19.01.2013 Views

TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Symposium 1 - the National Sea ...

TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Symposium 1 - the National Sea ...

TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Symposium 1 - the National Sea ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

will have a large effect upon <strong>the</strong> cost of product. Fixed costs, which are an amalgamation<br />

of all costs that are independent of <strong>the</strong> rate of production, also represent a large part of <strong>the</strong><br />

cost of production. In reality, most costs are a combination of a fixed and a variable<br />

component, and thus estimates of fixed costs will vary greatly depending upon which costs<br />

are considered fixed costs.<br />

Losordo and Westerman (1994) state that capital costs and depreciation of capital<br />

equipment account for approximately 34 percent of <strong>the</strong> total production cost, but <strong>the</strong>se<br />

costs are just two of <strong>the</strong> larger fixed costs. Thus total fixed costs would represent a much<br />

larger percentage of <strong>the</strong> cost of production than <strong>the</strong> 34 percent noted previously.<br />

O’Rourke (1996) divided all of his costs into ei<strong>the</strong>r fixed or variable, and calculated that<br />

fixed cost were 56 percent of total costs. Included in <strong>the</strong> list of fixed costs were wages,<br />

water, and maintenance, which usually would not be considered total fixed. It is fair to say<br />

however that fixed cost represent somewhere between 34 and 56 percent of total<br />

production costs. By definition, once a production facility is operational, fixed expenses<br />

remain constant. Fixed or overhead costs per unit of production change as <strong>the</strong> production<br />

rate changes, thus fixed costs as a percentage of total production costs can be reduced by<br />

increasing <strong>the</strong> production rate.<br />

The production rate for a given facility can be increased by ei<strong>the</strong>r increasing <strong>the</strong> stocking<br />

density or <strong>the</strong> growth rate. While increasing stocking densities is an obviously attractive<br />

goal, <strong>the</strong>re are physiological as well as engineering and physical limitations that limit <strong>the</strong><br />

culture intensity. Stocking density has been shown to negatively affect growth rates in<br />

many species of fish, although <strong>the</strong> responses vary. Poorer growth rates have been<br />

associated with higher stocking densities of tilapia raised in ponds, irrigation ditches or<br />

cages (Coche 1982; Carro-Anzalotta and McGinty 1986; D'Silva and Maughan 1996; Yi<br />

et al. 1996; Siddiqui et al. 1989), but little research has be conducted on tilapia in<br />

recirculating systems. Huang and Chiu (1997) researched <strong>the</strong> effects of stocking density<br />

on growth rates on tilapia fry smaller than 10 g, and observed that increasing stocking<br />

densities had a significantly negative effect upon size, size variation and survival rate.<br />

Regardless, <strong>the</strong> effect of stocking density is beyond <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong> experiments reported<br />

herein. For this research project, a density of 5 gallons per fish was selected to minimize<br />

<strong>the</strong> effects of crowding.<br />

Fish physiologists do not fully understand <strong>the</strong> biological mechanisms that control <strong>the</strong><br />

growth rates of fish. Although <strong>the</strong>re have been numerous ma<strong>the</strong>matical models to<br />

describe <strong>the</strong> growth characteristics of fish, most of <strong>the</strong>se models do not take into account<br />

such important factors as availability of food, food quality or <strong>the</strong> effect of environmental<br />

factors such as temperature. This has given rise to <strong>the</strong> scientific field of bioenergetics,<br />

which partitions <strong>the</strong> energy consumed into various metabolic processes including<br />

production or growth, and waste products. While <strong>the</strong> bioenergetic models account for<br />

changes in energy consumption, measuring each of <strong>the</strong> energy partitions is labor intensive,<br />

and are usually measured as a function of only one variable; thus ignoring <strong>the</strong> interactions<br />

with o<strong>the</strong>r biological factors. Bioenergetics provides a reasonable growth projection for<br />

fish in <strong>the</strong> natural environment, but its usefulness for describing growth in recirculating<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!