18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Rocky<br />

Mountain Region (R2)<br />

Figure 11. Instream Flow Water Rights<br />

Other water uses, such as water dependent recreation (fishing, rafting, kayaking), were initially<br />

considered but eventually eliminated from the WVA because they were either limited in their distribution<br />

or were represented by other values (e.g., fishing would occur where cold water fisheries are present).<br />

As with the infrastructure values, above, water use value metrics were designed to compare<br />

subwatersheds in a more relative way. For each individual water use value, the results were standardized<br />

(results for each subwatershed were divided by the largest result of all the subwatersheds). The<br />

standardized results for each water use value were then summed to get a cumulative water use value<br />

(water rights quantification + water rights structure + Surface Source Water Protection Areas + instream<br />

flow water rights = Water Uses Value Ranking). The cumulative Water Uses Value Rankings were<br />

classified into quartiles. The top 25% were classified 3 (high), middle 50% were classified 2 (moderate),<br />

lowest 25% were classified 1 (low). Figure 12 shows the resulting Water Uses Values Ranking.<br />

77 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!