17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 9 - Reevaluation and Future Directions 335<br />

receptors respond to contact. But recent evidence shows that the<br />

reverse is also true. The muscles (somatically innervated sensorimotor<br />

system) work in parallel with the eccrine sweat glands (autonomically<br />

innervated sudomotor system). Biomechanicians have measured<br />

aspects of hand postures, such as maximum grip strength, mechanical<br />

advantages of tendons, effect of wrist orientation, torques at the<br />

joints, and direction of frictional and shearing forces for various object<br />

sizes. See (Amis, 1987: Chao et al., 1989; Hazelton et al., 1975).<br />

As described in <strong>Chapter</strong> 2, taxonomies of prehensile capabilities<br />

have been developed that offer insights into the complexity of human<br />

prehension. Across this diverse set, themes are repeated, suggesting<br />

the possibility of a unifying view. Hand surfaces, hand shapes,<br />

functions, and object characteristics are possible identifying features<br />

for taxonomies (Cutkosky, 1989; Jacobson & Sperling, 1976;<br />

Kamakura et al., 1980; Kapandji, 1982; Schlesinger, 1919; Taylor,<br />

1948). Before actual tools were constructed, our hands were the tools,<br />

and prehensile postures can be described in those terms (Schlesinger,<br />

19 19). Power versus precision capabilities have been noted (Napier,<br />

1956). Power grasps create a method for fixing the object in the hand,<br />

while precision grasping offers manipulative abilities by opposing the<br />

pads of the thumb and fingers (Landsmeer, 1962; Napier, 1956). The<br />

three jaw chuck (Schlesinger, 1919) and dynamic tripod (Elliott and<br />

Connolly, 1984; Kroemer, 1986), between the thumb, index, and<br />

middle fingers, are precision postures that allow fine manipulations.<br />

Other sensorimotor features of the hand are exhibited in the lateral<br />

pinch (Skerik et al., 1971), the hook grip (Napier, 1956), the<br />

adduction grasp (Kamakura et al., 1980), and the finger touch<br />

(Kroemer, 1956). This latter notion we call a ‘finger-as-antenna’,<br />

highlighting the hand’s sensorimotor capabilities. Importantly, power<br />

and precision capabilities can be exhibited in one posture, as when<br />

tying knots (Napier, 1956).<br />

In all these postures, the hand is applying forces to the object in<br />

three directions with respect to the palm. We call the participating hand<br />

surfaces grasping surface patches on virtual fingers. A virtual finger is<br />

the palm or else a collection of one or more real fingers. Pad<br />

opposition occurs between the finger and thumb pads along an axis<br />

generally parallel to the palm. Due to the nature of the sensorimotor<br />

features of the hand, it provides the ability to comply with small<br />

forces, impart small motions, and gather precise sensory information<br />

to match the manipulative requirements of the task. Palm opposition<br />

occurs between the fingers and palm along an axis generally<br />

perpendicular to the palm. It matches larger anticipated forces, gathers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!