(PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

More documents

Recommendations

Info

AEA AER Beneficiaries BIIA Bund CARITAS CEBEMO CRS FFW F' GOI HYV IRDP MCH MISEREOR Nullah Panchayat PM&E PVO Recipients SOW TA USAID USG - :6: - GLOSSARY Asset Effectiveness Analysis Annual Estimate of Requirements Those who receive assets created under a FFW project. Beneficiary Income Improvement Analysis Mud Embanment Official Agency of the Catholic Bishops of India Dutch Donor Agency Catholic Relief Services Food for Work Fiscal Year (1 Oct to 30 Sept.) Government of India High Yielding Varities Integrated Rural Development Programme Maternal and Child Health Official Agency of German Catholic Bishops Stream/canal for drainage/irrigation Elected local body of village Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Private Voluntary Organization Those who receive food under a FFW project Scope of Work Technical Assistance United States Agency for International Development United States Government
1. INTRODUCTION - :7: This first section of the Food For Work (FFW) evaluation report is intended to provide a summary of the following: * the overall purpose and major objectives of the FFW Evaluation; * the approach of the evaluation team to this evaluation; and * the evaluation itinerary and major events. 1.1 The Purpose and Major Objectives of this Evaluation As stated in the Food For Work Evaluation Scope of Work (See Appendix A), the overall purpose of the FFW evaluation was to "assess the management tasks involved in the implementation of the CRS Food For Work (FFW) Program by quantitative and qualitative review at the Field, CRS zonal and headquarter levels". USAID/India emphasized at the outset of this evaluation mission that the team should not attempt to quantify the volume and bize of the FFW Program, nor should it attempt to measure program impact; but rather, it should assess the ability of CRS and its counterpart agencies to manage the program. As noted in the SOW, this evaluation - with its focus on program management - was expected to complement the 1979 eval-iation, and the FFW program impact studies which followed that evaluation. An additional objective of this evaluation mission was to evaluate the 3-year FFW Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (PM&E) Grant ($79,200), which was given to CRS in 1984, and which ends on September 30, 1987. Given this Scope of Work, the FFW evaluation team identified the following key issues to address in its information gathering: Effectiveness of the management and implementation of the CRS FFW Program. Status of the Planning, Monitoring, and Evaluation (PM&E) System. * Selection criteria for FFW projects, project beneficiaries, and FFW recipients. Resource integration at the project level - Government, PVO and other donors. Relationship of community to project holder. (Is there a dependency relationship?).
Page 1 and 2: o 0TWM - :80 D. AC IVITYA ro ect W,
Page 3 and 4: A.I.D. EVALUATION SUMMARY PART II J
Page 5 and 6: * CRS should take more initiative w
Page 7 and 8: EVALUATION OF CR3-I OOD FOR WORK PP
Page 9 and 10: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Evaluation Mis
Page 11 and 12: Purpose and Method - : I : - EXECUT
Page 13 and 14: - :3: 4.1 The remaining PM&E Gra
