursuant to NEPA, evaluation of contamination levels 

with various State Programs, coordination of work with United Consulting’s branch offices and Subconsultants, 

budgeting, staffing requirements and extensive Client communication. 

Clorox Site Assessment - Atlanta, Georgia 

Mr. Smelter supervised a Phase II Site Assessment and Geotechnical Investigation of a property in South 

Atlanta prior to purchase by Clorox. Included asbestos sampling and testing of existing buildings, and 

Phase II soil testing and sampling and testing of groundwater from a deep, abandoned well found at the 

site. Included remediation recommendations. 

DeKalb County Fleet Maintenance - Decatur, Georgia 

Mr. Smelter managed a Phase II Environmental Assessment and Remediation Design for DeKalb County, 

which involved the development of a Corrective Action Plan for the removal of free product from an 

Underground Storage Tank (UST) site. The site was significantly contaminated with gasoline in the soil and 

groundwater. A Phase II Assessment was conducted in order to delineate the lateral extent of the 

contamination, the groundwater gradient and to define the contaminant plume. A free product removal 

system was designed which included the installation of three (3) monitoring wells, a 4 inch diameter 70 foot 

deep recovery well, an oil/water separator tank and various pumps, hoses and cables. We provided training 

and technical oversight for the DeKalb County staff, which operated the remediation system. 

2

UNITED CONSULTING DIRECTOR OF ECOLOGICAL SERVICES 

Education 

BS | Forest Resources Majoring in 

Wildlife Biology | University of Georgia 

| 1993 

Years Experience 

Firm-17 Total-18 

Certification/Training 

• GSWCC - Level 1A Certified- 

00000165284 

• 36 Hour Wetland Delineation 

Course 

• Red-Cockaded Woodpecker, 

Identification and Management 

• Wetland Plant Identification Course 

• 40 Hour OSHA Training 

• Fundamentals of Erosion and 

Sedimentation Control 

• Restoring Forested Wetlands 

Workshop 

• Applied Fluvial Geomorphology 

• Stream Restoration Design 

Principles 

• NPDES Level 1A Inspector 

• Stream Restoration Project 

Implementation and Evaluation 

• Endangered Species – Section 7 

Consultation 

Expertise 

• Environmental Assessments 

• Wetland and Ecological Services 

• Sedimentation Analyses 

• NEPA/GEPA Evaluations 

• Telecommunications Towers 

DAVID P. HUETTER 

Summary 

Mr. Huetter has extensive experience conducting and reviewing over 500 Phase I 

Environmental Assessments since 1994. He has successfully completed 

environmental due diligence investigations utilizing standards that are more stringent 

than current ASTM guidelines, such as outlined by agencies such as the Georgia 

Department of Community Affairs, SunAmerica, and Fannie Mae/Munnie Mae. He 

has reviewed hundreds of sites for compliance with the National Environmental 

Policy Act, Georgia Environmental Policy Act and/or the National Historic 

Preservation Act. 

Mr. Huetter has also conducted sediment surveys on several ponds and lakes to 

determine the effects of sediment loading as a result of upstream construction 

activities. In addition, Mr. Huetter has performed ecological research and 

assessments for state and federal government agencies, as well as for private 

individuals. His experience includes mapping of wetlands and vegetative 

communities, investigations for protected species and their related habitat. Mr. 

Huetter has conducted wetland delineations and assisted with wetland permitting 

throughout the Southeast. In addition, Mr. Huetter has assisted with the preparation 

of several wetland mitigation plans as well as supervising wetland creation and 

restoration projects. He has provided several Wetland training seminars to clients 

and to professional organizations such as the American Consulting Engineers 

Council. 

Representative Environmental Assessment Projects 

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS – GEORGIA DCA 

Mr. Huetter has been involved with conducting or reviewing more than 30 projects 

conducted in accordance with the Georgia Department of Community Affairs 

standards. His duties included conducting the Phase I ESA site reconnaissance, 

reviewing historical documentation, conducting Phase II field investigations, 

delineating streams and wetlands, providing environmental expertise regarding 

evaluating RECs, and reviewing final reports. Some of the projects Mr. Huetter has 

been involved with include: Marcus Street Senior Residences, Hope Estates Senior 

Residences, Grove Park, MLK Senior Residences, Mossy Branch Apartments, 

Columbia Senior Residences at Wheat Street, Mechanicsville Apartments, William 

Holmes Borders Senior Residences, and Thomson Senior Residences. 

SOUTHLAND TRACT - STONE MOUNTAIN, GEORGIA 

Mr. Huetter performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment on a 90-acre tract. 

The Phase I identified the potential for environmental concern relating to illegally 

dumped trash and debris including a drum and several automotive batteries. A Phase II Environmental Site Assessment was 

performed to determine if contamination had occurred to the site. Mr. Huetter conducted test pit investigations and collected 

soil samples for laboratory analysis of lead, volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds. The results of the investigation 

identified that significant contamination had not occurred on the site.


DAVID P. HUETTER 

LANGFORD DRIVE SITE - NORCROSS, GEORGIA 

Mr. Huetter performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment on a tract containing an old home site. The Phase I identified 

the potential for environmental concern relating to an area of apparent soil contamination. A Phase II Environmental Site 

Assessment was performed to determine the constituents of the contamination and the proper method of disposal. Mr. Huetter 

collected soil samples for analytical testing and then supervised the excavation and disposal of the contaminated soil. The 

residential development project was then able to proceed as planned. 

HINESVILLE POST OFFICE SITE - HINESVILLE/FT. STEWART, GEORGIA 

Mr. Huetter supervised the completion of a Phase I Environmental Assessment on a wooded parcel in accordance with the 

USPS guidelines. In addition, Mr. Huetter conducted a follow-up investigation of the site to delineate wetlands and conduct a 

detailed investigation for protected species. A small area of wetlands on the site was delineated and no protected species 

were discovered. Construction was able to proceed with limited permit coordination. 

FULTON COUNTY SCHOOL SITES – FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA 

Mr. Huetter conducted Environmental Evaluations in accordance with the Georgia Environmental Policy Act guidelines to 

assess potential environmental impacts associated with construction of several new school sites. Evaluations included 

assessing potential impacts to various natural resources including; streams, wetlands, protected species, forest resources, 

and soil erosion. 

FORT VALLEY STATE COLLEGE, DAIRY GOAT RESEARCH CENTER - FORT VALLEY, GEORGIA 

Mr. Huetter conducted a pre-construction environmental assessment for a dairy goat research processing facility at Fort Valley 

State College. USDA guidelines were required for the assessment, which included endangered species, wetlands, and natural 

resources evaluation for the site. He also prepared the reports and supporting documents for submittal with a grant application 

to the USDA.

UNITED CONSULTING DIRECTOR OF NPDES SERVICES 

Location 

Norcross 

Education 

BS | Geology | Northwest 

Missouri State University | 

1984 


Firm-26 Total-27 

Professional Registration 

Professional Geologist | 

Georgia #938 | 1993 

Certification/Training 

NICET Level III – Soil, 

Asphalt, Concrete 

NPDES Level IB 

Project Experience 

TIMOTHY J. BECK, PG 

Summary 

Mr. Beck began his career with United Consulting in 1985 in the Environmental 

Services Department. He gained his environmental knowledge in the field and has 

taken his extensive experience from a field engineer, to a project manager, now 

serving as Department Manager of NPDES and Water Resources Services. He 

has served as inspector and project manager for NPDES projects over the Atlanta 

metropolitan area and all over north Georgia. 

Mr. Beck’s experience includes project management and field inspection in the 

residential, commercial, government, and industrial areas conducting stormwater 

inventory surveys, Phase I and Phase II Environmental Assessments, UST 

Closures project management, water and groundwater drainage investigations, 

moisture and mold inspection and remediation, Indoor Air Quality Investigations 

and Testing, concrete and soils testing and placement, moisture-density 

relationships of soils, Atterburg limits of soils, sieve analysis of aggregate, 

foundation footings, structural steel, post-tensioning of concrete, proctor for 

certification program of shotcrete skills and performance for pre-stressed concrete 

storage tank construction, field monitoring of single-ply and built up roofing systems 

during construction, and inspection and testing of fireproofing materials. 

This experience has prepared Mr. Beck to manage projects for United Consulting 

over the years from small projects of $100,000.00 to large projects of 

$5,000,000.00+ in size. 

DOBBINS ARB STORMSEWER INVENTORY – MARIETTA, GEORGIA. Project Manager working with Merrick and Company 

completed a comprehensive survey of all Stormwater facilities on the 580 acre Dobbins Airfield. This involved first 

order GPS as well as traditional survey method to gain all horizontal and vertical control data of each structure and 

pipe segment. The project included CCTV of the entire 8 mile airfield system to include even small 6 inch laterals, 

plus roof and hangers downspouts, in an effort to find causes of serious roof leaks on their larger hanger facilities. 

The time frame for this project was critical because of an allotted 30-day time limit to close the field for this work, and 

other construction work on the runway to be completed. Another key element in this project was the required 

continuous communication with the Airfield and Tower staff, security police, and the other four (4) contractors, and 

their equipment operation on the site. 

VDL ATLANTA – VARIOUS SUBDIVISION SITES – NORTH GEORGIA. As Project Manager, Mr. Beck performed NPDES 

erosion control inspections and stormwater monitoring and sampling at various subdivision sites in the metro Atlanta 

Area and throughout North Georgia that were partially developed for the VDL Atlanta Fund. The VDL Atlanta Fund is 

an organization set up to purchase and manage imperiled subdivisions. This project currently includes over 1000 lots 

in seventeen different subdivisions over North Georgia. Inspections and monitoring were conducted per the Georgia 

NPDES General Construction Permit GAR 100001. Results and recommendations of the inspections were 

communicated to the owner in order that deficiencies or violations of the permit can be rectified to prevent sediments 

and other pollutants from entering waterways or the client from being fined or shut down by the local and state 

authorities.


