18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chugach National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Alaska Region (R10)<br />

• Tailings piles deposited along the creek have confined the channel and caused downcutting.<br />

Greater flow velocities, scouring, and erosion may occur with predicted increases in precipitation<br />

and extreme events. Salmon redds may be subject to scouring.<br />

• The creek channel has been moved and straightened, increasing the gradient and water velocity.<br />

Again, scouring and erosion are likely to increase with precipitation and extreme events.<br />

• Mining has removed the trees in the riparian areas. This has resulted in the loss of future LWD<br />

that would add roughness to the channel and moderate water velocities. The loss or pool-forming<br />

LWD reduces fish habitat.<br />

• Mining activity has reduced the fine-grained sediment and organic material from the floodplain,<br />

so re-establishment of the riparian vegetation has been minimal. Without healthy vegetation, the<br />

streambanks are more sensitive to erosion from high flows during extreme events.<br />

The topography and current climate conditions, however, may reduce the sensitivity of the watershed to<br />

climate change. Even with the predicted increases in temperature and precipitation, the watershed will<br />

still remain relatively cold and dry. In addition, some current and proposed restoration work could lessen<br />

the sensitivity. In brief:<br />

• Cold winter temperatures (even at sea level), high mean elevation, low precipitation, could all<br />

reduce sensitivity to snowline increase and rain-on-snow events.<br />

• Continued cold winter temperatures at high elevations should result in fewer freeze/thaw cycles<br />

and instances of wet heavy snow falling on dry snow layers. Avalanche danger and its sediment<br />

transport may not be sensitive to changes.<br />

• Short duration, high intensity storms are relatively rare, and the flow response from such events is<br />

limited by high initial infiltration. This reduces sensitivity to flooding and high flows.<br />

• A restoration project along one mile of stream reconnected floodplain, created meanders to<br />

reduce gradient, added LWD and secondary channels. Several miles of unrestored channel<br />

remain.<br />

• Current low stream temperatures, minimal lake area, make water temperatures less sensitive to<br />

warming.<br />

• Low acreage of glaciers/permanent ice field reduces sensitivity to the effects of increased glacial<br />

melting – higher flows, moraine transport.<br />

• Low road density and minor current mining operations do not contribute significant amounts of<br />

sediment to the streams.<br />

One non-aquatic stressor that may have already been worsened by climate change is increased timber<br />

mortality due to the spruce bark beetle. Warmer winters have been cited as one reason for increases in the<br />

beetle population and infestation of the stands. Continued warming trends could lead to further increases<br />

in the beetle population and greater tree mortality.<br />

With high numbers of dead trees, the watershed is expected to be more vulnerable to fire, although the<br />

extent of risk is in question. Fire and the resulting loss of vegetation could lead to greater erosion of the<br />

hillslopes. More in-depth analysis of the fire potential is needed, but the general outlook is that the risk of<br />

fire will increase as described here:<br />

• The spruce bark beetle infests about 11% of the watershed, resulting in high levels of dead trees<br />

and fuel loading. Predicted warmer summer temperatures with only small increases in<br />

precipitation may increase fuel drying and fire hazard.<br />

• Increased temperatures, growing season, and precipitation could increase grass and shrub growth,<br />

increasing fuel load (Haufler et al. 2010).<br />

290 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!