19.01.2013 Views

TWICE THE SIZE - DIT Update - Dublin Institute of Technology

TWICE THE SIZE - DIT Update - Dublin Institute of Technology

TWICE THE SIZE - DIT Update - Dublin Institute of Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Another important point <strong>of</strong> attention must be ‘governance’. The regional level is seen as critical<br />

for any <strong>of</strong> the gateway centres outside the East corridor to develop ‘distinctiveness’ and strong<br />

and clear spatial policies. The current administrative system <strong>of</strong> cities with their surrounding<br />

county structure is completely inadequate. The future <strong>of</strong> the eight Gateway cities outside<br />

<strong>Dublin</strong> could be very different if each <strong>of</strong> these cities represented the core <strong>of</strong> a regional body<br />

with directly elected Regional Senators and Regional Mayors. The elected representatives at<br />

county council level would obtain meaningful functions at local level rather than the role they<br />

currently have which is <strong>of</strong>ten meaningless in reality because funds are directly determined by<br />

central government. While the regions would be based on the existing boundaries <strong>of</strong> regional<br />

authorities, the bodies could be renamed according to the name <strong>of</strong> the gateway city. This would<br />

create a more urban and dynamic image. One could imagine an Ireland with the following<br />

governance structure: National Federal, including European and all-Ireland axis (<strong>Dublin</strong>/Belfast),<br />

Cork City Region, Limerick/Shannon City Region, Galway City Region, Waterford City Region,<br />

Dundalk/Drogheda City Region, Sligo/Letterkenny/Derry City Region, Midlands City Region.<br />

What does this mean for the ‘twice the size’ challenge? After all, this was based on the premise<br />

that the gateway cities should prepare for much more significant population growth and move<br />

away from incrementalist policies. The main lesson from the study appears to be that growth is<br />

not always necessary and that growth is not always required for a town or city, to become<br />

successful.<br />

The preferred vision can be summarised as follows:<br />

• The critical mass argument <strong>of</strong> Balanced Regional Development may need to be<br />

reviewed.<br />

• All spatial planning and infrastructure policies should be tested against the possible<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a single urban centre along the Eastern seaboard.<br />

• Gateway cities outside the East corridor should be encouraged to develop<br />

‘distinctiveness’ instead <strong>of</strong> population growth. The ‘twice the size’ exercise <strong>of</strong> strategic<br />

long-term visionary planning should take this distinctiveness as the starting point.<br />

9 PREPARING IRELAND FOR POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE FUTURES<br />

9.1 Policy Testing<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> the scenarios shows that some underlying drivers and outcomes are common to<br />

all scenarios. It is clear that some actions will help to reinforce outcomes that are generally<br />

desirable while other actions will retard such developments. A set <strong>of</strong> desirable and undesirable<br />

outcomes and reinforcers and retardants, presented in Table 6, can be used to test emerging<br />

plans and policies by asking whether the intervention will reinforce or retard desirable<br />

outcomes.<br />

136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!