TIMOTHY J. BECK, PG 

FULTON COUNTY, GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACT FOR STORMWATER BASIN AND POND INVENTORY AND RETROFIT – 

FULTON COUNTY, STATE GEORGIA. As Project Manager Mr. Beck coordinated the project. The scope encompassed 

the review of three major Watersheds in Fulton County for Water Quality enhancements. This involved the inventory 

and condition survey of over 2,000 structures and ponds in three major watersheds. Additionally, reviewing 303 (d) 

listed stream and their respective upstream watershed land use and other potential related characteristics. The 

project identified many non-inventoried Public and Private Stormwater ponds that were not serving their intended 

propose or were not being maintained as designed. The program resulted in recommending many watersheds for 

retrofitting from Retention/Detention Pond to Water Quality ponds. Water quality monitoring was performed as 

needed, and designs were provided for typical retrofits or maintenance repairs. Repair work orders were prepared to 

immediate problems or safety issues. We also drafted policies, for the County to include in proposed Ordinances and 

design Standards to better control future development. Policies for maintenance enforcement, and to acquire private 

ponds for potential Water Quality BMP’s were drafted. 

GREENSFERRY BASIN – ATLANTA, GEORGIA. Mr. Beck served as Project Manager for this project where a Quality 

Level “B” subsurface utility engineering effort was performed. The Greensferry Basin Sewer/Water Replacement 

project involved approximately 10.89 mile project section. We identified multiple active utility targets and abandoned 

features such as street car tracks, UST’s, building foundations and numerous geological features (such as voids). 

ORME STREET COMBINED SEWER – ATLANTA, GEORGIA. Project Manager This project was a 9,380 linear feet, 

$45,750,000 relief sewer for an existing brick sewer that was built in the late 1800s and early 1900s. The ground 

conditions and described methods for ground support and construction along the alignment of the 11 foot diameter 

tunnel were evaluated. Our subsurface exploration along the proposed alignment described the physical 

characteristics of the materials through which the tunnel was driven and provided specific rock and soil design 

parameters, and established design conditions. With the variable conditions present, it was decided that a shield 

would be required to maintain a symmetrical tunnel cross section and provide safety for workers. 

CITY OF STONE MOUNTAIN MS4 DRY WEATHER SCREENING – STONE MOUNTAIN, DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA. Project 

Manager. Mr. Beck inspected a percentage of city inventoried outfalls during dry weather and sampling and testing of 

those found flowing. Information was then used to determine if illicit discharges.

UNITED CONSULTING SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST 

Education 

BS | Environmental Health 

Science | University of Georgia 


Firm-10 Total-12 

Professional Registrations 

LEED AP, No. 10309229 

Certifications/Training 

• LEED AP Certified 

• Inspector - Asbestos in 

Buildings 

• 40 Hour HAZWOPER 

• 8 Hour HAZWOPER 

Refresher 

• Lead Based Paint Inspector 

Expertise 

• Phase I and II Environmental 

Assessments 

• Corrective Action Plans 

• Compliance Status Reports 

• Brownfield Act 

• Underground Storage Tank 

Closures 

• Geotechnical Investigations 

• Asbestos Surveys 

• Lead Based Paint Surveys 

• Preliminary Wetland 

Investigation 

• Hazardous Waste 

Remediation 

IAN G. PILLING, LEED AP 

Summary 

Mr. Pilling has experience managing over 500 environmental assessments 

throughout the southeast since 2000. These projects have included: Phase I 

and Phase II environmental assessments on residential, commercial, and 

industrial properties to various standards including, AAI, ASTM E 1527-05, 

DCA, MMA, and HUD. Experience includes conducting Corrective Action 

Plans for underground storage tanks facilities and hazardous waste facilities, 

supervising and managing underground storage tank closures, performing 

and managing asbestos and lead based paint surveys, supervising and 

managing hazardous waste remediation, and geophysical/geotechnical 

surveys. Mr. Pilling has also recently successfully applied for limitations of 

liability for Project Sites under the Hazardous Site Reuse and Redevelopment 

Act (a.k.a. Brownfields). 

Project Experience 

Phase I and II Environmental Assessments 

Mr. Pilling has experience conducting Phase I and II environmental 

Assessments in accordance with existing Federal and State regulations. 

COLUMBIA SENIOR RESIDENCES AT MECHANICSVILLE – ATLANTA, GEORGIA. Mr. Pilling 

conducted a Phase I Environmental Assessment, limited Asbestos Survey, 

and limited Lead Based Paint Survey on a multi-family residential complex, 

which was planned for demolition and redevelopment as a senior residence. 

The assessment was performed in substantial conformance with ASTM 

Environmental Assessment Guideline E-1527-00 and the Georgia Department 

of Community Affairs (DCA) guidelines. Asbestos containing materials were 

identified throughout the complex. Regulated concentrations of lead were not 

identified in the complex. The assessment did not reveal evidence of 

Recognized Environmental Conditions with respect to the site. 

MECHANICSVILLE APARTMENTS PHASE 4 - ATLANTA, GEORGIA. Mr. Pilling conducted 

a Phase I Environmental Assessment on this 4.67-acre tract of land that was in 

the process of having nine apartment buildings, one maintenance building and 

associated garage demolished for redevelopment. The assessment was 

performed in substantial conformance with ASTM Environmental Assessment Guideline E-1527-00 and the 

Georgia Department of Community Affairs guidelines. The assessment identified Recognized Environmental 

Conditions with respect to the site including: possible impacts from two USTs that were closed in place at the 

Project Site, the operation of a maintenance shop for at least 20 years on the site, and the historic operation of 

a metal salvage operation on the site. 

Mr. Pilling performed a Phase II Environmental Assessment on the Mechanicsville Apartment Phase 4 facility to 

assess the identified Recognized Environmental Conditions. The Phase II consisted of drilling three direct push



borings at the site. Soil samples were collected from two of the borings for analytical testing of benzene, 

toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX), total lead, toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) lead, 

PAH, and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). No BTEX or PAH constituents of analysis were detected nor 

was TPH detected in the soil samples submitted. Groundwater samples were collected from two borings and 

submitted for analytical testing of VOCs, PAHs and RCRA metals. Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) was detected 

in the groundwater samples collected from the two borings. MTBE is a constituent in petroleum, but is not 

regulated in Georgia, therefore, the impacts detected were not regulated substances and no actions were 

required. 

2200 FLAT SHOALS ROAD- ATLANTA, GEORGIA. Mr. Pilling conducted a Phase I Environmental Assessment on this 

35.7-acre tract of wooded land. The assessment was performed in general conformance with ASTM 

Environmental Assessment Guideline E-1527-00. No evidence of industrial facilities or hazardous waste was 

identified on the Project Site. 

310 14TH STREET-ATLANTA, GEORGIA. Mr. Pilling conducted a Phase I Environmental Assessment on this 1.5-acre 

tract of land developed with a funeral home. The assessment was performed in general conformance with 

ASTM Environmental Assessment Guideline E-1527-00. The environmental assessment identified a Leaking 

Underground Storage Tank located adjacent to property. Additional environmental services were determined to 

be necessary at this site to determine the extent of soil and groundwater impacts. 

COURTNEY DRIVE TRACT- FOREST PARK, GEORGIA. Mr. Pilling conducted a Phase I Environmental Assessment on 

this 1.0-acre tract of land developed with an abandoned dentist office. The assessment was performed in 

general conformance with ASTM Environmental Assessment Guideline E-1527-00. The environmental 

assessment identified two unregistered underground storage tanks (UST) located on the site. Additional 

environmental services were determined to be necessary at this site to determine if the site had been impacted 

by the USTs located on the site. 

CENTRAL METALS - ATLANTA, GEORGIA. Mr. Pilling conducted a Phase II Environmental Assessment on this metal 

recycling site for a potential purchase of this site. Nine permanent wells and two SPT borings were installed 

throughout the Project Site in areas of potential concern. Soil and Groundwater samples were collected and 

submitted to an independent laboratory for analysis of various constituents including: VOCs, SVOCs, TPH, 

PAH, PCBs, and/or total RCRA metals. Results indicated the presence of benzene, ethylbenzene, naphthalene, 

4-methyl-2-pentanone, 2-hexanone, acetone and toluene at varying concentrations in the groundwater at 

several locations throughout the Project Site. Some concentrations detected at the Project Site required 

reporting under the Rules of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division, 

Hazardous Site Response Act and several concentrations were above maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) 

established under the Rules for Safe Drinking Water, Chapter 391-3-5. The results of this investigation led to 

the seller being responsible for reporting quantities of several constituents in the soil and groundwater to the 

Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) as opposed to our client. 

STERLING AUTO BODY- ATLANTA, GEORGIA. Mr. Pilling conducted a Phase II Environmental Assessment on this site. 

Two standard penetration test borings were converted into permanent monitoring wells. One groundwater 

sample was obtained from each of the monitoring wells and submitted for analytical testing of volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs), semi volatile organic compounds (SVOC). The results of the analyses of the groundwater



samples did not indicate the presence of VOC or SVOC constituents above their respective laboratory detection 

limits. 

CHECKERS AT CANDLER ROAD-ATLANTA, GEORGIA. Mr. Pilling conducted a Phase II Environmental Assessment on 

this site. Two standard penetration tests (SPT) borings were drilled to thirty-five feet below the existing grade. 

One groundwater sample was obtained from each of the SPT borings and submitted for analytical testing of 

VOCs, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). The results of the analyses of the groundwater samples did 

not indicate the presence of VOC or PAH constituents above their respective laboratory detection limits.

APPENDIX I – PREVIOUS PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS

NOT APPLICABLE

APPENDIX J – NOISE ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTATION

APPENDIX J 

__________________________________________________________ 

1. Noise Assessment Report

NOT APPLICABLE

APPENDIX J 

__________________________________________________________ 

2. Noise Attenuation Plan (if applicable)

NOT APPLICABLE

APPENDIX K – ADDITIONAL HOME REQUIREMENTS

APPENDIX K 

__________________________________________________________ 

1. HOME and HUD Environmental Questionnaire

HOME and HUD ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE 

Instructions: The following questionnaire must be completed and included as part of the Phase I Report at 

Application Submission for HOME/HUD funded Projects, including but not limited to PBRA and NSP. All 

appropriate documentation, including the Owner Environmental Questionnaire and Disclosure Statement, should 

be used in completing the questionnaire. 

Part A of this form should be completed by the Applicant, while Part B of this form should be completed by the 

Environmental Professional and Part C should be completed jointly by the Applicant and the Environmental 

Professional. 

