19.01.2013 Views

TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Symposium 1 - the National Sea ...

TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Symposium 1 - the National Sea ...

TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Symposium 1 - the National Sea ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bounty Farms believes that this eliminates any direct threat to <strong>the</strong> wild fish population,<br />

even if it does not fully address certain of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r environmental concerns cited<br />

previously. The policy issue here is, is it not more acceptable to raise sterile, rapidly<br />

growing transgenic fish in open water cages than fertile, slow growing non-trangenic fish?<br />

If <strong>the</strong> commercialization of transgenic fish proceeds according to <strong>the</strong> principles of using<br />

environmentally isolated facilities or growing only sterile fish in open areas, this<br />

technology will produce a net gain for <strong>the</strong> ocean’s ecosystems by replacing systems with<br />

more severe impacts.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Recognizing <strong>the</strong> enormous potential benefit of biotechnology, such as <strong>the</strong> development of<br />

transgenic fish, means also recognizing that while regulatory oversight is necessary,<br />

regulations must be used to safely advance its use, not to hamper or eliminate <strong>the</strong><br />

technology. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, regulatory oversight should be developed in keeping with <strong>the</strong><br />

thoughts expressed in <strong>the</strong> ICLARM-GTZ Bellagio Conference ‘Environment and<br />

Aquaculture in Developing Countries’ (Pullin 1993), that “environmental conservation and<br />

human needs must be balanced.” A sound understanding of <strong>the</strong> economic, nutritional and<br />

environmental advantages which transgenics can offer - through application of costbenefit<br />

analysis - should be employed (Hite and Gutrich 1998; Balint et al. 1998).<br />

Examples where <strong>the</strong>se guidelines to <strong>the</strong> development of policy have not been followed<br />

show that <strong>the</strong> results are negative to producers, consumers, and ultimately, to <strong>the</strong><br />

environment as well (Ackefors and Olburs 1995).<br />

References<br />

Ackefors, H. and C. Olburs. 1995. Aquaculture: a threat to <strong>the</strong> environment, or opportunities for a new<br />

industry? The Swedish paradox. J of Marine Biot. 3:53-55.<br />

Ackefors, H., C. Olburs. 1996. Swedish aquaculture policy - a nightmare for <strong>the</strong> industry? Aquaculture<br />

Europe. 21(2): 6-13.<br />

A/F Protein, Inc. 1998. AquAdvantage . US Patent & Trademark Office. Reg. No. 2,147,668. March 31,<br />

1998.<br />

Anon. 1997. Scotland loses £1.3m salmon. Scottish Fish Farmer: October, 1997: p 2.<br />

Aqua Bounty Farms. 1998. The Blue Revolution. Aqua Bounty Farms Update: Vol.1, No.4, July, 1998:<br />

p.2<br />

Balint, P.J., Colwell, R.R., Gutrich, J.J., Hite, D., Levin, M., Stenquist, S., Whiteman, H.H. and R. A.<br />

Zilinskas. 1998. Risks and benefits of marine biotechnology: conclusions and recommendations,<br />

p.213-220. In R.A. Zilinskas and P.J. Balint (eds.) Genetically engineered marine organisms:<br />

environmental and economic risks and benefits. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht,<br />

London.<br />

Claxton, L. 1995. Production must increase to meet world needs. Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Aquaculture: November 1995:<br />

p.1<br />

CNI. 1995. Transgenic fish: <strong>the</strong> next threat to marine biodiversity. Community Nutrition Institute in<br />

collaboration with <strong>the</strong> Biotechnology Working Group. November 1995. Washington, D.C.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!