19.01.2013 Views

TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Symposium 1 - the National Sea ...

TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Symposium 1 - the National Sea ...

TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Symposium 1 - the National Sea ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

percentage size differences for each female were <strong>the</strong>n averaged toge<strong>the</strong>r to produce an<br />

average difference. It was found that <strong>the</strong> females were 87.9 % of <strong>the</strong> length of <strong>the</strong> males,<br />

but only 66.6 % of <strong>the</strong> male weight. For tanks that had at least three females, a t-test was<br />

used to compare <strong>the</strong> weights of females to males. In each case, <strong>the</strong> males were<br />

significantly larger at <strong>the</strong> = 0.05 level.<br />

E. Coefficient of Variation<br />

The coefficient of variation is <strong>the</strong> standard deviation divided by <strong>the</strong> mean, thus <strong>the</strong> mean<br />

acts as a scaling factor so that standard deviations can be compared, from one sample to<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r. If all <strong>the</strong> fish grow at <strong>the</strong> same specific growth rate, <strong>the</strong> coefficient of variation<br />

would remain constant. If, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, some fish grow proportionally faster than<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs, possibly due to sex or aggressiveness, <strong>the</strong> coefficient of variation will increase with<br />

time or size.<br />

Table 3 provides <strong>the</strong> average value of <strong>the</strong> coefficient of variation for each treatment for<br />

<strong>the</strong> three measurement intervals. An ANOVA repeated measurement analysis was<br />

conducted using SAS. At <strong>the</strong> α = 0.05 level, nei<strong>the</strong>r time, temperature nor feeding level<br />

resulted in statistically significant differences in <strong>the</strong> coefficient of variation.<br />

Table 3. Summary of <strong>the</strong> average values of <strong>the</strong> coefficient of determination at <strong>the</strong><br />

beginning, midpoint, and end of <strong>the</strong> experiment for each treatment<br />

Treatments<br />

Temp. °C Feeding Level<br />

Discussion and Conclusions<br />

14<br />

Coefficient of Determination<br />

0 weeks 10 weeks 20 weeks<br />

26 Satiation 0.26 0.27 0.27<br />

26 87 % 0.27 0.27 0.47<br />

26 73 % 0.24 0.24 0.26<br />

26 60 % 0.25 0.32 0.29<br />

29 Satiation 0.27 0.29 0.33<br />

29 87 % 0.22 0.22 0.23<br />

29 73 % 0.29 0.25 0.26<br />

29 60 % 0.27 0.28 0.34<br />

32 Satiation 0.23 0.25 0.28<br />

32 87 % 0.28 0.29 0.28<br />

32 73 % 0.24 0.28 0.29<br />

32 60 % 0.24 0.32 0.35<br />

Average 0.25 0.27 0.30<br />

Std. Dev. 0.047 0.045 0.089<br />

It should be reiterated that <strong>the</strong> fish used in this experiment were sex-reversed, graded<br />

twice, and had been selectively bred for several generations. Thus <strong>the</strong> growth performance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!