(PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

-:10:­
.,;In l85 -Pri'ce: Waterhous was ont2rcted 2 000through-CRS"- T",,-,,'
for; management improvement in' the!-overall 'CRS5 'operationswhc
re sulte d ,7amo ng- ot her things in? the .rev ision of somz e FF, foms
2r Th roram s, Cur rent St atus
Th e'. 198 TFFW Program bud g ist 7.1 3-,mi1 io'n' repre sent ing" 33
prcen _of h-Ce' CRS Title I a'ss istance6 budget.
In'FY, 1986, a total of 2189 projects- were imlmne 1ih
h
assistance of CRS Food For.Work commodities., ,ost of ,these proj ectsb
were 'low-cost 'houses, wells (driiikingairrig hrand i
clearing 'and leyeling. gto),adln
USAID dollar ceilings for' the CRS~Title.IProgram 1984 88i
Afollows 00 'i
:7K$27338 t28,1'43~ $26,249 -t21,713- ' t'19,860
,1984 9>'1985 ' 1986, '' 1987, 1988
Gien te above ceiligs, CRS- all~ocations to its-FEFW Program from
1984-88 ar~e as follows:,
$10,676 t9W16&00 til0,400 t7,3002- '$6 342'
1984 ~ ~L985 ~ 1986 1 ~987 '1988 -
-As evident from, the above'figures,.'there has, been: a dowznward
trendF ini the FFW -Program since. 1986- a reflection of, he .downward
trend in the overall CRS Title II Program., This"ten e tlet he
USAID decision in'1984 to phase out the FFW,,program' b 99. t ug
USAI5/India is'int'erested in supporting coiV.-Linuation of, th, program
beyond 1990, CRS woulid -like, UAID' to n6ot only% reverse, the'decision,
but to also expand' the program
-Bu-gar repIa ed-wve a Ir 1'l9 86' as th primary pr omo
4~addiion to vegeta le oil1'
At'teproect level,'teF Program~ismanied b azale3
number of CRS .7consignees.,or ,c n orparts) rdpojc-ode
Consignees ar primar-ly Catholic pris wodirec d-iocesan-,,cai
se rvi ce organizat. on's Proect holders8arprimaril. - s' rea .
and nuns I-kou )a:,rowing numer ofprojet Jodr'ae, c
pr ve voluntarqorgai'za tions, ( CRS, Prograr n ad 'ddd
0.four "z'esooperation - fdr's.' 1 u~z ~
F11 ne'na Cchi one, TeG n;zocIEe not' i~e' F roram
XSee Map.) See.Tabil ofrua I ta e data on th-F k.. Os I
India for they r 19 't1986'