(PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EVALUATION OF CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES' FOOD FOR WORK PROGRAM IN INDIA Steven Joyce, Team Leader Averthanus D'Souza P. Subramaniyam USAID/New Delhi July 15, 1987
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Evaluation Mission team received very friendly support in the course of its work. We would like to acknowledge this support and to express our deep appreciation. The participative and collaborative approach to evaluation is still unfamiliar to and not understood by many. We would like to thank Dr. Peter Amato, Deputy Chief, PRJ/PD/E for his understanding and support of our evaluation process, specially the one-day seminar with the representatives of the four CRS zones. This support was crucial for the successful outcome of this Mission. The encouragement, specially at the briefing and debriefing sessions with officials of USAID/India helped to focus the attention of the Mission and resulted in a more thorough assessmenL of the FFW Program. We gratefully extend our thanks to Dr. Richard Blue, Deputy Director; Mr. Christopher Crowley. Office Director, DPP; Mr. Douglas Broome, Deputy Chief, DPP. During the field visits, the members of the team were received with deep courtesy and hospitality by CRS zonal staff, consignees and project holders. CRS zonal staff accompanied team members in their travels and facilitated their visits. We would be failing in our duty if we did not acknowledge these kindnesses. We would like specially to thank the zonal Directors for making available to the team the members of their staff. In the process of reviewing and analyzing data collected from the field, the team had the benefit of the services of Mr. S. Chandrasekhar, Mr. Kotwancy and Mr. Y. Chhabra. Ms. Hema Ramaswamy and Ms. Rita Soni were unstinting in their support. They not only smoothed out logistical difficulties but facilitated administrative passage of team requirements. A specia] mention needs to be made of the assistance which the team received from Mr. N. Krishnamurchy. His long experience with Title II Frogran in; India provided the team with valuable insights. Moreover, the team was greatly impressed with the dedication of Mr. Krishnamurthy to the cause of ensuring that food resources be used in the best possible way to promote development.
Page 1 and 2: o 0TWM - :80 D. AC IVITYA ro ect W,
Page 3 and 4: A.I.D. EVALUATION SUMMARY PART II J
Page 5 and 6: * CRS should take more initiative w
Page 7: EVALUATION OF CR3-I OOD FOR WORK PP
Page 11 and 12: Purpose and Method - : I : - EXECUT
Page 13 and 14: - :3: 4.1 The remaining PM&E Gra
Page 15 and 16: - :5: 6. RESOURCE INTEGRATION ..
Page 17 and 18: 1. INTRODUCTION - :7: This first
Page 19 and 20: 1.3 The Team's Itinerary - :9: T
Page 21 and 22: 190 AEbRe -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -
Page 23 and 24: - 4 CRS In4Jd i aware that :th6efoo
Page 25 and 26: - 15: - It should be emphasized, ho
Page 27 and 28: - : 17 attracting resources from
Page 29 and 30: - :19: - Project beneficiary sel
Page 31 and 32: - : 21 holder level. Institution
Page 33 and 34: - : 23 assets." Funds are obliga
Page 35 and 36: Cas'e Studies6 Fi ye case- studies
Page 37 and 38: - :27: - no funds were provided
Page 39 and 40: - 29: counterparts having agreem
Page 41 and 42: - :31 - n tepshetndency had been. ,
Page 43 and 44: - : 33: levels, including some r
Page 45 and 46: - :35: - stipulation builds up pres
Page 47 and 48: - 37: developmental momentum. Wh
Page 49 and 50: The' integrat Ion of re so rcs $sid
Page 51 and 52: - :41 7.4.2 The scope of their w
Page 53 and 54: - :43: to discuss evaluation fin
Page 55 and 56: AFGiANISTAN V.S.S.R. 0 00 J AMU A X
Page 57 and 58: -4 h. Describe origin/amount of c
Page 59 and 60:
-2 drawing to a close with the te
Page 61 and 62:
-S - thsJauto.heeoe eouenai htfo fr
Page 63 and 64:
VI iCoIsltion' of the Ttam A.i n te
Page 65 and 66:
- 9 3. Submission of the Report:
Page 67 and 68:
isr'Wh., i. our, overlal ±pesi of'
Page 69 and 70:
VVtt Who i. c~1eins ~ .ee in I-,,ha
Page 71 and 72:
4. Ce ",CDITY DITTT.ON 5 4.1 Are yo
Page 73 and 74:
Tota]2 Co oii fo0r, e ac y'vea r -
Page 75 and 76:
FIELD REVIEWERS in addition to appr
Page 77 and 78:
2.1 Wh~t are -our primarv res-onsib
Page 79 and 80:
'2: 2.2 Ae o ab'le- o 1 eve r e .,
Page 81 and 82:
: 4 : 6. PROJECT MkIN'"EN,- NCE/SUS
Page 83 and 84:
: 2' "hicof t ~ e resource~~e qe lo
Page 85 and 86:
4 6.2 In what ways are projects pla
Page 87 and 88:
TCE CRS SEMINAR July 1, 1987
Page 89 and 90:
Sub Group II - Decentralization * H
Page 91 and 92:
APPENDIX D LIST OF INTERVIEWEES
Page 93 and 94:
CONSIGNEE - TIRUCHIRAPALLI MULTIPUR
Page 95 and 96:
CRS CALCUTTA ZONAL OFFICE 1. Ms. Vi
Page 97 and 98:
Beneficiary - Mr. Chainanalk, Jalal
Page 99 and 100:
PROJECT SITE - Vase Bhil Adivasi Sa
Page 101 and 102:
APPENDIX E CRS FFW ZONAL PROFILE OF
Page 103 and 104:
APPENDIX F COMMUNICATION TO CONSIGN
Page 105 and 106:
RELIEF SERVICES. U.SCC,'!I CotnuanS
Page 107 and 108:
s44: y ic sisto be usod Fo 1N:_ ,pr
Page 109 and 110:
,To: 1e.oCL/1 O/v86/D ,CATjHLIC; RL
Page 111 and 112:
74 -3 4.44 rT i
Page 113 and 114:
11 1C CONT. LIfJ OF POOR FAMILIES :
Page 115 and 116:
Cs~ 'F 'F ' I-, 'F F' ~4 F F F 4"''
Page 117 and 118:
HEALTH EDUCATIONA H ~ E____LTH___ L
Page 119 and 120:
I-)- o -- 2, 44 U) C)zt P41- I
Page 121 and 122:
kr . . f~ . . . . 1 ~~~I1, r ) 0 1
Page 123 and 124:
. Ration rates are followed. 1 2s c
Page 125 and 126:
CRS Viewpoint: The Characteristics
Page 127 and 128:
The Food Resource Itself: Food is a
Page 129 and 130:
E~~r~t ~ 0o- r,; C4 CA E-tol N- -
Page 131 and 132:
V' , A.OJECTMS 01' j.o r~1~ T IrI(C
Page 133 and 134:
tIcall e ccolumn 1a to b~e used f o
Page 135 and 136:
'Pach~round Iformaticn *,~ Cunsigno
Page 137 and 138:
Dakrmu Ifrtion ±. d I nf t'ro r. b
Page 139 and 140:
I i.t$jl 1 AWAI CATIHOLIC DIOCESE O
Page 141 and 142:
to) C) 1 4) o r(6) 63 AJYS C) n 'MA
show all

(PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?