watervulnerability

watervulnerability watervulnerability

18.01.2013 Views

Coconino National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Southwest Region (R3) It should be noted that the ID team questioned the accuracy of the stream spring layer because it only includes about 200 springs and there are at least 100-150 more known springs not digitized in the forest GIS. Additional spring data were obtained from Northern Arizona University (NAU). NAU and other studies have identified at least 100-150 more springs located in the fifth-field watersheds included in this assessment. Results of the riparian spring ratings are shown in Figure 8. Perennial Stream Habitat As mentioned earlier, perennial stream habitat on the CNF is relatively uncommon, and supports a wide variety of environmental and human uses. Initially, streams were combined with riparian and spring habitat, but further consideration by the ID team resulted in the decision to look at the perennial stream resource by itself. The team felt that the data for perennial streams were slightly better than that for either riparian habitat or springs, and that the existing and future demands on the perennial stream resource justified the switch. Miles of stream were calculated for each subwatershed. The results, displayed in Figure 9, reflect ratings based on ranking of the subwatersheds by miles of stream and then grouping them into thirds. The break for these groupings is less than 16 miles for low, and greater than 27 miles for a high rating. Figure 9. Relative values of subwatershed for perennial stream habitat 140 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Coconino National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Southwest Region (R3) STEP 2 - Assess Exposure Background During initial work on this assessment, exposure was included after a generic assessment of water sensitivity. In the final assessment procedure, exposure was evaluated prior to sensitivity. This allowed the team to focus on a narrower list of potential hydrologic changes, derived from consideration of how predicted exposure would affect hydrology, and which of those changes were important to the water resource values included in the assessment. Historic Changes The first step in assessment of exposure of the selected watersheds to potential climate change was to look at relevant historic climatic data. Review of some available long-term data from Flagstaff shows a general pattern of warming (Figure 10), with a less-clear pattern relative to precipitation and snowfall (Figure 11). Regional long term data from the Arizona Water Atlas (Figure 12) indicates a much more dramatic increase in air temperature since 1960, and a decline in precipitation starting about 1966, except for a few years of above-average precipitation in the late 1970’s to mid 1980’s. Figure 10. Average daily air temperatures from Flagstaff, 1950-2006 (Staudenmaier et al. 2007) 141 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Coconino National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Southwest Region (R3)<br />

STEP 2 - Assess Exposure<br />

Background<br />

During initial work on this assessment, exposure was included after a generic assessment of water<br />

sensitivity. In the final assessment procedure, exposure was evaluated prior to sensitivity. This allowed<br />

the team to focus on a narrower list of potential hydrologic changes, derived from consideration of how<br />

predicted exposure would affect hydrology, and which of those changes were important to the water<br />

resource values included in the assessment.<br />

Historic Changes<br />

The first step in assessment of exposure of the selected watersheds to potential climate change was to<br />

look at relevant historic climatic data. Review of some available long-term data from Flagstaff shows a<br />

general pattern of warming (Figure 10), with a less-clear pattern relative to precipitation and snowfall<br />

(Figure 11). Regional long term data from the Arizona Water Atlas (Figure 12) indicates a much more<br />

dramatic increase in air temperature since 1960, and a decline in precipitation starting about 1966, except<br />

for a few years of above-average precipitation in the late 1970’s to mid 1980’s.<br />

Figure 10. Average daily air temperatures from Flagstaff, 1950-2006 (Staudenmaier et al. 2007)<br />

141 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!