(PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

The 'fieId.. reviewe rs in: !each' zone are. expected to vsit all,;1
Sconsig nee's at le'ast':once,,a,year; and '25 othprec hldsevry
year', Thyae roae to dferent- consges duigechfi9
visi~t to avoid: comp licity - pehap" eesr rcuin u
pt~ao ze-vert eless iwhich idoes 'not_ bui- d xeinc ien -,,
location to sufcient y "under'stn he spcal problem andisue
facd byapriua onsignee and his proj'ect holders, l in F'W progra
impl'ementation
An analysis of.Table 5 indicate's that on an averagefie,
reviewers barely contact 14% of project-holder's', as 'against' :their' ow~n
arge of25%a yar.Given the f igure's in.Table 5',-adteditne
obecovered, it is creditable that the field :revewr cane'ven,,,
reach 1 4 %. However, it wo~uld seem obvious that' they ,cannot offeri-he
program su~pport services expected of them.: Field,, e I w r from all
Athree zones Atold team- members that in most cases they only had time to
audit" co6nsignee and project holder records and they'rarely'had time
to vi sit project sites.Y
Table 5 ~ ~ -TOTAL FIELD YISITS BY ZONAL STAFF:
lp / lie ron
Iiie I 1year wise, Grand I
151,~IStI No ear Wise I MADAS I BOMBA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ICALCUTA 1. otal
7----------------­
1 1 ----- 43 1 50 1 Is
U1 1585 1 23 1 44 1 1693
~ 1 ~ 19B~ -~[1-~ 12~ .1 498 1 .79
- - - -~u~- ~ ~2. ~i~roj-t Htolders ~'~-~ .
S 18 I 101 i 20 1 89 1- 3
1904 1 319 1 175
ZoalW seSand -TotalI - 4O
Atthe CRS semnaron~ July 1 1987 on of thesa1- rusws
asked t o adrs i 1cW gqeto
J, WhtI a re aI I st Ic and appra r st e role , , i f i Id
reviee vis-a-vis theFFW Program?,.
Tei r responses, recorded, on: flpchr we re a1 1 OWS
- Roleo re R- ee
dt ard Revo
-~h a c ~~rf .aand s"e - 1~llato