19.01.2013 Views

Prospectus - Notowania

Prospectus - Notowania

Prospectus - Notowania

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(Parmalat). The extraordinary administration subsequently requested that Capitalia and Banca<br />

di Roma S.p.A. be found jointly liable to reimburse a sum of €168 million and that all<br />

defendants be found jointly liable to pay damages of €474 million.<br />

Furthermore, the extraordinary administration requested, should the above fail, the revocation<br />

of the deeds of settlement made by Cirio S.p.A. and/or repayment by the banks of the amount<br />

paid for the agreement in question, on the grounds of undue profiteering, pursuant to Article<br />

2901 of the Italian Civil Code.<br />

In May 2007, the case was retained for the judge’s ruling. No preliminary investigation was<br />

conducted. In February 2008, an unexpected ruling by the Court of Rome ordered Capitalia<br />

(currently UniCredit) and Sergio Cragnotti to pay €223.3 million plus currency appreciation<br />

and interest from 1999. UniCredit has appealed the sentence, requesting the suspension of the<br />

execution of the lower court’s judgment.<br />

The Rome Court of Appeals, with a ruling issued on March 17, 2009, suspended the execution<br />

of the judgment against UniCredit and Sergio Cragnotti of payment of €223.3 million, as well<br />

as currency appreciation and interest from 1999, as directed in the Rome Court ruling of<br />

February 2008 in favour of Cirio S.p.A.'s receivers. The proceeding is still pending as at the<br />

Date of the <strong>Prospectus</strong>. In order to oversee such risks, provisions were made for an amount<br />

considered congruous to the current risk of the proceedings.<br />

*****<br />

In April 2007, certain Cirio Group companies in administration filed a petition against<br />

Capitalia (now UniCredit), Banca di Roma S.p.A., UBM (now UniCredit) and other banks for<br />

compensation of damages resulting from their role as arrangers of bond issues by Cirio Group<br />

companies, although, according to the plaintiffs, they were already insolvent at the time.<br />

Damages were quantified as follows:<br />

(i) the damages incurred by the petitioners due to a worsening of their difficulties were<br />

calculated within a range of €421.6 million to €2.082 billion (depending upon the<br />

criteria applied);<br />

(ii) the damages incurred because of the fees paid to the Lead Managers for bond<br />

placements were calculated at a total of €9.8 million;<br />

(iii) the damages, to be determined during the proceedings, incurred by Cirio Finanziaria<br />

S.p.A. (formerly Cirio S.p.A.), for losses related to the infeasibility of recovering,<br />

through post-bankruptcy clawback, at least the amount used between 1999 and 2000 to<br />

cover the debt exposure of some of the Group companies;<br />

plus interest and currency revaluation from the date owed to the date of payment.<br />

In the ruling of November 3, 2009 the judge denied the plaintiff’s claim holding the companies<br />

of Cirio Group in extraordinary administration jointly liable for reimbursement of legal<br />

expenses in favour of the defendant banks. The ruling could be appealed.<br />

UniCredit, having considered the opinion of its defence counsel, believes the action to be<br />

groundless, and is confident the judgment will be favourable. Accordingly no provisions have<br />

been made.<br />

- 344 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!