18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Coconino National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Southwest Region (R3)<br />

and sixth HUC watersheds without many water resources have not been assessed for climate<br />

vulnerability and will not inform sixth HUC WCF prioritization or projects outside of the WCF.<br />

2. Following the WVA process, watersheds without many water resources will have low value, even<br />

though climate change can significantly alter upland vegetation types. Thus, results are biased<br />

towards watersheds with many water resources. The process could be expanded to assess<br />

vulnerability of other resources to better assist management.<br />

3. We need to effectively present the framework so that Forest staff understand the process and do<br />

not have to start from scratch. It seems that the 6-step process varied somewhat between pilot<br />

Forests.<br />

4. Integration with the resource specialists was necessary to identify the resource values of concern,<br />

assess how potential hydrologic changes might affect the resources, and identify and weigh<br />

stressors and buffers.<br />

5. Need to be able to effectively address the time, cost, and relevance of performing a WVA to the<br />

leadership team to make it useful to managers.<br />

PROJECT TEAM<br />

The following team members contributed to this assessment:<br />

Amina Sena, CNF, hydrologist<br />

Mike Childs, CNF, fisheries<br />

Janie Agyagus, CNF, wildlife<br />

Ralph Martinez, Plumas NF, GIS<br />

Ken Roby, Lassen NF (retired)<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Arizona Department of Water Resources. 2011. Arizona Water Atlas Volume 5: Central Highlands<br />

Planning Area.<br />

http://www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/StatewidePlanning/WaterAtlas/CentralHighlands/default.htm<br />

Dominguez, F. and J. Cañon and J. Valdes. 2009. IPCC-AR4 climate simulations for the Southwestern<br />

US: the importance of future ENSO projections. Climatic Change DOI: 10.1007/s10584-009-9672-5<br />

Liang, X., D. P. Lettenmaier, E. F. Wood, and S. J. Burges. 1994. A Simple hydrologically Based<br />

Model of Land Surface Water and Energy Fluxes for GSMs, J. Geophys. Res., 99(D7), 14,415-14,428.<br />

Littell, J.S., M.M. Elsner, G.S. Mauger, E.R. Lutz, A.F. Hamlet, and E.P. Salathé. 2011. Hydrologic<br />

Change in the Northern U.S. Rockies and Pacific Northwest: Internally Consistent Projections of Future<br />

Climate for Resource Management. Regional Climate and Preliminary project report, USFS JVA 09-JV-<br />

11015600-039. Prepared by the Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington, Seattle.<br />

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1994. National Climatic Data Center. Mean Total<br />

Precipitation - Annual vector digital data. Available on line at: Server=geodata.library.arizona.edu;<br />

Service=5151; Database=atlas01; User=NCDC; Version=dbo.DEFAULT<br />

156 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!