(PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

More documents

Recommendations

Info

- . - Ths, collaborati on~seemsto:'vary,fro State to:,State ,as also from Dist:rict to: D stric.t.j Consignee and prject older claorato wth Gvrmn a evident i n the matter. ofl obtai'ning,,pemsso forselectionII of ' projett site s-and:for-det-erni ng' ty sOf :Pro3 wl'fih WI. I be m,156-ffost ,-,---7behef iciai to t le' communt ies. Moreover, consignees' and 'project,' holders', of ten -sought -a nd obtained technical assistance f rom -the" 'extension servi'ces" o various:-, SaeGovernment departments. For,example, in fosttoprjcs preoetahodrsno oly got. advice on site selection and-methods, for' refresatinbut they also got free seeds, 'seedlings- and :sapins In rojctsinolvin the const'ruction of~ "chekdstocae-tr reservoirs, the, local, Irrigation Engi neers, ofered-s thncrate watier and ofte suervised the construction of the 'earth dams. 6. atalst~for Release of Governmenit Funds-' There were examples ~where the availabiliity, of food for worki., served to make available government funds eg 4hsi poctfor backwr lses lsesor and fo~r roads, and drinking water wells f r'wr tribals living in remote hill areas. It must be notedth.intesisacs the type o~f projects an~d the ben~eficiaries were selected by the local, Govenmen ofiias SSuch collaboration between consi'gnees and :projec~t holiders on the one h~and, and loalGovernment officials onV the other' incrae h possibilityof~ FFW asise prjcshaving 'agreater long erm £developmna impact. Thered is scope for inceasing such collaboration, and efforts 4 ndto be made to promote4 closer iton top wi.th Government programs, It was hearten~ing to sll some proje'cts such as vi'liage roas swhiich had been 'constructe~d' with FFW ,ow being maintained by the village. Isoecases the road were streng~thened anid surfaced by the Public Works Depari~ tmento, allow local~ bu services to operate to the villages which were previouslyin'accessbe 6. Other~ Donors Atsome consignee level there was* evidence that many FFWasistd rojct were 'implemented with cash i.np obtaained 'from other fundin sources suc as MISE~RW(Wst Gemn) CEEM (Holan); RS/ew York CARITA INDIADa -t e Indo-German 'Social Service S8ociety. In some cases, t~e: Doc ee aalso', cont'i bu t es. -- , ,, 4 -
The' integrat Ion of re so rcs $sidnml yb te on e w 0 Vs also ' in most: cases ,the Di ector .of, t e6Diocesan SocialXServ ce-I-_ Society co Where p e th tr y rgoee osge p1as Lg ega after t e~ t r wfa poe n~ s -s projects, Wheri he6 Cos ignee is not, acti ve nprsig%complementary-' ........ re sou rces the-impa'c of-FF2W-asiste pr o jec~ts i m ess beause hey are traditional type's of projects w'ch !an ecomnpi ted,,ony..,with'FW.' Thle key to mxmznthdeveopment Impact of FFW assisted projet idh aon of time 'that~ the Consignee and/or, Hlespenidsin the ;Project: planning the project resources. and leragn ecmleetr oo~project plnignral tragcng thre complementary" jresources.< i C ~pi om,'~~tat a bpeetr Forucche ssfu co ple ion of a proj ec t, 'i is -necessary that thaalabiliy of the fo resources adtecash resources shouild synchronize.Tisi stl not'always the case. 64Private Voluntary 0Organi'zain iesource ~projects were mlmntdete thiroug'h PVOs or with their7 R integraio as Moat in evidence when~ FFW assi sted PVs regally betterable t ensu~re commuity,involvement. in §rpoject~ selection an~d siting. They provideconuiyraiza ac ldrship traiig,~ includitng buidlding of skils They have easier acesto local government departments and officialsand facltt lJinkages which enabl~e the FEW assisted projects, to avail of- technical an financial resources avial wt o'vernment. t, Since PV~ ar usually located intea,&te rvd h necessary organiza~tionalJ Inrsrcue ohnl Wasse projects. reomnain frpormiprovemn emege More rsourc spot an more..ifood Y. -* Op~ . a Techical ancnutnysevcssciastiiga prjc ein otaj~t'eauto6
