17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix D - Prosthetic and Robotic Hands 403<br />

certain restrictions apply, particularly at the physical level in terms of<br />

dynamics and kinematics, even though they are different realizations<br />

(see <strong>Chapter</strong> 8). While a robot controller will not necessarily use the<br />

same algorithms that the central nervous system does (since we don't<br />

know those!), behaviors can be modelled and tested on a mechanical<br />

hand, with success or failure being seen immediately. High level<br />

control variables, such as opposition space parameters, could be used<br />

to drive the artificial device. Such an abstraction at the functional level<br />

is typical of the general progression toward machine-independence<br />

seen in computer systems, and would allow a variety of hand designs<br />

to be developed for different purposes but still be able to share a<br />

common control language.<br />

D.2 Prostheses and Their Control<br />

Objectives for the design of future prosthetic devices (Childress,<br />

1974) include subconscious control, comfort, cosmetics, reliability,<br />

esthetics, and improvement over existing prosthetic devices. The<br />

control system should be (Jacobsen et al., 1982) reasonable to learn,<br />

natural, graceful, reliable, flexible, and include feedback. In terms of<br />

the fingers themselves (Law 198l), they should be light, robust, have<br />

consistent joint frictional forces, be compatible with socket and palmar<br />

materials, and provide an accurate fill for the cosmetic covering,<br />

maintaining a good cosmetic profile throughout the full range of<br />

movement. The needs of the amputee have been divided into two basic<br />

requirements: the desire for the best aesthetic replacement, and the<br />

restoration of specific hand functions (Baumgartner, 198 1, Peizer,<br />

1981). Currently, no one prosthetic device can accomplish all of<br />

these. The devices available include body-powered split hook or hand,<br />

electrically powered hand controlled by myoelectrically, and cosmetic<br />

passive hand. Studies have shown that amputees have a variety of<br />

functional needs (c.f., Millstein et al., 1986), and thus they may have<br />

one or more devices. In fact, Therapeutic Recreation Systems<br />

(Boulder, Colorado) has introduced a family of designs called the<br />

Super Sport series, shaped specifically just for catching a ball.<br />

D.<strong>2.</strong>1 Control of prosthetic devices<br />

Body powered prostheses use power transmitted in the most direct<br />

way for maximum indirect sensory feedback. Four different body<br />

sources are used (Baumgartner, 1981): the wrist joint, the forearm,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!