Please note that, if this project is funded, the completion of this Questionnaire facilitates DCA’s ability to quickly 

complete the Request for the Release of Funds Process, which must be submitted to the US Department of 

Housing and Urban Development for approval before DCA can release the HOME funds (See 2011 Qualified 

Allocation Plan, Threshold Criteria, Section 6, Subsection C (3)). The Comments and Source Documentation 

categories should be used to detail review findings and list the sources of such findings. Source documentation 

should clearly list the name of the reference document and the corresponding page number where the information 

can be located. N/A is not an acceptable response for Part C questions. Tabbing of reference materials is 

strongly encouraged to expedite the review. Incomplete questionnaires may result in significant delays in 

the Request for the Release of Funds. 

PART A—TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT 

Project Name: Veranda Blackshear 

Project Location Address: 940 Ware St. 

City: Blackshear, County: Pierce, State: GA Zip: 31516 

Contact person: Ms. Audrey Martin Telephone number: (512) 306-9206 

Estimated Project Costs (from Application): 4,000,000 

Has the project completed a federal environmental review and received a clearance (i.e. 4128)? _NO_ If so, who 

performed the review? _________________________________________________________________________ 

*Make sure to attach it to this document 

Project site is in a location described as (check all that applies): 

Central city _____ 

Suburban _____ 

Infill urban development _____ 

New construction _____ 

Other______________________ 

Rehabilitation __X_ 

In developing rural area __X_ 

In undeveloped area _____ 

Project Description-should provide location specific information and geographic boundaries, as well as a 

delineation of all activities included in the overall scope of the project. Also include funding sources. 

Heritage Village is Senior only facility, located at the NW intersection of Ware Street and Yeomans Steet. A vacant 

pecan grove lies to the north and a heavily wooded area to the west. On the east side of Yeomans Street, the 

Pierce County Recreational Department has built and operates a variety of ball fields, playgrounds and picnic 

facilities. Single family homes are located around the property as you travel outward. 

Adjacent to Heritage Village is the Blackshear Housing Authority. 

Heritage Village lies on approximately 7.2 acres. There are 16 residential buildings, with four, one bedroom, one 

bath units per building. Square footage of each unit is approximately 576 square feet. There is a manager/leasing 

office and a clubhouse located on the property. 

Heritage Village was built in the late 1970s and renovated in the mid 1990s. Due to the age and general 

deterioration, as well as, current building code and ADA requirements, the development will require a major 

renovation. A short list of items consists of: new roofs, handicapped access, appliances, all mechanicals, wood 

2011 HOME/HUD Environmental Questionnaire DCA Office of Affordable Housing 


epair, unit size upgrade, paving and landscaping. A physical Needs Assessment will be performed to ascertain a 

more complete scope of work. Funding for the acquisition and rehabilitation of Heritage Village will be generated 

from the 2011 Georgia Tax Credits as well as 2011 Home funds. Financing shortages will be made up by a first 

mortgage and/or owner financing. 

Planning/Zoning (complete only if new construction) [Project is not new construction] 

Yes No 

( ) ( ) Is the project in compliance or conformance with the local zoning? 

Comments: 

Source Documentation: 

If no or not applicable, please explain. 

If yes, provide the following documentation: 

Attach a zoning map with the project location(s) identified or a letter from the Local Unit of Government or Municipality 

Water, Supply, Sanitary Sewers, and Solid Waste Disposal (complete only if new construction) 

Yes No 

( ) ( ) Is the site served by an adequate and acceptable water supply 

( ) ( ) Municipal Private sanitary sewers and waste water disposal systems 

( ) ( ) Municipal Private trash collection and solid waste disposal 

( ) ( ) Municipal Private If the water supply is non-municipal, has an acceptable “system” been approved by 

appropriate authorities and agencies? 

( ) ( ) If the sanitary sewers and waste water disposal systems are non-municipal, has an acceptable “system” been 

approved by appropriate authorities and agencies? 

Comments: 


Letters from appropriate authorities granting approval if a non-municipal water supply system, sanitary sewer 

and/or waste water disposal system will be used. 

Schools, Parks, Recreation, and Social Services (complete only if new construction) 

Yes No 

( ) ( ) Will the local school system have the capability to service the potential school age children from the project? 

( ) ( ) Are parks and play spaces available on site or nearby? 

( ) ( ) Will social services be available on site or nearby for residents of the proposed project? 

Comments: 


Provide approximate distances if the above services are not on the project site. 

**Does not apply to Senior projects. 

Emergency Health Care, Fire and Police Services (complete only if new construction) 

Yes No 

( ) ( ) Are emergency health care providers located within reasonable proximity to the proposed project? 

( ) ( ) Are police services located within reasonable proximity to the proposed project? 

( ) ( ) Is fire fighting protection municipal volunteer adequate and equipped to service the project? 

Comments: 


Provide approximate response times for the above listed services. 

Commercial/Retail and Transportation (complete only if new construction) 

Yes No 

( ) ( ) Are commercial/retail shopping services nearby? Provide approximate distances 

( ) ( ) Is the project accessible to employment, shopping and services by public transportation or private vehicle? 

Specify if whether it is public or private transportation. 

( ) ( ) Is the project accessible to employment, shopping and services by public transportation or private vehicle? 

Specify if whether it is public or private transportation. 

( ) ( ) Is adequate public transportation available from the project to these facilities? 



( ) ( ) Are the approaches to the project convenient, safe and attractive? 

Comments: 


Nuisances and Hazards (complete only if new construction) 

Will the project be affected by natural hazards: 

Yes No 

( ) ( ) Faults, fracture 

( ) ( ) Wind/sand storm concerns 

( ) ( ) Fire hazard materials 

( ) ( ) Cliffs, bluffs, crevices 

Will the project be affected by built hazards and nuisances: 

Yes No 

( ) ( ) Hazardous street 

( ) ( ) Inadequate screened drainage catchments 

( ) ( ) Dangerous intersection 

( ) ( ) Hazards in vacant lots 

( ) ( ) Through traffic 

( ) ( ) Chemical tank-car terminals 

( ) ( ) Inadequate separation of pedestrian / vehicle 

traffic 

( ) ( ) Other hazardous chemical storage 

( ) ( ) Children’s play areas located next to freeway 

or other high traffic way 



Yes No 

( ) ( ) Slope-failures from rains 

( ) ( ) Poisonous plants, insects, animals 

( ) ( ) Unprotected water bodies 

( ) ( ) Hazardous terrain features 

( ) ( ) High-pressure gas or liquid petroleum 

transmission lines on site 

( ) ( ) Inadequate street lighting 

( ) ( ) Overhead transmission lines 

( ) ( ) Quarries or other excavations 

( ) ( ) Hazardous cargo transportation routes 

( ) ( ) Dumps/sanitary landfills or mining 

( ) ( ) Oil or gas wells 

( ) ( ) Railroad crossing 

( ) ( ) Industrial operations 

( ) ( ) Other (specify): 

____________________________ 

Will the project be affected by any of the following nuisances: 

( ) ( ) Gas, smoke, fumes 

( ) ( ) Glare from parking area 

( ) ( ) Unsightly land uses 

( ) ( ) Vermin infestation 

( ) ( ) Odors 

( ) ( ) Vacant/boarded-up buildings 

( ) ( ) Front-lawn parking 

( ) ( ) Industrial nuisances 

( ) ( ) Vibration 

( ) ( ) Other (specify): 

( ) ( ) Abandoned vehicle 

____________________________ 

Comments: 


If Yes, please attach photographs of the hazards or nuisances and an explanation any planned mitigation 

measures. 

Newspaper Contact Information 

Name of local newspaper: The Blackshear Times 

Address: 113 S. Central Ave 

City: Blackshear State: Georgia 

Telephone number (912) 449-6693 Fax number: (912) 449-1719 

Contact name for Classifieds/Legal/Public Notice: LaVerne Boatright 

Contact email address for Classifieds/Public Notice: advertising@theblacksheartimes.com

PART B—TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL 

Environmental Laws and Authorities Resource Guide 

Along with the 2009 Environmental Manual, the list that follows is to assist the Environmental Professional in the 

completion of this Questionnaire. 

HUD and HOME Environmental Questionnaire Guidance 

HUD website (www.hud.gov) 

HUD Handbook 1390.2 (available at 

http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/hudclips/handbooks/cpdh/1390.2/index.cfm) 

Floodplain Management (24 CFR Part 55) 

Historic Preservation (36 CFR Part 800) 

Noise Abatement (24 CFR Part 51 Subpart B) 

Hazardous Operations (24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C) 

Airport Hazards (24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D) 

Protection of Wetlands and Floodplains (E.O. 11990 and E. O. 11988) 

Toxic Chemicals & Radioactive Materials (§50.3(i)) 

Other § 50.4 authorities – see HUD website 

(e.g., endangered species, farmlands protection, flood, insurance, environmental justice) 

Unique Natural Features and Areas 

Yes No 

( ) (X ) Is the site near natural features (i.e., coastal bluffs, waterfalls or cliffs) or near public or private scenic areas? 

( ) (X ) Are other natural resources visible on site or in vicinity? 

( ) (X ) Will any such resources be adversely affected or will they adversely affect the project? 

Comments: 

No unique features were observed on the Project Site or in the immediate viewscape of the Project Site. 

Source Documentation: If Yes, attach photographs of the natural feature(s). 

Site/Area Reconnaissance, GoogleEarth, Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

Site Suitability, Access, and Compatibility with Surrounding Development 

Yes No 

( ) (X ) Has the site has been used as a dump, sanitary landfill or mine waste disposal area? 

(X ) ( ) Is there paved access to the site? If yes, please explain below 

( ) (X ) Are there other unusual conditions on site? If yes, please explain below 

Is there indication of: 

( ) (X ) distressed vegetation 

( ) (X ) oil/chemical spills 

( ) (X ) waste material/containers: 

( ) (X ) abandoned machinery, cars, 

refrigerators 

Will the project be unduly influenced by: 

( ) (X ) Building deterioration 

( ) (X ) Transition of land uses 

( ) (X ) Postponed maintenance 

( ) (X ) Incompatible land uses 

( ) (X ) Obsolete public facilities 

( ) (X ) Inadequate off-street parking 

( ) (X ) Are there air pollution generators nearby 

which would adversely affect the site? 