Page 15: - :5: 6. RESOURCE INTEGRATION ..
Page 19 and 20: 1.3 The Team's Itinerary - :9: T
Page 21 and 22: 190 AEbRe -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -
Page 23 and 24: - 4 CRS In4Jd i aware that :th6efoo
Page 25 and 26: - 15: - It should be emphasized, ho
Page 27 and 28: - : 17 attracting resources from
Page 29 and 30: - :19: - Project beneficiary sel
Page 31 and 32: - : 21 holder level. Institution
Page 33 and 34: - : 23 assets." Funds are obliga
Page 35 and 36: Cas'e Studies6 Fi ye case- studies
Page 37 and 38: - :27: - no funds were provided
Page 39 and 40: - 29: counterparts having agreem
Page 41 and 42: - :31 - n tepshetndency had been. ,
Page 43 and 44: - : 33: levels, including some r
Page 45 and 46: - :35: - stipulation builds up pres
Page 47 and 48: - 37: developmental momentum. Wh
Page 49 and 50: The' integrat Ion of re so rcs $sid
Page 51 and 52: - :41 7.4.2 The scope of their w
Page 53 and 54: - :43: to discuss evaluation fin
Page 55 and 56: AFGiANISTAN V.S.S.R. 0 00 J AMU A X
Page 57 and 58: -4 h. Describe origin/amount of c
Page 59 and 60: -2 drawing to a close with the te
Page 61 and 62: -S - thsJauto.heeoe eouenai htfo fr
Page 63 and 64: VI iCoIsltion' of the Ttam A.i n te
Page 65 and 66: - 9 3. Submission of the Report:
Page 67 and 68:
isr'Wh., i. our, overlal ±pesi of'
Page 69 and 70:
VVtt Who i. c~1eins ~ .ee in I-,,ha
Page 71 and 72:
4. Ce ",CDITY DITTT.ON 5 4.1 Are yo
Page 73 and 74:
Tota]2 Co oii fo0r, e ac y'vea r -
Page 75 and 76:
FIELD REVIEWERS in addition to appr
Page 77 and 78:
2.1 Wh~t are -our primarv res-onsib
Page 79 and 80:
'2: 2.2 Ae o ab'le- o 1 eve r e .,
Page 81 and 82:
: 4 : 6. PROJECT MkIN'"EN,- NCE/SUS
Page 83 and 84:
: 2' "hicof t ~ e resource~~e qe lo
Page 85 and 86:
4 6.2 In what ways are projects pla
Page 87 and 88:
TCE CRS SEMINAR July 1, 1987
Page 89 and 90:
Sub Group II - Decentralization * H
Page 91 and 92:
APPENDIX D LIST OF INTERVIEWEES
Page 93 and 94:
CONSIGNEE - TIRUCHIRAPALLI MULTIPUR
Page 95 and 96:
CRS CALCUTTA ZONAL OFFICE 1. Ms. Vi
Page 97 and 98:
Beneficiary - Mr. Chainanalk, Jalal
Page 99 and 100:
PROJECT SITE - Vase Bhil Adivasi Sa
Page 101 and 102:
APPENDIX E CRS FFW ZONAL PROFILE OF
Page 103 and 104:
APPENDIX F COMMUNICATION TO CONSIGN
Page 105 and 106:
RELIEF SERVICES. U.SCC,'!I CotnuanS
Page 107 and 108:
s44: y ic sisto be usod Fo 1N:_ ,pr
Page 109 and 110:
,To: 1e.oCL/1 O/v86/D ,CATjHLIC; RL
Page 111 and 112:
74 -3 4.44 rT i
Page 113 and 114:
11 1C CONT. LIfJ OF POOR FAMILIES :
Page 115 and 116:
Cs~ 'F 'F ' I-, 'F F' ~4 F F F 4"''
Page 117 and 118:
HEALTH EDUCATIONA H ~ E____LTH___ L
Page 119 and 120:
I-)- o -- 2, 44 U) C)zt P41- I
Page 121 and 122:
kr . . f~ . . . . 1 ~~~I1, r ) 0 1
Page 123 and 124:
. Ration rates are followed. 1 2s c
Page 125 and 126:
CRS Viewpoint: The Characteristics
Page 127 and 128:
The Food Resource Itself: Food is a
Page 129 and 130:
E~~r~t ~ 0o- r,; C4 CA E-tol N- -
Page 131 and 132:
V' , A.OJECTMS 01' j.o r~1~ T IrI(C
Page 133 and 134:
tIcall e ccolumn 1a to b~e used f o
Page 135 and 136:
'Pach~round Iformaticn *,~ Cunsigno
Page 137 and 138:
Dakrmu Ifrtion ±. d I nf t'ro r. b
Page 139 and 140:
I i.t$jl 1 AWAI CATIHOLIC DIOCESE O
Page 141 and 142:
to) C) 1 4) o r(6) 63 AJYS C) n 'MA
show all

(PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?