17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

404 Appendices<br />

biceps, and shoulder and thoracic muscles. Using the shoulder and<br />

thoracic muscles, force is transmitted by a shoulder harness and cable<br />

to the terminal device. Body-powered devices are relatively<br />

inexpensive, functional, reliable, and have some indirect sensory<br />

proprioceptive feedback (Muilenburg & LeBlanc, 1989). They are<br />

functionally better than other methods, because position and force<br />

feedback is available from the harness. The indirect sensory feedback<br />

is provided through extended physiological proprioception (Law,<br />

198 l), which comes from proprioceptive information about limb<br />

position and velocity. This seems to extend to include additional limb<br />

segments provided a consistent relationship exists between the<br />

position and velocity of the artifical segment and the position, velocity,<br />

and applied force of the contiguous natural body part (Law, 1981).<br />

Externally powered, myoelectric prostheses are controlled by<br />

electromyographic (EMG) signals, where the force developed by the<br />

muscle is used to drive motors or to set control switches.<br />

Conventional myoelectric hands have a single channel from a pair of<br />

opposing muscle groups, controlling a single degree of freedom in the<br />

hand (Kyberd et al., 1987). The input is usually a simple on/off<br />

signal, where flexor tension opens the hand and extensor tension<br />

closes it. Depending on the level of the amputation, muscles use<br />

include forearm muscles, or biceps and triceps. Sensory information<br />

may come from visual and auditory cues, such as the sound of<br />

motors, motor vibration, accurate memory of opening-closing time,<br />

and movements of the center of gravity (Law, 1981).<br />

Myoelectric digital on/off control uses a simple EMG threshold<br />

detect to control a switch. When muscle tension reaches a critical level,<br />

it causes the switch to change states, which in turn controls a motor to<br />

direct the hand in one direction or the other. Pinch force between<br />

finger can be indirectly related to the duration of the signal; the longer<br />

the closing motor runs, the harder the fingers pinch. Proportional<br />

myoelectric control is an alternative method of control. Integrated<br />

EMG amplitude varies closely with actual tension generated by muscle<br />

(see Sears & Shaperman, 1991). The EMG controls the motor<br />

directly, designed so that the output of the motor is proportional to the<br />

output of the muscle. With more muscle contraction, the faster the<br />

motor operates. The user has more sensitive slow and fast control of<br />

the hand, depending on the strength of the muscle contraction.<br />

Myoelectric devices have certain advantages (Baumgartner, 198 l),<br />

including no body harness, increased comfort, and more independent<br />

control in bilateral amputations. The disadvantages are that they not<br />

designed for heavy work, their weight is greater, costs are higher, and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!