Yes No 

( ) (X ) soil staining, pools of liquid 

( ) (X ) transformers, fill/vent pipes, pipelines 

( ) (X ) drainage structures 

( ) (X ) loose/empty drums, barrels 

Comments: 

There are paved driveways on the Project Site off of both Ware Street and Yeomans Street. 

Source Documentation: Site Reconnaissance 

If Yes, attach photographs of the problem. 

( ) (X ) Heavy industry Incinerators 

( ) (X ) Power generating plants 

( ) (X ) Cement plants? 

( ) (X ) Large parking facilities (1000 or more cars)? 

( ) (X ) Heavy traveled highway (6 or more lanes)? 

( ) (X ) Oil refineries 

( ) (X ) Other(specify)?_______________________

Soil Stability, Erosion, and Drainage 

Slopes: Not Applicable ____ Steep ____ Moderate ____ Slight _x__ 

Yes No 

( ) (x ) Is there evidence of slope erosion or unstable slope conditions on or near the site? 

( ) (x ) Is there evidence of ground subsidence, high water table, or other unusual conditions on the site? 

( ) (x ) Is there any visible evidence of soil problems (foundations cracking or settling, basement flooding, etc.) in the 

neighborhood of the site? 

( ) (x ) Have soil studies or borings been made for the project site or the area? 

( ) ( ) Do the soil studies or borings indicate marginal or unsatisfactory soil conditions? Not Applicable 

( ) (x ) Is there indication of cross-lot runoff, swales, drainage flows on the property? 

( ) (x ) Are there visual indications of filled ground? If your answer is Yes, please attach a 79(g) report/analysis. 

( ) (x ) Are there active rills and gullies on site? 

( ) (x ) Is a soils report (other than structural) needed? 

( ) (x ) Are structural borings or a dynamic soil analysis/geological study needed? 

Please note: The HUD Land-Planning Data Sheets (79g), Handbooks 4140.3 and 4145.1 should be used for grading, drainage 

and fill specifications. For more information about these procedures and forms please refer to HUD Handbook 4140.3 (Data 

Sheet 79G). 

Comments: 

Project Site is located in the Coastal Plains region of South Georgia; no slopes were observed on the Project Site. 

Source Documentation: Site Reconnaissance 

If applicable, please provide copies of soil reports or studies, borings or septic system studies. 

Wetland Protection 

Yes No 

( ) ( x) Are there drainage ways, streams, rivers, or coastlines on or near the site? Please provide site map. 

( ) ( x) Is the property located in a wetland? 

( ) ( x) Is an incidental portion of the property within a wetland? 

( ) ( x) Will disturbance of the wetland exceed 1/10th of one acre? 

( ) ( x) Are there ponds, marshes, bogs, swamps or other wetlands on or near the site? 

( ) ( x) Is the project located within a wetland designated on a National Wetlands Inventory map of the Department of 

the Interior (DOI)? 

( ) ( x) Will proposed construction/landscaping activities disturb the wetland? 

If your answer is “Yes” to any of the above listed questions, please attach the following: 

1. Wetlands maps for the proposed site; 

2. Statement from engineer or architect of record that the proposed construction and/or landscaping activities will not occupy or 

modify the wetland area; and 

3. Documentation from Environmental Professional regarding direct and indirect impacts associated with constructing the 

project on or near a wetland and proposed mitigation strategies and/or alternative designs. 

In addition, if you answered “Yes” to the last question, please attach the following: 

4. Required notices from the Wetlands Management Requirements (8 step process, see §55.20; not required to be submitted 

at pre-application, but must be submitted by September 30, 2009). 

Comments: 

No wetland or streams were present on the Project Site. 

Source Documentation: National Wetlands Inventory Map, Site Reconnaissance 

Attach copy of wetlands map with project location identified (if applicable) 

Coastal Barrier Resources 

Yes No 

( ) (X ) Is the project located within a coastal barrier designated on a current FEMA flood map or Department of 

Interior coastal barrier resources map? 

( ) (X ) Is the project located within a coastal management zone (CZM)? 



Georgia’s six coastal counties and five “inland tier” counties include: Chatham, Effingham, Bryan, Liberty, McIntosh, 

Long, Glynn, Wayne, Brantley, Camden and Charlton counties. 

Comments: 

The Project Site is located outside of the Coastal Management Zone (CMZ). 


Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Site/Area Maps 

Historic Preservation 

Yes No 

(x ) ( ) Has the SHPO been notified of the project and requested to provide comments? 

( ) (x ) Is the subject property/project structure more than 50 years old? 

( ) (x ) Does the Application currently include Historic Tax Credits? 

( ) (x ) Will Historic Tax Credits be applied for? 

( ) (x ) Is the property listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places? 

( ) (x ) Is the property located within or directly adjacent to an historic district? 

( ) (x ) Does the property’s area of potential effects include an historic district or property? 

( ) ( ) If the proposed properties are affected, have you contracted with a Preservation Professional? NA 

( ) (x ) Has the SHPO been or is being advised of HUD’s finding? 

( ) (x ) Is the project located in any of the following counties: Burke, Chatham, Effingham, Richmond and Screven? If 

so, Catawba Indian Nation must be consulted as required under Section 106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act projects. 

If your answer is “Yes” to any of the above questions, consult with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and 

comply with 36 CFR Part 800.Review DCA’s Environmental Manual for further instructions and provide the following at 

Application Submission by attaching to this Questionnaire: 

1. Documentation from the local SHPO office to determine eligibility. (This may include evidence of the 106 process 

completion, or any other information pertinent to the property development.); 

2. If it is determined that the proposed project will affect historic properties, you must employ a qualified professional or contract 

with a qualified professional(s) such as a Preservation Professional. Please provide the qualified professional’s 

documentation. 

3. Documentation from the local SHPO office and Preservation Professional that the proposed project development and work 

scope meets the requirements of the National Register of Historic Places; and 

4. A statement from the architect or Preservation Professional of record regarding direct or indirect impacts associated with the 

property development on the neighborhood and existing buildings, giving the proposed mitigation and or alternatives. 

5. Documentation from the local SHPO office and Preservation Professional that the Georgia Historic Preservation Division 

Environmental Review Form has been submitted. 

6. As part of the supporting documentation to DCA, please include the following: Detail site location map of the area in which 

the development is to occur, one photo of each structure and/or site (house, building, etc.) to be impacted and information on 

the age of any structures located on the site. 

Comments: 

A review request was submitted to the GA Historic Preservation Division, a “No Effect” response letter has been issued. 


Submit the Georgia Historic Preservation Division Environmental Review Form if applicable 

NARHGIS Research documentation and HPD letter 

Floodplain Management 

Yes No 

( ) (x ) Is an incidental portion of the property within a floodplain? 

( ) (x ) Is the project located within a floodplain designated on a current FEMA flood map? 

Identify FEMA flood map used to make this finding: _Pierce County, Ga, Map No. 13229C0195D 

Community Name and Number: _City of Blackshear 130491, Pierce County 130151_ 

Map Panel Number: 195 of 310 __________________________ 

Date of Map Panel: _September 25, 2009_________________ 

( ) (x ) Will the proposed construction/landscaping activities occupy or modify the floodplain? 



If your answer is “Yes” to any of above questions, please attach documentation below to Questionnaire: 

1. Floodplain maps for the proposed site; 

2. Statement from the engineer or architect of record that proposed construction and/or landscaping activities will not occupy or 

modify the floodplain; 

3. A conditional LOMA or LOMR if it has been provided by FEMA; and 

4. Documentation from Environmental Professional regarding direct and indirect impacts associated with constructing the 

project on or near a floodplain and proposed mitigation strategies and/or alternative designs. 

In addition, if you answered “Yes” to the last question, please attach the following: 

5. Required notices from the Flood Plain Management Requirements (8 step process, see 42 C.F.R. § 55.20) (not required to 

be submitted at pre-application, but must be submitted by September 30, 2009). 

Comments: 

The Project Site is not located within a mapped flood zone. 


FEMA Flood Insurance Map 

See Appendix A, Figure 2 of the Phase I Environmental Assessment 

Flood Insurance 

Yes No 

( ) (X ) Is the building located or to be located within a Special Flood Hazard Area identified on a current Flood 

Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)? 

If your answer is “Yes”, flood insurance protection is required for buildings located or to be located within a Special Flood 

Hazard Area as a condition of approval of the project. In addition, compliance with § 55.12 and the floodplain management 

decision-making process (§ 55.20) is required (refer to floodplain management section above). Document the map used to 

determine Special Flood Hazard Area in above item #17 pertaining to community name and number, map panel number and 

date of map panel. 

Comments: 

Based on the FEMA Insurance Map, the Project Site is located in an area with no special flood hazards. 


FEMA Flood Insurance Map 

Endangered Species 

Yes No 

(x ) ( ) Has the Department of Interior list of Endangered Species and Critical Habitats been reviewed? 

( ) (x ) Is the project likely to affect any listed or proposed endangered or threatened species or critical habitats? 

If your answer is “Yes” to the second question, compliance is required with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, which 

mandates consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service in order to preserve the species. 

Comments: 

No listed species were identified on the Project Site. 

Source Documentation: Site Reconnaissance, Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

http://www.fws.gov/athens/endangered/counties_endangered.html 

See Appendix R of the Phase I Environmental Assessment 

Wild and Scenic Rivers/Unique Natural Features and Areas 

Yes No 

( ) (x ) Is the project new construction? If so please answer the following questions. 

( ) ( ) Is the site near natural features (i.e., bluffs or cliffs) or public or private scenic areas? (Not Applicable) 

( ) ( ) Are other natural resources visible on site or in vicinity? Will any such resources be adversely affected or will 

they adversely affect the project? (Not Applicable) 

( ) ( ) Is the project site located within one mile of the Chattooga Wild and Scenic River? (Not Applicable) 

If so, please provide a map clearly delineating both the project site and the Wild and Scenic River. 

Comments: 

There are no Wild and Scenic Rivers identified in the area of the Project Site. See attached map. 




