industrial court malaysia - Malaysian Legal and Tax Information Centre

More documents

Recommendations

Info

REFERENCE: This is a reference made under Section 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1967 pertaining to the dismissal of Encik Thomas Juergen Schnitker (the Claimant) by DIGI Telecommunications Sdn. Bhd (the Respondent). AWARD This is a reference made under Section 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1967 pertaining to the dismissal of Mr Thomas Juergen Schnitker (the Claimant) by DIGI Telecommunications Sdn. Bhd (the Respondent or “the Company”). The Claimant's Last Drawn Salary was RM102,850.00 (See page 33 of Company's Bundle of Documents, COB1). The Issues The Issues in this case are as follows: First Issue: Whether the dismissal was with just cause <strong>and</strong> excuse. Second Issue: Whether the Claimant's contract of employment was a fixed term contract. Third Issue: If the dismissal was without just cause <strong>and</strong> excuse, whether the Claimant should be reinstated. Fourth Issue: What would be the quantum in terms of backwages. 2
The Pleadings The Pleadings in this case comprised the following: a) Statement of Case dated 15.11.2010 (“SOC”); b) Statement in Reply dated 12.2.2011 (“SIR”); c) Rejoinder dated 14.3.2011 (“Rejoinder”). The Documents The Documents pertaining to this case were as follows: a) Claimant's Bundle of Documents-1 marked as “CLB-1”; b) Company's Bundle of Documents marked as “COB-1”; c) Company's Supplementary Bundle of Documents marked as “COB-2”. The Witnesses The Witnesses were: 1. The Company's sole witness Mr. Chan Nam Kiong (COW1, Witness Statement dated 25.5.2011 marked as “COW-S1”); 2. The Claimant was sole witness in his case (CLW1, Witness Statement dated 25.5.2011 marked as “CLW-S1”). Claimant's Case The Contract of Employment The Claimant was appointed as the Chief Commercial/Marketing Officer (CCO/CMO) of the Company by virtue of the Letter of Offer of Employment dated 3
Page 1: INDUSTRIAL COURT MALAYSIA CASE NO:
Page 5 and 6: Bjorn Magnus Kopperud to him (page
Page 7 and 8: We wish you well in your further un
Page 9 and 10: 'misbehaviour', 'inappropriate beha
Page 11 and 12: Decision on the First Issue The bur
Page 13 and 14: It was argued on behalf of the Clai
Page 15 and 16: The principle in Han Chiang appears
Page 17 and 18: Third Issue: If the dismissal was w
Page 19 and 20: the relevant factors into considera
Page 21 and 22: Appeal had observed that in industr
Page 23 and 24: gainsaid that this is a very senior
Page 25 and 26: In Robert John Reeves v Southern Ba
Page 27 and 28: was only reasonable that the first

industrial court malaysia - Malaysian Legal and Tax Information Centre

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?