Page 1 and 2: o 0TWM - :80 D. AC IVITYA ro ect W,
Page 3 and 4: A.I.D. EVALUATION SUMMARY PART II J
Page 5 and 6: * CRS should take more initiative w
Page 7 and 8: EVALUATION OF CR3-I OOD FOR WORK PP
Page 9 and 10: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Evaluation Mis
Page 11 and 12: Purpose and Method - : I : - EXECUT
Page 13 and 14: - :3: 4.1 The remaining PM&E Gra
Page 15 and 16: - :5: 6. RESOURCE INTEGRATION ..
Page 17 and 18: 1. INTRODUCTION - :7: This first
Page 19 and 20: 1.3 The Team's Itinerary - :9: T
Page 21 and 22: 190 AEbRe -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -
Page 23 and 24: - 4 CRS In4Jd i aware that :th6efoo
Page 25 and 26: - 15: - It should be emphasized, ho
Page 27 and 28: - : 17 attracting resources from
Page 29 and 30: - :19: - Project beneficiary sel
Page 31 and 32: - : 21 holder level. Institution
Page 33 and 34: - : 23 assets." Funds are obliga
Page 35 and 36: Cas'e Studies6 Fi ye case- studies
Page 37 and 38: - :27: - no funds were provided
Page 39 and 40: - 29: counterparts having agreem
Page 41 and 42: - :31 - n tepshetndency had been. ,
Page 43 and 44: - : 33: levels, including some r
Page 45 and 46: - :35: - stipulation builds up pres
Page 47: - 37: developmental momentum. Wh
Page 51 and 52: - :41 7.4.2 The scope of their w
Page 53 and 54: - :43: to discuss evaluation fin
Page 55 and 56: AFGiANISTAN V.S.S.R. 0 00 J AMU A X
Page 57 and 58: -4 h. Describe origin/amount of c
Page 59 and 60: -2 drawing to a close with the te
Page 61 and 62: -S - thsJauto.heeoe eouenai htfo fr
Page 63 and 64: VI iCoIsltion' of the Ttam A.i n te
Page 65 and 66: - 9 3. Submission of the Report:
Page 67 and 68: isr'Wh., i. our, overlal ±pesi of'
Page 69 and 70: VVtt Who i. c~1eins ~ .ee in I-,,ha
Page 71 and 72: 4. Ce ",CDITY DITTT.ON 5 4.1 Are yo
Page 73 and 74: Tota]2 Co oii fo0r, e ac y'vea r -
Page 75 and 76: FIELD REVIEWERS in addition to appr
Page 77 and 78: 2.1 Wh~t are -our primarv res-onsib
Page 79 and 80: '2: 2.2 Ae o ab'le- o 1 eve r e .,
Page 81 and 82: : 4 : 6. PROJECT MkIN'"EN,- NCE/SUS
Page 83 and 84: : 2' "hicof t ~ e resource~~e qe lo
Page 85 and 86: 4 6.2 In what ways are projects pla
Page 87 and 88: TCE CRS SEMINAR July 1, 1987
Page 89 and 90: Sub Group II - Decentralization * H
Page 91 and 92: APPENDIX D LIST OF INTERVIEWEES
Page 93 and 94: CONSIGNEE - TIRUCHIRAPALLI MULTIPUR
Page 95 and 96: CRS CALCUTTA ZONAL OFFICE 1. Ms. Vi
Page 97 and 98: Beneficiary - Mr. Chainanalk, Jalal
Page 99 and 100:
PROJECT SITE - Vase Bhil Adivasi Sa
Page 101 and 102:
APPENDIX E CRS FFW ZONAL PROFILE OF
Page 103 and 104:
APPENDIX F COMMUNICATION TO CONSIGN
Page 105 and 106:
RELIEF SERVICES. U.SCC,'!I CotnuanS
Page 107 and 108:
s44: y ic sisto be usod Fo 1N:_ ,pr
Page 109 and 110:
,To: 1e.oCL/1 O/v86/D ,CATjHLIC; RL
Page 111 and 112:
74 -3 4.44 rT i
Page 113 and 114:
11 1C CONT. LIfJ OF POOR FAMILIES :
Page 115 and 116:
Cs~ 'F 'F ' I-, 'F F' ~4 F F F 4"''
Page 117 and 118:
HEALTH EDUCATIONA H ~ E____LTH___ L
Page 119 and 120:
I-)- o -- 2, 44 U) C)zt P41- I
Page 121 and 122:
kr . . f~ . . . . 1 ~~~I1, r ) 0 1
Page 123 and 124:
. Ration rates are followed. 1 2s c
Page 125 and 126:
CRS Viewpoint: The Characteristics
Page 127 and 128:
The Food Resource Itself: Food is a
Page 129 and 130:
E~~r~t ~ 0o- r,; C4 CA E-tol N- -
Page 131 and 132:
V' , A.OJECTMS 01' j.o r~1~ T IrI(C
Page 133 and 134:
tIcall e ccolumn 1a to b~e used f o
Page 135 and 136:
'Pach~round Iformaticn *,~ Cunsigno
Page 137 and 138:
Dakrmu Ifrtion ±. d I nf t'ro r. b
Page 139 and 140:
I i.t$jl 1 AWAI CATIHOLIC DIOCESE O
Page 141 and 142:
to) C) 1 4) o r(6) 63 AJYS C) n 'MA
show all

(PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?