watervulnerability
watervulnerability watervulnerability
Chugach National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Alaska Region (R10) Eyak Lake Area Meriting Special Attention (AMSA) Cooperative Management Plan The Copper River Watershed Project is working on an update of the Eyak Lake AMSA plan (Professional Fishery Consultants 1985) that assesses the condition of Eyak Lake, which was designated as an “area meriting special attention.” The ADFG, Prince William Sound Science Center, City of Cordova, Native Village of Eyak, Ecotrust, USDA Forest Service, and others have worked together identifying resource issues, community concerns, monitoring needs, and possible projects for restoration or to improve recreational uses. Some of the issues identified include non-point source pollutants, effects of the Power Creek Road and its culverts on the lake and spawning areas, pollution from the flooding of developed areas along Eyak River, and relocating a boat ramp. While these issues do not directly relate to climate change, maintaining the health of the watershed and its fish and wildlife species, is perhaps the best way to mitigate potential effects in a system that is generally functioning in a natural condition. Fisheries Management The Forest Service has no direct management authority over fish populations but sport and subsistence fishers are important users of National Forest lands in the Cordova area. The nutrients that spawning salmon bring to the watershed are also an important part of the ecosystem, not only for predators such as bears and eagles, but for future generations of salmon as well (Lang et al. 2006). Thus, it is important to have sufficient numbers of salmon returning to streams in National Forests and for the Forest Service to provide input and assistance where possible. Just recently, the CRWP and the Prince William Sound/Copper River Marketing Association (a commercial fishing group) recently started an outreach to see if there is interest in developing a sustainability plan for the Copper River and Prince William Sound fisheries. The announcement stated, “Our goal is to bring together information resources on fisheries, management and habitat; identify data gaps and information needs; and identify indicators for tracking sustainability of the fisheries over time.” (CRWP and PWSCRMA 2011.) This appears to be a good cooperative opportunity for agencies, organizations, commercial interests, Native groups, and others to provide input for the managers at the ADFG. One example would be the management of the coho salmon fishery. Currently, coho salmon in the Copper River Delta and adjacent systems are managed as a single stock based on aerial observations of index streams. There are no set escapement goals for individual streams; rather, the management biologists work to meet an overall total. In practice, the desired range of the combined counts has been met consistently (Botz et al. 2010). Hilborn et al. (2003) and Bryant (2009), however, suggest that genetic stocks may occur on a much smaller level, either among or within stream systems. Ruff et al. (2011) identified distinct genetic stocks associated with different spawning behaviors within a single system. Thus, to maintain the ability of a species to adapt to change, especially in their behaviors, diverse stocks need to be preserved. Bryant (2009) concludes that in view of the potential disruptive effects of climate change, future harvests should be conservative to ensure that all stocks have sufficient escapement. Given the satisfactory overall counts, the management strategy appears to be working well under the present conditions. However, in order to conserve all of the stocks, interested parties should collaborate on ways to monitor escapement in the numerous smaller systems. The Forest Service and other partners could take an active role and provide additional personnel to obtain this information and ensure that the current management is effective. 286 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change
Chugach National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Alaska Region (R10) Watershed Restoration Restoring damaged watersheds to improve their natural function is widely seen as the key to increasing resiliency to the effects of climate change (Furniss et al. 2010, Haufler et al. 2010). The Eyak Lake watershed has not been severely damaged, but there have been restoration opportunities, and some still exist. The CRWP has taken the lead in implementing restoration projects through their FishWatch and Million Dollar Eyak Lake programs. The Forest Service, ADF&G, Native Village of Eyak, and others have worked with CRWP to identify and prioritize projects. Some of the specific projects have included the following. • Replaced three undersized failing culverts with an arch culvert that restores passage to upstream fish habitat and downstream transport of spawning gravels to sockeye salmon spawning areas in the lake. • Installed a Stormceptor oil and grit separator to remove sediment and hydrocarbons from street runoff and an urban stream that flow into the lake. • Removed an artificial spit and abandoned floatplane dock that adversely affected sockeye salmon spawning habitat in the lake. • Revegetated disturbed shorelines where roads border the lake. Vegetation will reduce erosion, trap sediment runoff from the roads, and provide shade and cover to improve fish habitat. • Worked with the City of Cordova to address snowplowing and dumping practices to help keep sand, salt, and hydrocarbons from entering the lake. Thus, many of the existing problems have been addressed. There are still some culverts that prevent fish passage, but the loss of habitat is relatively small, and replacement costs would be high. The CRWP, in partnership with Ecotrust, ADFG, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Alaska Department of Transportation, has also developed a culvert replacement prioritization protocol that has been used in the Eyak watershed and surrounding areas (CRWP 2011). The highest priority sites are outside of the watershed. Eyak Lake Watershed Summary The Eyak Lake watershed was chosen because it is typical of coastal Alaska and because its climate change issues would be similar for most rainforest watersheds in southcentral and southeast Alaska. Higher precipitation, melting glaciers, and more frequent rain-on-snow events increase the possibility of floods, erosion, increased sediment transport, and changes to channels in depositional areas. All of these increase the risks to infrastructure and fish habitat. As discussed by Rothwell and Bidlack (2011) there are many data gaps that hinder the development of a water budget for Eyak Lake, therefore, it is difficult to quantify flows and their effects. There are also no models that can predict and quantify snow avalanches and how they affect the landscape. However, a general look at the issues and values allows land managers to identify possible mitigation actions, or things to leave as is – in this case the existing flows and habitats that appear to be functioning well. Maintaining the habitat and the diverse genetic stocks may be all that mangers can do to buffer the effects of climate change. This brief study also shows the value of an active, concerned community. NGO’s like the CRWP have taken an extensive role in identifying and implementing restoration projects. The Prince William Sound Science Center, Ecotrust, and others are conducting studies that will provide baseline data for future 287 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change
