watervulnerability

watervulnerability watervulnerability

18.01.2013 Views

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Rocky Mountain Region (R2) What tools were most useful? Examples from other units of methods used to deal with different aspects of the analysis were helpful. Similarly, examples of vulnerability assessments in general were useful because they provided methods to rank different data. ArcGIS was the most useful tool to display and evaluate all the spatial data. Microsoft Excel was a useful tool to manipulate and summarize tabular data, as well as display modeled outputs. People with expertise in these programs are necessary in the team makeup. What tools were most problematic? On the GMUG, while we had a relative wealth of information related both to the spatial resource data and climate change predictions, we lacked the knowledge to identify and evaluate the implications of predicted climate changes to our resource values of concern beyond a very general level. Forests completing watershed vulnerability analyses should be teamed up with research station personnel who can provide expertise in interpreting the climate change implications portion of the vulnerability assessment. It was clear that previous work between the Sawtooth NF and Boise research station had created a high level of understanding about the implications of climate change predictions, and familiarity with tools available to evaluate where changes are likely to occur and what the impacts of those changes may be. PROJECT TEAM Carol Howe, Resource Information Specialist (GIS), Climate Change Coordinator John Almy, Forest Hydrologist Clay Speas, Wildlife, Fish and Rare Plants Program Lead Warren Young, Forest Soils Scientist Ben Stratton, Hydrologist Steven Jay, Hydrology Technician Sherry Hazelhurst, Deputy Forest Supervisor PROJECT CONTACT Carol Howe Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests 2250 Hwy 50 Delta CO, 81416 970-874-6647 chowe@fs.fed.us REFERENCES Barsugli, J.J. and L.O. Mearns. Draft 2010. Climate and Hydrologic Change Scenarios for the Upper Gunnison River, Colorado. Prepared for The Nature Conservancy in support of the southwest Climate Change Initiative’s Climate Change Adaptation Workshop for Natural Resource Managers in the Gunnison Basin. 110 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Rocky Mountain Region (R2) Christensen, N.S., and D.P. Lettenmaier. 2007. “A multimodel ensemble approach to assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River Basin.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1417–1434 (www.hydrol-­‐earth-­‐syst-­‐sci.net/11/1417/2007/).” Colorado Water Conservation Board. Draft 2010. Colorado River Water Availability Study; Phase I Report. Furniss, M.J., B.P. Staab, S. Hazelhurst, C.F. Clifton, K.B. Roby, B.L. Ilhadrt, E.B. Larry, A.H. Todd, L.M. Reid, S.J. Hines, K.A. Bennett , C.H. Luce, P.J. Edwards. 2010. Water, climate change and forests: watershed stewardship for a changing climate. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW_GTR-812. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland OR. Hirsch, C.L., S. E. Albeke, and T. P. Nessler. 2006. Range-wide status of Colorado River cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii pleuriticus): 2005. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver, CO. IPCC. 2008. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change on Climate Change and Water. [Bates, B.C., Z.W. Kundzewicz, S.Wu, and J.P. Palutikof, (eds.)] IPCC Secretariate, Geneva. (Available at: http://ipcc.ch/pdf/technical-­‐papers/climate-­‐change-­‐water-­‐en.pdf). Painter, T.H., J. Deems, J. Belnap, A. Hamlet, C.C. Landry, and B. Udall. 2010. Response of Colorado river runoff to dust radiative forcing in snow. Proceedings of the North Academy of Sciences. (accessed at www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/09/14/0913139107.full.pdf+html) Ray, A.J., J.J. Barsugli, K.B. Averyt, K. Wolter, M. Hoerling, N. Doesken, B. Udall, R.S. Webb. 2008. Climate Change in Colorado: a Synthesis to Support Water Resources Management and Adaptation. Western Water Assessment. Boulder, CO. Rieman, B.E. and D.J. Isaak. 2010. Climate Change, Aquatic Ecosystems, and Fishes in the Rocky Mountain West: implications and alternatives for management. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-250. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Fort Collins, CO. Spears, M., L. Brekke, A. Harrison, and J Lyons. 2009. Literature Synthesis on Climate Change Implications for Reclamation’s Water Resources. Technical memorandum 86-68210-091. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Research and Development Office. Denver, CO. 111 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Rocky<br />

Mountain Region (R2)<br />

What tools were most useful?<br />

Examples from other units of methods used to deal with different aspects of the analysis were helpful.<br />

Similarly, examples of vulnerability assessments in general were useful because they provided methods to<br />

rank different data.<br />

ArcGIS was the most useful tool to display and evaluate all the spatial data. Microsoft Excel was a useful<br />

tool to manipulate and summarize tabular data, as well as display modeled outputs. People with expertise<br />

in these programs are necessary in the team makeup.<br />

What tools were most problematic?<br />

On the GMUG, while we had a relative wealth of information related both to the spatial resource data and<br />

climate change predictions, we lacked the knowledge to identify and evaluate the implications of<br />

predicted climate changes to our resource values of concern beyond a very general level. Forests<br />

completing watershed vulnerability analyses should be teamed up with research station personnel who<br />

can provide expertise in interpreting the climate change implications portion of the vulnerability<br />

assessment. It was clear that previous work between the Sawtooth NF and Boise research station had<br />

created a high level of understanding about the implications of climate change predictions, and familiarity<br />

with tools available to evaluate where changes are likely to occur and what the impacts of those changes<br />

may be.<br />

PROJECT TEAM<br />

Carol Howe, Resource Information Specialist (GIS), Climate Change Coordinator<br />

John Almy, Forest Hydrologist<br />

Clay Speas, Wildlife, Fish and Rare Plants Program Lead<br />

Warren Young, Forest Soils Scientist<br />

Ben Stratton, Hydrologist<br />

Steven Jay, Hydrology Technician<br />

Sherry Hazelhurst, Deputy Forest Supervisor<br />

PROJECT CONTACT<br />

Carol Howe<br />

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests<br />

2250 Hwy 50<br />

Delta CO, 81416<br />

970-874-6647<br />

chowe@fs.fed.us<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Barsugli, J.J. and L.O. Mearns. Draft 2010. Climate and Hydrologic Change Scenarios for the Upper<br />

Gunnison River, Colorado. Prepared for The Nature Conservancy in support of the southwest Climate<br />

Change Initiative’s Climate Change Adaptation Workshop for Natural Resource Managers in the<br />

Gunnison Basin.<br />

110 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!