XIX Sympozjum Srodowiskowe PTZE - materialy.pdf
XIX Sympozjum Srodowiskowe PTZE - materialy.pdf
XIX Sympozjum Srodowiskowe PTZE - materialy.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>XIX</strong> <strong>Sympozjum</strong> <strong>PTZE</strong>, Worliny 2009<br />
human<br />
body<br />
92<br />
excitation<br />
coil<br />
Figure 1. Schematic view of human body surrounded by wire with excitation current.<br />
Dimensions are given in meters.<br />
The human body is considered as homogeneous medium with averaging material parameters.<br />
The current in exciting wire is flowing in counter clock-wise direction. The radius of this coil<br />
has value r1. The exciting current in the coil generates sinusoidal electromagnetic field, which<br />
next induces eddy currents in human body. These currents are sources of heat and after some<br />
transient time, a temperature distribution in body is established. In order to calculate<br />
temperature, first distribution of electromagnetic field generated by circular coil with exciting<br />
current has to be calculated. Following partial differential equation should be solved:<br />
⎛ 1 ˆ ⎞ 2<br />
∇× ( ωε jωσ)<br />
ˆ ˆ<br />
⎜ ∇× A⎟− + A = J i<br />
(1)<br />
⎝µ ⎠<br />
In two dimensions we assume symmetry with respect to coordinate φ, so magnetic vector<br />
potential can be written as ˆ A = Aϕ (, rz)<br />
e ϕ and Jˆ i = Jie φ thus equation (1) can be written in simpler<br />
form<br />
( rAφ) ( rAφ)<br />
⎡<br />
∂ ⎛ 1 ∂ ⎞ ∂ ⎛ 1 ∂ ⎞⎤<br />
2<br />
− ⎢ ⎜ ⎟+ ⎜ ⎟⎥−<br />
( ωε+ jωσ) Aφ= J<br />
⎢∂r⎜µ r ∂r ⎟ ∂z⎜µ r ∂z<br />
⎟<br />
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠<br />
⎥<br />
⎣ ⎦<br />
As boundary condition we assume zero potential on symmetry axis z. The above equation is<br />
solved by finite element method over given computational domain. If σ >> ωε then<br />
displacement current can be neglected. Unlike the computation of the electric currents in<br />
body, for which agreement exists accordingly a derived physical model, no clear consensus<br />
exists for an appropriate mathematical model for the evaluation of temperature field<br />
distribution in biological tissues. An extremely important work in the modeling of heat<br />
transfer in biological tissues was done over half a century ago by Pennes [2, 3]. The equation,<br />
which he derived, is named bioheat equation, and it can be derived from the classical Fourier<br />
law of heat conduction. This model is based on the simple assumption of the energy exchange<br />
between the blood flowing in vessels and the surrounding the tumor tissues. Pennes model<br />
may provide suitable information on temperature distributions in whole body, organ under<br />
consideration, and tumor analysis under study.<br />
Pennes model states, that the total heat exchange between tissue surrounding a vessel and<br />
blood flowing in it, is proportional to the volumetric heat flow and the temperature difference<br />
between the blood and the tissue. The expression of Pennes bioheat equation in a body with<br />
uniform material properties in steady state is given by [4]<br />
i<br />
(2)