If your project site is located in a county with a Wild and Scenic River, attach a map showing location of the project – draw a 

circle to define an approximately 1 mile radius around the project and note any rivers that fall within that circle 

Rivers.gov (see attached map), Site/Area Reconnaissance 

Clean Air Act 

Yes No 

( ) (x ) Is the project located in the Atlanta Metropolitan area or one of the below listed counties? 

( ) ( ) Is the project in compliance with the air quality State Implementation Plan (SIP)? (Not Applicable) 

If the answer is “Yes”, please verify whether the project in compliance with the air quality State Implementation Plan (SIP). 

(Metro Atlanta (including Barrow, Bartow, Carrol, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, 

Gwinnett, Hall, Heard, Henry, Newton, Paulding, Putnam, Rockdale, Spalding, Walton), Macon (Bibb, Monroe), Others 

Catoosa, Walker, Floyd) 

Comments: 

A representative of the Georgia Air Protection Branch indicated no specific requirements were in force for residential areas. 


Georgia Air Protection Branch 

Farmlands Protection (complete only if new construction) 

Yes No 


( ) ( ) Is the site or the area where the site is located presently being farmed? (Not Applicable) 

Comments: 

Source Documentation: If located in an urban area, please attach a zoning letter. 

Environmental Justice 

Yes No 

( ) (x ) Does project require any mitigation plans or measures to be taken? If so please list below. 

Mitigation measures could include excessive noise, any abatement, toxic conditions etc. 


( ) ( ) Is the project located in a predominantly minority and low-income neighborhood? (Not Applicable) 

If so, please provide narrative in supporting documentation. 

( ) ( ) Is there an adverse environmental impact caused by the proposed action, or is the proposed action subject to 

adverse environmental impact? (Not Applicable) 

( ) ( ) Does the project site or neighborhood suffer from disproportionately adverse environmental effects on 

minority and low-income populations relative to the community at-large? (Not Applicable) 

If your answer is “Yes” to any of the above questions, compliance is required with E.O. 12898, Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice. Attach documentation to show that the environmental review considered mitigation or avoidance of 

adverse impacts from the project to the extent practicable. 

(See http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/energyenviron/environment/subjects/justice/index.cfm) 

Comments: 

The project is not new construction; no mitigation measures are necessary 


Phase I Environmental Assessment 

Noise Abatement 

Yes No 

( ) (x ) Is the project within 1000 feet of a major road/highway/freeway (i.e. a roadway with an average daily traffic 

count of 10,000 or greater)? 

( ) (x ) Is the project within 3000 feet of a railroad? 



( ) (x ) Is the project within 15 miles of a military airfield? 

( ) (x ) Is the project within 5 miles of a civil airport? 

( ) (x ) Is noise a problem on the site and/or is expected to be in the future? 

Noise is ________dnl. 

If any of the above are checked “Yes”, please attach the following: 

1. A noise assessment conforming to the HUD Noise Assessment Guidelines (NAG) and 24 C.F.R § 51.100 et seq. prepared 

by the Environmental Professional or other qualified engineering professional (for airports, use the adopted DNL contours). 

Please refer to the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Noise Guidebook, located at: 

http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/energyenviron/environment/resources/guidebooks/noise/index.cfm. 

2. A noise attenuation plan produced by an engineering professional to describe the proposed mitigation to meet HUD sound 

guidelines. 

3. Attach a map showing the project location and the locations of any relevant roads, railroads, or airports, along with their 

approximate distance from the project site; (2) If applicable, attach a copy of the Noise Assessment Guidelines worksheets. 

Comments: 

Source Documentation: (attach NAG worksheets) 

Site and area reconnaissance, maps 

Explosive and Flammable/Hazardous Industrial Operations 

Yes No 

( ) (x ) Are industrial facilities handling explosive or fire-prone materials such as liquid propane, gasoline or other 

storage tanks adjacent to or visible from the project site? 

(attach ASD worksheets) 

If your answer is “Yes”, use the HUD Hazards Guide and comply with 24 CFR Part 51, Subpart C (www.hudclips.org). 

Comments: 

No above ground storage tanks were observed on adjacent properties. 


If your answer is YES, use HUD Hazards Guide and comply with 24 CFR Part 51, Subpart C and attach Acceptable 

Separation Distance worksheets from the HUD Hazards Guide. 

Area/Site Reconnaissance, Google Earth 

Hazards and Toxic Chemicals 

Yes No 

( ) (x ) Are industrial facilities handling explosive or fire-prone materials such as liquid propane, gasoline, or other 

storage tanks visible from or near the project site? 

( ) (x ) Is the project located near a dump or landfill site? 

( ) (x ) Is the project near an industry disposing of chemicals or hazardous wastes? 

( ) (x ) Are there issues that require a special/specific Phase II report before completing the environmental 

assessment? 

( ) (x ) Is site listed on an EPA Superfund National Priorities, CERCLA, or equivalent State list? 

( ) (x ) Is the site located within 3,000 feet of a toxic or solid waste landfill site? 

( ) (x ) Does the site have an underground storage tank? 

( ) (x ) Are there any unresolved concerns that could lead to HUD being determined to be a Potential Responsible 

Party (PRP)? 

If your answer is “Yes” to any of the above questions, use current techniques by qualified professionals to undertake 

investigations determined necessary and comply with § 50.3(i). Attach Phase I (ASTM) Report) Documentation from 

the Environmental Professional, including any applicable mitigation measures, that the project will be located at an 

acceptable distance from the hazardous site. 

Comments: 





Airport Hazards 

Yes No 

( ) (x ) Is the project within 3,000 feet from the end of a runway at a civil airport? 

( ) (x ) Is the project within 2-1/2 miles from the end of a runway at a military airfield? 

If your answer is “Yes” to either of the above questions, comply with 24 CFR Part 51, Subpart D. 

Comments: 

No airports are located within 2.5 miles of the Project Site. 



Vapor Intrusion 

Yes No 

( ) (x ) Has a Tier I vapor intrusion assessment (VIA) revealed a vapor intrusion condition exists that may present a 

an unacceptable health risk to occupants? 

If your answer is yes, then additional assessment must be performed according to ASTM E 2600-08 standards. 

For more guidance, please refer to ASTM E 2600. 

Comments: 





PART C—TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT & ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL 

COMPLETE ONLY IF PROJECT IS NEW CONSTRUCTION 

Please answer the below questions. Attach additional sheets as necessary. 

Alternatives and Project Modifications Considered: Identify other reasonable courses of action that were considered and 

not selected, such as other sites, design modifications, or other uses of the subject site. Describe the benefits and adverse 

impacts to the human environment of each alternative and the reasons for rejecting it. 

DCA is not looking for actual specific site locations but alternatives and/or project modifications considered, for 

example, closer to desirables or public transportation. Examples of project modifications may include 

smaller/larger density, zoning and high rise vs. garden style. 

The Project is not new construction; therefore these sections are not applicable. 

No Action Alternative: Discuss the benefits and adverse impacts to the human environment of not implementing the preferred 

alternative. 

Discuss why the project site you chose benefits the human environment or discuss alternative would have been is 

a less desirable location or presented issues like minority concentration. In cases, where an alternative does not 

apply, list why. 

Mitigation Measures Recommended: Are there feasible ways in which the proposal or its external factors should be modified 

in order to minimize adverse environmental impacts and restore or enhance environmental quality? 

Additional Studies Performed: Please identify any additional studies or work performed. 

Discuss all mitigation taken or recommended by Environmental professional and your Architect. 

Additional Studies Performed 

Ex. Phase II reports 


Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey 

Lead in Drinking Water Testing 

Radon Testing 

List of Sources, Agencies and Persons Consulted: 

ASTM Practice E 1527-05 

EPA AAI, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 312 (40 CFR 312) 

Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines 



DCA guidelines, dated 2011 

Site Survey dated August 23, 1985 and prepared by Southeastern Consulting Group 

Geologic Map of Atlanta, Georgia 30-minute x 60-minute Quadrangle, 2006, Georgia Geological Survey 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Wetland Delineation Manual, 1987 

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (NWI) map and 


United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Pierce County, 

http://soils.usda.gov/ 

Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Rate 

Map, Fulton County, Georgia, Community Panel No. 130130110. December 18, 2009 

Official Code of Georgia Annotated (OCGA), Volume 10, 12-7-3 

Department of Natural Resources (DNR), National Heritage Inventory Program (NHIP) – endangered 

species 

www.edrnet.com: Regulatory Review, City Directories, and aerial photographs dated 1938, 1947, 1956, 

1968, 1970, 1988, 1993, 2005 and 2006 

http://www.gaepd.org - Brownfield List dated January 11, 2010 

1968 Functional System Map of Pierce County, Georgia – Landfills 

Ms. Mary Whatley, GA EPD, Emergency Response Team (ERT) - 404-656-6905 

Mr. Jimmy Johnston, - Program Manager, GA EPD, Air Protection Branch, Planning and Support – 404 

363-7014 

EPA’s Map of Radon Zones, Georgia, Radon Division Office of Radiation and Indoor Air US EPA, 1993 

Rules of DNR…391-3-6 Water Quality Control 

United States Geologic Survey, 7.5-minute series quadrangle Topographic Map, Blackshear West, dated 

1971, photorevised 1988 

United States Geologic Survey, 7.5-minute series quadrangle Topographic Map, Blackshear East, dated 

1971, photorevised 1988 

National Register of Historic Places (NAHRGIS) – historical preservation 

Mr. Steve Russell maintenance person for the Heritage Village Apartments 

Ms. Tricia Thornton, property manager for the Heritage Village Apartments 



APPENDIX K 

__________________________________________________________ 

2. HOME and HUD Questionnaire Supporting Documentation

At a minimum, the Historic Preservation Division (HPD), Georgia State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), may require the 

following information in order to review projects in accordance with applicable federal or state laws (Section 106 of the National 

Historic Preservation Act or the Georgia Environmental Policy Act, etc). Please note that responsibility for preparing 

documentation, including the identification of historic resources and the assessment of potential effects resulting from an 

undertaking, rests with the federal or state agency or its designated applicant. If insufficient information is provided, we may 

request additional materials. The role of the SHPO is to review, comment, and consult with federal/state agencies, applicants, 

and consultants. Please note that the US Corps of Engineers (USACE) does not delegate compliance to applicants and all 

information prepared for permits through this agency should be coordinated directly with USACE. Also, if you are submitting a 

cell tower project do not use this form. Please submit all cellular projects on either the Form 620 or 621. 

