watervulnerability

watervulnerability watervulnerability

18.01.2013 Views

Coconino National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Southwest Region (R3) relative assessment of risk for recreation facilities. Results of the infrastructure rating (with the location of campgrounds within 300 ft of channels) are shown in Figure 6. Water Uses Water from the forest supports domestic, livestock, wildlife and fish, recreational, and agricultural uses downstream, and all watersheds within the analysis area are highly valued for this reason. Additionally, water for domestic use is captured by and delivered from the C.C. Cragen Reservoir. Substantial surface water is stored close to its source in stockponds or tanks, where it used for stock water and wildlife purposes. Numerous agricultural diversions exist on the lower reaches of Oak, Beaver, and West Clear Creeks and the Verde River. Ratings of relative subwatershed values for water uses were based on a combination of all these factors. The amount of water (acre ft) diverted in each watershed was determined, and subwatersheds with no diversions were given a low value, watersheds with less than 500 acre ft diverted (annually) were classed as moderate, and those with greater than 500 acre ft were rated as high. GIS was used to obtain a count of tanks per subwatershed. Subwatersheds were divided into three classes: those subwatersheds with 16 or fewer tanks were given the lowest value, those with 17 to 32 had moderate value, and those with more than 32 received the highest rating. Tanks and diversions were given equal weight, and were combined to produce a single water resource score. These values were then divided into thirds, with the highest third of subwatersheds given a rating of “high.” Finally, all subwatersheds that contribute flow to the C.C. Cragen reservoir were rated as high. The results of the water-uses rating are displayed in Figure 7. Riparian and Spring Habitats Relative to other areas of the country, the amount of aquatic and riparian habitat (including springs) on the CNF is limited. Riparian areas represent 0.7% of the area on the Forest. These spatially limited areas provide habitat for 80% of the Forest’s bird species, including neotropical species. Eighty percent of the Forest’s vertebrate species depend on riparian habitat for at least half of their life cycles. These habitats are vitally important as habitat for numerous reptiles and amphibians not listed above and other aquatic organisms, such as macroinvertebrates. Springs also provide habitat for aquatic and riparian species, including numerous endemic macroinvertebrate species. The relative value of subwatersheds for this resource was based on two data sources: miles of riparian habitat and the number of springs. GIS was used to determine the miles of riparian habitat in each subwatershed. As with other attributes, values for each watershed were ranked and then grouped into thirds, with subwatersheds with the most riparian habitat (>17 miles) given the highest scores. Forest GIS data for springs were used to determine the number of springs per watershed; these were then grouped into thirds. A riparian-spring rating was obtained by combining the subwatershed scores for the individual factors, with the riparian value given twice as much weight as the spring rating. To be clear, ratings of “high” were given a score of 3, and low ratings were given a score of 2. The combined scores were then ranked and divided into thirds, with the highest third rated as high value. 138 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Coconino National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Southwest Region (R3) Figures 7 and 8. Relative Ratings of Water Uses and Riparian and Spring Habitats 139 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Coconino National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Southwest Region (R3)<br />

relative assessment of risk for recreation facilities. Results of the infrastructure rating (with the location of<br />

campgrounds within 300 ft of channels) are shown in Figure 6.<br />

Water Uses<br />

Water from the forest supports domestic, livestock, wildlife and fish, recreational, and agricultural uses<br />

downstream, and all watersheds within the analysis area are highly valued for this reason. Additionally,<br />

water for domestic use is captured by and delivered from the C.C. Cragen Reservoir. Substantial surface<br />

water is stored close to its source in stockponds or tanks, where it used for stock water and wildlife<br />

purposes. Numerous agricultural diversions exist on the lower reaches of Oak, Beaver, and West Clear<br />

Creeks and the Verde River.<br />

Ratings of relative subwatershed values for water uses were based on a combination of all these factors.<br />

The amount of water (acre ft) diverted in each watershed was determined, and subwatersheds with no<br />

diversions were given a low value, watersheds with less than 500 acre ft diverted (annually) were classed<br />

as moderate, and those with greater than 500 acre ft were rated as high. GIS was used to obtain a count of<br />

tanks per subwatershed. Subwatersheds were divided into three classes: those subwatersheds with 16 or<br />

fewer tanks were given the lowest value, those with 17 to 32 had moderate value, and those with more<br />

than 32 received the highest rating. Tanks and diversions were given equal weight, and were combined to<br />

produce a single water resource score. These values were then divided into thirds, with the highest third<br />

of subwatersheds given a rating of “high.” Finally, all subwatersheds that contribute flow to the C.C.<br />

Cragen reservoir were rated as high. The results of the water-uses rating are displayed in Figure 7.<br />

Riparian and Spring Habitats<br />

Relative to other areas of the country, the amount of aquatic and riparian habitat (including springs) on<br />

the CNF is limited. Riparian areas represent 0.7% of the area on the Forest. These spatially limited areas<br />

provide habitat for 80% of the Forest’s bird species, including neotropical species. Eighty percent of the<br />

Forest’s vertebrate species depend on riparian habitat for at least half of their life cycles. These habitats<br />

are vitally important as habitat for numerous reptiles and amphibians not listed above and other aquatic<br />

organisms, such as macroinvertebrates. Springs also provide habitat for aquatic and riparian species,<br />

including numerous endemic macroinvertebrate species.<br />

The relative value of subwatersheds for this resource was based on two data sources: miles of riparian<br />

habitat and the number of springs. GIS was used to determine the miles of riparian habitat in each<br />

subwatershed. As with other attributes, values for each watershed were ranked and then grouped into<br />

thirds, with subwatersheds with the most riparian habitat (>17 miles) given the highest scores. Forest GIS<br />

data for springs were used to determine the number of springs per watershed; these were then grouped<br />

into thirds. A riparian-spring rating was obtained by combining the subwatershed scores for the individual<br />

factors, with the riparian value given twice as much weight as the spring rating. To be clear, ratings of<br />

“high” were given a score of 3, and low ratings were given a score of 2. The combined scores were then<br />

ranked and divided into thirds, with the highest third rated as high value.<br />

138 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!