18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chequamegon-­‐Nicolet National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Eastern Region (R9)<br />

Additional research should be conducted regarding the thermal requirements and tolerance of cool water<br />

fish, to better clarify their vulnerability to warming and potential management options. This work should<br />

be supported by the CNNF and US Forest Service. The CNNF stream segment classification system<br />

should be used to better identify existing cool water stream habitat.<br />

The CNNF should continue to (1) implement best management practices for water quality, (2) practice<br />

sound watershed management, and (3) restore streams (e.g. properly replace stream crossings that<br />

impound water or prevent fish passage, restore streams impacted by log drives, manage beaver in critical<br />

habitat) to improve their resilience to climate change impacts.<br />

The CNNF should also continue to monitor stream temperatures across a variety of stream types to (1),<br />

gather year round temperature data, (2) provide up-to-date data on current stream temperatures, (3) more<br />

accurately identify vulnerable streams, (4) establish trends in stream temperature, and (5) facilitate more<br />

accurate modeling of response to climate change.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Boelter, D.H. and E.S. Verry. 1977. Peatland and Water in the northern Lake States. USDA Forest<br />

Service General Technical Report NC-31, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, 22 p.<br />

Brooks, K.N., S.Y. Lu and T.V.W. McAdams. 1995. User Manual for Peatland Hydrologic Impact<br />

Model (PHIM), Version 4. College of Natural Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108,<br />

150 p.<br />

Dripps, W.R. and K.R. Bradbury, K.R.. 2007. A simple daily soil-water balance model for estimating<br />

the spatial and temporal distribution of groundwater recharge in temperate humid areas. J. of<br />

Hydrogeology 15: 433-444.<br />

Eggers, S.D. and D.M. Reed. 1987. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and<br />

Wisconsin. US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, St. Paul, MN, 201 p.<br />

Guertin, D.P., P.K. Barten and K.N. Brooks. 1987. The Peatland Hydrologic Impact Model:<br />

Development and Testing. Nordic Hydrology 18, p. 79-100.<br />

Hawkinson, C.F. and E.S. Verry. 1975. Specific Conductance Identifies Perched and Ground Water<br />

Lakes. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NC-120, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul,<br />

MN, 5 p.<br />

Lyons, J., J. S. Stewart and M. Mitro. 2010. Predicted effects of climate warming on the distribution of<br />

50 stream fishes in Wisconsin, U.S.A. J. of Fish Biology 77:1867-1898.<br />

McAdams, T.V., K.N. Brooks and E.S. Verry. 1993. Modeling Water Table Response to Climate<br />

Change in a Northern Minnesota Peatland. In: Management of Irrigation and Drainage Systems<br />

Symposium, July 21-23, 1993, ASCE, Park City, Utah, p. 358-365.<br />

Urie, Dean. 1977. Groundwater differences on pine and hardwoods forests of the Udell Experimental<br />

Forest in Michigan. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NC-145, North Central Forest Experiment<br />

Station, St. Paul, MN, 12 p.<br />

264 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!