(PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
(PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
(PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
- :7: <br />
This first section of the Food For Work (FFW) evaluation report<br />
is intended to provide a summary of the following:<br />
* the overall purpose and major objectives of the FFW<br />
Evaluation;<br />
* the approach of the evaluation team to this evaluation; and<br />
* the evaluation itinerary and major events.<br />
1.1 The Purpose and Major Objectives of this Evaluation<br />
As stated in the Food For Work Evaluation Scope of Work (See<br />
Appendix A), the overall purpose of the FFW evaluation was to "assess<br />
the management tasks involved in the implementation of the CRS Food<br />
For Work (FFW) Program by quantitative and qualitative review at the<br />
Field, CRS zonal and headquarter levels". <strong>USAID</strong>/India emphasized at<br />
the outset of this evaluation mission that the team should not attempt<br />
to quantify the volume and bize of the FFW Program, nor should it<br />
attempt to measure program impact; but rather, it should assess the<br />
ability of CRS and its counterpart agencies to manage the program. As<br />
noted in the SOW, this evaluation - with its focus on program<br />
management - was expected to complement the 1979 eval-iation, and the<br />
FFW program impact studies which followed that evaluation.<br />
An additional objective of this evaluation mission was to<br />
evaluate the 3-year FFW Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (PM&E)<br />
Grant ($79,200), which was given to CRS in 1984, and which ends on<br />
Septe<strong>mb</strong>er 30, 1987.<br />
Given this Scope of Work, the FFW evaluation team identified the<br />
following key issues to address in its information gathering:<br />
Effectiveness of the management and implementation of<br />
the CRS FFW Program.<br />
Status of the Planning, Monitoring, and Evaluation<br />
(PM&E) System.<br />
* Selection criteria for FFW projects, project<br />
beneficiaries, and FFW recipients.<br />
Resource integration at the project level - Government,<br />
PVO and other donors.<br />
Relationship of community to project holder. (Is there<br />
a dependency relationship?).