17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 4 - Planning of <strong>Prehension</strong> 79<br />

In summary, object size is veridically assessed and finely<br />

calibrated by the CNS for prehension. Some object properties are<br />

accessible more through vision than haptics. Due to the covarying<br />

nature of object properties and our previous experience, we make<br />

assumptions about object properties like weight, given observations<br />

about size. With visual perturbations, replanning for intrinsic object<br />

properties in prehension takes at least 300 ms.<br />

4.3.2 Perceiving extrinsic object properties<br />

Studying the nature of extrinsic object property perception can<br />

also be done using perturbation studies. Paulignan, MacKenzie,<br />

Marteniuk & Jeannerod (1991) performed an experiment where the<br />

object’s location was perturbed. Subjects were asked to grasp a<br />

vertically standing dowel between their thumb and index finger pad.<br />

Made of translucent material, the dowel was made visible by means of<br />

illuminating a light-emitting diode (LED) placed under the dowel. In<br />

this way, Paulignan and colleagues could change the illuminated light,<br />

making it appear as if the dowel moved from one location to another.<br />

In comparing perturbed trials to control trials, they found that wrist<br />

trajectories were modified about 250-290 ms after the perturbation,<br />

and the first acceleration and velocity peaks occurred earlier in the<br />

perturbed trials. The first detectable difference in wrist trajectories<br />

was seen at 100 ms, because the time to the first peak acceleration for<br />

control trials was about 130 ms, but for the perturbed ones it was<br />

closer to 100 ms. This seems to correspond to the minimum delay<br />

needed for sensory reafferents to affect ongoing movement4.<br />

Corrections might occur by directly comparing target position and limb<br />

position signals. Finally, they showed that perturbing the object loca-<br />

tion influenced the grasping component as well as the transport com-<br />

ponent. In showing the dissociation of transport and grasping com-<br />

ponents, because the transport component was completed and the grip<br />

size was readjusted, there may be different time constants for the two<br />

components. These results are discussed further in <strong>Chapter</strong> 5.<br />

The orientation of the object is also an extrinsic object property.<br />

Jeannerod and Decety (1990) studied the accuracy of matching hand<br />

orientations to visually presented object orientations. Subjects held a<br />

plate between their thumb and palmar finger surfaces and were asked<br />

to rotate the hand to match the seen orientation of the target bar.<br />

4F0r proprioceptive processing, minimum delay is estimated at 70 to 100 msec<br />

(Johansson & Westling, 1987).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!