(PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
(PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
(PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- :34: -<br />
Consignee Control in Project Selection Results in Better<br />
Resource Integration. The Consignee's ability to control the<br />
selection process makes it possible to achieve a sizeable level<br />
of integration of the FFW resource with other resources. Many<br />
Consignees have In fact achieved such integration with cash<br />
resources from CRS and other donors.<br />
Weaknesses<br />
The element of Consignee control over selection of<br />
Projects is not without its weaknesses.<br />
Consignees can Present Individual Projects to Appear as<br />
Community Projects. For example, in certain housing projects<br />
that the team saw, the consignees had presented them to CRS as<br />
community projects, putting forth the logic that it was a<br />
"community housing scheme". Similarly, there were cases of<br />
"land-clearing" or even individual wells which were described<br />
as "community land clearing" and "community irrigation wells."<br />
Pressure from Peers. Since consignees and project holders<br />
are often peers in the church, pressure is sometimes exerted by<br />
peers for project approval. There are cases where consignees<br />
also happen to be project holders, and thus are seen as "one<br />
among equals" in project implementation.<br />
CRS Policy Guidelines Circumvented. Where the consignees'<br />
approach to the project selection is in conformity with CRS<br />
selection policy, implementation of that policy is<br />
accomplished; and where it is not, the policy is circumvented.<br />
Given such a situation, the implementation of CRS policy<br />
guidelines varies among consignees.<br />
Consignee "Looking for Projects" for FFW. Some consignees<br />
look for quick identification of projects to provide employment<br />
to people during the lean season. In such cases, it is obvious<br />
that proper planning is not done. This lack of planning<br />
results in ad-hocism in project implementation. In other<br />
words, resources that are available are not utilised optimally,<br />
resulting in less than "the greatest nu<strong>mb</strong>er of the neediest<br />
gettinc the largest amount. of benefit".<br />
Non-Adherrnce to Time-Schedules Vitiates Project Implementation.<br />
Whenl requests do not conform to CRS time schedules, commodities arrive<br />
late (sometimes during the rainy season) creating storage problems,<br />
and increasing the risk of spoilage. Moreover, when commodities<br />
arrive late workers may not be available.<br />
Pressure to Utilize Commodities Before End of Fiscal Year. FFW<br />
mandays which are not utilized by Septe<strong>mb</strong>er 30 are carried over to the<br />
next fiscal year, and deducted from that year's request. This