watervulnerability

watervulnerability watervulnerability

18.01.2013 Views

Coconino National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Southwest Region (R3) Figure 17. Relative watershed sensitivities for Stream Habitat Data sources for each sensitivity factor are listed in Table 5. The Watershed Condition Assessment provided much of these data. Other data sources were the Forest records, GIS, and professional judgment. To assess how the location of highly-valued resources related to watershed sensitivities, maps were created that combined these two factors. An example (for stream habitat) is displayed as Figure 18. 148 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Coconino National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Southwest Region (R3) Figure 18. Stream Habitat, relative rating of value and sensitivity As seen in Figure 18, the ID team decided to focus on the subwatersheds where resource values were highest, and sensitivity was either high or moderate. The logic for this approach was that since the factors that contributed to the sensitivity ratings were strongly influenced by management, sensitivity ratings could likely be influenced by focused management. Therefore, those areas where management might improve sensitivity were deemed to be highest priority, and are highlighted. Results for each resource are available at www.fs.fed.us/ccrc/wva/appendixes. The results for the combination of all resources and combined sensitivities are shown in Figure 19. 149 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Coconino National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Southwest Region (R3)<br />

Figure 18. Stream Habitat, relative rating of value and sensitivity<br />

As seen in Figure 18, the ID team decided to focus on the subwatersheds where resource values were<br />

highest, and sensitivity was either high or moderate. The logic for this approach was that since the factors<br />

that contributed to the sensitivity ratings were strongly influenced by management, sensitivity ratings<br />

could likely be influenced by focused management. Therefore, those areas where management might<br />

improve sensitivity were deemed to be highest priority, and are highlighted. Results for each resource are<br />

available at www.fs.fed.us/ccrc/wva/appendixes. The results for the combination of all resources and<br />

combined sensitivities are shown in Figure 19.<br />

149 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!