19.01.2013 Views

Documents Workplace Relations 10.14379.pdf - Chief Minister's ...

Documents Workplace Relations 10.14379.pdf - Chief Minister's ...

Documents Workplace Relations 10.14379.pdf - Chief Minister's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

With regard to the management of annual leave, the Govenunent's position is consistent with<br />

the arrangements applying In the ACTPS that employees have an annual leave usage plan in<br />

place if their credits exceed those accmed in two years. The adoption of this provision is to<br />

encourage the use of annual leave, and is not dependent on any review of TOIL arrangements.<br />

In relation to the accrual of TOIL, the Government's position is that an 80-hour cap is more<br />

than sufficient, on the basis that senior officers in the ACTPS do not have access to such<br />

generous arrangements, ihat the salaries of LAMS employees are somewhat in advance of their<br />

ACTPS counterparts as reflected in the 2002 Marshall Repod, and that compensation for<br />

additional hours worked is incorporated into these salaries.<br />

The Govemment' s position on these three unresolved matters is ·not unreasopable. Better<br />

management to avoid the excessive accrual of ammalleave and TOIL are important from an<br />

occupational health and safety perspective. Amending and clarifying the termination payment<br />

provision will go some way to addressing the reconm1endation in the Anditor-General's 2009<br />

report on the Adminislratiml of employine111 issues .for staff of Members of the Legislative<br />

Assembly and the subsequent criticisms levelled at government and unions.<br />

While the Government position in relation to these matters has moved, it appears that the staff<br />

and unions have to date been 1mprepared to make any concessions. It is tltis unwillingness of<br />

staff and unions to 1i1ake concessions on these matters that has prevented the parties reaching<br />

agteement, not delays attributed to the govenn11ent negotiatii1g team. I therefore request that<br />

staff reconsider their position in relation to these matters and I reaffirm my commitment to<br />

continued negotiations.<br />

Yours sincerely<br />

Jon StanhopeMLA<br />

<strong>Chief</strong> Minister<br />

CC: All !viLAs, All LAMS Staff, Michael White (MEAA), Matt Taylor (CPSU),<br />

Leila Walter (CPSU)<br />

2 0 DEC 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!