I. General Information 

A. Project Name: ___Heritage Village Apartments __________________________________________ 

Project Address: _____940 Ware Street ______________________________________________ 

City: _______Blackshear ____________________________ County: _____Pierce _________ 

U. S. Congressional District - see http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cd108th/GA/plc_c8_13.pdf : _____1______ 

B. Federal Agency: ________HUD_____________________________________________________________ 

State Agency (if applicable): ___________GA DCA____________________________________________ 

C. Agency’s Involvement: 

Funding 

License/Permit 

Direct/Is performing the action 

D. Project Type: 

Road/Highway Construction or 

Improvements 

Demolition 

Rehabilitation 

Addition to Existing Building/Structure 

New Construction 

Georgia Historic Preservation Division 

Environmental Review Form 

E. Level of Review: 

Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Federal) 

Section 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act 

Georgia Environmental Policy Act (State) 

State Agency Historic Property Stewardship Program (State Stewardship) 

Technical Assistance 

Unknown 

1 

Unknown 

Other, please explain: 

___Tax Credits________________ 

Relicensing 

Utilities/Infrastructure 

Unknown 

Other: _______________________ 

F. Project Description and Plans (Please include details as to what will be constructed, what will be altered and how and 

what will be demolished, as applicable. Attach additional pages if necessary): __ Heritage Village is Senior only facility, 

located at the NW intersection of Ware Street and Yeomans Steet. Heritage Village was built in the late 1970’s and renovated 

in the mid 1990’s. Due to the age and general deterioration, as well as, current building code and ADA requirements, the 

development will require a major renovation. A short list of items consists of: new roofs, handicapped access, appliances, all 

mechanicals, wood repair, unit size upgrade, paving and landscaping. A Physical Needs Assessment will be performed to 

ascertain a more complete scope of work.

G. Contact Information: 

Applicant Consultant 

Name: ___Ian Pilling _________________________________________________________________ 

Address: ______625 Holcomb Bridge Road__________________________________________________ 

City: ________Norcross___________________________ State: __GA___ Zip: ____30071_______ 

Phone: _______770-582-2816______________________ Fax: _______770-582-2900____________ 

Email: _____________ipilling @unitedconsulting.com_____________________________________ 

Agency Contact Info (either State or Federal, according to review type): 

Name and Title: _______HUD/DCA_________________________________________________________ 

Address: _______________________________________________________________________________ 

City: ______________________________________ State: _______ Zip: __________________ 

Phone: _____________________________________ Fax: ________________________________ 

Email: _________________________________________________________________________________ 

H. Attach a map indicating the precise location of the project, preferably a clear color copy of a USGS topographic 

quadrangle map (7.5 minute). For projects in urban areas, please also include a city map that shows more detail. For 

additional help and information you may want to refer to the following websites: http://terraserver.microsoft.com/, 

http://topomaps.usgs.gov 1 . 

I. Has this identical project or a related project been previously submitted for review? YES ____ NO __X__ If yes, 

please enclose a copy of the State Historic Preservation Officer’s comments. 

II. Information Defining the Area of Potential Effect (APE) 

A. The APE varies with project types, and can be direct or indirect (physical or visual). The APE is defined as “the 

geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may cause changes in the character or use of historic properties, 

if any such properties exist.” Factors considered when determining the APE include topography, vegetation, existing 

development, orientation of an existing resource to the project, physical siting of a resource, and existing and planned 

future development. For example: 

1. Rehabilitation, renovation, and/or demolition of an historic building or structure, or new 

construction: the APE might include the building itself and the adjacent setting. 

2. Streetscapes: the APE might include the viewshed from the street. 

3. Pedestrian/bicycle facilities: the APE might extend the length of the corridor and for some distance 

on both sides of the corridor. 

4. Underground utilities: the APE would usually be limited to the area of ground disturbance. 

Based on this information, describe the Area of Potential Effect for your project: _____The APE will be limited to 

the Project Site. 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 

1 

Please note, this is not a complete list of websites with topographic map information. These websites are not controlled by 

HPD and HPD bears no responsibility for their content. 

2

B. Attach a map or site plan and project plans (as applicable), which indicate the boundaries of the APE and 

provide information about project scope of work (this may be the same map used above to show project location), 

please see the examples on our website. 

C. Provide high-resolution color photographs, which illustrate the project area and the entire APE as defined 

above. Photography should document not only the project area, but also any adjacent properties that are within the 

APE If the APE includes buildings or structures, please include clear views of each. All photography should be 

keyed to a site map and project plans (as applicable), please see our examples. Photographs should be individually 

numbered, and corresponding numbers should be placed on the map or site plan, showing location and direction of 

view. Should your project entail the alteration of existing historic structures, please provide photographs of existing 

conditions of sites, buildings and interior areas to be impacted. 

III. Site Information 

A. To your knowledge, has a cultural resources assessment or a historic resources survey been conducted in the 

project area? YES_____ NO _____ DO NOT KNOW __x___ 

If yes, provide the title of the report, author, date and principal investigator: 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

B. Attach any available information concerning known or suspected archaeological resources in the area of potential 

effect. (Note: Research at the Georgia Archaeological Site File in Athens may be undertaken only by a qualified 

archaeologist or site file staff. For questions, please call 706-542-8737.) Please note that as part of the review 

process, HPD may request an archaeological survey. 

C. In the past has this property been used for: 

1. Farming YES __x__ NO ____ 

2. Pasture YES __x__ NO ____ 

3. Mining YES ____ NO _x__ 

4. Timbering YES ____ NO _x__ 

5. Road construction YES ____ NO _x__ 

6. Housing YES ____ NO _x__ 

7. Landfill YES ____ NO _x__ 

8. Commercial YES ____ NO _x__ 

9. Industrial YES ____ NO _x__ 

10. Other (explain): 

D. Describe what is on the property today (i.e. buildings, parking lot, house, barn, outbuildings, woods, grass, 

garden, etc.) :_______16 residential buildings, a community center, grassed and landscaped areas, as well as asphalt 

driveways and parking areas associated with the development. _____________ 

E. Does the project include any land disturbing activities? (haul roads, cut or fill areas, excavations, landscaping 

activities, ditching, utility burial, grading, water tower construction etc.) YES _____ NO __x__ If yes, please 

describe the nature of the work and the approximate three dimensional extent of work: _____ __________ 

F. If not provided in response to previous sections, please include a project specific map and/or preliminary site plan 

that fully describe the project boundaries and areas of land disturbing work. Note in detail all changes and additions 

proposed to be made to the existing site. 

IV. Building and Structure Information 

A. Is the project located within or adjacent to a National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed or eligible 

historic district? 

YES ____ NO __X__ DO NOT KNOW ____ If yes, please provide the name of the district: 

______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

B. Within the project APE, are there any other buildings or structures that are 50 years old or older? 

YES ____ NO __X__ If yes, provide numbered photographs of each that have been keyed to a site map. 

3

C. Are any of the buildings or structures identified above listed or eligible for listing in the NRHP? 

YES ____ NO _X__ DO NOT KNOW____ If yes, please identify the properties (by name or photo #). 

D. Does the project involve the rehabilitation, renovation, relocation, demolition or addition to any building or 

structure that is 50 years old or older? 

YES ____ NO __X__ 

(Note: Background research for previously identified properties within an APE may be undertaken at HPD, including 

the National Register of Historic Places files, county architectural surveys, and identified sites files. To make a 

research appointment, please call 404-651-5911. Some information may also be available on the web.) 

V. Additional Information for Effects Determination 

An effect occurs when an action alters the characteristics of a property that may qualify it for the National Register or 

alters the features of a property’s location, setting or use that contribute to its significance. How is the project going to 

affect any of the properties identified in the previous section? 

A. Will the project take away or change anything within the apparent or existing boundary of any of these historic 

properties? 

YES ____ NO _X__ If yes, please explain: ___________________________________________________________ 

B. Will the project change the view from or the view of any of these properties? 


C. Will the project introduce any audible or atmospheric elements to the setting of any of these historic properties? 


D. Will the project result in the transfer, lease or sale of any of these historic properties? 

YES ____ NO __X_ If yes, please explain: ___________________________________________________________ 

Please note: HPD’s ability to complete a timely project review largely depends on the quality of the material submitted. For 

complex projects, some applicants may find it advantageous to hire a historic preservation professional with expertise in 

history, architectural history and/or archaeology. 

We are unable to accept project submittals via facsimile or e-mail. There is a 30-day review and comment period. For 

questions regarding this form or the review process, please contact HPD’s Environmental Review Specialist at 404-651-6546. 

When completed, please send this form along with the supporting material to: 

Dr. David Crass, Acting Division Director, 

Historic Preservation Division 

Attention: Environmental Review 

254 Washington Street, SW 

Ground Level 

Atlanta, GA 30334 

4

APPENDIX K 

__________________________________________________________ 

3. 8-Step Process for Floodplains and Wetlands

NOT APPLICABLE

APPENDIX L – OWNER ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

APPENDIX M – PROPERTY LOG AND INFORMATION CHECKLIST

PROPERTY LOG AND INFORMATION CHECKLIST 

This form MUST be completed by the Qualified Environmental Professional who 

performed the Phase I and/or Phase II. All entries must be fully documented and 

explained in the environmental reports. This form, together with all supporting 

documentation relating to the Phase I, must be submitted to DCA before any application 

can be accepted for processing. 

PROPERTY LOG 

Property Address: 940 Ware Street, Blackshear, Georgia 

Developer’s Name and Address: Realtex Development Corporation 

Developer’s e-mail Address: rdeyoe@realtexdevelopment.com 

Developer’s Telephone Number: (512) 306-9206 

Qualified Environmental Professional’s’ Name: Ian G. Pilling 

Qualified Environmental Professional’s’ Telephone Number and e-mail address: 

770-582-2816, ipilling@unitedconsulting.com 

Environmental Consulting Firm’s Name and Address: 

United Consulting, 625 Holcomb Bridge Road, Norcross, Georgia 30071 

Date Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Completed: June 6, 2011 

Summary of Phase I Results: The Project Site consisted of an approximate 7.2-acre 

tract of land that was developed with sixteen apartment buildings containing 64 units and 

a community center building. The Project Site was historically undeveloped land utilized 

as an orchard prior to the development of the apartment complex on the Project Site in 

the late 1970s. The Project Site was not listed on the federal or state databases we 

reviewed. No visual evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) on the 

Project Site such as stained soils, stressed vegetation, drums, land filling, or illegal 

disposal of hazardous substances was identified. Based on the entirety of the Phase I 

Environmental Site Assessment, no on-site RECs were identified. 

