Conditions Sample: Polylactide, polycaprolactone and polylactide-glycolide Columns: 2 x <strong>Agilent</strong> ResiPore, 300 x 7.5 mm (p/n PL1113-630) Eluent: THF Flow Rate: 1 mL/min Temp: 40 °C Detector: <strong>Agilent</strong> PL-GPC 50 Plus (DRI and <strong>Agilent</strong> PL-BV 400RT) Results and Discussion Figures 1 to 3 show examples of dual detection chromatograms for some biodegradable polymers. Figure 1 shows a polylactide sample, Figure 2 is a polycaprolactone sample and Figure 3 is a polylactide-glycolide. 0 Retention time (min) 22 Figure 1. Dual detection chromatograms of a sample of polylactide Viscometry Differential refractive index Viscometry Differential refractive index 0 Retention time (min) 22 Figure 2. Dual detection chromatograms of a sample of polycaprolactone 2 Viscometry Differential refractive index 0 Retention time (min) 22 Figure 3. Dual detection chromatograms of a sample of polylactideglycolide The overlaid molecular weight distribution plots are shown in Figure 4. dw/dlogM Retention time (min) Polylactide-glycolide Polylactide Polycaprolactone Figure 4. Molecular weight distibutions of three biodegradable polymers The universal calibration curve was generated using linear PS standards with narrow polydispersity (Figure 5). Based on this calibration, the molecular weight averages and weight average, intrinsic viscosity (IVw) was calculated for the biodegradable polymers. The table shows the molecular weight averages for a selection of such polymers.
Figure 5. Universal calibration curve Table 1. Molecular weight averages for a selection of biodegradable polymers Sample Poly(dl-lactide) Poly(dl-lactide)glycolide 50:50 d,l-PLGA 65:35 d,l-PLGA 75:25 d,l-PLGA 95:5 d,l-PLGA Polycaprolactone Conclusion Molecular Weight Averages gmol-1 Mp Mn Mw Mz Mz+1 Mv PD 70,863 42,039 73,904 115,032 160,338 68,604 1.758 69,596 41,967 74,148 114,767 158,539 68,860 1.7668 72,153 44,926 77,077 118,849 164,761 71,687 1.7156 70,863 43,821 76,555 118,849 164,761 71,687 1.747 43,010 24,729 42,860 63,021 84,231 40,121 1.7332 42,259 24,183 41,822 62,163 83,542 390,774 1.7294 64,762 36,471 63,183 96,758 133,397 58,812 1.7324 59,209 33,999 61,212 96,217 135,076 56,698 1.8004 72,153 43,984 75,487 116,184 160,925 70,231 1.7162 72,153 42,852 74,164 114,689 158,620 68,914 1.7307 16,447 9,114 16,488 24,968 33,641 15,339 1.8091 16,447 9,231 16,280 24,477 32,753 15,167 1.7636 100,091 67,340 105,978 153,033 203,984 99,736 1.5738 100,091 67,310 105,871 154,173 206,777 99,514 1.5729 The GPC system successfully characterized some biodegradable polymers. Using RI and viscometer detection, and universal calibration, it was possible to derive the molecular weight distirbutions of the samples, and calculate several of their characterization parameters. www.agilent.com/chem This information is subject to change without notice. © <strong>Agilent</strong> <strong>Technologies</strong>, Inc. 2010 Published in UK, September 3, 2010 SI-01914
- Page 1 and 2:
MATERIALS TESTING AND RESEARCH SOLU
- Page 3 and 4:
When accuracy and reliability in me
- Page 5 and 6:
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES APPLICATIONS F
- Page 7 and 8:
Figure 1. Agilent Cary 630 FTIR spe
- Page 9 and 10:
The calibration samples were measur
- Page 11 and 12:
Author Frank Higgins Agilent Techno
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 1. The overlaid aliphatic be
- Page 15 and 16:
Author John Seelenbinder Agilent Te
- Page 17 and 18:
Figure 3. Sample is lightly pressed
- Page 19 and 20:
Author Dr. Mustafa Kansiz Agilent T
- Page 21 and 22:
microscopy provides for a factor of
- Page 23 and 24:
Standard ATR IR Image No Pressure (
- Page 25 and 26:
A visual inspection of the sample u
- Page 27 and 28:
Experimental Instrumentation To per
- Page 29 and 30:
Authors Jonah Kirkwood † and Must
- Page 31 and 32:
Spectra were collected from each lo
- Page 33 and 34:
Infrared mapping allows for multipl
- Page 35 and 36:
The spectra in Figure 2 are visuall
- Page 37 and 38:
Conclusion Agilent‟s Cary 610 FTI
- Page 39 and 40:
Authors Dr. Wayne Collins*, John Se
- Page 41 and 42:
The calibration curve obtained for
- Page 43 and 44:
Conclusion Select ‘Peak Ratio’
- Page 45 and 46:
Summary This method describes a pro
- Page 47 and 48:
Method configuration To determine t
- Page 49 and 50:
Authors Dr. Wayne Collins*, John Se
- Page 51 and 52:
The calibration curve for the deter
- Page 53 and 54:
Figure 6. The MicroLab PC FTIR soft
- Page 55 and 56:
Summary An analytically representat
- Page 57 and 58:
Figure 3. The Irganox 1010 peak are
- Page 59 and 60:
Authors Dr. Wayne Collins*, John Se
- Page 61 and 62:
The calibration curve and equation
- Page 63 and 64:
Select ‘Peak Ratio’ - from the
- Page 65 and 66:
Summary An analytically representat
- Page 67 and 68:
Figure 3. The GMS peak height absor
- Page 69 and 70:
Advanced Atomic Force Microscopy: E
- Page 71 and 72:
signal) image indicating the overwh
- Page 73 and 74:
A dependence of surface potential o
- Page 75 and 76:
A B C Figure 6A-C. The topography (
- Page 77 and 78:
A B Figure 10A-C. The topography (A
- Page 79 and 80:
KFM with AM-FM operation in the int
- Page 81 and 82:
ibbons is only slightly different f
- Page 83 and 84:
References 1. G. Binnig, C.F. Quate
- Page 85 and 86:
Figure 1. AFM topographic image of
- Page 87 and 88:
100nm 100nm 350nm 100nm Figure 3. A
- Page 89 and 90:
to perfect hexagonal patterns, whic
- Page 91 and 92:
Single-pass KFM studies have been k
- Page 93 and 94:
images due to the difference of the
- Page 95 and 96:
0.5 V) of the nanowires. Additional
- Page 97 and 98:
appeared in the topography image. T
- Page 99 and 100:
of PSS component. TEM studies of mo
- Page 101 and 102:
Atomic Force Microscopy Studies in
- Page 103 and 104:
on graphite and MoS2 are shown in F
- Page 105 and 106:
A B C D Scan size: 5 µm. Scan size
- Page 107 and 108:
images of PEDOT:PSS blend, (PEDOT -
- Page 109 and 110:
Young’s Modulus of Dielectric ‘
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 3. Young’s modulus as a fu
- Page 113 and 114:
Nanoindentation, Scratch, and Eleva
- Page 115 and 116:
The samples listed as “D” sampl
- Page 117 and 118:
Figure 6. Elastic modulus results f
- Page 119 and 120:
Figure 11. Elastic modulus results
- Page 121 and 122:
Sample B Figure 16. Scratch curves
- Page 123 and 124:
Conclusions Nanoindentation and scr
- Page 125 and 126:
measurement technique has been expl
- Page 127 and 128:
References 1. J.L. Hay, “Using In
- Page 129 and 130:
Theory The complex shear modulus (G
- Page 131 and 132:
References 1. Jain, S.K., Bhattacha
- Page 133 and 134:
LCCC relies on carrying out isocrat
- Page 135 and 136:
log Mp 5 4.6 4.2 3.8 0.5 15% Water
- Page 137 and 138:
Authors Wei Luan and Chunxiao Wang
- Page 139 and 140:
Table 1. Chemical Information of An
- Page 141 and 142:
Injection Volume Influence of Real
- Page 143 and 144:
translator into three modes on diff
- Page 145 and 146:
To identify the matrix influence on
- Page 147 and 148:
Authors Chun-Xiao Wang and Wei Luan
- Page 149 and 150:
Table 1. Polymer Additives in ASTM
- Page 151 and 152:
1 2 3 4 5 1 Tinuvin P 2 BHT 3 BHEB
- Page 153 and 154:
1 Tinuvin P 2 BHT 3 BHEB 4 Isonox 1
- Page 155 and 156: Authors Edgar Naegele Agilent Techn
- Page 157 and 158: Results and discussion To meet the
- Page 159 and 160: Authors Melissa Dunkle, Gerd Vanhoe
- Page 161 and 162: Experimental The analyses were perf
- Page 163 and 164: Repeatability of the SFC/MS analysi
- Page 165 and 166: Conclusion The combination of the A
- Page 167 and 168: Introduction Phthalates form a grou
- Page 169 and 170: The analytical method was applied t
- Page 171 and 172: Introduction Bisphenol A (BPA) is a
- Page 173 and 174: Preparation of standards BPA and BP
- Page 175 and 176: Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit
- Page 177 and 178: Sample analysis The content of BPA
- Page 179 and 180: The calibration for BPA and BPF, wh
- Page 181 and 182: Author Stephen Ball Agilent Technol
- Page 183 and 184: Results and discussion By operating
- Page 185 and 186: Introduction The wavelength of UV r
- Page 187 and 188: LC parameters Premixed solutions of
- Page 189 and 190: Linearity A linearity study was per
- Page 191 and 192: References 1. Dr. James H. Gibson,
- Page 193 and 194: Instrumentation Columns: 2 x PLgel
- Page 195 and 196: Authors Greg Saunders and Ben MacCr
- Page 197 and 198: Authors Greg Saunders, Ben MacCreat
- Page 199 and 200: Authors Greg Saunders, Ben MacCreat
- Page 201 and 202: Authors Greg Saunders, Ben MacCreat
- Page 203 and 204: Authors Greg Saunders, Ben MacCreat
- Page 205: Author Greg Saunders Agilent Techno
- Page 209 and 210: Methods and Materials Conditions Co
- Page 211 and 212: Materials and Methods A column set
- Page 213 and 214: Authors Greg Saunders, Ben MacCreat
- Page 215 and 216: Authors Greg Saunders, Ben MacCreat