17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42 WHAT IS PREHENSION?<br />

quired opposing forces, virtual fingers and state variables allows for<br />

modelling and control of natural, prosthetic and robotic hands.<br />

<strong>2.</strong>5 Summary<br />

Beginning with an overview of prehension and grasp classifica-<br />

tions, the essence of these typologies has been searched. In so doing,<br />

the importance of more detailed information about prehensile postures<br />

was identified, based on the hand, object, and task characteristics.<br />

The black box introduced in <strong>Chapter</strong> 1 mapping object and task char-<br />

acteristics to prehensile behaviors can be looked at with a finer level of<br />

detail (see Figure <strong>2.</strong>10). Objects come in a variety of shapes, sizes<br />

and surface characteristics, and tasks have constraints on their spatial<br />

degrees of freedom. In order to achieve the task goals with these ob-<br />

jects, the hand is used to apply forces, impart motions as necessary,<br />

and gather sensory information. Prehensile postures can be described<br />

either using the terminology of the classifications listed in Table <strong>2.</strong>1,<br />

or else in opposition space terms. Schlesinger identified hand surfaces<br />

and shapes that combine with object characteristics to name possible<br />

ways that the hand, in effect, creates tools for prehension. He pointed<br />

out how the hand can grasp arbitrary objects. Napier introduced the<br />

notion of task features, noting that the power and precision<br />

requirements of tasks could be met by the power and precision<br />

capabilities of the human hand. Landsmeer focused on the dynamic<br />

aspects of grasping and contrasted precision handling with power<br />

grasp, noting the manipulative options are afforded by opposing the<br />

pads of the thumb and fingers. Kapandji gave examples, such as<br />

turning, squeezing, and cutting, and Elliott and Connolly provided a<br />

vocabulary to expand on this notion (twiddling, rocking, rolling,<br />

stepping, sliding). Other researchers, studying the hand from<br />

anatomical, occupational, disability, and robotics perspectives, have<br />

identified unique sensorimotor features of the hand that are exhibited<br />

in the link grip, the hook grip, the three-jaw chuck, the dynamic tri-<br />

pod, the adduction grasp, and the finger-as-antenna. The Opposition<br />

Space model suggests that, in all these postures, the hand is applying<br />

oppositional forces against task forces and torques and/or around an<br />

object along three general directions, either alone or in combinations.<br />

This extensive multidisciplinary research provides insights into the<br />

functionality of the human hand, based on three issues: applying<br />

forces to match the anticipated forces in the task, imparting motion to<br />

the object as necessary, and gathering sensory information about the<br />

state of the interaction with the object.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!