2011 Property Log DCA Office of Affordable Housing Page 1 of 4 

and Information Checklist

INFORMATION CHECKLIST 

Check [√] any information sources used to perform the Phase I Review. 

1. Overall Property Description 

_X_ Building Specifications 

_X_ Zoning or Land Use Maps 

_X_ Aerial Photos (e.g., Sanborn) 

__ List of Commercial Tenants On-Site 

_X_ Title History 

_X_ Site Survey 

_X_ Verification of Public Water and Sewer 

_X_ Interviews with Local Fire, Health, Land Use or Environmental Officials 

_X_ Interviews with Builder, and/or Property Manager 

_X_ Review of records of local, state and federal regulatory agencies 

_X_ Review of adjacent properties 

__ Other (Specify) 

2. Asbestos 

__ Dated Building Construction Or Rehabilitation Specifications 

_X_ Engineer’s/Consultant’s Asbestos Report (Dated May 26, 2011) – United 

Consulting 


Regulated concentrations of asbestos were identified in bulk samples collected 

from the Project Site. 

3. Polychlorinated Biphenyls 

__ Utility Transformer Records 

X_ Site Survey of Transformers 

__ Site Soil and Groundwater PCB Test Results 


4. Radon 

__ Water Utility Records 

__ Gas Utility Records 

_X On-Site Radon Test Results (Dated May 17, 2011) – United Consulting 

_X_ Other (Specify) EPA Radon Map 



5. Underground Storage Tanks 

_X_ Oil, Motor Fuel and Waste Oil Systems Reports, EPD, LUST & ERNS Records 

_X CERCLIS/RCRIS Results of Neighborhood search (within radius of one mile) 

__ Site Soil and Groundwater Tests 

__ Site Tank Survey 


6. Waste Sites 

_X_ CERCLIS/RCRIS Results of neighborhoods search (within radius of one mile) 

_X_ State EPD site lists for neighborhoods (within radius of one mile) 

__ Federal Facilities Docket 

__ Site Soil and Groundwater Test Results 


7. Lead Based Paint 

_X_ Lead Paint Survey 

__ Certification/Compliance Records 

__ Site Soil Test Results (on site soil testing for lead is not needed since no lead 

paint was identified on the Project Site) 


8. Additional Hazards 

__ Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation Survey 

__ Interior Air Test Results 

__ Lead in Drinking Water Test Results 

_X Mold Inspection Results (including in Phase I Report) – United Consulting 2011 


Checklist completed by: . 

Name (Type or Print): Ian G. Pilling . 

Date: June 2, 2011 . 



APPENDIX N – PROOF OF INSURANCE

ACORDTM CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 

PRODUCER 

Crow Friedman Group of Georgia, Inc. 

1255 Lakes Pkwy 

Bldg 100 Suite 120 

(678) 690-5990 


THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION 

ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE 

HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 

ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. 

Lawrenceville, GA 30043 

INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # 

INSURED United Consulting Group, LTD 

INSURER A: Travelers Indemnity Co. of America 25666 


Norcross, GA 30071-2045 

INSURER B: Phoenix Insurance Company 

25623 

INSURER C: Travelers Property & Casualty Co. of America 25674 

INSURER D: Travelers Indemnity Co of Connecticut 25682 

INSURER E: Hudson Insurance Company 

25054 

COVERAGES 

A X 

680-8085M643 

X 

B X 

BA-8119M872 

X 

X 

C X 

CUP-1554T401 

X 

10,000 

D UB-1570T401 

E Professional Liability 

AEE71689-05 

E Professional Liability 

AEE71689-05 

1/1/2011 1/1/2012 

1/1/2011 1/1/2012 

1/1/2011 1/1/2012 

1/1/2011 1/1/2012 

Each Claim 

Aggregate 

1,000,000 

1,000,000 

10,000 

1,000,000 

2,000,000 

2,000,000 

1,000,000 

5,000,000 

5,000,000 

1,000,000 

1,000,000 

1,000,000 

$5,000,000 

$5,000,000 

Project: 2011.2232.01 - Veranda Blackshear, Certificate holder is included as additional insured on General Liability on primary basis provided it is 

a requirement of written contract or agreement. Professional Liability includes pollution liability. 

GHFA and DCA 

Veranda Blackshear, LP 

1101 S. Capital of Texas Highway, Bldg. F, Ste. 200 

Austin, TX 78746- 

UNITCON-01 

30 

DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) 

THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING 

ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR 

MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH 

POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. 

INSR ADD'L POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION 

LTR INSRD TYPE OF INSURANCE 

POLICY NUMBER DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE (MM/DD/YY) 

LIMITS 

GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 1/1/2011 1/1/2012 

DAMAGE TO RENTED 

PREMISES (Ea occurence) $ 

CLAIMS MADE OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ 

PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 

GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 

GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 

POLICY X PRO- 

JECT LOC 

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 

ANY AUTO 

ALL OWNED AUTOS 

SCHEDULED AUTOS 

HIRED AUTOS 

NON-OWNED AUTOS 

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT 

(Ea accident) 

BODILY INJURY 

(Per person) 

BODILY INJURY 

(Per accident) 

PROPERTY DAMAGE 

(Per accident) 

GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ 

ANY AUTO EA ACC $ 

OTHER THAN 

AUTO ONLY: 

AGG $ 

EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 

OCCUR CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ 

DEDUCTIBLE $ 

RETENTION $ $ 

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND 

EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY 

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE 

1/1/2011 1/1/2012 

WC STATU- X TORY LIMITS 

E.L. EACH ACCIDENT 

OTH- 

ER 

$ 

OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 

If yes, describe under 

SPECIAL PROVISIONS below 

E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 

OTHER 

DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES / EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT / SPECIAL PROVISIONS 

CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION 

ACORD 25 (2001/08) 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

TOBI 

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION 

DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL DAYS WRITTEN 

NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL 

IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR 

REPRESENTATIVES. 

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 

© ACORD CORPORATION 1988

APPENDIX O – LETTERS OF REFERENCE

APPENDIX P – ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION

Project Name: 

Project Location: 

10. The Environmental Professional has: 

ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION 

The undersigned being first duly sworn on oath do certify to the Georgia Department of Community Affairs 

(DCA)/Georgia Housing and Finance Authority (GHFA) that the statements contained in this certification 

are true and correct. The undersigned also acknowledge that deviations from the requirements contained in 

the certification and checklist could result in scoring deductions (Page, Section and/or Appendix numbers 

must be included for each item). 


940 Ware Street, Blackshear, Georgia 

1. The Phase I Report for the above referenced project has been prepared according to the 

applicable DCA required format. 

2. The Phase I Report and/or update was performed under the supervision of an 

"Environmental Professional" as defined in 40 C.F.R. § 312.10(b) (hereinafter referred to as 

an Environmental Professional). Résumés describing the qualifications of all personnel 

involved with the Phase I environmental site assessment must be included. 

3. The Environmental Professional is not affiliated with the Owner/developer or a buyer or 

seller of the project. 

4. The Phase I Report and/or update was prepared less than 180 days prior to Application 

submission and within 30 days of the site reconnaissance. In addition, the date of the Report 

appears of the cover page of the Report. 

5. The Georgia Housing and Finance Authority and DCA have the right to rely upon the 

Phase I and/or Phase II Report prepared for the property in the same way as the Owner, 

client and any other authorized users of the Report(s). 

6. The Phase I Report was prepared in accordance with the applicable ASTM and DCA 

standards. 

7. The Environmental Professional employed by the consulting firm has supervised the 

performance of the Phase I, reviewed, signed and stamped both the Phase I and Phase II 

Reports (if applicable) and any amendments, addenda and updates thereto. 

8. The Environmental Professional has included a comprehensive historical review of the 

subject property back to 1940 or the property’s first developed use, whichever is earlier. 

9. The Phase I includes the professional opinion of the Environmental Professional as to 

any potential environmental risks and as to any recognized environmental conditions 

identified during the comprehensive historical review. 

* Commercial General Liability insurance, total combined single limits 

of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $2,000,000.00 in the aggregate; 

Page/Sec./App. 

Sec. 2.1/2.2 

Consultant's 

Signature Page/ 

Appdx H 

Sec. 2.4 

Cover Letter\ 

Report Cover 

Sec. 2.6 

Sec. 2.2 

Consultant's 

Certification Page/ 

Cover Letter 

Sec. 5.5.4/ 

Sec. 5 Summary 

Sec. 5 Summary 

Appdx N 

2009 Environmental Certification DCA Office of Affordable Housing 1

APPENDIX Q – CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT 

ON WATER QUALITY

APPENDIX R – ENDANGERED SPECIES DOCUMENTATION 

(if applicable)

Pierce Amphibians Animal Rana capito Gopher Frog G3 S3 

Pierce Fish Animal Fundulus chrysotus Golden Topminnow G5 S2S3 

Pierce Fish Animal Umbra pygmaea Eastern Mudminnow G5 S2S3 

Pierce Mammals Animal Ursus americanus floridanus Florida Black Bear G5T2 S2 

Pierce Reptiles Animal Clemmys guttata Spotted Turtle G5 S3 

Pierce Reptiles Animal Drymarchon couperi Eastern Indigo Snake G3 S3 LT 

Pierce Reptiles Animal Gopherus polyphemus Gopher Tortoise G3 S2 

Pierce Vascular Plants Plant Agalinis aphylla Scale-leaf Purple Foxglove G3G4 S3? 

Pierce Vascular Plants Plant Agalinis divaricata Pineland Purple Foxglove G3? S1? 

Pierce Vascular Plants Plant Agalinis filicaulis Spindly Purple Foxglove G3G4 S2? 

