19.01.2013 Views

TWICE THE SIZE - DIT Update - Dublin Institute of Technology

TWICE THE SIZE - DIT Update - Dublin Institute of Technology

TWICE THE SIZE - DIT Update - Dublin Institute of Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

may see the commencement <strong>of</strong> supply-push as distinct from current demand-pull in-migration<br />

pressures.<br />

‘Doubling’ at the gateway level<br />

At national level, it would not be realistic to assume a doubling <strong>of</strong> population by 2030. However,<br />

that is not impossible that individual urban settlements could attain such growth. For example,<br />

over a period <strong>of</strong> 25 years, Galway city grew impressively by 74%, from 41,861 in 1981 to 72,729<br />

in 2006. Yet, on the basis <strong>of</strong> this comparison, the rate <strong>of</strong> that city’s growth would have had to<br />

be some 41.3% stronger than actually achieved, in order for its population to have doubled<br />

within 24 years. In Table 2, the current population <strong>of</strong> eight gateways and its national ‘doubled’<br />

population in 2030 are presented.<br />

Accordingly, such a doubling <strong>of</strong> population over a similar time-frame would require a specific,<br />

targeted Government growth strategy in favour <strong>of</strong> Ireland’s Gateway and Hub settlements. In<br />

this, it has to be noted that, despite the thrust <strong>of</strong> the NSS in its selection <strong>of</strong> these particular<br />

settlements, government policy to decentralise the civil service away from <strong>Dublin</strong> has been<br />

directed towards a wider pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> dispersal to over 50 locations. Furthermore, it assumes that<br />

this strategy will continue to represent future strategic policy.<br />

Since Independence, no Irish government has ever truly implemented a growth-centred policy.<br />

And given that political expediency dictates and influences the form <strong>of</strong> governance, the political<br />

focus tends to be very much ‘local’ and ‘short-term’. In recent decades, rejection <strong>of</strong> the 1968<br />

Buchanan and 1985 ERDO Plans both stand as evidence <strong>of</strong> such expediency. And yet, if balanced<br />

regional development as espoused by the NSS is to be achieved – on a scale that will generate<br />

the growth potential and scale size needed for urban agglomeration – a doubling <strong>of</strong> settlement<br />

population is a prerequisite to such achievement. This is especially the case because <strong>of</strong> an<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> critical mass and in particular, due to the State’s absence <strong>of</strong> small to medium- sized<br />

cities in the 200,000 to 500,000 population range.<br />

Table <strong>of</strong> Settlements (‘000) 2006 population 2030 target<br />

Cork 190,000 380,000<br />

Limerick/ Shannon 100,000 200,000<br />

Galway 73,000 146,000<br />

Waterford 49,000 98,000<br />

Athlone-Tullamore-Mullingar 46,000 92,000<br />

Dundalk 35,000 70,000<br />

Sligo 19,000 38,000<br />

Letterkenny (excluding Derry) 18,000 36,000<br />

Gateway totals: 530,000 1,060,000<br />

Table 2: Population <strong>of</strong> gateways in 2006 and in 2030 if doubled. Source: 2006 Census. Analysis<br />

by Brian P. Hughes, Faculty <strong>of</strong> the Built Environment, <strong>DIT</strong>. Note: Populations rounded to<br />

nearest thousand.<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!