18.01.2013 Views

ARI Volume 1 Number 2.pdf - Zoology and Environmental Biology ...

ARI Volume 1 Number 2.pdf - Zoology and Environmental Biology ...

ARI Volume 1 Number 2.pdf - Zoology and Environmental Biology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Physico-chemical parameters of an African aridzone man made lake<br />

Table 1: Physico-chemical Parameters is Relation to Stations in Lake Alau<br />

Parameters<br />

S T A T I O N S<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Temperature o C<br />

25.25±0.18<br />

Depth (m)<br />

Current (Cm/sec)<br />

Transparency (m)<br />

pH<br />

Dissolved oxygen (Do)<br />

(mg/l)<br />

Conductivity (homs/cm)<br />

Free Co2 (mg/l)<br />

Alkalinity (mg/l)<br />

Biochemical oxygen<br />

Dem<strong>and</strong> BOD (mg/l)<br />

Nitrate-Nitrogen (No3-N)<br />

(mg/l)<br />

Phosphate-phosphorus (P-<br />

Po4) (mg/l)<br />

Total dissolved Solids TDS<br />

(mg/l)<br />

b<br />

2.85±0.18 c<br />

26.71±0.30 b<br />

0.36±0.01 b<br />

6.79±0.05 b<br />

6.15±0.05 a<br />

31.45±0.75 b<br />

2.55±0.05 b<br />

30.30±0.32 b<br />

4.34±0.32 a<br />

4.27±0.18 a<br />

0.34±0.00 b<br />

63.31±0.30 b<br />

25.05±0.14 b<br />

3.64±0.03 b<br />

25.46±0.27 b<br />

0.33±0.02 b<br />

6.97±0.03 b<br />

6.35±0.05 a<br />

128.8±0.52 b<br />

2.90±0.01 ab<br />

36.85±0.05 b<br />

4.30±0.28 a<br />

5.43±0.19 a<br />

0.28±0.00 b<br />

67.88±0.28 a<br />

25.05±0.19 b<br />

3.92±0.25 b<br />

25.08±0.36 b<br />

0.35±0.01 b<br />

6.83±0.02 b<br />

5.18±0.02 b<br />

119.42±0.83 a<br />

2.85±0.02 ab<br />

40.67±0.18 a<br />

4.45±0.50 a<br />

5.4 o ±0.25 a<br />

0.37±0.10 a<br />

59.17±0.42 b<br />

27.24±0.12 a<br />

7.23±0.13 a<br />

25.10±0.28 b<br />

0.42±0.03 a<br />

7.29±0.05 b<br />

6.32±0.01 a<br />

115.47±0.75 a<br />

3.06±0.04 a<br />

47.00±0.02 a<br />

5.03±0.33 a<br />

5.73±0.37 a<br />

0.31±0.01 b<br />

65.84±0.62 a<br />

25.13±0.00 b<br />

3.18±0.06 b<br />

19.62±0.22 a<br />

0.26±0.01 c<br />

6.59±0.01 b<br />

5.15±0.03 b<br />

118.41±0.16 a<br />

2.84±0.04 ab<br />

37.25±0.24 b<br />

5.31±0.25 a<br />

6.30±0.50 a<br />

0.32±0.01 b<br />

60.73±0.33 b<br />

The mean values with the same superscript on the same row are no t significantly different at P ≤ 0.05<br />

The mean values recorded for depth showed<br />

that station 4 had the highest mean depth of<br />

7.23 ± 0.13 m. The lowest mean value of 2.85<br />

± 0.18 m was recorded in station 1. Station 4<br />

was significantly deeper than all other stations<br />

(P < 0.05). There was no significant difference<br />

in depth between stations 2, 3 <strong>and</strong> 5 (P > 0.05).<br />

These stations were significantly different from<br />

station 1 (P < 0.05). The depth variations of<br />

each station may be attributed to the structure<br />

of the Ngadda river valley <strong>and</strong> the surrounding<br />

l<strong>and</strong> prior to impoundment. The water current<br />

varied from 19.62 ± 0.22 cm/sec in station 5, to<br />

26.71 ± 0.30 cm/sec in station 1. Station 5 was<br />

significantly different from all the other stations<br />

(P>0.05). The highest mean water current<br />

observed in station 1 may be due to regulation<br />

from the dam site, <strong>and</strong> the release from this<br />

station resulting in a constant flow of water. A<br />

factor of potential limnological significance is<br />

water movement within the lake produced by<br />

discharge from the upstream reservoir <strong>and</strong> the<br />

release down stream (station 1). The actual<br />

effects of the current on the chemistry <strong>and</strong> the<br />

biota of the lake are not known, but one may<br />

speculate that significant water movement<br />

through the surface of the lake may prevent<br />

development of anoxic conditions in an<br />

otherwise stagnant environment <strong>and</strong> thereby<br />

preclude release of sediment bound nutrients.<br />

The values recorded for lake Alau were low<br />

compared with 32.80 cm/sec recorded in lake<br />

Chad (Nwoko, 1991). The reason may be due to<br />

large volume of water in lake Chad compared<br />

with lake Alau.<br />

115<br />

The highest mean values of Secchi disc<br />

transparency recorded was 0.42 ± 0.03 m in<br />

station 4, while the lowest mean value was 0.26<br />

± 0.01 m in station 5. Stations 1, 2 <strong>and</strong> 3 were<br />

not significantly different P > 0.05). These<br />

stations were significantly different from<br />

stations 4 <strong>and</strong> 5 (P < 0.05). Light penetration<br />

in a lake estimated by use of Secchi disc is an<br />

indicator of water transparency <strong>and</strong> turbidity<br />

(Olsen, 1975). The mean transparency values<br />

from other stations showed signs of good<br />

quality except for station 5, which reflect high<br />

turbidity during the study period. The high<br />

turbidity may be linked to the constant<br />

disturbance <strong>and</strong> agitation of the water body by<br />

canoe paddlers, as well as constant washing in<br />

of s<strong>and</strong> material from the burrow pits. The<br />

quality may not, however, have adverse effect<br />

on the aquatic organisms in the lake. The<br />

values of transparency recorded in lake Alau<br />

was low compared with the findings of Nwoko<br />

(1983) in Lake Chad (0.92m) <strong>and</strong> Adeniji (1989)<br />

in Jebba lake (0.75 m).<br />

The mean pH values recorded for all<br />

stations varied between 6.59 ± 0.01 <strong>and</strong> 7.29 ±<br />

0.05. There was no significant difference<br />

(P>0.05) between the values recorded for all<br />

stations. Lake Alau falls between acidic <strong>and</strong><br />

alkaline Lake. The pH range obtained in the<br />

lake suggests a medium carbon dioxide supply<br />

<strong>and</strong> medium productivity. The pH range is<br />

comparatively narrow but falls within the<br />

recommended range (6.5 – 9) as suitable for<br />

aquatic life (Adeniji, 1989). A pH of 5.5 – 10<br />

was recommended as optimum range for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!