Pierce Vascular Plants Plant Quercus chapmanii Chapman Oak G4G5 S2 

Pierce Vascular Plants Plant Sarracenia minor var. minor Hooded Pitcherplant G4T4 SNR 

Pierce Vascular Plants Plant Scutellaria arenicola Sandhill Skullcap G3G4 SH 

Pierce Vascular Plants Plant Sideroxylon macrocarpum Ohoopee Bumelia G3Q S3

APPENDIX S – SHPO REVIEW DOCUMENTATION (if applicable)

At a minimum, the Historic Preservation Division (HPD), Georgia State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), may require the 

following information in order to review projects in accordance with applicable federal or state laws (Section 106 of the National 

Historic Preservation Act or the Georgia Environmental Policy Act, etc). Please note that responsibility for preparing 

documentation, including the identification of historic resources and the assessment of potential effects resulting from an 

undertaking, rests with the federal or state agency or its designated applicant. If insufficient information is provided, we may 

request additional materials. The role of the SHPO is to review, comment, and consult with federal/state agencies, applicants, 

and consultants. Please note that the US Corps of Engineers (USACE) does not delegate compliance to applicants and all 

information prepared for permits through this agency should be coordinated directly with USACE. Also, if you are submitting a 

cell tower project do not use this form. Please submit all cellular projects on either the Form 620 or 621. 

I. General Information 

A. Project Name: ___Heritage Village Apartments __________________________________________ 

Project Address: _____940 Ware Street ______________________________________________ 

City: _______Blackshear ____________________________ County: _____Pierce _________ 

U. S. Congressional District - see http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cd108th/GA/plc_c8_13.pdf : _____1______ 

B. Federal Agency: ________HUD_____________________________________________________________ 

State Agency (if applicable): ___________GA DCA____________________________________________ 

C. Agency’s Involvement: 

Funding 

License/Permit 

Direct/Is performing the action 

D. Project Type: 

Road/Highway Construction or 

Improvements 

Demolition 

Rehabilitation 

Addition to Existing Building/Structure 

New Construction 

Georgia Historic Preservation Division 

Environmental Review Form 

E. Level of Review: 

Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Federal) 

Section 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act 

Georgia Environmental Policy Act (State) 

State Agency Historic Property Stewardship Program (State Stewardship) 

Technical Assistance 

Unknown 

1 

Unknown 

Other, please explain: 

___Tax Credits________________ 

Relicensing 

Utilities/Infrastructure 

Unknown 

Other: _______________________ 

F. Project Description and Plans (Please include details as to what will be constructed, what will be altered and how and 

what will be demolished, as applicable. Attach additional pages if necessary): __ Heritage Village is Senior only facility, 

located at the NW intersection of Ware Street and Yeomans Steet. Heritage Village was built in the late 1970’s and renovated 

in the mid 1990’s. Due to the age and general deterioration, as well as, current building code and ADA requirements, the 

development will require a major renovation. A short list of items consists of: new roofs, handicapped access, appliances, all 

mechanicals, wood repair, unit size upgrade, paving and landscaping. A Physical Needs Assessment will be performed to 

ascertain a more complete scope of work.

G. Contact Information: 

Applicant Consultant 

Name: ___Ian Pilling _________________________________________________________________ 

Address: ______625 Holcomb Bridge Road__________________________________________________ 

City: ________Norcross___________________________ State: __GA___ Zip: ____30071_______ 

Phone: _______770-582-2816______________________ Fax: _______770-582-2900____________ 

Email: _____________ipilling @unitedconsulting.com_____________________________________ 

Agency Contact Info (either State or Federal, according to review type): 

Name and Title: _______HUD/DCA_________________________________________________________ 

Address: _______________________________________________________________________________ 

City: ______________________________________ State: _______ Zip: __________________ 

Phone: _____________________________________ Fax: ________________________________ 

Email: _________________________________________________________________________________ 

H. Attach a map indicating the precise location of the project, preferably a clear color copy of a USGS topographic 

quadrangle map (7.5 minute). For projects in urban areas, please also include a city map that shows more detail. For 

additional help and information you may want to refer to the following websites: http://terraserver.microsoft.com/, 

http://topomaps.usgs.gov 1 . 

I. Has this identical project or a related project been previously submitted for review? YES ____ NO __X__ If yes, 

please enclose a copy of the State Historic Preservation Officer’s comments. 

II. Information Defining the Area of Potential Effect (APE) 

A. The APE varies with project types, and can be direct or indirect (physical or visual). The APE is defined as “the 

geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may cause changes in the character or use of historic properties, 

if any such properties exist.” Factors considered when determining the APE include topography, vegetation, existing 

development, orientation of an existing resource to the project, physical siting of a resource, and existing and planned 

future development. For example: 

1. Rehabilitation, renovation, and/or demolition of an historic building or structure, or new 

construction: the APE might include the building itself and the adjacent setting. 

2. Streetscapes: the APE might include the viewshed from the street. 

3. Pedestrian/bicycle facilities: the APE might extend the length of the corridor and for some distance 

on both sides of the corridor. 

4. Underground utilities: the APE would usually be limited to the area of ground disturbance. 

Based on this information, describe the Area of Potential Effect for your project: _____The APE will be limited to 

the Project Site. 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 

1 

Please note, this is not a complete list of websites with topographic map information. These websites are not controlled by 

HPD and HPD bears no responsibility for their content. 

2

B. Attach a map or site plan and project plans (as applicable), which indicate the boundaries of the APE and 

provide information about project scope of work (this may be the same map used above to show project location), 

please see the examples on our website. 

C. Provide high-resolution color photographs, which illustrate the project area and the entire APE as defined 

above. Photography should document not only the project area, but also any adjacent properties that are within the 

APE If the APE includes buildings or structures, please include clear views of each. All photography should be 

keyed to a site map and project plans (as applicable), please see our examples. Photographs should be individually 

numbered, and corresponding numbers should be placed on the map or site plan, showing location and direction of 

view. Should your project entail the alteration of existing historic structures, please provide photographs of existing 

conditions of sites, buildings and interior areas to be impacted. 

III. Site Information 

A. To your knowledge, has a cultural resources assessment or a historic resources survey been conducted in the 

project area? YES_____ NO _____ DO NOT KNOW __x___ 

If yes, provide the title of the report, author, date and principal investigator: 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

B. Attach any available information concerning known or suspected archaeological resources in the area of potential 

effect. (Note: Research at the Georgia Archaeological Site File in Athens may be undertaken only by a qualified 

archaeologist or site file staff. For questions, please call 706-542-8737.) Please note that as part of the review 

process, HPD may request an archaeological survey. 

C. In the past has this property been used for: 

1. Farming YES __x__ NO ____ 

2. Pasture YES __x__ NO ____ 

3. Mining YES ____ NO _x__ 

4. Timbering YES ____ NO _x__ 

5. Road construction YES ____ NO _x__ 

6. Housing YES ____ NO _x__ 

7. Landfill YES ____ NO _x__ 

8. Commercial YES ____ NO _x__ 

9. Industrial YES ____ NO _x__ 

10. Other (explain): 

D. Describe what is on the property today (i.e. buildings, parking lot, house, barn, outbuildings, woods, grass, 

garden, etc.) :_______16 residential buildings, a community center, grassed and landscaped areas, as well as asphalt 

driveways and parking areas associated with the development. _____________ 

E. Does the project include any land disturbing activities? (haul roads, cut or fill areas, excavations, landscaping 

activities, ditching, utility burial, grading, water tower construction etc.) YES _____ NO __x__ If yes, please 

describe the nature of the work and the approximate three dimensional extent of work: _____ __________ 

F. If not provided in response to previous sections, please include a project specific map and/or preliminary site plan 

that fully describe the project boundaries and areas of land disturbing work. Note in detail all changes and additions 

proposed to be made to the existing site. 

IV. Building and Structure Information 

A. Is the project located within or adjacent to a National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed or eligible 

historic district? 

YES ____ NO __X__ DO NOT KNOW ____ If yes, please provide the name of the district: 

______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

B. Within the project APE, are there any other buildings or structures that are 50 years old or older? 

YES ____ NO __X__ If yes, provide numbered photographs of each that have been keyed to a site map. 

3

C. Are any of the buildings or structures identified above listed or eligible for listing in the NRHP? 

YES ____ NO _X__ DO NOT KNOW____ If yes, please identify the properties (by name or photo #). 

D. Does the project involve the rehabilitation, renovation, relocation, demolition or addition to any building or 

structure that is 50 years old or older? 

YES ____ NO __X__ 

(Note: Background research for previously identified properties within an APE may be undertaken at HPD, including 

the National Register of Historic Places files, county architectural surveys, and identified sites files. To make a 

research appointment, please call 404-651-5911. Some information may also be available on the web.) 

V. Additional Information for Effects Determination 

An effect occurs when an action alters the characteristics of a property that may qualify it for the National Register or 

alters the features of a property’s location, setting or use that contribute to its significance. How is the project going to 

affect any of the properties identified in the previous section? 

A. Will the project take away or change anything within the apparent or existing boundary of any of these historic 

properties? 


B. Will the project change the view from or the view of any of these properties? 


C. Will the project introduce any audible or atmospheric elements to the setting of any of these historic properties? 


D. Will the project result in the transfer, lease or sale of any of these historic properties? 

YES ____ NO __X_ If yes, please explain: ___________________________________________________________ 

Please note: HPD’s ability to complete a timely project review largely depends on the quality of the material submitted. For 

complex projects, some applicants may find it advantageous to hire a historic preservation professional with expertise in 

history, architectural history and/or archaeology. 

We are unable to accept project submittals via facsimile or e-mail. There is a 30-day review and comment period. For 

questions regarding this form or the review process, please contact HPD’s Environmental Review Specialist at 404-651-6546. 

When completed, please send this form along with the supporting material to: 

Dr. David Crass, Acting Division Director, 

Historic Preservation Division 

Attention: Environmental Review 

254 Washington Street, SW 

Ground Level 

Atlanta, GA 30334 

4

APPENDIX T – OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL 

(if applicable)

NOT APPLICABLE

APPENDIX U – OTHER 

(if applicable)

June 17, 2011 To: Georgia Department of Community Affairs 60 ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?