- Page 240 and 241: Assessment of Watershed Vulnerabili
- Page 242 and 243: Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National F
- Page 244 and 245: Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National F
- Page 246 and 247: Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National F
- Page 248 and 249: Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National F
- Page 250 and 251: Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National F
- Page 252 and 253: Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National F
- Page 254 and 255: Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National F
- Page 256 and 257: Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National F
- Page 258 and 259: Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National F
- Page 260 and 261: Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National F
- Page 262 and 263: Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National F
- Page 264 and 265: Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National F
- Page 266 and 267: Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National F
- Page 268 and 269: Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National F
- Page 270 and 271: Assessment of Watershed Vulnerabili
- Page 272 and 273: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 274 and 275: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 276 and 277: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 278 and 279: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 280 and 281: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 282 and 283: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 284 and 285: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 286 and 287: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 288 and 289: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 292 and 293: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 294 and 295: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 296 and 297: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 298 and 299: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 300 and 301: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 302 and 303: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 304 and 305: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 306 and 307: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
- Page 308 and 309: Chugach National Forest Watershed V
Chugach National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Alaska Region (R10)<br />
Eyak Lake Area Meriting Special Attention (AMSA) Cooperative Management Plan<br />
The Copper River Watershed Project is working on an update of the Eyak Lake AMSA plan (Professional<br />
Fishery Consultants 1985) that assesses the condition of Eyak Lake, which was designated as an “area<br />
meriting special attention.” The ADFG, Prince William Sound Science Center, City of Cordova, Native<br />
Village of Eyak, Ecotrust, USDA Forest Service, and others have worked together identifying resource<br />
issues, community concerns, monitoring needs, and possible projects for restoration or to improve<br />
recreational uses.<br />
Some of the issues identified include non-point source pollutants, effects of the Power Creek Road and its<br />
culverts on the lake and spawning areas, pollution from the flooding of developed areas along Eyak River,<br />
and relocating a boat ramp. While these issues do not directly relate to climate change, maintaining the<br />
health of the watershed and its fish and wildlife species, is perhaps the best way to mitigate potential<br />
effects in a system that is generally functioning in a natural condition.<br />
Fisheries Management<br />
The Forest Service has no direct management authority over fish populations but sport and subsistence<br />
fishers are important users of National Forest lands in the Cordova area. The nutrients that spawning<br />
salmon bring to the watershed are also an important part of the ecosystem, not only for predators such as<br />
bears and eagles, but for future generations of salmon as well (Lang et al. 2006). Thus, it is important to<br />
have sufficient numbers of salmon returning to streams in National Forests and for the Forest Service to<br />
provide input and assistance where possible.<br />
Just recently, the CRWP and the Prince William Sound/Copper River Marketing Association (a<br />
commercial fishing group) recently started an outreach to see if there is interest in developing a<br />
sustainability plan for the Copper River and Prince William Sound fisheries. The announcement stated,<br />
“Our goal is to bring together information resources on fisheries, management and habitat; identify data<br />
gaps and information needs; and identify indicators for tracking sustainability of the fisheries over time.”<br />
(CRWP and PWSCRMA 2011.)<br />
This appears to be a good cooperative opportunity for agencies, organizations, commercial interests,<br />
Native groups, and others to provide input for the managers at the ADFG. One example would be the<br />
management of the coho salmon fishery. Currently, coho salmon in the Copper River Delta and adjacent<br />
systems are managed as a single stock based on aerial observations of index streams. There are no set<br />
escapement goals for individual streams; rather, the management biologists work to meet an overall total.<br />
In practice, the desired range of the combined counts has been met consistently (Botz et al. 2010).<br />
Hilborn et al. (2003) and Bryant (2009), however, suggest that genetic stocks may occur on a much<br />
smaller level, either among or within stream systems. Ruff et al. (2011) identified distinct genetic stocks<br />
associated with different spawning behaviors within a single system. Thus, to maintain the ability of a<br />
species to adapt to change, especially in their behaviors, diverse stocks need to be preserved. Bryant<br />
(2009) concludes that in view of the potential disruptive effects of climate change, future harvests should<br />
be conservative to ensure that all stocks have sufficient escapement.<br />
Given the satisfactory overall counts, the management strategy appears to be working well under the<br />
present conditions. However, in order to conserve all of the stocks, interested parties should collaborate<br />
on ways to monitor escapement in the numerous smaller systems. The Forest Service and other partners<br />
could take an active role and provide additional personnel to obtain this information and ensure that the<br />
current management is effective.<br />
286 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change