17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix C - Computational Neural Modelling 389<br />

input directly from every other unit, hence the number of connections<br />

is equal to the square of the number of units. As before, some units<br />

are defined as input units, while others are defined as output units.<br />

Recurrent networks are capable of more complex behavior, in<br />

particular rather than converging on a single state, they may settle into<br />

limit cycles of neural activity. Such networks are in general harder to<br />

analyze, but are necessary when dynamic behavior is desired.<br />

C.<strong>2.</strong>2 Adaptation in neural networks<br />

Computational models can be adaptable or non-adaptable. Non-<br />

adaptive networks have fixed synaptic weights and behavior, whereas<br />

adaptive networks modify their synaptic weights (and therefore their<br />

behavior) over time according to the stimuli they experience. Hybrid<br />

nets also exist which have ‘pre-wired’ non-adaptive portions<br />

interacting with adaptive portions, as was seen in the Kuperstein<br />

(1988) model in <strong>Chapter</strong> 43. A non-adaptive network might model a<br />

peripheral area which does not change its behavior over time, such as<br />

the spinal circuitry subserving the knee-jerk reflex. Adaptive neural<br />

nets would be used to model parts of the brain concerned with<br />

learning, which change their behavior with experience.<br />

In an adaptive neural network, the synaptic connection weights<br />

modify themselves based on locally available information, that is the<br />

‘activity levels’ in the pre- and post-synaptic neurons. This is one of<br />

the compelling properties of neural networks - that while the individual<br />

units are performing simple computations on the small scale, the<br />

overall network may develop complex emergent behavior. There are<br />

two classes of adaptation rules - supervised and unsupervised.<br />

Supervised adaptation rules contain some measure of the desired<br />

behavior of the network, while unsupervised adaptation rules do not.<br />

(Thus networks governed by supervised learning develop behavior<br />

defined by the training signal, whereas those governed by<br />

unsupervised learning respond to properties of the patterns presented,<br />

extracting repeated information or correlations in the data.)<br />

In neural network models, this adaptation is captured in a learning<br />

&. In 1949, D. 0. Hebb described a rule which has been<br />

generalized to the following: adjust the strength of the connections<br />

3An adaptive network can also be used as if it were non-adaptive. For example,<br />

once the Model Network in the Jordan (1988) network learned the inverse<br />

kinematics of the arm, it was used as a fixed network while the Sequential Network<br />

learned the sequences.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!