19.01.2013 Views

Prospectus - Notowania

Prospectus - Notowania

Prospectus - Notowania

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 72 -<br />

RISK FACTORS<br />

The settlement attempt was unproductive due to the difference in the positions<br />

of the parties. The judge adjourned the case until the hearing on January 12,<br />

2010 for the purpose of attempting a new settlement. The proceedings were<br />

pending as of the Date of the <strong>Prospectus</strong>.<br />

On October 2, 2009, the Fin.Part bankruptcy receivership summoned UniCredit<br />

Corporate Banking (as rightful claimant of the former Credito Italiano) before<br />

the Milan Court so that the following should take place (i) acknowledgement of<br />

the invalidity of the “payment” of €46 million made, in September 2001, by<br />

Fin.Part in favour of the then Credito Italiano and, consequently, (ii) the<br />

defendant be ordered to return said amount which refers to the repayment of a<br />

credit facility granted by the bank within the sphere of the complex financial<br />

transaction already disputed in the previous legal proceedings.<br />

The plaintiff’s petitions appear to be included in that brought by the Fin.Part<br />

receivership in the proceedings already underway.<br />

In UniCredit’s opinion, partly on the basis of the information provided by its<br />

legal advisors, the plaintiff’s petition in any event appears groundless and/or<br />

lacking a supporting strategy; consequently, also taking into account that the<br />

proceedings are at the initial state, no provisions have been made at present.<br />

(g) GBS S.p.A.<br />

At the beginning of February 2008, General Broker Service S.p.A. (GBS S.p.A.)<br />

had started an arbitrational procedure against UniCredit aimed at declaring the<br />

unlawfulness of the conduct by Capitalia and subsequently by UniCredit with<br />

reference to the insurance brokerage relationship in effect and verified as<br />

deriving from the exclusive agreement executed in 1991, to consequently obtain<br />

the reimbursement for the damages sustained and originally quantified in €121.7<br />

million and then increased to €197.1 million.<br />

The 1991 agreement, that contained a commitment of exclusivity, was executed<br />

between GBS S.p.A. and the (then) Banca Popolare di Pescopagano e Brindisi.<br />

the aforementioned bank, subsequent to the merger – dating back to 1992 – with<br />

the Bank of Lucania, became Banca Mediterranea, which was then incorporated<br />

(2000) into the Banca di Roma S.p.A., which in turn became Capitalia (now<br />

UniCredit).<br />

The brokerage relations with GBS S.p.A., originating from the agreement<br />

executed in 1991, were subsequently regulated by (i) an agreement for the<br />

supply of insurance brokerage services executed in 2003 between GBS S.p.A.,<br />

AON S.p.A. and Capitalia, extended for decisive facts until May 2007, and (ii) a<br />

similar further agreement in May 2007 between the aforementioned brokers and<br />

Capitalia Solutions S.p.A, on its own and as mandate with power of attorney for<br />

the operative banks and in the interests of the Companies of the ex Capitalia<br />

group, including the holding company.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!